Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology 3/2020

23.05.2019 | Original Article

Tumour architecture, grade and location remain predictors of non-organ-confined upper tract urothelial carcinoma at time of radical nephroureterectomy: results from a multicenter Norwegian external validation study

verfasst von: Bjarte Almås, Stein Øverby, Ole J. Halvorsen, Lars A. R. Reisæter, Jørg Assmus, Birgitte Carlsen, Anders Loe, Christian Beisland

Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology | Ausgabe 3/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Selecting patients for intensified treatment for upper tract urothelial carcinoma can be challenging, partly due to the lack of accurate preoperative staging tools. Several preoperative staging models for upper tract urothelial carcinoma have been presented, but none have been externally validated. The aim of the current study was to perform an external validation of the Margulis nomogram for predicting non-organ-confined upper tract urothelial carcinoma at time of nephroureterectomy.

Methods

209 patients from two high-volume centres in Norway were treated with radical nephroureterectomy during the period 2005–2017. 163 patients with complete data necessary for external validation of the Margulis nomogram were included in the study. All relevant covariates were analysed with uni- and multivariate regression analysis to assess their ability to predict non-organ-confined disease. The Margulis nomogram was applied on the present cohort to calculate predicted risk of non-organ-confined disease. This was compared to the observed risk to assess model calibration. The Margulis nomogram accuracy was measured as the area under the curve in a receiver operator characteristics curve to evaluate model discrimination.

Results

Tumour grade (OR 28.1, p = 0.001) and architecture (OR 4.72, p < 0.001) were independent predictors of non-organ-confined disease. There was a high concordance between predicted and observed risk quantified with a Cronbach alpha of 0.96. The Margulis nomogram had an area under the curve of 0.83 in predicting non-organ-confined disease when applied on the current cohort.

