Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 1/2017

19.05.2016 | Original Article

Transvaginal uterosacral ligament hysteropexy: a retrospective feasibility study

verfasst von: Rodolfo Milani, Matteo Frigerio, Stefano Manodoro, Alice Cola, Federico Spelzini

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 1/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Uterine-sparing procedures could be attractive in patients concerned about preservation of fertility and change in corporeal image and sexuality. Transvaginal uterosacral hysteropexy can provide an alternative mesh-free technique for uterine suspension. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of transvaginal uterine suspension to uterosacral ligaments in terms of operative data, complications, midterm efficacy, and patient satisfaction.

Materials and methods

This retrospective study analyzed the first 20 cases of transvaginal hysteropexy through bilateral high uterosacral ligaments (modified Shull technique) performed in our Institution.

Results

Mean follow-up was 33.2 months. The procedure was performed in 84 ± 19 min ,and blood loss was 228 ± 139 ml. Three mild complications (15 %) were observed. Recurrence [Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system (POP-Q) stage ≥ II was observed in five patients (25 %), and three of them (15 %) required reintervention. Mean Patient Global Impression of Improvement score was “much improved.” Two woman (40 %) who had not fulfilled their childbearing desire obtained a pregnancy. Both underwent elective caesarean section at term.

Conclusions

Transvaginal uterosacral hysteropexy appears a feasible mesh-free technique for apical support. This procedure can be indicated in women with the desire of preserving fertility or who prefer a uterine-sparing surgical option.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Samuelsson EC, Victor FT, Tibblin G, Svärdsudd KF (1999) Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180(2 Pt 1):299–305CrossRefPubMed Samuelsson EC, Victor FT, Tibblin G, Svärdsudd KF (1999) Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180(2 Pt 1):299–305CrossRefPubMed
2.
3.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Merrill RM (2008) Hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 1997 through 2005. Med Sci Monit 14(1):CR24–CR31PubMed Merrill RM (2008) Hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 1997 through 2005. Med Sci Monit 14(1):CR24–CR31PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Jha S, Moran P (2011) The UK national prolapse survey: 5 years on. Int Urogynecol J 22(5):517–528CrossRefPubMed Jha S, Moran P (2011) The UK national prolapse survey: 5 years on. Int Urogynecol J 22(5):517–528CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Vanspauwen R, Seman E, Dwyer P (2010) Survey of current management of prolapse in Australia and New Zealand. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 50(3):262–267CrossRefPubMed Vanspauwen R, Seman E, Dwyer P (2010) Survey of current management of prolapse in Australia and New Zealand. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 50(3):262–267CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ridgeway BM (2015) Does prolapse equal hysterectomy? The role of uterine conservation in women with uterovaginal prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 213(6):802–809CrossRefPubMed Ridgeway BM (2015) Does prolapse equal hysterectomy? The role of uterine conservation in women with uterovaginal prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 213(6):802–809CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Flory N, Bissonnette F, Binik YM (2005) Psychosocial effects of hysterectomy: literature review. J Psychosom Res 59(3):117–129CrossRefPubMed Flory N, Bissonnette F, Binik YM (2005) Psychosocial effects of hysterectomy: literature review. J Psychosom Res 59(3):117–129CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Costantini E, Porena M, Lazzeri M, Mearini L, Bini V, Zucchi A (2013) Changes in female sexual function after pelvic organ prolapse repair: role of hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J 24:1481–1487CrossRefPubMed Costantini E, Porena M, Lazzeri M, Mearini L, Bini V, Zucchi A (2013) Changes in female sexual function after pelvic organ prolapse repair: role of hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J 24:1481–1487CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP et al (1996) The standardization of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175(1):10–11CrossRefPubMed Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP et al (1996) The standardization of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175(1):10–11CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Shull BL, Bachofen C, Coates KW, Kuehl TJ (2000) A transvaginal approach to repair of apical and other associated sites of pelvic organ prolapse with uterosacral ligaments. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:1365–1373, discussion 1373–1364 CrossRefPubMed Shull BL, Bachofen C, Coates KW, Kuehl TJ (2000) A transvaginal approach to repair of apical and other associated sites of pelvic organ prolapse with uterosacral ligaments. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:1365–1373, discussion 1373–1364 CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Srikrishna S, Robinson D, Cardozo L (2010) Validation of the patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I) for urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 21(5):523–528CrossRefPubMed Srikrishna S, Robinson D, Cardozo L (2010) Validation of the patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I) for urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 21(5):523–528CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Stekelenburg J, IntHout J, Vierhout ME, Kluivers KB et al (2015) Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial. BMJ 351:h3717CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Stekelenburg J, IntHout J, Vierhout ME, Kluivers KB et al (2015) Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial. BMJ 351:h3717CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Medina C, Takacs P (2006) Laparoscopic uterosacral uterine suspension: a minimally invasive technique for treating pelvic organ prolapse. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 13(5):472–475CrossRefPubMed Medina C, Takacs P (2006) Laparoscopic uterosacral uterine suspension: a minimally invasive technique for treating pelvic organ prolapse. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 13(5):472–475CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Maher CF, Carey MP, Murray CJ (2001) Laparoscopic suture hysteropexy for uterine prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 97(6):1010–1014PubMed Maher CF, Carey MP, Murray CJ (2001) Laparoscopic suture hysteropexy for uterine prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 97(6):1010–1014PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosen DM, Shukla A, Cario GM, Carlton MA, Chou D (2008) Is hysterectomy necessary for laparoscopic pelvic floor repair? A prospective study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15(6):729–734CrossRefPubMed Rosen DM, Shukla A, Cario GM, Carlton MA, Chou D (2008) Is hysterectomy necessary for laparoscopic pelvic floor repair? A prospective study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15(6):729–734CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Romanzi LJ, Tyagi R (2012) Hysteropexy compared to hysterectomy for uterine prolapse surgery: does durability differ? Int Urogynecol J 23(5):625–631CrossRefPubMed Romanzi LJ, Tyagi R (2012) Hysteropexy compared to hysterectomy for uterine prolapse surgery: does durability differ? Int Urogynecol J 23(5):625–631CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Hyakutake MT, Cundiff GW, Geoffrion R (2014) Cervical elongation following sacrospinous hysteropexy: a case series. Int Urogynecol J 25(6):851–854CrossRefPubMed Hyakutake MT, Cundiff GW, Geoffrion R (2014) Cervical elongation following sacrospinous hysteropexy: a case series. Int Urogynecol J 25(6):851–854CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Transvaginal uterosacral ligament hysteropexy: a retrospective feasibility study
verfasst von
Rodolfo Milani
Matteo Frigerio
Stefano Manodoro
Alice Cola
Federico Spelzini
Publikationsdatum
19.05.2016
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3036-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

International Urogynecology Journal 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.