Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2011

01.05.2011 | Reproductive Medicine

Tubal anastomosis after tubal sterilization: a review

verfasst von: Xavier Deffieux, Michèle Morin Surroca, Erika Faivre, Frédérique Pages, Hervé Fernandez, Amélie Gervaise

Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Ausgabe 5/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate various techniques for restoring tubal patency after sterilisation.

Methods

A search strategy was designed, and for each subject either thesaurus terms (MeSH descriptors) or terms from the title or summary were used.

Results

Mean length of hospital stay following laparoscopy seems to be shorter in comparison with laparotomy (3.3 vs. 6.1 days, P < 0.05). Rate of conversion to laparotomy is 5%. Pregnancy rates observed are between 54 and 88% for laparotomy and 31–85% for laparoscopy. Mean time to conception was between 2 and 9.6 months. Most pregnancies occurred in the 2 years following restoration of tubal patency (cumulative conception rate 80% at 12 months). Young age (<35 years), type of ligature (rings), how recently the ligature was done (<8 years), the anastomosis site (in the middle of the tube) and a good length of remaining tube (>7 cm) are the factors that govern whether there can be good restoration of tubal patency. Ectopic pregnancy rates observed are between 1.7 and 12% for laparotomy and 0–7% for laparoscopy. There are no randomised or quasi-randomised studies comparing tubal anastomosis and in vitro fertilization.

