Skip to main content
main-content

01.12.2015 | Research article | Ausgabe 1/2015 Open Access

BMC Public Health 1/2015

Tuberculosis treatment delays and associated factors within the Zimbabwe national tuberculosis programme

Zeitschrift:
BMC Public Health > Ausgabe 1/2015
Autoren:
Kudakwashe C Takarinda, Anthony D Harries, Barnet Nyathi, Mkhokheli Ngwenya, Tsitsi Mutasa-Apollo, Charles Sandy
Wichtige Hinweise

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

KT designed the study, collected and analysed data, wrote the first draft and coordinated the writing of the subsequent drafts and the final paper. ADH, TA, CS, and BN contributed to the design of the study and review of all subsequent drafts of the paper. All authors read and approved the final paper.

Background

Tuberculosis remains an infectious disease of public health concern with the World Health Organisation (WHO) declaring it a global public health emergency in 1993 [1]. There has been a global increase in notified TB cases since then from an estimated 7-8 million cases to 9 million cases in 2013 [1]. In sub-Saharan Africa, the resurgence of TB has been attributed mostly to the HIV pandemic, and this has been felt most strongly in the southern part of the continent [2]. Providing treatment with anti-tuberculosis drugs through the directly observed treatment short course (DOTS) has greatly assisted most national tuberculosis control programmes in curing TB, and as a result it is estimated that from 2000 to 2013, 37 million lives have been saved [1]. However, the continued spread of TB can partly be attributed to delayed or undiagnosed TB and this in turn has also been shown to be associated with increased mortality [3].
The severity of disease and the likelihood of a TB infected individual infecting another person is highest in those with microbiologically confirmed pulmonary TB (PTB) in comparison with other types of TB such as smear-negative pulmonary TB and extra-pulmonary TB [4]. Moreover, the high burden of HIV co-infection results in a rapid increase in the number of tuberculosis patients in the community [4]. Zimbabwe has a high burden of TB/HIV co-infection, which was recorded at 69% in 2013 [1]. In 2013 prevalence estimates of TB morbidity (including HIV/TB co-infections) were 409 (235-630) cases per 100,000 population whilst mortality estimates (including HIV/TB deaths) were 153 (121-189) cases per 100,000 population [1].
Given this, early diagnosis and immediate initiation of TB treatment are therefore essential for an effective TB control programme in order to prevent further disease progression at the individual level and transmission within the community. A systematic review of 52 studies on the length of treatment delays by Sreeramareddy et al [5] showed that average patient delays and health system delays were similar (28.7 versus 25 days) and the trend was similar when stratified into low and high income countries. Other systematic reviews by Storla et al [6] and Finnie et al [7] showed varying factors associated with TB treatment delays but both highlighted the importance of how uptake of measures to shorten these delays may reduce infectious cases and improve TB control. In Finnie et al’s [7] systematic review which was specific to sub-Saharan Africa, consulting traditional leaders first and longer travel time were consistently associated with patient health system delays among other factors. In the Zimbabwe National TB programme, there is insufficient knowledge on the extent of total TB treatment delay and whether such delay is mostly attributable to patient delay or health system delay. The aim of this study was therefore to assess the length of patient and health system delays among TB patients in Zimbabwe and their associated risk factors.

Methods

Study design

This was a descriptive cross-sectional study.

Study participants and sampling

We used a two-stage random sampling design. In the first stage, 4 of the country’s 10 provinces were randomly selected, whilst in the second stage, 3 districts were randomly selected in each province. In the third stage, 4 health facilities were randomly selected from all health facilities that registered ≥30 smear-positive PTB cases per month in each district. In total, 47 health facilities were included in the study of which 3 were provincial hospitals, 15 were district/mission hospitals, 10 were urban clinics and 19 were rural primary health care facilities.
All patients aged ≥ 18 years with microbiologically confirmed PTB and who were started on TB treatment and entered in the TB registers from these facilities between 01 January and 31 March 2013 were sequentially recruited in the study after verbal consent. The diagnosis and confirmation of TB was either by sputum-smear microscopy for acid-fast bacilli or GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay. Using Dobson’s formula, a minimum sample size of 260 study participants was required to estimate the proportion with patient delays >30 days given a 95% confidence interval (CI) with a 5% margin of error, based on 83% of patients experiencing patient delay >30 days as derived from a study by Odusanya et al [8] and an 80% response rate.

