Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery 2/2021

21.08.2020 | Original Contributions

Trends and Outcomes of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Between 2015 and 2018 in the USA and Canada

verfasst von: Jerry T. Dang, Jaclyn Shelton, Valentin Mocanu, Warren Sun, Daniel W. Birch, Shahzeer Karmali, Noah J. Switzer

Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Given there are approximately 100,000 primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) procedures performed a year in North America, there is a need to evaluate recent trends in LSG. The objective of this study was to analyze the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) to identify trends in technical factors and patient outcomes over time.

Methods

The MBSAQIP prospectively collects data from 854 centers in the USA and Canada. Patients undergoing primary LSG were included. Statistical analysis was performed to characterize trends in patient factors, technical factors, and 30-day postoperative outcomes.

Results

A total of 434,030 patients underwent primary LSG. The mean age was 44.2 (SD 12.0) years and mean body mass index was 45.1 (SD 7.8) kg/m2. Baseline demographics did not vary appreciably by year. Operative time decreased from 2015 to 2018 (75.4 to 70.6 min, p < 0.001). Bougie size and stapling distance from the pylorus did not change by year. However, staple line reinforcement (66.8 to 63.2%, p < 0.001) and oversewing of the staple line (23.1 to 20.1%, p < 0.001) were less commonly performed. Postoperatively, from 2015 to 2018, there was a 45.8% relative reduction in leaks (0.48 to 0.26%, p < 0.001). There were also reductions in 30-day major complications (2.87 to 2.28%, p < 0.001), length of stay (1.72 to 1.44 days, p < 0.001), and readmissions (3.39 to 2.77%, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

