Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 9/2020

10.10.2019 | 2019 SAGES Oral

Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer: beyond the learning curve

verfasst von: Anthony P. D’Andrea, Elisabeth C. McLemore, Antoinette Bonaccorso, Jordan M. Cuevas, Motahar Basam, Anna T. Tsay, Deepika Bhasin, Vikram Attaluri, Patricia Sylla

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 9/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) is a surgical approach for low rectal cancer with a learning curve estimated at 40–50 cases. The experience among taTME surgeons beyond their learning curve is limited.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of all taTME cases performed for rectal cancer at two tertiary care hospitals from 2014 to 2019 was conducted. Transanal surgeons had previously performed > 50 taTME cases. Demographic, perioperative, and short-term outcomes were analyzed.

Results

Among 54 taTME patients, 74.1% were male and 27.8% had a BMI ≥ 30. Tumors were stage I (8), II (13), III (29), and IV (4). Complex cases included 4 local recurrences, 4 prior liver resections, and 2 with prior prostate cancer. Thirty tumors were located ≤ 6 cm from the anal verge. On staging MRI, 12 had a positive predicted circumferential radial margin (+CRM), and 4 had internal anal sphincter involvement (+IAS). Forty-seven patients received neoadjuvant therapy. A 2-team approach was used in 51 patients with laparoscopic (83.3%) or robotic (16.7%) abdominal assistance with a 9.2% conversion rate. Low anterior resection with sphincter salvage was achieved in 87% with 8 patients requiring intersphincteric resection. Anastomoses were hand-sewn in 57.4% and all patients were diverted. Median LOS was 5 days with a 42.6% 30-day morbidity rate and 3 postoperative mortalities (ARDS, pulmonary embolism and pseudomembranous colitis). Complete and near complete TME grade was achieved in 94.4% with a 3.7% rate of +CRM. At a median follow-up of 28 months, local and distant recurrence rates were 3.9% and 17.6%, respectively, with no cancer-related mortality.

Conclusion

Indications for taTME at experienced centers have expanded to include complex reoperative cases, local recurrences, metastatic cancer, and tumors with threatened CRM or IAS with evidence of post-treatment tumor regression. In the latter cases, taTME achieves good short-term outcomes and may facilitate R0 resection.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Heald R (1988) The ‘Holy Plane’ of rectal surgery. J R Soc Med 81:503–508CrossRef Heald R (1988) The ‘Holy Plane’ of rectal surgery. J R Soc Med 81:503–508CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Heald R, Husband E, Ryall R (1982) The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery–the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 69:613–616CrossRef Heald R, Husband E, Ryall R (1982) The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery–the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 69:613–616CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Guillou P, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne D, Smith A, Heath R, Brown J, MRC CLASICC trial group (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRef Guillou P, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne D, Smith A, Heath R, Brown J, MRC CLASICC trial group (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Jayne D, Guillou P, Thorpe H, Quirke P, Copeland J, Smith A, Heath R, Brown J, UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25:3061–3068CrossRef Jayne D, Guillou P, Thorpe H, Quirke P, Copeland J, Smith A, Heath R, Brown J, UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25:3061–3068CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang S, Park J, Jeong S, Nam B, Choi H, Kim D, Lim S, Lee T, Kim D, Kim J, Chang H, Lee H, Kim S, Jung K, Hong Y, Kim J, Sohn D, Kim D, Oh J (2010) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 11:637–645CrossRef Kang S, Park J, Jeong S, Nam B, Choi H, Kim D, Lim S, Lee T, Kim D, Kim J, Chang H, Lee H, Kim S, Jung K, Hong Y, Kim J, Sohn D, Kim D, Oh J (2010) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 11:637–645CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Jeong S, Park J, Nam B, Kim S, Kang S, Lim S, Choi H, Kim D, Chang H, Kim D, Jung K, Kim T, Kang G, Chie E, Kim S, Sohn D, Kim D, Kim J, Lee H, Kim J, Oh J (2014) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 15:767–774CrossRef Jeong S, Park J, Nam B, Kim S, Kang S, Lim S, Choi H, Kim D, Chang H, Kim D, Jung K, Kim T, Kang G, Chie E, Kim S, Sohn D, Kim D, Kim J, Lee H, Kim J, Oh J (2014) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 15:767–774CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Pas M, Haglind E, Cuesta M, Fürst A, Lacy A, Hop W, Bonjer H, COlorectal cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection II (COLOR II) Study Group (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:210–218CrossRef van der Pas M, Haglind E, Cuesta M, Fürst A, Lacy A, Hop W, Bonjer H, COlorectal cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection II (COLOR II) Study Group (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:210–218CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonjer H, Deijen C, Abis G, Cuesta M, van der Pas M, de Lange-de Klerk E, Lacy A, Bemelman W, Andersson J, Angenete E, Rosenberg J, Fuerst A, Haglind E, COLOR II Study Group (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372:1324–1332CrossRef Bonjer H, Deijen C, Abis G, Cuesta M, van der Pas M, de Lange-de Klerk E, Lacy A, Bemelman W, Andersson J, Angenete E, Rosenberg J, Fuerst A, Haglind E, COLOR II Study Group (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372:1324–1332CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent D, Boller A, George V, Abbas M, Peters WJ, Maun D, Chang G, Herline A, Fichera A, Mutch M, Wexner S, Whiteford M, Marks J, Birnbaum E, Margolin D, Larson D, Marcello P, Posner M, Read T, Monson J, Wren S, Pisters P, Nelson H (2015) Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection of stage II or III rectal cancer on pathologic outcomes: the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314:1346–1355CrossRef Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent D, Boller A, George V, Abbas M, Peters WJ, Maun D, Chang G, Herline A, Fichera A, Mutch M, Wexner S, Whiteford M, Marks J, Birnbaum E, Margolin D, Larson D, Marcello P, Posner M, Read T, Monson J, Wren S, Pisters P, Nelson H (2015) Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection of stage II or III rectal cancer on pathologic outcomes: the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314:1346–1355CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent D, Boller A, George V, Abbas M, Peters WJ, Maun D, Chang G, Herline A, Fichera A, Mutch M, Wexner S, Whiteford M, Marks J, Birnbaum E, Margolin D, Larson D, Marcello P, Posner M, Read T, Monson J, Wren S, Pisters P, Nelson H (2019) Disease-free survival and local recurrence for laparoscopic resection compared with open resection of stage II to III rectal cancer: follow-up results of the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 269:589–595CrossRef Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent D, Boller A, George V, Abbas M, Peters WJ, Maun D, Chang G, Herline A, Fichera A, Mutch M, Wexner S, Whiteford M, Marks J, Birnbaum E, Margolin D, Larson D, Marcello P, Posner M, Read T, Monson J, Wren S, Pisters P, Nelson H (2019) Disease-free survival and local recurrence for laparoscopic resection compared with open resection of stage II to III rectal cancer: follow-up results of the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 269:589–595CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Stevenson A, Solomon M, Lumley J, Hewett P, Clouston A, Gebski V, Davies L, Wilson K, Hague W, Simes J, ALaCaRT Investigators (2015) Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection on pathological outcomes in rectal cancer: the ALaCaRT randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314:1356–1363CrossRef Stevenson A, Solomon M, Lumley J, Hewett P, Clouston A, Gebski V, Davies L, Wilson K, Hague W, Simes J, ALaCaRT Investigators (2015) Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection on pathological outcomes in rectal cancer: the ALaCaRT randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314:1356–1363CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Stevenson A, Solomon M, Brown C, Lumley J, Hewett P, Clouston A, Gebski V, Wilson K, Hague W, Simes J, Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group (AGITG) ALaCaRT investigators (2019) Disease-free survival and local recurrence after laparoscopic-assisted resection or open resection for rectal cancer: the australasian laparoscopic cancer of the rectum randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 269:596–602CrossRef Stevenson A, Solomon M, Brown C, Lumley J, Hewett P, Clouston A, Gebski V, Wilson K, Hague W, Simes J, Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group (AGITG) ALaCaRT investigators (2019) Disease-free survival and local recurrence after laparoscopic-assisted resection or open resection for rectal cancer: the australasian laparoscopic cancer of the rectum randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 269:596–602CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, Croft J, Corrigan N, Copeland J, Quirke P, West N, Rautio T, Thomassen N, Tilney H, Gudgeon M, Bianchi P, Edlin R, Hulme C, Brown J (2017) Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: the ROLARR randomized clinical trial. JAMA 318:1569–1580CrossRef Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, Croft J, Corrigan N, Copeland J, Quirke P, West N, Rautio T, Thomassen N, Tilney H, Gudgeon M, Bianchi