E. S. Farag and J. Vendrik contributed equally to this work.
With the implementation of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in lower-risk patients, evaluation of blood flow characteristics and the effect of TAVR on aortic dilatation becomes of considerable interest. We employed 4D flow MRI in the ascending aorta of patients after TAVR to assess wall shear stress (WSS) and compare blood flow patterns with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and age- and gender-matched controls.
Fourteen post-TAVR patients and ten age- and gender-matched controls underwent kt-PCA accelerated 4D flow MRI of the thoracic aorta at 3.0 Tesla. Velocity and wall shear stress was compared between the two groups. In addition, aortic flow eccentricity and displacement was assessed and compared between TAVR patients, controls and 14 SAVR patients recruited as part of an earlier study.
Compared to controls, abnormally elevated WSS was present in 30±10% of the ascending aortic wall in TAVR patients. Increased WSS was present along the posterior mid-ascending aorta and the anterior distal-ascending aorta in all TAVR patients. TAVR results in eccentric and displaced flow in the mid- and distal-ascending aorta, whereas blood flow displacement in SAVR patients occurs only in the distal-ascending aorta.
This study shows that TAVR results in increased blood flow velocity and WSS in the ascending aorta compared to age- and gender-matched elderly controls. This finding warrants longitudinal assessment of aortic dilatation after TAVR in the era of potential TAVR in lower-risk patients. Additionally, TAVR results in altered blood flow eccentricity and displacement in the mid- and distal-ascending aorta, whereas SAVR only results in altered blood flow eccentricity and displacement in the distal-ascending aorta.
• TAVR results in increased blood flow velocity and WSS in the ascending aorta.
• Longitudinal assessment of aortic dilatation after TAVR is warranted in the era of potential TAVR in lower-risk patients.
• Both TAVR and SAVR result in altered blood flow patterns in the ascending aorta when compared to age-matched controls.
van Ooij P, Markl M, Collins JD et al (2017) Aortic valve stenosis alters expression of regional aortic wall shear stress: New insights from a 4-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging study of 571 subjects. J Am Heart Assoc 13:6–9
von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Karunaharamoorthy A, Trauzeddel RF et al (2016) Evaluation of Aortic Blood Flow and Wall Shear Stress in Aortic Stenosis and Its Association With Left Ventricular Remodeling. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 9:3
Hope MD, Dyverfeldt P, Acevedo-Bolton G et al (2012) Post-stenotic dilation: Evaluation of ascending aortic dilation with 4D flow MR imaging. Int J Cardiol 156:40–42 CrossRef
von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Trauzeddel RF, Barker AJ et al (2014) Blood flow characteristics in the ascending aorta after aortic valve replacement—a pilot study using 4D-flow MRI. Int J Cardiol 170:426–433 CrossRef
Farag ES, van Ooij P, Planken RN et al (2018) Aortic valve stenosis and aortic diameters determine the extent of increased wall shear stress in bicuspid aortic valve disease. J Magn Reson Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25956
Trauzeddel RF, Loebe U, Barker AJ et al (2015) Blood flow pattern in the ascending aorta after TAVI and conventional aortic valve replacement: Analysis using 4D-Flow MRI. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 17:1–2 CrossRef
Zakkar M, Alassar A, Lopez-Perez M et al (2015) Left ventricular remodeling after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: one-year follow-up study. Innovations (Phila) 10:44–47 CrossRef
Praz F, Siontis GCM, Verma S et al (2017) Latest evidence on transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs. surgical aortic valve replacement for the treatment of aortic stenosis in high and intermediate-risk patients. Curr Opin Cardiol 32:1 CrossRef
- Transcatheter aortic valve replacement alters ascending aortic blood flow and wall shear stress patterns: A 4D flow MRI comparison with age-matched, elderly controls
E. S. Farag
P. van Ooij
Q. L. Poortvliet
F. van Kesteren
L. W. Wollersheim
A. H. G. Driessen
J. J. Piek
K. T. Koch
R. N. Planken
A. J. Nederveen
B. A. J. M. de Mol
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- European Radiology
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie
Meistgelesene Bücher aus der Radiologie
e.Med Kampagnen-Visual, Mail Icon II