Skip to main content
Erschienen in: BMC Urology 1/2020

Open Access 01.12.2020 | Case report

Transverse testicular ectopia with Müllerian duct remnant in an incarcerated congenital inguinal hernia – a case report

verfasst von: Mostafa Kotb, Ahmed Hassan, Mohamed Abouheba

Erschienen in: BMC Urology | Ausgabe 1/2020

Abstract

Background

Transverse testicular ectopia (TTE) is a rare anomaly characterized by both testes descending through a single inguinal canal. In this report, the diagnosis of TTE was discovered in the event of an incarcerated congenital inguinal hernia in a neonate.

Case presentation

We present a case of TTE accompanied by persistent Müllerian duct structures (PMDS) that had been discovered incidentally during inguinal exploration of a 26-day-old boy who presented with an incarcerated congenital inguinal hernia on the right side and left cryptochidism on the left side. The pathogenesis, approach and proposed management of TTE are discussed.

Conclusion

TTE is an extremely rare anomaly, especially in neonates, and should be suspected in patients presenting with inguinal hernia on one side and cryptorchidism on the other side.
Hinweise

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abkürzungen
MIF
Müllerian inhibiting factor
PMDS
Persistent Müllerian duct structures
TTE
Transverse testicular ectopia

Background

Transverse testicular ectopia (TTE), also named testicular pseudo-duplication or crossed testicular ectopia, is a rare anomaly characterized by both testes descending through a single inguinal canal [1]. Most of the cases (65%) are diagnosed intraoperatively during an inguinal hernia repair, while a few are diagnosed preoperatively [2]. We present a case of TTE accompanied by persistent Müllerian duct structures (PMDS) that had been discovered incidentally during inguinal exploration of a male neonate presenting with an incarcerated congenital inguinal hernia on the right side and left cryptochidism on the left side. The pathogenesis, approach and proposed management of TTE were discussed.

Case presentation

A 26-day-old boy was referred from a peripheral hospital with a right-sided incarcerated congenital inguinal hernia. The referring pediatrician told his father that he has a palpable testis in his right inguinal canal but no palpable testis on the left side. Apart from a clinically evident right irreducible hernia and empty both hemiscrota, the rest of the examination was unremarkable. After initial resuscitation with intravenous fluids and antibiotics, an urgent operation was undertaken. On inguinal exploration, the hernia sac was found to contain a viable cecum and small bowel loops. After reduction of the contents to the peritoneal cavity, the right testis was found in the inguinal canal. However, a second testis was unexpectedly delivered through the deep inguinal ring. Both testes have independent spermatic cords, i.e. two separate sets of vas deferens and testicular vessels on either side of a T- shaped structure resembling an infantile uterus and fallopian tube (Fig. 1). Because of the shortness of the spermatic cord and the vague nature of this anomaly for the operating surgeon, only a biopsy was taken from both testes and all the structures were returned back to the peritoneal cavity followed by herniotomy.
Postoperative pathology showed normal testicular tissue bilaterally with absent ovarian structures. Karyotyping was done for the patient and revealed a normal 46XY male karyotype. Diagnostic laparoscopy was performed at the age of 6 months, which showed a closed left internal ring on the left side and a widely open internal ring on the right side. In addition, the left sided testis and spermatic cord were found joining their counterparts on the right side through the rudimentary uterus close to the right internal ring. The rudimentary uterus as well as the fallopian tubes were partially excised. Peritoneal dissection was made to gain extra length for both spermatic cords. Orchiopexy was done, with each testis fixed into its corresponding hemiscrotum. The patient had an uneventful recovery. Throughout the 6-month follow-up period, the size and the blood flow of both testes were normal as evaluated by Doppler ultrasound.