P, Edlin R, Hulme C, Brown J (2017) Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: the ROLARR randomized clinical trial. JAMA 318:1569–1580CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagtegaal I, Marijnen C, Kranenbarg E, van de Velde C, van Krieken J, Committee Pathology Review, Investigators Cooperative Clinical (2002) Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit. Am J Surg Pathol 26:350–357CrossRef Nagtegaal I, Marijnen C, Kranenbarg E, van de Velde C, van Krieken J, Committee Pathology Review, Investigators Cooperative Clinical (2002) Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit. Am J Surg Pathol 26:350–357CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagtegaal I, van de Velde C, van der Worp E, Kapiteijn E, Quirke P, van Krieken J, Cooperative Clinical Investigators of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group (2002) Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control. J Clin Oncol 20:1729–1734CrossRef Nagtegaal I, van de Velde C, van der Worp E, Kapiteijn E, Quirke P, van Krieken J, Cooperative Clinical Investigators of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group (2002) Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control. J Clin Oncol 20:1729–1734CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Targarona E, Balague C, Pernas J, Martinez C, Berindoague R, Gich I, Trias M (2008) Can we predict immediate outcome after laparoscopic rectal surgery? Multivariate analysis of clinical, anatomic, and pathologic features after 3-dimensional reconstruction of the pelvic anatomy. Ann Surg 247:642–649CrossRef Targarona E, Balague C, Pernas J, Martinez C, Berindoague R, Gich I, Trias M (2008) Can we predict immediate outcome after laparoscopic rectal surgery? Multivariate analysis of clinical, anatomic, and pathologic features after 3-dimensional reconstruction of the pelvic anatomy. Ann Surg 247:642–649CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Sylla P, Rattner D, Delgado S, Lacy A (2010) NOTES transanal rectal cancer resection using transanal endoscopic microsurgery and laparoscopic assistance. Surg Endosc 24:1205–1210CrossRef Sylla P, Rattner D, Delgado S, Lacy A (2010) NOTES transanal rectal cancer resection using transanal endoscopic microsurgery and laparoscopic assistance. Surg Endosc 24:1205–1210CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Veltcamp Helbach M, Deijen C, Velthuis S, Bonjer H, Tuynman J, Sietses C (2016) Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma: short-term outcomes and experience after 80 cases. Surg Endosc 30:464–470CrossRef Veltcamp Helbach M, Deijen C, Velthuis S, Bonjer H, Tuynman J, Sietses C (2016) Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma: short-term outcomes and experience after 80 cases. Surg Endosc 30:464–470CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Tuech J, Karoui M, Lelong B, De Chaisemartin C, Bridoux V, Manceau G, Delpero J, Hanoun L, Michot F (2015) A step toward NOTES total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: endoscopic transanal proctectomy. Ann Surg 261:228–233CrossRef Tuech J, Karoui M, Lelong B, De Chaisemartin C, Bridoux V, Manceau G, Delpero J, Hanoun L, Michot F (2015) A step toward NOTES total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: endoscopic transanal proctectomy. Ann Surg 261:228–233CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Burke J, Martin-Perez B, Khan A, Nassif G, de Beche-Adams T, Larach S, Albert M, Atallah S (2016) Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: early outcomes in 50 consecutive patients. Colorectal Dis 18:570–577CrossRef Burke J, Martin-Perez B, Khan A, Nassif G, de Beche-Adams T, Larach S, Albert M, Atallah S (2016) Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: early outcomes in 50 consecutive patients. Colorectal Dis 18:570–577CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen C, Lai Y, Jiang J, Chu C, Huang I, Chen W, Cheng A, Yang S (2016) Transanal total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a matched case-control study. Ann Surg Oncol 23:1169–1176CrossRef Chen C, Lai Y, Jiang J, Chu C, Huang I, Chen W, Cheng A, Yang S (2016) Transanal total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a matched case-control study. Ann Surg Oncol 23:1169–1176CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Perez D, Melling N, Biebl M, Reeh M, Baukloh J, Miro J, Polonski A, Izbicki J, Knoll B, Pratschke J, Aigner F (2018) Robotic low anterior resection versus transanal total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: a comparison of 115 cases. Eur J Surg Oncol 44:237–242CrossRef Perez D, Melling N, Biebl M, Reeh M, Baukloh J, Miro J, Polonski A, Izbicki J, Knoll B, Pratschke J, Aigner F (2018) Robotic low anterior resection versus transanal total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: a comparison of 115 cases. Eur J Surg Oncol 