Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Updates in Surgery 1/2021

09.08.2020 | Original Article

Trends of complications and innovative techniques’ utilization for colectomies in the United States

verfasst von: Mohamed A. Abd El Aziz, Fabian Grass, Kevin T. Behm, Sherief Shawki, Anne-Lise D’Angelo, Kellie L. Mathis, David W. Larson

Erschienen in: Updates in Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Despite an increasing trend towards utilization of minimally invasive approaches (MIS), results regarding their safety profile are contradictory. All patients who underwent elective colectomy for any underlying disease with an identifiable operative approach available from the targeted colectomy files of the ACS-NSQIP PUFs 2013 to 2018 were included. The trend of utilization and complication rates of the different operative approaches (open, laparoscopic, robotic) were assessed during the inclusion period. Furthermore, overall, surgical, and medical complications were compared between the three approaches. The study cohort included 78,987 patients. Of them, 12,335 (15.6%) patients underwent open, 57,874 (73.3%) laparoscopic, and 8,778 (11.1%) robotic surgery. There was an increasing trend towards the utilization of robotic surgery (2.5% increase per year) at the expense of the other approaches. With the increasing trend toward the utilization of the robotic approach, a decreasing trend in overall and surgical complications and length of stay was observed. After adjusting for the baseline confounders, robotic surgery was associated with shorter length of stay, lower rate of overall (OR 0.397; p < 0.05 compared to open and OR: 0.763; p < 0.05 compared to laparoscopy) and surgical complications (OR: 0.464; p < 0.05 compared to open and OR: 0.734; p < 0.05 compared to laparoscopy). This study revealed an increasing trend toward the utilization of MIS for elective colectomy in the US. Robotic surgery was associated with a decreasing trend in overall and surgical morbidity and length of stay.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Sheetz KH, Norton EC, Dimick JB, Regenbogen SE (2019) Perioperative outcomes and trends in the use of robotic colectomy for medicare beneficiaries from 2010 through 2016. JAMA Surg 155:41CrossRef Sheetz KH, Norton EC, Dimick JB, Regenbogen SE (2019) Perioperative outcomes and trends in the use of robotic colectomy for medicare beneficiaries from 2010 through 2016. JAMA Surg 155:41CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat George EI, Brand TC, LaPorta A, Marescaux J, Satava RM (2018) Origins of robotic surgery: from skepticism to standard of care. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 22(4):e201800039CrossRef George EI, Brand TC, LaPorta A, Marescaux J, Satava RM (2018) Origins of robotic surgery: from skepticism to standard of care. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 22(4):e201800039CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Leal Ghezzi T, Campos Corleta O (2016) 30 Years of robotic surgery. World J Surg 40(10):2550–2557CrossRef Leal Ghezzi T, Campos Corleta O (2016) 30 Years of robotic surgery. World J Surg 40(10):2550–2557CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramirez P, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, Lopez A, Vieira M, Ribeiro R, Buda A, Yan X, Shuzhong Y, Chetty N et al (2018) Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 379:1895CrossRef Ramirez P, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, Lopez A, Vieira M, Ribeiro R, Buda A, Yan X, Shuzhong Y, Chetty N et al (2018) Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 379:1895CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lo BD, Leeds IL, Sundel MH, Gearhart S, Nisly G, Safar B, Atallah C, Fang SH (2020) Frailer patients undergoing robotic colectomies for colon cancer experience increased complication rates compared to open or laparoscopic approaches. Dis Colon Rectum 63:588–597CrossRef Lo BD, Leeds IL, Sundel MH, Gearhart S, Nisly G, Safar B, Atallah C, Fang SH (2020) Frailer patients undergoing robotic colectomies for colon cancer experience increased complication rates compared to open or laparoscopic approaches. Dis Colon Rectum 63:588–597CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat van Hilst J, de Rooij T, Bosscha K, Brinkman DJ, van Dieren S, Dijkgraaf MG, Gerhards MF, de Hingh IH, Karsten TM, Lips DJ et al (2019) Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours (LEOPARD-2): a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised controlled phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 4(3):199–207CrossRef