Skip to main content
main-content

01.12.2012 | Research article | Ausgabe 1/2012 Open Access

BMC Health Services Research 1/2012

Treating childhood pneumonia in hard-to-reach areas: A model-based comparison of mobile clinics and community-based care

Zeitschrift:
BMC Health Services Research > Ausgabe 1/2012
Autoren:
Catherine Pitt, Bayard Roberts, Francesco Checchi
Wichtige Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.​1186/​1472-6963-12-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

CP designed the study, developed the model, carried out analyses and co-wrote the paper. BR supervised the study and co-wrote the paper. FC designed and supervised the study and co-wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Abstract

Background

Where hard-to-access populations (such as those living in insecure areas) lack access to basic health services, relief agencies, donors, and ministries of health face a dilemma in selecting the most effective intervention strategy. This paper uses a decision mathematical model to estimate the relative effectiveness of two alternative strategies, mobile clinics and fixed community-based health services, for antibiotic treatment of childhood pneumonia, the world's leading cause of child mortality.

Methods

A "Markov cycle tree" cohort model was developed in Excel with Visual Basic to compare the number of deaths from pneumonia in children aged 1 to 59 months expected under three scenarios: 1) No curative services available, 2) Curative services provided by a highly-skilled but intermittent mobile clinic, and 3) Curative services provided by a low-skilled community health post. Parameter values were informed by literature and expert interviews. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted for several plausible scenarios.

Results

We estimated median pneumonia-specific under-5 mortality rates of 0.51 (95% credible interval: 0.49 to 0.541) deaths per 10,000 child-days without treatment, 0.45 (95% CI: 0.43 to 0.48) with weekly mobile clinics, and 0.31 (95% CI: 0.29 to 0.32) with CHWs in fixed health posts. Sensitivity analyses found the fixed strategy superior, except when mobile clinics visited communities daily, where rates of care-seeking were substantially higher at mobile clinics than fixed posts, or where several variables simultaneously differed substantially from our baseline assumptions.

Conclusions

Current evidence does not support the hypothesis that mobile clinics are more effective than CHWs. A CHW strategy therefore warrants consideration in high-mortality, hard-to-access areas. Uncertainty remains, and parameter values may vary across contexts, but the model allows preliminary findings to be updated as new or context-specific evidence becomes available. Decision analytic modelling can guide needed field-based research efforts in hard-to-access areas and offer evidence-based insights for decision-makers.
Zusatzmaterial
Additional file 1: Appendix. Appendix containing details on the model. (DOCX 143 KB)
12913_2011_1908_MOESM1_ESM.DOCX
Authors’ original file for figure 1
12913_2011_1908_MOESM2_ESM.tiff
Authors’ original file for figure 2
12913_2011_1908_MOESM3_ESM.tiff
Authors’ original file for figure 3
12913_2011_1908_MOESM4_ESM.tiff
Authors’ original file for figure 4
12913_2011_1908_MOESM5_ESM.tiff
Authors’ original file for figure 5
12913_2011_1908_MOESM6_ESM.jpeg
Authors’ original file for figure 6
12913_2011_1908_MOESM7_ESM.jpeg
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2012

BMC Health Services Research 1/2012 Zur Ausgabe