Discussion and conclusions

TTE is a rare entity that usually presents in childhood, with a mean age of 4 years [3]. To our best knowledge, the present case represents the first TTE diagnosed in a neonate with irreducible inguinal hernia. The precise etiology of TTE is still unclear. Nevertheless, various anatomic factors (for instance, tearing or rupture or defective implantation of the gubernaculum, deep inguinal ring occlusion, adhesions developing between the testis and adjacent structures, late closure of the umbilical ring, etc.) are suggested to result in testicular maldescent [4].
TTE can be classified according to the presence of associated anomalies into 3 types; type 1 (associated with hernia only, 50% of the cases), type 2 (associated with PMDS, 30% of cases) and type 3 (associated with genitourinary abnormalities, 20% of cases) [5]. Our case belongs to type 2, which results from defects either in the synthesis or action of Müllerian inhibiting factor (MIF) and is characterized by the presence of uterus and fallopian tubes in otherwise phenotypically normal 46 XY males. PMDS is mostly discovered incidentally during surgery for inguinal hernia or cryptorchidism [6]. In patients with inguinal hernia and cryptorchidism, possible TTE and PMDS must be considered requiring radiologic evaluation of the genitourinary system and karyotyping [7].
Unfortunately, the overall occurrence of malignant transformation is 18%, which is nearly equal to that of abdominal testes in otherwise normal men [8]. Among the tumors which were reported with PMDS are seminoma, embryonal carcinoma, yolk sac tumor and teratoma. Moreover; these testes are subjected to a higher risk of malignant transformations arising from Müllerian remnants to squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma and papillary cystadenocarcinoma. Hence, long term follow-up for tumors is required [9].
The optimal surgical management of PMDS is still debatable. A staged procedure remains the most acceptable option as long as PMDS is usually found incidentally during surgery for inguinal hernia repair or undescended testis [10]. Testicular biopsies were taken and then replacing the testes, uterus, and fallopian tubes back through the deep inguinal ring to the abdominal cavity along with herniotomy are performed in the first stage. This is to be followed by the definitive surgery after confirming PMDS. Care should be taken as the vasa deferentia are usually found embedded in the wall of the uterus and the epididymis is contained in the mesosalpinx. Therefore, the removal of Müllerian remnants may injure these structures and interfere with the testicular blood supply as well [10]. Given the reported incidence of malignant transformation from the retained Müllerian structures along with their interference with the intrascrotal placement of the testes, as the free segment of the spermatic cord is usually short, partial removal of these structures without jeopardizing the vasa deferentia seems to be a valuable option. This was described by Guerrier et al. [11] that entails extensive dissection of the spermatic cord along with corporal hysterectomy, bilateral proximal salpingectomies while leaving fimbria and cervix attached to the epididymis to avoid vasa deferentia injury, and bilateral orchiopexy.
To sum up, TTE should be put in consideration whenever a patient presents with inguinal hernia on one side and undescended testis on the opposite side. Because of the risk of malignant transformation and interference with scrotal placement of the testis, MD remnants should be removed without jeopardizing the vas deferens, epididymis and testicular vessels in addition to herniotomy and orchiopexy. In addition, a long-term follow-up will be needed for assessment of malignant transformation and fertility in these patients.