TB diagnosis under the National TB program

In Zimbabwe, TB treatment services are integrated with general health services at all health facilities in the country. When patients present with TB symptoms at a health facility, they are recorded in the TB suspect register and have their sputum examined by direct smear microscopy looking for acid-fast bacilli with a Ziehl-Neelsen stain. Sputum specimens are sent to TB diagnosing centres for sputum-smear microscopy which are often located at selected primary level health facilities (microscopy centres) and all secondary level health facilities (district or mission hospitals) in each district and all tertiary level (provincial) hospitals at the provincial level. In urban areas, TB diagnosing centres are located at selected municipal polyclinics. Smear-positive PTB cases are those with sputum smears positive for acid-fast bacilli [9]. Recently, Gene Xpert is being recommended as the initial TB diagnosis test among presumptive TB patients who are HIV-infected or who have risk factors for drug-resistant TB although it is not available at all TB diagnosing centres. In patients who are known to be HIV-negative and/or who have no risk factors for DR-TB, sputum smear microscopy remains the diagnostic method of choice. Patients with smear-positive sputum or a positive result from Gene Xpert are classified as having microbiologically confirmed PTB and have their results communicated to their respective health facilities by telephone. Upon receiving this communication, these patients are traced in the community by a village health worker (VHW) or an environmental health technician (EHT).
Once traced, these patients are referred back to their nearest health facility where they are registered in the health facility daily observed treatment (DOT) register and are started on anti-TB treatment. All presumptive and confirmed TB patients are offered HIV counselling and testing (opt-out provider-initiated) and those confirmed HIV-positive are provided with [10] HIV treatment and care in the form of cotrimoxazole preventive therapy (CPT) and antiretroviral therapy (ART), provided there is no contra-indication [11].

Data variables, source of data and data collection

A one-day data collection training exercise was conducted prior to piloting of the questionnaire. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire adapted from WHO [12], and this was administered by selected health workers in the selected health facilities. Variables that were abstracted from TB registers included: date of collection of the sputum specimens, type of TB, name of referring health facility, TB treatment start date, sex and age of the patient. TB registration numbers and TB suspect numbers were collected as patient identifiers in place of patient names. The structured questionnaires were administered to all microbiologically confirmed PTB patients upon commencing TB treatment or during review visits within 1 week of commencing TB treatment. Questionnaires were also translated into the 2 local languages (Shona and Ndebele) for those who were not conversant with English. Informed verbal consent was sought prior to the interview and participants were allowed to withdraw from the interviews whenever they pleased.
Variables collected in the questionnaire about timing and treatment delays included:- date of onset of any TB symptoms, date of first encounter with a health worker and number of visits to a health facility prior to starting treatment. Information on the first encounter with a health worker and the number of visits to the health facility was verified wherever possible by looking through the patient’s case notes and their TB treatment card.

Study definitions

This study focused on total delay which was stratified into patient delay and health care system delay. These terms were defined as follows:

Patient delay

The time period in days between the onset of TB symptoms and the patient’s first contact with a health worker of >30 days [7,13,14]. Contact with a health worker refers to a nurse or medical doctor at a public health facility (which are the only institutions providing TB treatment) and this excludes pharmacists, private practitioners or traditional healers. Onset of TB symptoms was defined as the first experience of any symptoms suggestive of TB (cough, fever, weight loss, haemoptysis, fatigue, night sweats).

Health care system delay

The time period in days between the date of first contact with a health worker and the date of start of TB treatment of >4 days. This is under the assumption that laboratory turn-around times for sputum samples are expected to be less than 72 hours and are coupled with immediate tracing of patients for start of TB treatment for purposes of infection control.

Statistical analysis

Patient data collected in the structured report form were coded and double entered by three independent data entry clerks into EpiData version 3.1 and later cleaned for errors and analysed using STATA, version 12.1 (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas). Data were weighted prior to analysis to account for unequal probabilities of selection and to also account for the clustering effect of the sample design. Patient and health care system delays were first summarised and presented as the median (interquartile range) number of days. Patient delay was then categorised as patient delay >30 days whilst health system delay was categorised as health system delay >4 days and these were used for the univariate analysis. Associations between patient characteristics and both types of delay were determined by the chi-square test or alternatively the Fischer’s Exact test if numbers were small. Logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and their respective 95% confidence intervals for factors associated with patient delay and health system delay. All patient characteristics with p-values < 0.25 or those thought to be biologically plausible were included in both the univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. P-values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Ethics and approval

Ethics approval was obtained locally from the Medical Research Council of Zimbabwe (MRCZ) and also the Ethics Advisory Group (EAG) for the International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (IUATLD).