44:237–242CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat de Lacy F, van Laarhoven J, Pena R, Arroyave M, Bravo R, Cuatrecasas M, Lacy A (2018) Transanal total mesorectal excision: pathological results of 186 patients with mid and low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 32:2442–2447CrossRef de Lacy F, van Laarhoven J, Pena R, Arroyave M, Bravo R, Cuatrecasas M, Lacy A (2018) Transanal total mesorectal excision: pathological results of 186 patients with mid and low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 32:2442–2447CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Perdawood S, Thinggaard B, Bjoern M (2018) Effect of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes with laparoscopic and open surgeries. Surg Endosc 32:2312–2321CrossRef Perdawood S, Thinggaard B, Bjoern M (2018) Effect of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes with laparoscopic and open surgeries. Surg Endosc 32:2312–2321CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Penna M, Hompes R, Arnold S, Wynn G, Austin R, Warusavitarne J, Moran B, Hanna G, Mortensen N, Tekkis P, Collaborative TaTME Registry (2017) Transanal total mesorectal excision: international registry results of the first 720 cases. Ann Surg 266:111–117CrossRef Penna M, Hompes R, Arnold S, Wynn G, Austin R, Warusavitarne J, Moran B, Hanna G, Mortensen N, Tekkis P, Collaborative TaTME Registry (2017) Transanal total mesorectal excision: international registry results of the first 720 cases. Ann Surg 266:111–117CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Penna M, Hompes R, Arnold S, Wynn G, Austin R, Warusavitarne J, Moran B, Hanna G, Mortensen N, Tekkis P, International TaTME Registry Collaborative (2019) Incidence and risk factors for anastomotic failure in 1594 patients treated by transanal total mesorectal excision: results from the international TaTME registry. Ann Surg 269:700–711CrossRef Penna M, Hompes R, Arnold S, Wynn G, Austin R, Warusavitarne J, Moran B, Hanna G, Mortensen N, Tekkis P, International TaTME Registry Collaborative (2019) Incidence and risk factors for anastomotic failure in 1594 patients treated by transanal total mesorectal excision: results from the international TaTME registry. Ann Surg 269:700–711CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Koedam T, Veltcamp Helbach M, van de Ven P, Kruyt P, van Heek N, Bonjer H, Tuynman J, Sietses C (2018) Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: evaluation of the learning curve. Tech Coloproctol 22:279–287CrossRef Koedam T, Veltcamp Helbach M, van de Ven P, Kruyt P, van Heek N, Bonjer H, Tuynman J, Sietses C (2018) Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: evaluation of the learning curve. Tech Coloproctol 22:279–287CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Adamina M, Buchs N, Penna M, Hompes R, St.Gallen Colorectal Consensus Expert Group (2018) St.Gallen consensus on safe implementation of transanal total mesorectal excision. Surg Endosc 32:1091–1103CrossRef Adamina M, Buchs N, Penna M, Hompes R, St.Gallen Colorectal Consensus Expert Group (2018) St.Gallen consensus on safe implementation of transanal total mesorectal excision. Surg Endosc 32:1091–1103CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat McLemore E, Harnsberger C, Broderick R, Leland H, Sylla P, Coker A, Fuchs H, Jacobsen G, Sandler B, Attaluri V, Tsay A, Wexner S, Talamini M, Horgan S (2016) Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer: a training pathway. Surg Endosc 30:4130–4135CrossRef McLemore E, Harnsberger C, Broderick R, Leland H, Sylla P, Coker A, Fuchs H, Jacobsen G, Sandler B, Attaluri V, Tsay A, Wexner S, Talamini M, Horgan S (2016) Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer: a training pathway. Surg Endosc 30:4130–4135CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Sylla P, Bordeianou L, Berger D, Han K, Lauwers G, Sahani D, Sbeih M, Lacy A, Rattner D (2013) A pilot study of natural orifice transanal endoscopic total mesorectal excision with laparoscopic assistance for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 27:3396–3405CrossRef Sylla P, Bordeianou L, Berger D, Han K, Lauwers G, Sahani D, Sbeih M, Lacy A, Rattner D (2013) A pilot study of natural orifice transanal endoscopic total mesorectal excision with laparoscopic assistance for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 27:3396–3405CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat McLemore E, Coker A, Devaraj B, Chakedis J, Maawy A, Inui T, Talamini M, Horgan S, Peterson M, Sylla P, Ramamoorthy S (2013) TAMIS-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision in a cadaveric series. Surg Endosc 27:3478–3484CrossRef McLemore E, Coker A, Devaraj B, Chakedis J, Maawy A, Inui T, Talamini M, Horgan S, Peterson M, Sylla P, Ramamoorthy S (2013) TAMIS-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision in a cadaveric series. Surg Endosc 