Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Current Cardiology Reports 5/2015

01.05.2015 | Interventional Cardiology (S Rao, Section Editor)

Transradial Intervention in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

verfasst von: Ahmad H. S. Mustafa, Eric Holroyd, Rob Butler, Doug Fraser, Magdi El-Omar, James Nolan, Mamas A. Mamas

Erschienen in: Current Cardiology Reports | Ausgabe 5/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) represents the current gold standard reperfusion therapy. Recent advances in antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy have reduced the risk of ischemic complications and mortality in PPCI although this has been at the expense of major bleeding complications. Access site-related bleeding complications account for up to 50 % of major peri-procedural bleeding complications in PCI. Increasing adoption of the radial artery as the default access site has been shown to markedly reduce such major bleeding complications and mortality in selected patient cohorts. Recent data has suggested that adoption of the transradial access site in STEMI PCI procedures is associated with significant reductions in major bleeding complications and mortality in both national registry data and randomised controlled trials. We provide an overview of this data and discuss the remaining uncertainties around the synergy between access site and contemporary antithrombotic and antiplatelet therapy in such patients. Finally, whilst adoption of the radial artery as the default access site in PPCI has yielded a similar reduction in mortality as observed in the switch from thrombolysis to PPCI in the past, its adoption as a default access site is not universal. We discuss the remaining obstacles and challenges for more widespread adoption of the radial access site as the default access site in PPCI.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Grines C, Patel A, Zijlstra F, et al. Primary coronary angioplasty compared with intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: six-month follow up and analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials. Am Heart J. 2003;145:47–57.CrossRefPubMed Grines C, Patel A, Zijlstra F, et al. Primary coronary angioplasty compared with intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: six-month follow up and analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials. Am Heart J. 2003;145:47–57.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Stone GW, Witzenbichler B, Guagliumi G, et al. Bivalirudin during primary PCI in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2218–30.CrossRefPubMed Stone GW, Witzenbichler B, Guagliumi G, et al. Bivalirudin during primary PCI in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2218–30.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Stone GW, Witzenbichler B, Guagliumi G, et al. Heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor versus bivalirudin monotherapy and paclitaxel-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in acute myocardial infarction (HORIZONS-AMI): final 3-year results from a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;377:2193–204.CrossRefPubMed Stone GW, Witzenbichler B, Guagliumi G, et al. Heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor versus bivalirudin monotherapy and paclitaxel-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in acute myocardial infarction (HORIZONS-AMI): final 3-year results from a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;377:2193–204.CrossRefPubMed
4.••
Zurück zum Zitat Kwok C RS, Myint P, et al. Major bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention and risk of subsequent mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Heart 2014. This meta-analysis showed that increase in major bleeding predicts an increase in mortality and MACE Kwok C RS, Myint P, et al. Major bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention and risk of subsequent mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Heart 2014. This meta-analysis showed that increase in major bleeding predicts an increase in mortality and MACE
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Verheugt FW, Steinhubl SR, Hamon M, et al. Incidence, prognostic impact, and influence of antithrombotic therapy on access and nonaccess site bleeding in percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2011;4:191–7.CrossRef Verheugt FW, Steinhubl SR, Hamon M, et al. Incidence, prognostic impact, and influence of antithrombotic therapy on access and nonaccess site bleeding in percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2011;4:191–7.CrossRef
6.••
Zurück zum Zitat Mamas MA, Ratib K, Routledge H, et al. Influence of access site selection on PCI-related adverse events in patients with STEMI: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Heart. 2012;98:303–11. This meta-analysis of eight RCTs showed reduction of mortality, bleeding and access site complications in radial access.CrossRefPubMed Mamas MA, Ratib K, Routledge H, et al. Influence of access site selection on PCI-related adverse events in patients with STEMI: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Heart. 2012;98:303–11. This meta-analysis of eight RCTs showed reduction of mortality, bleeding and access site complications in radial access.CrossRefPubMed
7.••