Results

Patient characteristics

During the 3-month study period, all 383 interviewed patients gave voluntary consent to participate in the survey of whom the majority, 211 (55%) were male (Table 1). Overall median age of study participants was 34 years (IQR, 28-43). Most patients (62%) were recruited upon starting TB treatment from either district or mission hospitals. The majority of these patients, 280 (75%), started TB treatment at TB diagnosing centres were they had also been diagnosed. Tuberculosis diagnosis was mainly by sputum-smear microscopy (95%). Nearly all patients (98%) had been HIV-tested: there were 230 (62%) who were HIV-infected. Most patients (70%) resided in rural areas, unemployment was high (62%) and more than half (55%) had attained secondary school education or higher.
Table 1
Characteristics of tuberculosis patients in Zimbabwe
Characteristics (N = 383)
n
N
Weighted percent (95% CI)
Age in years
   
 18 – 25
53
383
13.9% (10.5-18.2)
 26 – 44
244
383
63.8% (58.3-69.0)
 45 – 54
54
383
14.2% (10.6-18.6)
 ≥55
31
383
8.1 (5.7-11.6)
Sex
   
 Female
172
383
45.0% (39.5-50.6)
 Male
211
383
55.0% (49.4-60.5)
Type of diagnostic test
   
 Sputum microscopy
363
383
94.8% (93.0-96.2)
 Gene Xpert
20
383
5.2% (3.8-7.0)
Type of health facility
   
 Provincial hospital
18
383
4.7% (3.1-6.9)
 District/mission hospital
237
383
61.8% (58.5-64.9)
 Urban municipal
73
383
19.1% (16.7-21.8)
 Rural primary healthcare facility
55
383
14.5% (11.4-18.2)
Diagnosing centre
   
 Same as DOT facility
280
373
75.1% (71.8-78.2)
 Different from DOT facility
93
373
24.9% (21.8-28.3)
 Missing
10
383
2.6%
HIV tested
   
 No
6
376
1.6% (0.8-3.4)
 Yes
370
376
98.4% (96.6-99.2)
 Missing
7
383
1.9%
HIV status
   
 HIV-negative
140
370
37.9% (32.6-43.6)
 HIV-positive
230
370
62.1% (56.4-67.4)
HIV + ve patient on CPT/ART prior to TB treatment
   
 No
72
230
31.2% (25.4-37.6)
 Yes
158
230
68.8 (62.4-74.7)
Staying with anyone currently on TB treatment
   
 No
348
383
90.9% (86.3-95.3)
 Yes
35
383
9.1% (6.3-13.1)
Education
   
 More than secondary
20
382
5.3% (3.3-8.4)
 Secondary
192
382
50.3% (45.0-55.6)
 Primary
145
382
38.0% (33.1-43.1)
 No education
25
382
6.5% (4.2-9.8)
 Missing
1
383
0.4%
Employment status
   
 Formal employment
40
379
10.7% (8.0-14.2)
 Informal employment
105
379
27.6% (23.1-32.6)
 Unemployed
234
379
61.8% (56.7-66.6)
 Missing
4
383
1.0%
Residence
   
 Urban
114
378
30.1% (26.1-34.5)
 Rural
264
378
69.9% (65.6-73.9)
 Missing
5
383
1.3%
History of smoking
   
 Never smoked
269
380
70.7% (65.3-75.5)
 Current smoker
26
380
6.8% (4.3-10.6)
 Quit smoking
86
380
22.5% (18.3-27.4)
 Missing
3
383
0.8%
History of alcohol use
   
 Never
213
373
57.0% (51.4-62.4)
 Current drinker
29
373
7.7% (5.5-10.6)
 Quit alchohol use
132
373
35.3% (30.2-40.9)
 Missing
10
383
2.6%
Previous contact with TB patient
   
 No
210
383
54.8% (48.4-62.1)
 Yes
173
383
45.2% (39.8-50.6)
Marital status
   
 Married
225
380
59.3% (53.6-64.7)
 Single
67
380
17.6% (13.7-22.4)
 Divorced/separated
35
380
9.3% (6.6-12.9)
 Widowed
52
380
13.8% (10.2-18.4)
 Missing
3
383
0.8%
Took self medication from pharmacy
   
 No
335
383
87.5% (84.0-90.3)
 Yes
48
383
12.5% (9.7-16.0)
Took traditional medicine
   