Conclusions

We consider the Margulis nomogram validated for clinical use.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Larsen IK (2017) Cancer in Norway 2017—cancer incidence, mortality, survival and prevalence in Norway. Norwegian Cancer registry, Oslo, pp 40–42 Larsen IK (2017) Cancer in Norway 2017—cancer incidence, mortality, survival and prevalence in Norway. Norwegian Cancer registry, Oslo, pp 40–42
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Stewart GD, Bariol SV, Grigor KM, Tolley DA, McNeill SA (2005) A comparison of the pathology of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder and upper urinary tract. BJU Int 95:791–793CrossRef Stewart GD, Bariol SV, Grigor KM, Tolley DA, McNeill SA (2005) A comparison of the pathology of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder and upper urinary tract. BJU Int 95:791–793CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Roupret M, Babjuk M, Comperat E et al (2018) European association of urology guidelines on upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: 2017 update. Eur Urol 73:111–122CrossRef Roupret M, Babjuk M, Comperat E et al (2018) European association of urology guidelines on upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: 2017 update. Eur Urol 73:111–122CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Margulis V, Shariat SF, Matin SF et al (2009) Outcomes of radical nephroureterectomy: a series from the upper tract urothelial carcinoma collaboration. Cancer 115:1224–1233CrossRef Margulis V, Shariat SF, Matin SF et al (2009) Outcomes of radical nephroureterectomy: a series from the upper tract urothelial carcinoma collaboration. Cancer 115:1224–1233CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Abouassaly R, Alibhai SM, Shah N, Timilshina N, Fleshner N, Finelli A (2010) Troubling outcomes from population-level analysis of surgery for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Urology 76:895–901CrossRef Abouassaly R, Alibhai SM, Shah N, Timilshina N, Fleshner N, Finelli A (2010) Troubling outcomes from population-level analysis of surgery for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Urology 76:895–901CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Seisen T, Krasnow RE, Bellmunt J et al (2017) Effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy after radical nephroureterectomy for locally advanced and/or positive regional lymph node upper tract urothelial carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 35:852–860CrossRef Seisen T, Krasnow RE, Bellmunt J et al (2017) Effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy after radical nephroureterectomy for locally advanced and/or positive regional lymph node upper tract urothelial carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 35:852–860CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujita K, Taneishi K, Inamoto T et al (2017) Adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival of patients with high-risk upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis. BMC Urol 17:110CrossRef Fujita K, Taneishi K, Inamoto T et al (2017) Adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival of patients with high-risk upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis. BMC Urol 17:110CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Birtle AJ, Chester JD, Jones RJ et al (2018) Results of POUT: a phase III randomised trial of perioperative chemotherapy versus surveillance in upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC). J Clin Oncol 36:407CrossRef Birtle AJ, Chester JD, Jones RJ et al (2018) Results of POUT: a phase III randomised trial of perioperative chemotherapy versus surveillance in upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC). J Clin Oncol 36:407CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Leow JJ, Martin-Doyle W, Fay AP, Choueiri TK, Chang SL, Bellmunt J (2014) A systematic review and meta-analysis of adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Eur Urol 66:529–541CrossRef Leow JJ, Martin-Doyle W, Fay AP, Choueiri TK, Chang SL, Bellmunt J (2014) A systematic review and meta-analysis of adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Eur Urol 66:529–541CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Matin SF, Margulis V, Kamat A et al (2010) Incidence of downstaging and complete remission after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk upper tract transitional cell carcinoma. Cancer 116:3127–3134CrossRef Matin SF, Margulis V, Kamat A et al (2010) Incidence of downstaging and complete remission after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk upper tract transitional cell carcinoma. Cancer 116:3127–3134CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Seisen T, Shariat SF, Cussenot O et al (2017) Contemporary role of lymph node dissection at the time of radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. World J Urol 35:535–548CrossRef Seisen T, Shariat SF, Cussenot O et al (2017) Contemporary role of lymph node dissection at the time of radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. World J Urol 35:535–548CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kondo T, Takagi T, Tanabe K (2015) Therapeutic role of template-based lymphadenectomy in urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract. World J Clin Oncol 6:237–251CrossRef Kondo T, Takagi T, Tanabe K (2015) Therapeutic role of template-based lymphadenectomy in urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract. World J Clin Oncol 6:237–251CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Roscigno M, Brausi M, Heidenreich A et al (2011) Lymphadenectomy at the time of nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial cancer. Eur Urol 60:776–783CrossRef Roscigno M, Brausi M, Heidenreich A et al (2011) Lymphadenectomy at the time of nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial cancer. Eur Urol 60:776–783CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Inokuchi J, Kuroiwa K, Kakehi Y et al (2017) Role of lymph node dissection during radical nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial cancer: multi-institutional large retrospective study JCOG1110A. World J Urol 35:1737–1744CrossRef Inokuchi J, Kuroiwa K, Kakehi Y et al (2017) Role of lymph node dissection during radical nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial cancer: multi-institutional large retrospective study JCOG1110A. World J Urol 35:1737–1744CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Favaretto RL, Shariat SF, Savage C et al (2012) Combining imaging and ureteroscopy variables in a preoperative multivariable model for prediction of muscle-invasive and non-organ confined disease in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma. BJU Int 109:77–82CrossRef Favaretto RL, Shariat SF, Savage C et al (2012) Combining imaging and ureteroscopy variables in a preoperative multivariable model for prediction of muscle-invasive and non-organ confined disease in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma. BJU Int 109:77–82CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Brien JC, Shariat SF, Herman MP et al (2010) Preoperative hydronephrosis, ureteroscopic biopsy grade and urinary cytology can improve prediction of advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma. J Urol 184:69–73CrossRef Brien JC, Shariat SF, Herman MP et al (2010) Preoperative hydronephrosis, ureteroscopic biopsy grade and urinary cytology can improve prediction of advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma. J Urol 184:69–73CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Margulis V, Youssef RF, Karakiewicz PI et al (2010) Preoperative multivariable prognostic model for prediction of nonorgan confined urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract. J Urol 184:453–458CrossRef Margulis V, Youssef RF, Karakiewicz PI et al (2010) Preoperative multivariable prognostic model for prediction of nonorgan confined urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract. J Urol 184:453–458CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen XP, Xiong GY, Li XS et al (2013) Predictive factors for worse pathological outcomes of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: experience from a nationwide high-volume centre in China. BJU Int 112:917–924PubMed Chen XP, Xiong GY, Li XS et al (2013) Predictive factors for worse pathological outcomes of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: experience from a nationwide high-volume centre in China. BJU Int 112:917–924PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Royston P, Altman DG (2013) External validation of a Cox prognostic model: principles and methods. BMC Med Res Methodol 13:33CrossRef Royston P, Altman DG (2013) External validation of a Cox prognostic model: principles and methods. BMC Med Res Methodol 13:33CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Fritsche HM, Novara G, Burger M et al (2012) Macroscopic sessile tumor architecture is a pathologic feature of biologically aggressive upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol 30:666–672CrossRef Fritsche HM, Novara G, Burger M et al (2012) Macroscopic sessile tumor architecture is a pathologic feature of biologically aggressive upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol 30:666–672CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Eble JN, Sauter G, Epstein JI (2004) Pathology & genetics of tumors of the urinary system and male genital organs. IARC Press, Lyon Eble JN, Sauter G, Epstein JI (2004) Pathology & genetics of tumors of the urinary system and male genital organs. IARC Press, Lyon
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Brierly JD, Gospodarowicz M, Wittekind C (2017) TNM classification of malignant tumors, 8th edn. Wiley Blackwell, Oxford Brierly JD, Gospodarowicz M, Wittekind C (2017) TNM classification of malignant tumors, 8th edn. Wiley Blackwell, Oxford
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Altman DG, Vergouwe Y, Royston P, Moons KG (2009) Prognosis and prognostic research: validating a prognostic model. BMJ 338:b605CrossRef Altman DG, Vergouwe Y, Royston P, Moons KG (2009) Prognosis and prognostic research: validating a prognostic model. BMJ 338:b605CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Messer J, Shariat SF, Brien JC et al (2011) Urinary cytology has a poor performance for predicting invasive or high-grade upper-tract urothelial carcinoma. BJU Int 108:701–705PubMed Messer J, Shariat SF, Brien JC et al (2011) Urinary cytology has a poor performance for predicting invasive or high-grade upper-tract urothelial carcinoma. BJU Int 108:701–705PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith AK, Stephenson AJ, Lane BR et al (2011) Inadequacy of biopsy for diagnosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: implications for conservative management. Urology 78:82–86CrossRef Smith AK, Stephenson AJ, Lane BR et al (2011) Inadequacy of biopsy for diagnosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: implications for conservative management. Urology 78:82–86CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Mbeutcha A, Roupret M, Kamat AM et al (2017) Prognostic factors and predictive tools for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review. World J Urol 35:337–353CrossRef Mbeutcha A, Roupret M, Kamat AM et al (2017) Prognostic factors and predictive tools for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review. World J Urol 35:337–353CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Tumour architecture, grade and location remain predictors of non-organ-confined upper tract urothelial carcinoma at time of radical nephroureterectomy: results from a multicenter Norwegian external validation study
verfasst von
Bjarte Almås
Stein Øverby
Ole J. Halvorsen
Lars A. R. Reisæter
Jørg Assmus
Birgitte Carlsen
Anders Loe
Christian Beisland
Publikationsdatum
23.05.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
World Journal of Urology / Ausgabe 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02813-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2020

World Journal of Urology 3/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.