From 2015 to 2018, there was a decrease in staple line reinforcement and oversewing. These changes correlated with reductions in operative time, length of stay, readmission, and major complications.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat World Health Organization. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2014. 2014. World Health Organization. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2014. 2014.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hales CM, Carroll MD, Fryar CD OC. Prevalence of obesity and severe obesity among adults: United States, 2017–2018. NCHS Data Brief, no 360. 2020;2017–8. Hales CM, Carroll MD, Fryar CD OC. Prevalence of obesity and severe obesity among adults: United States, 2017–2018. NCHS Data Brief, no 360. 2020;2017–8.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Must A, Spadano J, Coakley EH, et al. The disease burden associated with overweight and obesity. J Am Med Assoc. 1999;282:1523–9.CrossRef Must A, Spadano J, Coakley EH, et al. The disease burden associated with overweight and obesity. J Am Med Assoc. 1999;282:1523–9.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Fontaine KR, Redden DT, Wang C, et al. Years of life lost due to obesity. J Am Med Assoc. 2003;289:187–93.CrossRef Fontaine KR, Redden DT, Wang C, et al. Years of life lost due to obesity. J Am Med Assoc. 2003;289:187–93.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Sturm R. The effects of obesity, smoking, and drinking on medical problems and costs. Health Aff. 2002;21:245–53.CrossRef Sturm R. The effects of obesity, smoking, and drinking on medical problems and costs. Health Aff. 2002;21:245–53.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Assoc. 2004;292:1724–37.CrossRef Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Assoc. 2004;292:1724–37.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat English WJ, DeMaria EJ, Hutter MM, Kothari SN, Mattar SG, Brethauer SA, et al. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery 2018 estimate of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States. Surg Obes Relat Dis. Elsevier Inc.; 2020;1–7. English WJ, DeMaria EJ, Hutter MM, Kothari SN, Mattar SG, Brethauer SA, et al. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery 2018 estimate of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States. Surg Obes Relat Dis. Elsevier Inc.; 2020;1–7.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kumar SB, Hamilton BC, Wood SG, Rogers SJ, Carter JT, Lin MY. Is laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy safer than laparoscopic gastric bypass? A comparison of 30-day complications using the MBSAQIP data registry. Surg Obes Relat Dis. Elsevier Inc.; 2018;14:264–9. Kumar SB, Hamilton BC, Wood SG, Rogers SJ, Carter JT, Lin MY. Is laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy safer than laparoscopic gastric bypass? A comparison of 30-day complications using the MBSAQIP data registry. Surg Obes Relat Dis. Elsevier Inc.; 2018;14:264–9.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Brethauer SA, Hammel JP, Schauer PR. Systematic review of sleeve gastrectomy as staging and primary bariatric procedure. Surg Obes Relat Dis American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. 2009;5:469–75.CrossRef Brethauer SA, Hammel JP, Schauer PR. Systematic review of sleeve gastrectomy as staging and primary bariatric procedure. Surg Obes Relat Dis American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. 2009;5:469–75.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Peterli R, Wolnerhanssen BK, Peters T, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic roux-en-y gastric bypass onweight loss in patients with morbid obesity the sm-boss randomized clinical trial. JAMA - J Am Med Assoc. 2018;319:255–65.CrossRef Peterli R, Wolnerhanssen BK, Peters T, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic roux-en-y gastric bypass onweight loss in patients with morbid obesity the sm-boss randomized clinical trial. JAMA - J Am Med Assoc. 2018;319:255–65.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Salminen P, Helmio M, Ovaska J, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic roux-en-y gastric bypass onweight loss at 5 years among patients with morbid obesity the SLEEVEPASS randomized clinical trial. JAMA - J Am Med Assoc. 2018;319:241–54.CrossRef Salminen P, Helmio M, Ovaska J, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic roux-en-y gastric bypass onweight loss at 5 years among patients with morbid obesity the SLEEVEPASS randomized clinical trial. JAMA - J Am Med Assoc. 2018;319:241–54.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Berger ER, Clements RH, Morton JM, et al. The impact of different surgical techniques on outcomes in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomies: the first report from the metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program (MBSAQIP). Ann Surg. 2016;264:464–71.CrossRef Berger ER, Clements RH, Morton JM, et al. The impact of different surgical techniques on outcomes in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomies: the first report from the metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program (MBSAQIP). Ann Surg. 2016;264:464–71.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Aurora AR, Khaitan L, Saber AA. Sleeve gastrectomy and the risk of leak: a systematic analysis of 4,888 patients. Surg Endosc Springer-Verlag. 2012;26:1509–15.CrossRef Aurora AR, Khaitan L, Saber AA. Sleeve gastrectomy and the risk of leak: a systematic analysis of 4,888 patients. Surg Endosc Springer-Verlag. 2012;26:1509–15.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Mocanu V, Dang J, Ladak F, Switzer N, Birch DW, Karmali S. Predictors and outcomes of bleed after sleeve gastrectomy: an analysis of the MBSAQIP data registry. Surg Obes Relat Dis. Elsevier Inc.; 2019;15:1675–81. Mocanu V, Dang J, Ladak F, Switzer N, Birch DW, Karmali S. Predictors and outcomes of bleed after sleeve gastrectomy: an analysis of the MBSAQIP data registry. Surg Obes Relat Dis. Elsevier Inc.; 2019;15:1675–81.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Cunningham-Hill M, Mazzei M, Zhao H, et al. The impact of staple line reinforcement utilization on bleeding and leak rates following sleeve gastrectomy for severe obesity: a propensity and case–control matched analysis. Obes Surg. 2019;29:2449–63.CrossRef Cunningham-Hill M, Mazzei M, Zhao H, et al. The impact of staple line reinforcement utilization on bleeding and leak rates following sleeve gastrectomy for severe obesity: a propensity and case–control matched analysis. Obes Surg. 2019;29:2449–63.