 No
348
383
90.8% (87.3-93.4)
 Yes
35
383
9.2% (6.6-12.7)
Visited a private practitioner
   
 No
354
383
92.4% (89.4-94.7)
 Yes
29
383
7.6% (5.4-10.6)
Health care visits prior to diagnosis
   
 1
173
378
45.6% (40.2-51.1)
 2
121
378
31.9% (26.9-37.3)
 3
40
378
10.5% (7.6-14.4)
 ≥4
45
378
12.0% (9.1-15.7)
 Missing
5
383
1.2%
Time taken to reach health facility
   
 <30 minutes
150
377
39.9% (35.1-44.8)
 30mins - 1 hour
101
377
26.7% (21.9-32.0)
 >1 hour
126
377
33.5% (28.6-38.8)
 Missing
6
383
1.5%
Distance to health facility(in km)
   
 ≤5
122
331
36.8% (32.3-41.6)
 6 – 15
64
331
19.5% (15.4-24.3)
 16 – 30
55
331
16.5% (12.3-21.8)
 ≥30
90
331
27.2% (22.4-32.5)
Missing
52
383
13.7%
Difficulty in accessing transport to health centre
   
 No
322
383
84.2% (78.9-89.5)
 Yes
61
383
15.8% (12.1-20.5)
Ever heard of TB before diagnosis
   
 Yes
43
365
88.1% (83.6-91.5)
 No
322
365
11.9% (8.5-16.4)
 Missing
18
383
4.8%
NB: Percentages may not always add up to 100 because of rounding off error.
DOT = directly observed treatment; HIV = human immunodeficiency virus; CPT = cotrimoxazole preventive therapy; ART = antiretroviral therapy, TB = tuberculosis.

Patient delays and associated factors

There was a median of 28 days for patient delays (IQR, 21-63). Of all recruited study participants, 184 (48%) experienced patient delays >30 days in seeking TB treatment services.
Table 2 shows factors associated with patient delay. In comparison to patients starting TB treatment at district or mission hospitals, those starting treatment at rural primary health facilities were more likely [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.27-5.75, p = 0.01] to experience patient delays. On further analysis, those patients who started TB treatment at rural facilities accessed traditional healers first more than those accessing other types of health facilities although the association was not statistically significant (14.2% vs. 8.4%, p = 0.192). The seeking of treatment first at private practitioners was also similar for both those who were treated at rural facilities and other types of health facilities (7.8% vs. 7.5%, p = 0.937).
Table 2
Factors associated with patient delay in accessing TB treatment services
Characteristic (N = 383)
 
Patient delay > 30 days*
n (%)
OR (95% CI)
Adjusted OR (95% CI)
Age in years
   
 18 – 25
30 (55.8)
Reference
Reference
 26 – 44
122 (50.0)
0.79 (0.41-1.53)
0.55 (0.25-1.19)
 45 – 54
24 (43.9)
0.62 (0.26-1.46)
0.55 (0.21-1.43)
 ≥55
9 (29.4)
0.33 (0.12-0.88)
0.35 (0.10-1.24)
Sex
   
 Female
80 (46.5)
Reference
Reference
 Male
105 (49.7)
1.13 (0.72-1.78)
1.07 (0.59-1.96)
Type of health facility
   
 District/mission hosp
95 (51.2)
Reference
Reference
 Provincial hospital
10 (5.2)
1.77 (0.64-4.86)
1.82 (0.53-6.30)
 Urban municipal clinic
45 (24.6)
2.45 (1.42-4.22)
1.78 (0.88-3.60)
 Rural primary healthcare facility
35 (19.0)
2.61 (1.36-5.01)
2.70 (1.27-5.75)
HIV status
   
 Not tested
2 (40.0)
Reference
Reference
 HIV negative
63 (44.6)
1.21 (0.25-5.81)
1.01 (0.16-6.51)
 HIV positive, not on ART
36 (51.0)
1.56 (0.32-7.66)
1.38 (0.22-8.77)
 HIV positive, on ART/CPT
80 (50.5)
1.53 (0.32-7.30)
1.68 (0.26-10.77)
Staying with anyone currently on TB treatment
   
 No
170 (48.9)
Reference
Reference
 Yes
15 (41.7)
0.75 (0.35-1.61)
0.99 (0.79-1.23)
Education
   