27:3478–3484CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon M, Williams N (1986) Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet 2:996–999CrossRef Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon M, Williams N (1986) Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet 2:996–999CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Telem D, Han K, Kim M, Ajari I, Sohn D, Woods K, Kapur V, Sbeih M, Perretta S, Rattner D, Sylla P (2013) Transanal rectosigmoid resection via natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) with total mesorectal excision in a large human cadaver series. Surg Endosc 27:74–80CrossRef Telem D, Han K, Kim M, Ajari I, Sohn D, Woods K, Kapur V, Sbeih M, Perretta S, Rattner D, Sylla P (2013) Transanal rectosigmoid resection via natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) with total mesorectal excision in a large human cadaver series. Surg Endosc 27:74–80CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Borstlap W, Harran N, Tanis P, Bemelman W (2016) Feasibility of the TAMIS technique for redo pelvic surgery. Surg Endosc 30:5364–5371CrossRef Borstlap W, Harran N, Tanis P, Bemelman W (2016) Feasibility of the TAMIS technique for redo pelvic surgery. Surg Endosc 30:5364–5371CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamaguchi T, Imai M, Uematsu D (2017) Hybrid approach using laparoscopy and transanal minimally invasive surgery to treat rectal cancer with invasion to the seminal vesicles. Asian J Endosc Surg 10:219–222CrossRef Yamaguchi T, Imai M, Uematsu D (2017) Hybrid approach using laparoscopy and transanal minimally invasive surgery to treat rectal cancer with invasion to the seminal vesicles. Asian J Endosc Surg 10:219–222CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Uematsu D, Akiyama G, Sugihara T, Magishi A, Ono K, Yamaguchi T, Sano T (2018) Transanal total pelvic exenteration with sphincter-preserving surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 61:641CrossRef Uematsu D, Akiyama G, Sugihara T, Magishi A, Ono K, Yamaguchi T, Sano T (2018) Transanal total pelvic exenteration with sphincter-preserving surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 61:641CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Uematsu D, Akiyama G, Sugihara T, Magishi A, Yamaguchi T, Sano T (2017) Transanal total pelvic exenteration: pushing the limits of transanal total mesorectal excision with transanal pelvic exenteration. Dis Colon Rectum 60:647–648CrossRef Uematsu D, Akiyama G, Sugihara T, Magishi A, Yamaguchi T, Sano T (2017) Transanal total pelvic exenteration: pushing the limits of transanal total mesorectal excision with transanal pelvic exenteration. Dis Colon Rectum 60:647–648CrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Deijen CL, Velthuis S, Tsai A, Mavroveli S, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Sietses C, Tuynman JB, Lacy AM, Hanna GB, Bonjer HJ (2016) COLOR III: a multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing transanal TME versus laparoscopic TME for mid and low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 30(8):3210–3215CrossRef Deijen CL, Velthuis S, Tsai A, Mavroveli S, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Sietses C, Tuynman JB, Lacy AM, Hanna GB, Bonjer HJ (2016) COLOR III: a multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing transanal TME versus laparoscopic TME for mid and low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 30(8):3210–3215CrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Lelong B, de Chaisemartin C, Meillat H, Cournier S, Boher J, Genre D, Karoui M, Tuech J, Delpero J, French Research Group of Rectal Cancer Surgery (GRECCAR) (2017) A multicentre randomised controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy, morbidity and functional outcome of endoscopic transanal proctectomy versus laparoscopic proctectomy for low-lying rectal cancer (ETAP-GRECCAR 11 TRIAL): rationale and design. BMC Cancer 17:253CrossRef Lelong B, de Chaisemartin C, Meillat H, Cournier S, Boher J, Genre D, Karoui M, Tuech J, Delpero J, French Research Group of Rectal Cancer Surgery (GRECCAR) (2017) A multicentre randomised controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy, morbidity and functional outcome of endoscopic transanal proctectomy versus laparoscopic proctectomy for low-lying rectal cancer (ETAP-GRECCAR 11 TRIAL): rationale and design. BMC Cancer 17:253CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer: beyond the learning curve
verfasst von
Anthony P. D’Andrea
Elisabeth C. McLemore
Antoinette Bonaccorso
Jordan M. Cuevas
Motahar Basam
Anna T. Tsay
Deepika Bhasin
Vikram Attaluri
Patricia Sylla
Publikationsdatum
10.10.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 9/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07172-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 9/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.