Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 7/2019

13.03.2019 | Interventional Radiology

Transrectal and transvaginal catheter drainages and aspirations for management of pelvic fluid collections: technique, technical success rates, and outcomes in 150 patients

verfasst von: David H. Ballard, Michael C. Gates, Alireza Hamidian Jahromi, Daniel V. Harper, Daniel V. Do, Horacio B. D’Agostino

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 7/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate outcomes of image-guided transrectal/transvaginal (TR/TV) drainage for symptomatic pelvic fluid collections (SPFCs).

Materials and methods

Single-center retrospective study of 150 consecutive patients (36 males, 114 females, average age 41 years) who underwent attempted TR/TV drainages of SPFCs during an 11-year, 5-month period. All patients presented with pain and had SPFCs with rectal or vaginal contact on preceding diagnostic CT. Routine technique included Foley catheter insertion, image-guidance with ultrasound and fluoroscopy, 18 g/20 cm Chiba needles, and Seldinger technique for catheter insertion. No anoscope or speculum was used. SPFCs causes were classified by etiology including postoperative—70 (47%); gynecologic—49 (33%); and gastrointestinal—31 (21%). Resolutions of the SPFCs without the need for surgical intervention, collection recurrence, and complications were assessed. Surgical management after attempted TR/TV drainage was considered a failure.

Results

Technical success was achieved in 172/180 procedures [TR 128/134 (95%); TV 44/46 (96%)]. TR/TV drainage successfully managed SPFCs in 141/150 patients (94% success rate) and 145/150 patients (97%) did not require surgical intervention; 4 patients with failed TR/TV drainage attempts were managed conservatively. In 5 patients requiring surgery, 4 were after technically successful TR/TV and 1 was after a failed TR attempt. Complications occurred in 4 (3%) patients: 2 bladder punctures (both resolved with medical management), 1 propagation of sepsis, and 1 hemorrhagic return from TR drainage that prompted surgical exploration.

Conclusion

Transrectal and transvaginal drainage had high technical success rates and were successful in managing the majority (141/150; 94%) of patients with pelvic fluid collections.
Literatur
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Graham D, Sanders RC (1982) Ultrasound-directed transvaginal aspiration biopsy of pelvic masses. J Ultrasound Med 1:279–280CrossRefPubMed Graham D, Sanders RC (1982) Ultrasound-directed transvaginal aspiration biopsy of pelvic masses. J Ultrasound Med 1:279–280CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ballard DH, Flanagan ST, D’Agostino HB. Abscess Drainage. In Shafa J and Kee S (1st Ed.), Learning Interventional Radiology 2019. Elsevier Inc Ballard DH, Flanagan ST, D’Agostino HB. Abscess Drainage. In Shafa J and Kee S (1st Ed.), Learning Interventional Radiology 2019. Elsevier Inc
Metadaten
Titel
Transrectal and transvaginal catheter drainages and aspirations for management of pelvic fluid collections: technique, technical success rates, and outcomes in 150 patients
verfasst von
David H. Ballard
Michael C. Gates
Alireza Hamidian Jahromi
Daniel V. Harper
Daniel V. Do
Horacio B. D’Agostino
Publikationsdatum
13.03.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 7/2019
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-01974-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2019

Abdominal Radiology 7/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.