 More than secondary
10 (48.2)
Reference
Reference
 Secondary
101 (52.7)
1.20 (0.43-3.31)
1.40 (0.45-4.37)
 Primary
66 (44.8)
0.87 (0.31-2.45)
1.35 (0.39-4.74)
No education
9 (36.7)
0.62 (0.17-2.29)
1.10 (0.23-5.33)
Employment status
   
 Formal employment
25 (61.2)
Reference
Reference
 Informal employment
54 (51.5)
0.67 (0.33-1.39)
0.92 (0.37-2.27)
 Unemployed
104 (44.3)
0.50 (0.26-1.00)
0.74 (0.30-1.85)
Residence
   
 Urban
60 (52.8)
Reference
Reference
 Rural
119 (46.2)
0.82 (0.53-1.26)
1.04 (0.80-1.33)
History of smoking
   
 Never
131 (48.8)
Reference
Reference
 Current smoker
10 (36.8)
0.61 (0.24-1.57)
0.59 (0.20-1.78)
 Quit smoking
43 (50.3)
1.06 (0.63-1.80)
0.75 (0.35-1.62)
History of alcohol use
   
 Never
98 (46.2)
Reference
Reference
 Current drinker
12 (43.0)
0.88 (0.40-1.91)
1.19 (0.39-3.57)
 Quit alcohol use
69 (52.3)
1.28 (0.78-2.08)
1.26 (0.61-2.64)
Previous contact with TB patient
   
 No
100 (47.8)
Reference
Reference
 Yes
84 (48.8)
1.03 (0.66-1.59)
0.96 (0.79-1.16)
Took traditional medicine
   
 No
163 (46.8)
Reference
Reference
 Yes
22 (62.4)
1.88 (0.84-4.20)
1.80 (0.76-4.28)
Took self-medication from pharmacy
   
 No
140 (44.5)
Reference
Reference
 Yes
45 (65.4)
2.35 (1.35-4.11)
2.33 (1.23-4.43)
First consulted private practitioner
   
 No
166 (46.9)
Reference
Reference
 Yes
19 (65.3)
2.14 (0.95-4.81)
1.47 (0.56-3.87)
Time taken to reach health facility
   
 <30 minutes
89 (59.3)
Reference
Reference
 30mins - 1 hour
40 (39.9)
0.45 (0.26-0.81)
0.43 (0.22-0.83)
 >1 hour
54 (42.5)
0.51 (0.31-0.82)
0.47 (0.24-0.94)
Distance to health facility (in km)
   
 ≤5
66 (54.1)
Reference
Reference
 6 – 15
28 (43.8)
0.66 (0.36-1.21)
1.14 (0.52-2.47)
 16 – 30
27 (50.1)
0.85 (0.41-1.76)
1.85 (0.79-4.37)
 ≥30
39 (43.0)
0.64 (0.35-1.18)
1.39 (0.60-3.23)
Difficulty in accessing transport to health centre
   
 No
150 (46.6)
Reference
Reference
 Yes
35 (57.3)
1.51 (0.80-2.85)
0.66 (0.40-1.08)
Ever heard of TB before diagnosis?
   
 No
18 (40.4)
Reference
Reference
 Yes
156 (48.7)
1.40 (0.63-3.13)
1.16 (0.97-1.40)
Total
184 (48.3)
-
-
*Patient delay was defined as a period >30 days from onset of any TB symptom to date of first encounter with health worker.
HIV = human immunodeficiency virus; CPT = cotrimoxazole preventive therapy; ART = antiretroviral therapy; TB = tuberculosis; VCT = voluntary counseling and testing; OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval.
The likelihood of patient delays was higher for those who took self medication when experiencing cough symptoms [aOR 2.33, 95% CI 1.23-4.43, p = 0.01]. Those taking between 30 minutes to an hour to reach their DOT facility [aOR 0.43, 95% CI 0.22-0.83, p = 0.013] and >1 hour [aOR 0.47, 95% CI 0.24-0.94, p = 0.032] were both less likely to experience patient delays when compared to those reaching the DOT facility in less than 30 minutes.

