Skip to main content
main-content

01.12.2011 | Research | Ausgabe 1/2011 Open Access

Globalization and Health 1/2011

Trust and the regulation of pharmaceuticals: South Asia in a globalised world

Zeitschrift:
Globalization and Health > Ausgabe 1/2011
Autoren:
Petra Brhlikova, Ian Harper, Roger Jeffery, Nabin Rawal, Madhusudhan Subedi, MR Santhosh
Wichtige Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.​1186/​1744-8603-7-10) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Petra Brhlikova, Ian Harper, Roger Jeffery contributed equally to this work.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

PB carried out the desk research in Edinburgh on regulatory practices and helped to draft the manuscript. IH was responsible for the field research in Nepal and helped to draft the manuscript. RJ, IH and others conceived of the study, RJ was the PI, and participated in its design and coordination, in data collection, and helped draft the manuscript. NR and MS were partners in the data collection in Nepal. SMR was a partner in the data collection and analysis of material from India. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Abstract

Background

Building appropriate levels of trust in pharmaceuticals is a painstaking and challenging task, involving participants from different spheres of life, including producers, distributors, retailers, prescribers, patients and the mass media. Increasingly, however, trust is not just a national matter, but involves cross-border flows of knowledge, threats and promises.

Methods

Data for this paper comes from the project 'Tracing Pharmaceuticals in South Asia', which used ethnographic fieldwork and qualitative interviews to compared the trajectories of three pharmaceuticals (Rifampicin, Oxytocin and Fluoxetine) from producer to patient in three sites (north India, West Bengal and Nepal) between 2005-08.

Results

We argue that issues of trust are crucial in reducing the likelihood of appropriate use of medicines. Unlike earlier discussions of trust, we suggest that trust contexts beyond the patient-practitioner relationship are important. We illustrate these arguments through three case studies: (i) a conflict over ethics in Nepal, involving a suggested revised ethical code for retailers, medical representatives, producers and prescribers; (ii) disputes over counterfeit, fake, substandard and spurious medicines, and quality standards in Indian generic companies, looking particularly at the role played by the US FDA; and (iii) the implications of lack of trust in the DOTS programmes in India and Nepal for the relationships among patients, government and the private sector.

Conclusions

We conclude that the building of trust is a necessary but always vulnerable and contingent process. While it might be desirable to outline steps that can be taken to build trust, the range of conflicting interests in the pharmaceutical field make feasible solutions hard to implement.
Zusatzmaterial
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2011

Globalization and Health 1/2011 Zur Ausgabe