Conclusions

There are few good-quality controlled studies in this area. Results of restoration of tubal patency seem to be comparable, regardless of the route of approach (laparotomy or laparoscopy).
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilcox L, Chu S, Eaker E, Zeger S, Peterson H (1991) Risk factors for regret after tubal sterilization: 5 years of follow-up in a prospective study. Fertil Steril 55:927–999PubMed Wilcox L, Chu S, Eaker E, Zeger S, Peterson H (1991) Risk factors for regret after tubal sterilization: 5 years of follow-up in a prospective study. Fertil Steril 55:927–999PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Dubuisson JB, Chapron C (1998) Single suture laparoscopic tubal re-anastomosis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 10:307–313PubMedCrossRef Dubuisson JB, Chapron C (1998) Single suture laparoscopic tubal re-anastomosis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 10:307–313PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Chi I, Jones D (1994) Incidence, risk factors, and prevention of poststerilization regret in women: an updated international review from an epidemiological perspective. Obstet Gynecol Surv 49:722–732PubMedCrossRef Chi I, Jones D (1994) Incidence, risk factors, and prevention of poststerilization regret in women: an updated international review from an epidemiological perspective. Obstet Gynecol Surv 49:722–732PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kjer J (1990) Regret of laparoscopic sterilization. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 35:205–210PubMedCrossRef Kjer J (1990) Regret of laparoscopic sterilization. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 35:205–210PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilson R (1977) Why 103 women asked for reversal of sterilisation. Br Med J 2:305–307CrossRef Wilson R (1977) Why 103 women asked for reversal of sterilisation. Br Med J 2:305–307CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Leader A, Galan N, George R, Taylor P (1983) A comparison of definable traits in women requesting reversal of sterilization and women satisfied with sterilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 145:198–202PubMed Leader A, Galan N, George R, Taylor P (1983) A comparison of definable traits in women requesting reversal of sterilization and women satisfied with sterilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 145:198–202PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Rock JA, Bergquist CA, Kimball AW Jr, Zacur HA, King TM (1984) Comparison of the operating microscope and loupe for microsurgical tubal anastomosis: a randomized clinical trial. Fertil Steril 41:229–232PubMed Rock JA, Bergquist CA, Kimball AW Jr, Zacur HA, King TM (1984) Comparison of the operating microscope and loupe for microsurgical tubal anastomosis: a randomized clinical trial. Fertil Steril 41:229–232PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Tulandi T (1991) Effects of fibrin sealant on tubal anastomosis and adhesion formation. Fertil Steril 56:136–138PubMed Tulandi T (1991) Effects of fibrin sealant on tubal anastomosis and adhesion formation. Fertil Steril 56:136–138PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahmad G, Watson A, Vandekerckhove P, Lilford R (2006) Techniques for pelvic surgery in subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Issue 2. Art. no. CD000221 Ahmad G, Watson A, Vandekerckhove P, Lilford R (2006) Techniques for pelvic surgery in subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Issue 2. Art. no. CD000221
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Yovich J, Chau E (1998) Intrauterine pregnancies following laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis. Med J Aust 168:524–525PubMed Yovich J, Chau E (1998) Intrauterine pregnancies following laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis. Med J Aust 168:524–525PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Rouzi AA, Mackinnon M, McComb PF (1995) Predictors of success of reversal of sterilization. Fertil Steril 64:29–36PubMed Rouzi AA, Mackinnon M, McComb PF (1995) Predictors of success of reversal of sterilization. Fertil Steril 64:29–36PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Rock JA, Guzick DS, Katz E, Zacur HA, King TM (1987) Tubal anastomosis: pregnancy success following reversal of Falope ring or monopolar cautery sterilization. Fertil Steril 48:13–17PubMed Rock JA, Guzick DS, Katz E, Zacur HA, King TM (1987) Tubal anastomosis: pregnancy success following reversal of Falope ring or monopolar cautery sterilization. Fertil Steril 48:13–17PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ribeiro SC, Tormena RA, Giribela CG, Izzo CR, Santos NC, Pinotti JA (2004) Laparoscopic tubal anastomosis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 84:142–146PubMedCrossRef Ribeiro SC, Tormena RA, Giribela CG, Izzo CR, Santos NC, Pinotti JA (2004) Laparoscopic tubal anastomosis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 84:142–146PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Cha SH, Lee MH, Kim JH, Lee CN, Yoon TK, Cha KY (2001) Fertility outcome after tubal anastomosis by laparoscopy and laparotomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 8:348–352PubMedCrossRef Cha SH, Lee MH, Kim JH, Lee CN, Yoon TK, Cha KY (2001) Fertility outcome after tubal anastomosis by laparoscopy and laparotomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 8:348–352PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Rodgers