Health system delays and associated factors

There was a median of 2 days for health system delays (IQR, 1-5). There were only 118 (31%) of all study participants who encountered health system delays >4 days. Table 3 shows factors associated with health system delay >4 days. Health system delays were higher among those 26-44 years old [aOR 3.30, 95% CI 1.16-9.37, p = 0.025] and aged 45-54 years [aOR 3.57, 95% CI 1.09-11.72, p = 0.036]. Being male and having TB diagnosis done using GeneXpert were also associated with less odds of health system delays i.e. [aOR 0.47, 95% CI 0.23-0.96, p = 0.038] and [aOR 0.21, 95% CI 0.07-0.66, p = 0.008] respectively. All those who had a GeneXpert test done were HIV-infected individuals.
Table 3
Factors associated with Health system delays in accessing TB treatment services
Characteristic (N = 383)
 
Health system delay > 4 days*
 
n (%)
OR (95% CI)
Adjusted OR (95% CI)
Age in years
   
 18 – 25
9 (17.3)
Reference
Reference
 26 – 44
84 (34.4)
2.51 (1.08-5.84)
3.30 (1.16-9.37)
 45 – 54
18 (32.4)
2.30 (0.85-6.22)
3.57 (1.09-11.72)
 ≥55
7 (20.9)
1.26 (0.38-4.18)
2.66 (0.61-11.57)
Type of diagnostic test
   
 Direct smear microscopy
110 (30.4)
Reference
Reference
 Gene Xpert
7 (35.6)
1.27 (0.56-2.85)
0.21 (0.07-0.66)
Sex
   
 Female
61 (35.6)
Reference
Reference
 Male
56 (26.6)
0.66 (0.41-1.06)
0.47 (0.23-0.96)
Type of health facility
   
 District/mission hospital
48 (20.5)
Reference
Reference
 Provincial hospital
12 (64.6)
7.08 (2.81-17.88)
14.15 (4.58-43.69)
 Urban municipal
37 (50.1)
3.89 (2.21-6.86)
6.9 (2.41-19.82)
 Rural primary healthcare facility
21 (37.6)
2.33 (1.19-4.58)
2.67 (1.18-6.07)
TB Diagnosing centre on site
   
 Yes
71 (25.5)
Reference
Reference
 No
43 (45.8)
2.48 (1.53-4.02)
1.41 (0.59-3.36)
HIV status
   
 Not tested
2 (33.5)
Reference
Reference
 HIV-negative
38 (27.0)
0.73 (0.13-4.11)
0.72 (0.06-8.97)
 HIV-positive, not yet on ART
20 (28.0)
0.77 (0.13-4.52)
0.70 (0.06-8.99)
 HIV-positive, on ART/CPT
55 (34.5)
1.04 (0.19-5.78)
1.37 (0.11-17.04)
Residence
   
 Urban
43 (37.6)
Reference
Reference
 Rural
74 (27.9)
0.81 (0.54-1.22)
0.95 (0.71-1.29)
History of smoking
   
 Never
80 (29.9)
Reference
Reference
 Current smoker
7 (25.1)
0.79 (0.29-2.14)
1.58 (0.45-5.63)
 Quit smoking
29 (34.2)
1.22 (0.70-2.12)
0.86 (0.39-1.89)
History of alcohol use
   
 Never
64 (30.1)
Reference
Reference
 Current drinker
5 (18.6)
0.53 (0.20-1.37)
0.40 (0.11-1.42)
 Quit alcohol use
46 (34.7)
1.23 (0.74-2.05)
1.50 (0.69-3.26)
Took traditional medicine
   
 No
109 (31.3)
Reference
Reference
 Yes
9 (24.6)
0.72 (0.31-1.65)
0.66 (0.28-1.57)
Took self-medication from pharmacy
   
 No
98 (29.2)
Reference
Reference
 Yes
20 (41.3)
1.71 (0.90-3.23)
1.68 (0.72-3.93)
Health care visits prior to diagnosis
   
 1
46 (26.8)
Reference
Reference
 2
40 (33.5)
1.38 (0.79-2.41)
1.82 (0.93-3.53)
 3
10 (25.2)
0.92 (0.39-2.15)
0.99 (0.33-2.96)
 ≥4
20 (43.9)
2.14 (1.06-4.34)
2.24 (1.02-4.94)
Time taken to reach health facility
   
 <30 minutes
52 (34.3)
Reference
Reference
 30mins - 1 hour
33 (33.1)
0.95 (0.52-1.71)
1.38 (0.65-2.93)
 >1 hour
32 (25.4)
0.65 (0.37-1.15)
1.03 (0.46-2.27)
Distance to health facility (in km)
   
 ≤5
44 (36.4)
Reference
Reference
 6 – 15
17 (26.7)
0.64 (0.32-1.27)
0.78 (0.32-1.88)
 16 – 30
18 (32.9)
0.86 (0.41-1.78)
1.84 (0.68-4.98)
 ≥30
15 (16.5)
0.35 (0.16-0.75)
0.51 (0.20-1.29)
Difficulty in accessing transport to health centre
   