van Hilst J, de Rooij T, Bosscha K, Brinkman DJ, van Dieren S, Dijkgraaf MG, Gerhards MF, de Hingh IH, Karsten TM, Lips DJ et al (2019) Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours (LEOPARD-2): a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised controlled phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 4(3):199–207CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Spinoglio G, Bianchi PP, Marano A, Priora F, Lenti LM, Ravazzoni F, Petz W, Borin S, Ribero D, Formisano G et al (2018) Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy with complete mesocolic excision for the treatment of colon cancer: perioperative outcomes and 5-year survival in a consecutive series of 202 patients. Ann Surg Oncol 25(12):3580–3586CrossRef Spinoglio G, Bianchi PP, Marano A, Priora F, Lenti LM, Ravazzoni F, Petz W, Borin S, Ribero D, Formisano G et al (2018) Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy with complete mesocolic excision for the treatment of colon cancer: perioperative outcomes and 5-year survival in a consecutive series of 202 patients. Ann Surg Oncol 25(12):3580–3586CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Sheetz KH, Claflin J, Dimick JB (2020) Trends in the adoption of robotic surgery for common surgical procedures. JAMA Netw Open 3(1):e1918911CrossRef Sheetz KH, Claflin J, Dimick JB (2020) Trends in the adoption of robotic surgery for common surgical procedures. JAMA Netw Open 3(1):e1918911CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ingraham AM, Richards KE, Hall BL, Ko CY (2010) Quality improvement in surgery: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program approach. Adv Surg 44:251–267CrossRef Ingraham AM, Richards KE, Hall BL, Ko CY (2010) Quality improvement in surgery: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program approach. Adv Surg 44:251–267CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Shiloach M, Frencher SK Jr, Steeger JE, Rowell KS, Bartzokis K, Tomeh MG, Richards KE, Ko CY, Hall BL (2010) Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 210(1):6–16CrossRef Shiloach M, Frencher SK Jr, Steeger JE, Rowell KS, Bartzokis K, Tomeh MG, Richards KE, Ko CY, Hall BL (2010) Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 210(1):6–16CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Park JS, Choi GS, Park SY, Kim HJ, Ryuk JP (2012) Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopic right colectomy. Br J Surg 99(9):1219–1226CrossRef Park JS, Choi GS, Park SY, Kim HJ, Ryuk JP (2012) Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopic right colectomy. Br J Surg 99(9):1219–1226CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Waters PS, Cheung FP, Peacock O, Heriot AG, Warrier SK, O'Riordain DS, Pillinger S, Lynch AC, Stevenson ARL (2019) Successful patient-oriented surgical outcomes in robotic vs laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer—a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 22(5):488–499CrossRef Waters PS, Cheung FP, Peacock O, Heriot AG, Warrier SK, O'Riordain DS, Pillinger S, Lynch AC, Stevenson ARL (2019) Successful patient-oriented surgical outcomes in robotic vs laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer—a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 22(5):488–499CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ma S, Chen Y, Chen Y, Guo T, Yang X, Lu Y, Tian J, Cai H (2019) Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted right colectomy compared with laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Surg 42(5):589–598CrossRef Ma S, Chen Y, Chen Y, Guo T, Yang X, Lu Y, Tian J, Cai H (2019) Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted right colectomy compared with laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Surg 42(5):589–598CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Sheng S, Zhao T, Wang X (2018) Comparison of robot-assisted surgery, laparoscopic-assisted surgery, and open surgery for the treatment of colorectal cancer: a network meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 97(34):e11817CrossRef Sheng S, Zhao T, Wang X (2018) Comparison of robot-assisted surgery, laparoscopic-assisted surgery, and open surgery for the treatment of colorectal cancer: a network meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 97(34):e11817CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, Croft J, Corrigan N, Copeland J, Quirke P, West N, Rautio T, Thomassen N et al (2017) Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: the ROLARR randomized clinical trial. JAMA 318(16):1569–1580CrossRef Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, Croft