AK, Goldberg JM, Hammel JP, Falcone T (2007) Tubal anastomosis by robotic compared with outpatient minilaparotomy. Obstet Gynecol 109:1375–1380PubMedCrossRef Rodgers AK, Goldberg JM, Hammel JP, Falcone T (2007) Tubal anastomosis by robotic compared with outpatient minilaparotomy. Obstet Gynecol 109:1375–1380PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoon TK, Sung HR, Kang HG, Cha SH, Lee CN, Cha KY (1999) Laparoscopic tubal anastomosis: fertility outcome in 202 cases. Fertil Steril 72:1121–1126PubMedCrossRef Yoon TK, Sung HR, Kang HG, Cha SH, Lee CN, Cha KY (1999) Laparoscopic tubal anastomosis: fertility outcome in 202 cases. Fertil Steril 72:1121–1126PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Xue P, Fa YY (1989) Microsurgical reversal of female sterilization. Long-term follow-up of 117 cases. J Reprod Med 34:451–455PubMed Xue P, Fa YY (1989) Microsurgical reversal of female sterilization. Long-term follow-up of 117 cases. J Reprod Med 34:451–455PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim SH, Shin CJ, Kim JG, Moon SY, Lee JY, Chang YS (1997) Microsurgical reversal of tubal sterilization: a report on 1, 118 cases. Fertil Steril 68:865–870PubMedCrossRef Kim SH, Shin CJ, Kim JG, Moon SY, Lee JY, Chang YS (1997) Microsurgical reversal of tubal sterilization: a report on 1, 118 cases. Fertil Steril 68:865–870PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiegerinck MA, Roukema M, van Kessel PH, Mol BW (2005) Sutureless re-anastomosis by laparoscopy versus microsurgical re-anastomosis by laparotomy for sterilization reversal: a matched cohort study. Hum Reprod 20:2355–2358PubMedCrossRef Wiegerinck MA, Roukema M, van Kessel PH, Mol BW (2005) Sutureless re-anastomosis by laparoscopy versus microsurgical re-anastomosis by laparotomy for sterilization reversal: a matched cohort study. Hum Reprod 20:2355–2358PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Dharia Patel SP, Steinkampf MP, Whitten SJ, Malizia BA (2008) Robotic tubal anastomosis: surgical technique and cost effectiveness. Fertil Steril 90:1175–1179PubMedCrossRef Dharia Patel SP, Steinkampf MP, Whitten SJ, Malizia BA (2008) Robotic tubal anastomosis: surgical technique and cost effectiveness. Fertil Steril 90:1175–1179PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Boeckx W, Gordts S, Buysse K, Brosens I (1986) Reversibility after female sterilization. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 93:839–842PubMedCrossRef Boeckx W, Gordts S, Buysse K, Brosens I (1986) Reversibility after female sterilization. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 93:839–842PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat te Velde ER, Boer ME, Looman CW, Habbema JD (1990) Factors influencing success or failure after reversal of sterilization: a multivariate approach. Fertil Steril 54:270–277PubMed te Velde ER, Boer ME, Looman CW, Habbema JD (1990) Factors influencing success or failure after reversal of sterilization: a multivariate approach. Fertil Steril 54:270–277PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Dubuisson JB, Swolin K (1995) Laparoscopic tubal anastomosis (the one stitch technique): preliminary results. Hum Reprod 10:2044–2046PubMed Dubuisson JB, Swolin K (1995) Laparoscopic tubal anastomosis (the one stitch technique): preliminary results. Hum Reprod 10:2044–2046PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Glock JL, Kim AH, Hulka JF, Hunt RB, Trad FS, Brumsted JR (1996) Reproductive outcome after tubal reversal in women 40 years of age or older. Fertil Steril 65:863–865PubMed Glock JL, Kim AH, Hulka JF, Hunt RB, Trad FS, Brumsted JR (1996) Reproductive outcome after tubal reversal in women 40 years of age or older. Fertil Steril 65:863–865PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim J, Kim K, Doo J, Rhyeu C (1997) A report on 387 cases of microsurgical tubal reversals. Fertil Steril 68:875–880PubMedCrossRef Kim J, Kim K, Doo J, Rhyeu C (1997) A report on 387 cases of microsurgical tubal reversals. Fertil Steril 68:875–880PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Slowey MJ, Coddington CC (1998) Microsurgical tubal anastomoses performed as an outpatient procedure by minilaparotomy are less expensive and as safe as those performed as an inpatient procedure. Fertil Steril 69:492–495PubMedCrossRef Slowey MJ, Coddington CC (1998) Microsurgical tubal anastomoses performed as an outpatient procedure by minilaparotomy are less expensive and as safe as those performed as an inpatient procedure. Fertil Steril 69:492–495PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanafi MM (2003) Factors affecting the pregnancy rate after microsurgical reversal of tubal ligation. Fertil Steril 80:434–440PubMedCrossRef Hanafi MM (2003) Factors affecting the pregnancy rate after microsurgical reversal of tubal ligation. Fertil Steril 80:434–440PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Trimbos-Kemper TC (1990) Reversal of sterilization in women over 40 years of age: a multicenter survey in The Netherlands. Fertil Steril 53:575–577PubMed Trimbos-Kemper TC (1990) Reversal of sterilization in women over 40 years of age: a multicenter survey in The Netherlands. Fertil Steril 53:575–577PubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Barjot PJ, Marie G, Von Theobald P (1999) Laparoscopic tubal anastomosis and reversal of sterilization. Hum Reprod 14:1222–1225PubMedCrossRef Barjot PJ, Marie G, Von Theobald P (1999) Laparoscopic tubal anastomosis and reversal of sterilization. Hum Reprod 14:1222–1225PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Bissonnette F, Lapensee L, Bouzayen R (1999) Outpatient laparoscopic tubal anastomosis and subsequent fertility. Fertil Steril 72:549–552PubMedCrossRef Bissonnette F, Lapensee L, Bouzayen R (1999) Outpatient laparoscopic tubal anastomosis and subsequent fertility. Fertil Steril 72:549–552PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Mettler L, Ibrahim M, Lehmann-Willenbrock E, Schmutzler A (2001) Pelviscopic reversal of tubal sterilization with the one- to two-stitch technique. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 8:353–358PubMedCrossRef Mettler L, Ibrahim M, Lehmann-Willenbrock E, Schmutzler A (2001) Pelviscopic reversal of tubal sterilization with the one- to two-stitch technique. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 8:353–358PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Coste J, Bouyer J, Ughetto S et al (2004) Ectopic pregnancy is again on the increase. Recent trends in the incidence of ectopic pregnancies in France (1992–2002). Hum Reprod 19:2014–2018PubMedCrossRef Coste J, Bouyer J, Ughetto S et al (2004) Ectopic pregnancy is again on the increase. Recent trends in the incidence of ectopic pregnancies in France (1992–2002). Hum Reprod 19:2014–2018PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Stadtmauer L, Sauer MV (1997) Reversal of tubal sterilization using laparoscopically placed titanium staples: preliminary experience. Hum Reprod 12:647–649PubMedCrossRef Stadtmauer L, Sauer MV (1997) Reversal of tubal sterilization using laparoscopically placed titanium staples: preliminary experience. Hum Reprod 12:647–649PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Gauwerky JF, Klose RP, Forssmann WG (1993) Fibrin glue for anastomosis of the fallopian tube—morphology. Hum Reprod 8:2108–2114PubMed Gauwerky JF, Klose RP, Forssmann WG (1993) Fibrin glue for anastomosis of the fallopian tube—morphology. Hum Reprod 8:2108–2114PubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldberg JM, Falcone T (2003) Laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis with and without robotic assistance. Hum Reprod 18:145–147PubMedCrossRef Goldberg JM, Falcone T (2003) Laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis with and without robotic assistance. Hum Reprod 18:145–147PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Degueldre M, Vandromme J, Huong PT, Cadiere GB (2000) Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: a feasibility study. Fertil Steril 74:1020–1023PubMedCrossRef Degueldre M, Vandromme J, Huong PT, Cadiere GB (2000) Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: a feasibility study. Fertil Steril 74:1020–1023PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Vlahos NF, Bankowski BJ, King JA, Shiller DA (2007) Laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis using robotics: experience from a teaching institution. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 17:180–185PubMedCrossRef Vlahos NF, Bankowski BJ, King JA, Shiller DA (2007) Laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis using robotics: experience from a teaching institution. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 17:180–185PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Calvert JP (1995) Reversal of female sterilisation. Br J Hosp Med 53:267–270PubMed Calvert JP (1995) Reversal of female sterilisation. Br J Hosp Med 53:267–270PubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramlau-Hansen CH, Thulstrup AM, Nohr EA, Bonde JP, Sorensen TI, Olsen J (2007) Subfecundity in overweight and obese couples. Hum Reprod 22:1634–1637PubMedCrossRef Ramlau-Hansen CH, Thulstrup AM, Nohr EA, Bonde JP, Sorensen TI, Olsen J (2007) Subfecundity in overweight and obese couples. Hum Reprod 22:1634–1637PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Thurmond AS, Brandt KR, Gorrill MJ (1999) Tubal obstruction after ligation reversal surgery: results of catheter recanalization. Radiology 210:747–750PubMed Thurmond AS, Brandt KR, Gorrill MJ (1999) Tubal obstruction after ligation reversal surgery: results of catheter recanalization. Radiology 210:747–750PubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Sitko D, Commenges-Ducos M, Roland P, Papaxanthos-Roche A, Horovitz J, Dallay D (2001) IVF following impossible or failed surgical reversal of tubal sterilization. Hum Reprod 16:683–685PubMedCrossRef Sitko D, Commenges-Ducos M, Roland P, Papaxanthos-Roche A, Horovitz J, Dallay D (2001) IVF following impossible or failed surgical reversal of tubal sterilization. Hum Reprod 16:683–685PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Yossry M, Aboulghar M, D’Angelo A, Gillett W (2006) In vitro fertilisation versus tubal reanastomosis (sterilisation reversal) for subfertility after tubal sterilisation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:4144 Yossry M, Aboulghar M, D’Angelo A, Gillett W (2006) In vitro fertilisation versus tubal reanastomosis (sterilisation reversal) for subfertility after tubal sterilisation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:4144
Metadaten
Titel
Tubal anastomosis after tubal sterilization: a review
verfasst von
Xavier Deffieux
Michèle Morin Surroca
Erika Faivre
Frédérique Pages
Hervé Fernandez
Amélie Gervaise
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Ausgabe 5/2011
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-1858-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2011

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.