 No
21 (32.6)
Reference
Reference
 Yes
96 (30.3)
1.14 (0.60-2.19)
1.00 (0.64-1.57)
Total
118 (30.7)
-
-
*Health system delay was defined as a period >4 days from first encounter with health worker to date of starting TB treatment.
DOT = directly observed treatment; HIV = human immunodeficiency virus; CPT = cotrimoxazole preventive therapy; ART = antiretroviral therapy; TB = tuberculosis, VCT = voluntary counseling and testing.
In addition, the odds of health system delays were higher when starting treatment at urban municipal clinics [aOR 6.9, 95% CI 2.41-19.82, p = 0.03] and rural clinics [aOR 2.67, 95% CI 1.18-6.07, p = 0.019] although these delays were not significantly higher for those accessing treatment from non-TB diagnosing facilities after multivariate analysis. Lastly, there were higher odds of health system delays associated with encountering ≥4 health care visits in comparison to one healthcare visit prior to starting TB treatment [aOR 2.24, 95% CI 1.02-4.94, p = 0.045]. Further stratification of those with ≥4 healthcare visits by type of health-worker seen among those experiencing health system delays showed that 8 (42%) had seen different health workers in the same facility and 11 (58%) had seen different health workers in different health facilities.

Total delays

Total delay among all recruited study participants was a median of 36 days (IQR, 23-68). Figure 1 shows the distribution of total delays in weeks.

Discussion

In this study, we assessed the extent of both patient and health system delays in accessing TB treatment within public health facilities under the Zimbabwe National Tuberculosis Programme. The median patient delay was 28 days and this is similar to findings from other African countries such as Ghana [15] and South Africa [16] and slightly lower than reported findings from other low income countries as reported in a systematic review by Sreeramareddy et al [5]. The taking of self-medication for TB-related symptoms, as has been found in other studies [17,18], was associated with patient delay, although in general this practice was uncommon amongst this patient population. Also uptake of traditional medicine was not significantly associated with patient or health system delays and assuming there was no under-reporting, this practice was uncommon despite the fact that more than two thirds of study participants resided in a rural setting. This finding differs from findings from a meta-analysis by Finnie et al [7] of other sub-Saharan African countries where taking of traditional medicine was consistently found to be associated with patient delays.
Patients who started TB treatment at rural primary healthcare facilities were more likely to experience patient delays when compared to those who started at district or mission hospitals. Literature from other countries also indicates that an initial visit to a government low-level health care facility [19-21] and rural residence [14,16,22] are both associated with increased patient delays in seeking TB treatment services. Whilst the majority of our study participants were rural patients, distance to a DOT facility was not associated with patient delay and in fact those taking a longer time to reach a DOT facility were less likely to experience patient delays. The reasons for this finding are not clear as other studies have found that long distances to health facilities [7] and absence of transport have contributed to poor and delayed uptake of HIV care and treatment in co-infected patients [23].
It is likely that the patient delays among those with shorter travel time to a health facility and accessing treatment at lower-level health facilities are attributed to these patients being less health conscious and seeking treatment late in comparison to those who are more health conscious who seek services sooner at higher-level hospitals even though they may be further away. Zimbabwe has a four-tiered referral health system and district/mission hospitals which are at the second level may be preferable to patients since they manage referral cases not managed at primary care facilities which are at the first level, as they have a staff complement of medical doctors in addition to nursing staff. They also provide specialized services to periphery first-level health facilities within their district such as laboratory services and ART initiation prior to decentralization of ART initiations to lower-level health facilities. These district/mission hospitals are also centrally located within the district and therefore usually better resourced and managed and generally further away from patients in comparison to primary facilities, particularly in rural settings.
Contrary to other published studies, gender [24], education level [13] and old age [25,26] were not associated with patient delays. In our study, HIV status showed no association with patient or health system delays, as has been found elsewhere [16,27].
In this study, the greater proportion of delay in seeking TB treatment was a result of patient-related factors rather than health system factors, a finding that is similar to that of other countries [8,17,28,29]. The median health system delay was just 2 days, which is low in comparison to findings from other studies done in both intermediate [30,31] and high-burden TB [14,16,19] settings. This encouraging finding highlights the efficiency within the national TB programme of processes that exist from sputum collection to sputum examination to diagnosis and the return of results to the health worker and eventual transmission of information to the patient which is followed by the initiation of the patient on anti-TB treatment among microbiologically confirmed PTB cases.
Of note were the higher health system delays among those receiving treatment at lower-level health facilities and those with four or more health facility visits prior to starting TB treatment. Primary health-care facilities usually do not have TB diagnosing facilities on site and therefore refer sputum samples to TB diagnosing centres at second-level health facilities thereby increasing sputum turnaround times, especially in rural settings. Whilst sputum transportation using motorbikes has been established in some districts ranging from 2-day to 1-week intervals, it remains ad-hoc in some places and this needs improvement. In Zimbabwe, Gene Xpert which is a more accurate and rapid diagnostic test [32], has recently been recommended [33] and piloted as the initial diagnostic test for HIV-infected persons in addition to those with drug resistant TB risk factors as recommended by WHO [34]. This explains why fewer health system delays were noted for those HIV-infected patients with TB diagnosed using the Gene Xpert MTB/RIF assay compared to the conventional smear microscopy.
Those who had four or more visits had either seen different health workers in the same facility or different health workers in different health facilities and this finding may highlight an important barrier to early diagnosis and treatment of TB, especially among mobile populations where each consecutive visit to a different health care worker may be like a first time visit if the hospital or patient records are not properly scrutinised. This calls for an important need to strengthen TB case diagnosis and management trainings among health workers to ensure that information about investigations and management is effectively passed on from one health care worker to another. In general, however, the majority of patients (78%) had visited the health facility ≤ 2 times before the diagnosis of TB was made, and this does suggest that the awareness and knowledge of TB is high among health workers in a high HIV-TB burden country like Zimbabwe. This high awareness may relate to the high burden of disease in Zimbabwe: in 2008 alone, TB cases contributed 30% of all chronic out-patient disease conditions [35].
Unlike other studies done in urban settings [13,36,37] our study includes a heterogenous population of TB patients in Zimbabwe coming from different levels of the healthcare system, from different regions and with a rural and urban mix, and therefore is representative of the overall TB programme in Zimbabwe. Limitations of our study include a possibility of recall bias of past events among respondents relating to when they first encountered TB symptoms. Health system delays may have shortened during the time of the survey since the structured questionnaires were administered by health workers from the selected health facilities. Our study could have failed to capture information on confirmed TB cases that were started on TB treatment but were not registered as shown in a study conducted in one province of Zimbabwe in which 43% of treated TB cases were not registered [38].
There is also a possibility that our patient sample excluded vital information on those patients who may have been suspected of TB or diagnosed of TB in the private sector but did not go to public health facilities despite being referred. This is given the background that in Zimbabwe, TB treatment services are only offered in public health facilities hence those that are suspected of TB or diagnosed with TB in private health care facilities are referred to public health facilities which could either be missionary, local authority or government health facilities.