Zurück zum Zitat Baklanov DV, Kaltenbach LA, Marso SP, et al. The prevalence and outcomes of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: analysis from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (2007 to 2011). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:420–6. This analysis from the NCDR registry showed better outcomes in patients treated via the radial route.CrossRefPubMed Baklanov DV, Kaltenbach LA, Marso SP, et al. The prevalence and outcomes of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: analysis from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (2007 to 2011). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:420–6. This analysis from the NCDR registry showed better outcomes in patients treated via the radial route.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kikkert WJ, Delewi R, Ouweneel DM, et al. Prognostic value of access site and nonaccess site bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention: a cohort study in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and comprehensive meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2014;7:622–30.CrossRef Kikkert WJ, Delewi R, Ouweneel DM, et al. Prognostic value of access site and nonaccess site bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention: a cohort study in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and comprehensive meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2014;7:622–30.CrossRef
9.••
Zurück zum Zitat Mamas MA, Ratib K, Routledge H, et al. Influence of arterial access site selection on outcomes in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: are the results of randomized trials achievable in clinical practice? J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2013;6:698–706. BCIS registry analysis showed that radial access in STEMI was associated with better outcomes.CrossRef Mamas MA, Ratib K, Routledge H, et al. Influence of arterial access site selection on outcomes in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: are the results of randomized trials achievable in clinical practice? J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2013;6:698–706. BCIS registry analysis showed that radial access in STEMI was associated with better outcomes.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Rao SV, Tremmel JA, Gilchrist IC, et al. Best practices for transradial angiography and intervention: a consensus statement from the society for cardiovascular angiography and intervention’s transradial working group. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv: Off J Soc Cardiac Angiography Interv. 2014;83:228–36.CrossRef Rao SV, Tremmel JA, Gilchrist IC, et al. Best practices for transradial angiography and intervention: a consensus statement from the society for cardiovascular angiography and intervention’s transradial working group. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv: Off J Soc Cardiac Angiography Interv. 2014;83:228–36.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Steg PG, James SK, Gersh BJ. 2012 ESC STEMI guidelines and reperfusion therapy: evidence-based recommendations, ensuring optimal patient management. Heart. 2013;99:1156–7.CrossRefPubMed Steg PG, James SK, Gersh BJ. 2012 ESC STEMI guidelines and reperfusion therapy: evidence-based recommendations, ensuring optimal patient management. Heart. 2013;99:1156–7.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hannan EL, Farrell LS, Walford G, et al. Utilization of radial artery access for percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in New York. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2014;7:276–83.CrossRef Hannan EL, Farrell LS, Walford G, et al. Utilization of radial artery access for percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in New York. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2014;7:276–83.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Romagnoli E, De Vita M, Burzotta F, et al. Radial versus femoral approach comparison in percutaneous coronary intervention with intraaortic balloon pump support: the RADIAL PUMP UP registry. Am Heart J. 2013;166:1019–26.CrossRefPubMed Romagnoli E, De Vita M, Burzotta F, et al. Radial versus femoral approach comparison in percutaneous coronary intervention with intraaortic balloon pump support: the RADIAL PUMP UP registry. Am Heart J. 2013;166:1019–26.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujii T, Masuda N, Ijichi T, et al. Transradial intervention for patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction with or without cardiogenic shock. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv: Off J Soc Cardiac Angiography Interve. 2014;83:E1–7.CrossRef Fujii T, Masuda N, Ijichi T, et al. Transradial intervention for patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction with or without cardiogenic shock. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv: Off J Soc Cardiac Angiography Interve. 2014;83:E1–7.CrossRef
15.••
Zurück zum Zitat Mamas MA, Anderson SG, Ratib K, et al. Arterial access site utilization in cardiogenic shock in the United Kingdom: is radial access feasible? Am Heart J. 2014;167:900–8 e1. BCIS registry data showing that radial access in cardiogenic shock is associted with lower mortality and bleeding compared to femoral access.CrossRefPubMed Mamas MA, Anderson SG, Ratib K, et al. Arterial access site utilization in cardiogenic shock in the United Kingdom: is radial access feasible? Am Heart J. 2014;167:900–8 e1. BCIS registry data showing that radial access in cardiogenic shock is associted with lower mortality and bleeding compared to femoral access.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Yan ZX, Zhou YJ, Zhao YX, et al. Safety and feasibility of transradial approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction. Chin Med J. 2008;121:782–6.PubMed Yan ZX, Zhou YJ, Zhao YX, et al. Safety and feasibility of transradial approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction. Chin Med J. 2008;121:782–6.PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Rodriguez-Leor O, Fernandez-Nofrerias E, Carrillo X, et al. Results of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients ≥75 years treated by the transradial approach. Am J Cardiol. 