Acknowledgements

We thank Prof. Sameh Shehata, Professor of Pediatric Surgery, Alexandria Faculty of Medicine for his continuous and endless support and tips in the process of publication.
Not applicable.
Written informed consent was obtained from the parent for publication of this article and any accompanying tables/images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor of this journal upon request.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Prakash A, Jain S, Kela M, Yadav C, Lohiya R, Maheshwari T. Transverse testicular ectopia: what surgeons must know; insights in embryology and management. Arch Int Surg. 2016;6:191–4.CrossRef Prakash A, Jain S, Kela M, Yadav C, Lohiya R, Maheshwari T. Transverse testicular ectopia: what surgeons must know; insights in embryology and management. Arch Int Surg. 2016;6:191–4.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Naji H, Peristeris A, Stenman J, Svensson JF, Wester T. Transverse testicular ectopia: three additional cases and a review of the literature. Pediatr Surg Int. 2012;28:703–6.CrossRef Naji H, Peristeris A, Stenman J, Svensson JF, Wester T. Transverse testicular ectopia: three additional cases and a review of the literature. Pediatr Surg Int. 2012;28:703–6.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Vaos G, Zavras N. Irreducible inguinal hernia due to crossed testicular ectopia in an infant. Hernia. 2004;8:397–8.CrossRef Vaos G, Zavras N. Irreducible inguinal hernia due to crossed testicular ectopia in an infant. Hernia. 2004;8:397–8.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ueno S, Yokoyama S, Hirakawa H. A case of transverse testicular ectopia with Müllerian duct remnant. J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36:1710–2.CrossRef Ueno S, Yokoyama S, Hirakawa H. A case of transverse testicular ectopia with Müllerian duct remnant. J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36:1710–2.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Ozturk H, Eroglu M, Ozturk H, Uzunlar AK, Okur H. Persistent Müllerian duct syndrome associated with transverse testicular ectopia: report of two cases. FetalPediatr Pathol. 2007;26:41–6.CrossRef Ozturk H, Eroglu M, Ozturk H, Uzunlar AK, Okur H. Persistent Müllerian duct syndrome associated with transverse testicular ectopia: report of two cases. FetalPediatr Pathol. 2007;26:41–6.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Acikalin MF, Pasaoglu O, Tokar B, Ilgici D, Ilhan H. Persistent Müllerian duct syndrome with transverse testicular ectopia: a case report with literature review. Turk J Med Sci. 2004;34:333–6. Acikalin MF, Pasaoglu O, Tokar B, Ilgici D, Ilhan H. Persistent Müllerian duct syndrome with transverse testicular ectopia: a case report with literature review. Turk J Med Sci. 2004;34:333–6.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Tartar T, Sarac M, Bakal U, Canpolat Ş, Kazez E. Transverse testicular ectopia: two case reports. İstanbul Med J. 2018;19:179–81. Tartar T, Sarac M, Bakal U, Canpolat Ş, Kazez E. Transverse testicular ectopia: two case reports. İstanbul Med J. 2018;19:179–81.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Raj V, Redkar R, Krishna S, Tewari S. Rare case of transverse testicular ectopia – case report and review of literature. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;41:407–10.CrossRef Raj V, Redkar R, Krishna S, Tewari S. Rare case of transverse testicular ectopia – case report and review of literature. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;41:407–10.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Telli O, Gökçe Mİ, Haciyev P, Soygür T, Burgu B. Transverse testicular ectopia: a rare presentation with persistent Müllerian duct syndrome. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2014;6:180–2.CrossRef Telli O, Gökçe Mİ, Haciyev P, Soygür T, Burgu B. Transverse testicular ectopia: a rare presentation with persistent Müllerian duct syndrome. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2014;6:180–2.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Naouar S, Maazoun K, Sahnoun L, et al. Transverse testicular ectopia: a three-case report and review of the literature. Pediatr Urol. 2008;71:1070–3. Naouar S, Maazoun K, Sahnoun L, et al. Transverse testicular ectopia: a three-case report and review of the literature. Pediatr Urol. 2008;71:1070–3.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Guerrier D, Tran D, Vanderwinden JM, et al. The persistent Müllerian duct syndrome: a molecular approach. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1989;68:46–52.CrossRef Guerrier D, Tran D, Vanderwinden JM, et al. The persistent Müllerian duct syndrome: a molecular approach. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1989;68:46–52.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Transverse testicular ectopia with Müllerian duct remnant in an incarcerated congenital inguinal hernia – a case report
verfasst von
Mostafa Kotb
Ahmed Hassan
Mohamed Abouheba
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2020
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Urology / Ausgabe 1/2020
Elektronische ISSN: 1471-2490
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-020-00680-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2020

BMC Urology 1/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.