Background
Breast cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer death among women worldwide. The increase in incidence and mortality rates of breast cancer in China over the last couple of decades is particularly significant [
1]. Clinical parameters, such as the size of the primary tumor, the histological grade, and regional lymph node involvement, are generally useful for prognosis prediction. However, the profile of molecular markers may provide valuable insights into the underlying mechanisms of disease progression, thus aiding the intervention strategies. In light of the racial disparities of breast cancer incidences and prognoses documented in the literature, it is important to identify and validate specific biomarkers for Chinese breast cancer patients. To this end, estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR), and oncogene Her-2/neu have been shown to be useful markers of breast cancer [
2,
3].
Breast cancer mortality derives overwhelmingly from invasion and metastasis, a process that requires continuous and extensive remodeling of tumor stroma. Epithelial basement membrane and extracellular matrix (ECM) are composed of tough network of fibrillar ECM proteins that can be directly degraded only by divalent cation-dependent matrix metalloproteinses (MMPs). Not surprisingly, experimental evidence supports a critical role of MMPs, such as MMP-2 and MMP-9, in the invasion and metastasis of breast cancer [
4]. MMP-13, also named collagenase-3, is another MMP that is implicated in the degradation of ECM [
5,
6]. Recent studies further suggest that MMP-13 may play a central role in the extracellular MMP activation cascade [
7,
8]. It has been reported that overexpression of MMP-13 in several types of malignancy [
9‐
17] is associated with shorter overall patient survival [
16,
18,
19]. Consistently, functional evidence demonstrates that MMP-13 increases the invasive capacities of the malignant cells [
20‐
24]. However, the clinical utility of MMP-13 as a breast cancer marker remains controversial. While several studies conclude that MMP-13 is produced by tumor stromal fibroblast-like cells [
5], others claim that MMP-13 is synthesized predominantly by tumor cells [
25]. For example, Balduyck, et al, demonstrated that MMP-13 was expressed in more invasive breast carcinoma cells [
21]. Nielsen and colleagues showed that MMP-13 was expressed in myofibroblasts [
25,
26].
The goal of current study was to evaluate the prognostic value of MMP-13 expression level and its tissue distribution pattern in a large cohort of human breast cancer patients. Our evidence demonstrates that increased tumor-derived MMP-13 expression independently predicts poor prognoses. Furthermore, the combination of MMP-3 with other clinicopathological parameters and/or other breast cancer biomarkers may be particularly useful.
Discussion
Predicting patients' prognoses is clearly one the most challenging issues in breast cancer management. Racial, geographical and dietary factors have all been considered for their impact on breast cancer incidence and survival. However, at the histopathological level, breast cancer is a highly heterogeneous disease, hampering prognosis prediction. Histological grading, as shown by others and data in this paper, is not a reliable prognostic predictor. Hormone receptors (ER and PR) and Her-2/neu have been used as biomarkers with certain degree of success. In the current study, we examined a cohort of 263 Chinese breast cancer specimens and report that MMP-13 correlated with more aggressive breast cancer. Our data suggest that MMP13 may serve as a marker for poor prognosis. To our knowledge, this is the first IHC study to investigate the potential utility of MMP-13 as a biomarker of breast cancer among Chinese patients.
Our data support the earlier notion that MMP-13 marks the transition of ductal carcinoma
in situ to invasive carcinoma [
25] and increases the invasiveness of breast cancer cells
in vitro [
21]. The biological activity of MMP-13 in tumor progression may not be limited to breast cancer. For instance, Culhaci N et al., showed a significant correlation of MMP-13 with the aggressiveness of head and neck squamous carcinomas [
20].
Although tumor cells pass through multiple tissue barriers to metastasize, increasing evidence demonstrates a critical role of stromal cells in tumor microenvironments [
32,
33]. Vizoso FJ noted that MMP-13 in fibroblastic cells and mononuclear immune cells was associated with increased risk of metastases [
34]. Interestingly, others have reported that MMP-13 protein was restricted to small stromal foci within the tumor masses and was specifically produced by invading tumor cells [
25]. In this study, we found MMP-13 protein in the cytoplasm of both cancer cells and tumor-adjacent fibroblasts. The expression of MMP-13 in cancer cells correlates with the MMP-13 expression in the peritumoral fibroblasts. Furthermore, high levels of MMP-13 in cancer/peritumoral fibroblast cells correlate with tumor infiltration of lymph nodes. While this finding suggests that MMP-13 is likely to play a role in promoting tumor invasion and metastasis, further studies are needed to clarify whether the MMP-13 protein was expressed by both cancer cells and fibroblasts or by tumor cells alone.
The two types of most widely accepted prognostic biomarkers for breast cancer are hormone receptor (ER and/or PR) and oncoprotein Her-2/neu. ER is used to predict not only the response to endocrine therapy but also better overall survival. In contrast, Her-2/neu predicts more aggressive tumor phenotype, poor disease-free survival and poor OS [
26,
27]. High levels of MMP-13 in cancer cells correlated with the expression of the Her-2/neu protein. Recently, Ocharoenrat et al. reported similar results in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma specimens [
35]. Currently, it is not known whether MMP-13 is regulated by Her-2/neu. To this end, it is important to note that MMP-13 seems to be of prognostic value even for the Her-2/neu positive subset of cases, suggesting a Her-2/neu-indepdent function of MMP-13 in promoting breast cancer progression.
The correlation of MMP-13 with poor OS and tumor infiltration of lymph nodes suggests that it may promote tumor invasion. Since MMP-13 is a metalloproteinase, it may act in a similar manner as other MMPs, such as MMP-2, MMP-9. In fact, both MMP-2 and MMP-9 have been extensively studied as biomakers and as well as therapeutic targets in breast cancer [
36‐
39]. Interestingly, MMP-13 in both cancer cells and peritumoral fibroblast cells showed no correlation with either MMP-2 or MMP-9. Instead, we noted that MMP-13, both in cancer cells and peritumoral fibroblast cells, correlated with TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 (to a lesser extent). Thus, MMP-13 may be independent of MMP-2 and MMP-9 as a marker and as a regulator of breast tumor progression. The intricate interactions between MMPs and TIMPs are likely to be complex. Indeed, in contrast to the initial simple biochemistry-based hypothesis, TIMP-1 is viewed as a promising marker to predict poor prognoses of human breast cancer [
40‐
42]. The recent discovery of proteolysis-independent biological functions of TIMPs, such as the growth-stimulating, anti-apoptotic and pro-angiogenic properties, provided new insights into this paradox [
40‐
42]. Further studies are needed to clarify whether MMP-13 and TIMPs act as cognate partners or independently.
Conclusion
This IHC study of TMA with 263 specimens of Chinese breast cancer provided the first evidence that MMP-13 is highly expressed by both the tumor cells and adjacent fibroblast cells. High levels of MMP-13 in these two tissue compartments were strongly correlated with each other, and further correlated with Her-2/neu, TIMP-1, lymph node metastasis and decreased overall survival. Our study suggests a potential application of MMP-13 as an independent biomarker for breast cancer prognosis.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
ZB, CXC and ZF participated in the design of the study, optimized and carried out the immunohistochemical staining, performed the statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript. LHT and NLS collected the human tissue. LYX and CWF evaluated the results of immunohistochemical staining. ZSW and SBC prepared tumor tissue arrays block. FL and NY classified the invasive carcinomas. HXS and NRF participated in the design and the coordination of the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.