2014;113:452–6.CrossRefPubMed Rodriguez-Leor O, Fernandez-Nofrerias E, Carrillo X, et al. Results of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients ≥75 years treated by the transradial approach. Am J Cardiol. 2014;113:452–6.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Secco GG, Marinucci L, Uguccioni L, Parisi R, Uguccioni S, Fattori R. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary interventions in elderly patients. J Invasive Cardiol. 2013;25:254–6.PubMed Secco GG, Marinucci L, Uguccioni L, Parisi R, Uguccioni S, Fattori R. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary interventions in elderly patients. J Invasive Cardiol. 2013;25:254–6.PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehta SR, Jolly SS, Cairns J, et al. Effects of radial versus femoral artery access in patients with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:2490–9.CrossRefPubMed Mehta SR, Jolly SS, Cairns J, et al. Effects of radial versus femoral artery access in patients with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:2490–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Romagnoli E, Biondi-Zoccai G, Sciahbasi A, et al. Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:2481–9.CrossRefPubMed Romagnoli E, Biondi-Zoccai G, Sciahbasi A, et al. Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:2481–9.CrossRefPubMed
21.••
Zurück zum Zitat Bernat I, Horak D, Stasek J, et al. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by radial or femoral approach in a multicenter randomized clinical trial: the STEMI-RADIAL trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:964–72. This recent RCT comparing radial and femoral access in STEMI showed better outcomes with radial access.CrossRefPubMed Bernat I, Horak D, Stasek J, et al. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by radial or femoral approach in a multicenter randomized clinical trial: the STEMI-RADIAL trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:964–72. This recent RCT comparing radial and femoral access in STEMI showed better outcomes with radial access.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Genereux P, Mehran R, Palmerini T, et al. Radial access in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction: the HORIZONS-AMI trial. EuroIntervention : Journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2011;7:905–16.CrossRef Genereux P, Mehran R, Palmerini T, et al. Radial access in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction: the HORIZONS-AMI trial. EuroIntervention : Journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2011;7:905–16.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Chodor P, Kurek T, Kowalczuk A, et al. Radial vs femoral approach with StarClose clip placement for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. RADIAMI II: a prospective, randomised, single centre trial. Kardiol Pol. 2011;69:763–71.PubMed Chodor P, Kurek T, Kowalczuk A, et al. Radial vs femoral approach with StarClose clip placement for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. RADIAMI II: a prospective, randomised, single centre trial. Kardiol Pol. 2011;69:763–71.PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Saito S, Tanaka S, Hiroe Y, et al. Comparative study on transradial approach vs. transfemoral approach in primary stent implantation for patients with acute myocardial infarction: results of the test for myocardial infarction by prospective unicenter randomization for access sites (TEMPURA) trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv: Off J Soc Cardiac Angiography Interv. 2003;59:26–33.CrossRef Saito S, Tanaka S, Hiroe Y, et al. Comparative study on transradial approach vs. transfemoral approach in primary stent implantation for patients with acute myocardial infarction: results of the test for myocardial infarction by prospective unicenter randomization for access sites (TEMPURA) trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv: Off J Soc Cardiac Angiography Interv. 2003;59:26–33.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Cantor WJ, Puley G, Natarajan MK, et al. Radial versus femoral access for emergent percutaneous coronary intervention with adjunct glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in acute myocardial infarction—the RADIAL-AMI pilot randomized trial. Am Heart J. 2005;150:543–9.CrossRefPubMed Cantor WJ, Puley G, Natarajan MK, et al. Radial versus femoral access for emergent percutaneous coronary intervention with adjunct glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in acute myocardial infarction—the RADIAL-AMI pilot randomized trial. Am Heart J. 2005;150:543–9.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Brasselet C, Tassan S, Nazeyrollas P, Hamon M, Metz D. Randomised comparison of femoral versus radial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention using abciximab in acute myocardial infarction: results of the FARMI trial. Heart. 2007;93:1556–61.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Brasselet C, Tassan S, Nazeyrollas P, Hamon M, Metz D. Randomised comparison of femoral versus radial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention using abciximab in acute myocardial infarction: results of the FARMI trial. Heart. 2007;93:1556–61.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Hou L, Wei YD, Li WM, Xu YW. Comparative study on transradial versus transfemoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in Chinese patients with acute myocardial infarction. Saudi Med J. 2010;31:158–62.PubMed Hou L, Wei YD, Li WM, Xu YW. Comparative study on transradial versus transfemoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in Chinese patients with acute myocardial infarction. Saudi Med J. 2010;31:158–62.PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Jolly SS, Cairns J, Niemela K, et al. Effect of radial versus femoral access on radiation dose and the importance of procedural volume: a substudy of the multicenter randomized RIVAL trial. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2013;6:258–66.CrossRef Jolly SS, Cairns J, Niemela K, et al. Effect of radial versus femoral access on radiation dose and the importance of procedural volume: a substudy of the multicenter randomized RIVAL trial. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2013;6:258–66.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Jolly SS, Cairns J, Yusuf S, et al. Procedural volume and outcomes with radial or femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:954–63.CrossRefPubMed Jolly SS, Cairns J, Yusuf S, et al. Procedural volume and outcomes with radial or femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:954–63.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Komocsi A, Aradi D, Kehl D, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized trials on access site selection for percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Archives Med Sci: AMS. 2014;10:203–12.CrossRefPubMedCentral Komocsi A, Aradi D, Kehl D, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized trials on access site selection for percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Archives Med Sci: AMS. 2014;10:203–12.CrossRefPubMedCentral
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Karrowni W, Vyas A, Giacomino B, et al. Radial versus femoral access for primary percutaneous interventions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2013;6:814–23.CrossRef Karrowni W, Vyas A, Giacomino B, et al. Radial versus femoral access for primary percutaneous interventions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2013;6:814–23.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Chiang A, Gada H, Kodali SK, et al. Procedural variation in the performance of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a SCAI-based survey study of US interventional cardiologists. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv: Off J Soc Cardiac Angiography Interv. 2014;83:721–6.CrossRef Chiang A, Gada H, Kodali SK, et al. Procedural variation in the performance of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a SCAI-based survey study of US interventional cardiologists. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv: Off J Soc Cardiac Angiography Interv. 2014;83:721–6.CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Hess CN, Peterson ED, Neely ML, et al. The learning curve for transradial percutaneous coronary intervention among operators in the United States: a study from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Circulation. 2014;129(22):2277–86.CrossRefPubMed Hess CN, Peterson ED, Neely ML, et al. The learning curve for transradial percutaneous coronary intervention among operators in the United States: a study from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Circulation. 2014;129(22):2277–86.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Wimmer NJ, Resnic FS, Mauri L, et al. Risk-treatment paradox in the selection of transradial access for percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013;2:e000174.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Wimmer NJ, Resnic FS, Mauri L, et al. Risk-treatment paradox in the selection of transradial access for percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013;2:e000174.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Mamas MA, Anderson SG, Carr M, et al. Baseline bleeding risk and arterial access site practice in relation to procedural outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:1554–64.CrossRefPubMed Mamas MA, Anderson SG, Carr M, et al. Baseline bleeding risk and arterial access site practice in relation to procedural outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:1554–64.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Shahzad A, Kemp I, Mars C et al. Unfractionated heparin versus bivalirudin in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (HEAT-PPCI): an open-label, single centre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2014. Shahzad A, Kemp I, Mars C et al. Unfractionated heparin versus bivalirudin in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (HEAT-PPCI): an open-label, single centre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2014.
Metadaten
Titel
Transradial Intervention in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
verfasst von
Ahmad H. S. Mustafa
Eric Holroyd
Rob Butler
Doug Fraser
Magdi El-Omar
James Nolan
Mamas A. Mamas
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Current Cardiology Reports / Ausgabe 5/2015
Print ISSN: 1523-3782
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-3170
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-015-0585-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2015

Current Cardiology Reports 5/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Cardiac PET, CT, and MRI (SE Petersen, Section Editor)

Cardiac PET for Translational Imaging

Cardiac PET, CT, and MRI (SE Petersen, Section Editor)

Interventional CMR: Clinical Applications and Future Directions

Lipid Abnormalities and Cardiovascular Prevention (G De Backer, Section Editor)

Statin Intolerance: Diagnosis and Remedies

Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease (S Malik, Section Editor)

Role for Combination Therapy in Diabetic Dyslipidemia

Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease (S Malik, Section Editor)

Next Generation of Weight Management Medications: Implications for Diabetes and CVD Risk

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.