Conclusion

This study has assessed the extent of TB treatment delays in a country with a high HIV-TB burden, an important issue that relates to individual patient outcomes and TB transmission in the community. Patient delays were found to be moderately high, suggesting the need for increased advocacy, communication and social mobilization efforts targeted at informing the general population to seek health services early when they experience symptoms suggestive of TB. There is also need for engagement and training of pharmacy staff so that they can accurately identify people with TB-like symptoms and effectively explain to them that TB diagnosis and treatment are offered for free at public health institutions. A programme of this nature has been piloted in Cambodia and has shown positive results [39].
On the other hand, health system delays were not common, suggesting an efficient TB programme. Better understanding about why some patients have repeated visits to health facilities is needed. We also recommend more qualitative studies to elicit patient responses on why patient delays were associated with access to rural primary health facilities and also why health system delays where linked to older age and being female. Whilst our study findings are generalizable to those patients with microbiologically confirmed PTB, they are not representative of the HIV patient population which largely has smear negative TB and among whom delays are likely to be much more complex, longer, and more difficult to address. Hence a study specific to this population is also necessary.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Ministry of Health & Child Care and the AIDS & TB Unit for their support and for granting us the authority to conduct the study. Funding for the study was obtained from the USAID funded project TB CARE I Zimbabwe, while technical support was provided through the International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. KT is supported as an operational research fellow from the Centre for Operational Research at The Union, Paris, France.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

KT designed the study, collected and analysed data, wrote the first draft and coordinated the writing of the subsequent drafts and the final paper. ADH, TA, CS, and BN contributed to the design of the study and review of all subsequent drafts of the paper. All authors read and approved the final paper.
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2015

BMC Public Health 1/2015 Zur Ausgabe