J, Corrigan N, Copeland J, Quirke P, West N, Rautio T, Thomassen N et al (2017) Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: the ROLARR randomized clinical trial. JAMA 318(16):1569–1580CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Jimenez Rodriguez RM, Diaz Pavon JM, de La Portilla de Juan F, Prendes Sillero E, Hisnard Cadet Dussort JM, Padillo J (2011) Prospective randomised study: robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer resection. Cirugia espanola 89(7):432–438CrossRef Jimenez Rodriguez RM, Diaz Pavon JM, de La Portilla de Juan F, Prendes Sillero E, Hisnard Cadet Dussort JM, Padillo J (2011) Prospective randomised study: robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer resection. Cirugia espanola 89(7):432–438CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Crippa J, Grass F, Achilli P, Mathis KL, Kelley SR, Merchea A, Colibaseanu DT, Larson DW (2020) Risk factors for conversion in laparoscopic and robotic rectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg 107:560CrossRef Crippa J, Grass F, Achilli P, Mathis KL, Kelley SR, Merchea A, Colibaseanu DT, Larson DW (2020) Risk factors for conversion in laparoscopic and robotic rectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg 107:560CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Li L, Jin J, Min S, Liu D, Liu L (2017) Compliance with the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and prognosis after colorectal cancer surgery: a prospective cohort study. Oncotarget 8(32):53531–53541CrossRef Li L, Jin J, Min S, Liu D, Liu L (2017) Compliance with the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and prognosis after colorectal cancer surgery: a prospective cohort study. Oncotarget 8(32):53531–53541CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Roulin D, Donadini A, Gander S (2015) The impact of enhanced recovery protocol compliance on elective colorectal cancer resection: results from an international registry. Ann Surg 261(6):1153–1159CrossRef Roulin D, Donadini A, Gander S (2015) The impact of enhanced recovery protocol compliance on elective colorectal cancer resection: results from an international registry. Ann Surg 261(6):1153–1159CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Bach C, Miernik A, Schonthaler M (2014) Training in robotics: the learning curve and contemporary concepts in training. Arab J Urol 12(1):58–61CrossRef Bach C, Miernik A, Schonthaler M (2014) Training in robotics: the learning curve and contemporary concepts in training. Arab J Urol 12(1):58–61CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Sridhar AN, Briggs TP, Kelly JD, Nathan S (2017) Training in robotic surgery-an overview. Curr Urol Rep 18(8):58CrossRef Sridhar AN, Briggs TP, Kelly JD, Nathan S (2017) Training in robotic surgery-an overview. Curr Urol Rep 18(8):58CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Mark Knab L, Zenati MS, Khodakov A, Rice M, Al-Abbas A, Bartlett DL, Zureikat AH, Zeh HJ, Hogg ME (2018) Evolution of a novel robotic training curriculum in a complex general surgical oncology fellowship. Ann Surg Oncol 25(12):3445–3452CrossRef Mark Knab L, Zenati MS, Khodakov A, Rice M, Al-Abbas A, Bartlett DL, Zureikat AH, Zeh HJ, Hogg ME (2018) Evolution of a novel robotic training curriculum in a complex general surgical oncology fellowship. Ann Surg Oncol 25(12):3445–3452CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Moit H, Dwyer A, De Sutter M, Heinzel S, Crawford D (2019) A standardized robotic training curriculum in a general surgery program. JSLS J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 23(4):e201900045CrossRef Moit H, Dwyer A, De Sutter M, Heinzel S, Crawford D (2019) A standardized robotic training curriculum in a general surgery program. JSLS J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 23(4):e201900045CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Trends of complications and innovative techniques’ utilization for colectomies in the United States
verfasst von
Mohamed A. Abd El Aziz
Fabian Grass
Kevin T. Behm
Sherief Shawki
Anne-Lise D’Angelo
Kellie L. Mathis
David W. Larson
Publikationsdatum
09.08.2020
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Updates in Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2021
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Elektronische ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00862-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2021

Updates in Surgery 1/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Foreword

Foreword

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.