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat El Chaar M, Stoltzfus J. Assessment of sleeve gastrectomy surgical technique: first look at 30-day outcomes based on the MBSAQIP database. J Am Coll Surg. American College of Surgeons. 2018;227:564–72.CrossRef El Chaar M, Stoltzfus J. Assessment of sleeve gastrectomy surgical technique: first look at 30-day outcomes based on the MBSAQIP database. J Am Coll Surg. American College of Surgeons. 2018;227:564–72.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Demeusy A, Sill A, Averbach A. Current role of staple line reinforcement in 30-day outcomes of primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: an analysis of MBSAQIP data, 2015–2016 PUF. Surg Obes Relat Dis. Elsevier Inc.; 2018;14:1454–61. Demeusy A, Sill A, Averbach A. Current role of staple line reinforcement in 30-day outcomes of primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: an analysis of MBSAQIP data, 2015–2016 PUF. Surg Obes Relat Dis. Elsevier Inc.; 2018;14:1454–61.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Shikora SA, Mahoney CB. Clinical benefit of gastric staple line reinforcement (SLR) in gastrointestinal surgery: a meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2015;25:1133–41.CrossRef Shikora SA, Mahoney CB. Clinical benefit of gastric staple line reinforcement (SLR) in gastrointestinal surgery: a meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2015;25:1133–41.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Gagner M, Kemmeter P. Comparison of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leak rates in five staple-line reinforcement options: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. Springer US. 2020;34:396–407.CrossRef Gagner M, Kemmeter P. Comparison of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leak rates in five staple-line reinforcement options: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. Springer US. 2020;34:396–407.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi YY, Bae J, Hur KY, et al. Reinforcing the staple line during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: does it have advantages? A meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2012;22:1206–13.CrossRef Choi YY, Bae J, Hur KY, et al. Reinforcing the staple line during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: does it have advantages? A meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2012;22:1206–13.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Giannopoulos GA, Tzanakis NE, Rallis GE, et al. Staple line reinforcement in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: does it actually make a difference? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2782–8.CrossRef Giannopoulos GA, Tzanakis NE, Rallis GE, et al. Staple line reinforcement in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: does it actually make a difference? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2782–8.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Parikh M, Issa R, McCrillis A, et al. Surgical strategies that may decrease leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 9991 cases. Ann Surg. 2013;257:231–7.CrossRef Parikh M, Issa R, McCrillis A, et al. Surgical strategies that may decrease leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 9991 cases. Ann Surg. 2013;257:231–7.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen B, Kiriakopoulos A, Tsakayannis D, et al. Reinforcement does not necessarily reduce the rate of staple line leaks after sleeve gastrectomy. A review of the literature and clinical experiences. Obes Surg. 2009;19:166–72.CrossRef Chen B, Kiriakopoulos A, Tsakayannis D, et al. Reinforcement does not necessarily reduce the rate of staple line leaks after sleeve gastrectomy. A review of the literature and clinical experiences. Obes Surg. 2009;19:166–72.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang H, Lu J, Feng J, et al. Staple line oversewing during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2017;99:509–14.CrossRef Wang H, Lu J, Feng J, et al. Staple line oversewing during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2017;99:509–14.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Stroh C, Köckerling F, Volker L, et al. Results of more than 11,800 sleeve gastrectomies. Data analysis of the German bariatric surgery registry. Ann Surg. 2016;263:949–55.CrossRef Stroh C, Köckerling F, Volker L, et al. Results of more than 11,800 sleeve gastrectomies. Data analysis of the German bariatric surgery registry. Ann Surg. 2016;263:949–55.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Sánchez-Santos R, Corcelles Codina R, Vilallonga Puy R, et al. Prognostic factors for morbimortality in sleeve gastrectomy. The importance of the learning curve. A Spanish-Portuguese multicenter study. Obes Surg. 2016;26:2829–36.CrossRef Sánchez-Santos R, Corcelles Codina R, Vilallonga Puy R, et al. Prognostic factors for morbimortality in sleeve gastrectomy. The importance of the learning curve. A Spanish-Portuguese multicenter study. Obes Surg. 2016;26:2829–36.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Noyes K, Myneni AA, Schwaitzberg SD, et al. Quality of MBSAQIP data: bad luck, or lack of QA plan? Surg Endosc Springer US. 2020;34:973–80.CrossRef Noyes K, Myneni AA, Schwaitzberg SD, et al. Quality of MBSAQIP data: bad luck, or lack of QA plan? Surg Endosc Springer US. 2020;34:973–80.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Trends and Outcomes of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Between 2015 and 2018 in the USA and Canada
verfasst von
Jerry T. Dang
Jaclyn Shelton
Valentin Mocanu
Warren Sun
Daniel W. Birch
Shahzeer Karmali
Noah J. Switzer
Publikationsdatum
21.08.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Obesity Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2021
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Elektronische ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04939-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2021

Obesity Surgery 2/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.