Background
When physicians suspect postoperative recurrence of lung cancer owing to elevated serum tumor marker levels and computed tomography (CT) findings, fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/CT is performed. FDG-PET/CT is the most sensitive non-invasive imaging method for the detection of tumor metastasis and recurrence [
1]. However, PET/CT sometimes reveals false-positive results owing to infectious diseases, sarcoidosis, radiation pneumonitis, and post-operative surgical conditions [
2]. Herein, we report two cases of false-positive results on PET/CT scans along with elevated serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, mimicking local recurrence after pulmonary segmentectomy.
Discussion
Pulmonary granuloma is caused by inflammation; infection of bacteria, fungi, and human herpesvirus-8 [
3]; and foreign bodies. Sutures and staplers also cause granuloma after lung resection [
4,
5], in particular, stapler granulomas due to foreign body reaction [
4,
6]. Although Munteanu et al. first reported suture granuloma by PGA suture [
7], pulmonary granulomas caused by a PGA sheet have never been reported. PGA sheets are synthetic bioabsorbable meshes made with polyglycolic acid; they are useful for preventing air leakage from the lungs [
8]. We usually use PGA sheets on the segmental plane cut via electrocautery during pulmonary segmentectomy. Although the mechanism by which granulomas grow is unclear, foreign body reaction may be a main cause of granuloma formation because foreign-body giant cells were observed in the granuloma. The degradation process of PGA occurs in two stages [
9]. The first involves the diffusion of water into the amorphous regions of the matrix and simple hydrolytic chain scission of the ester groups. The second stage of degradation largely involves the crystalline areas of the polymer, which become predominant when the majority of the amorphous regions have been eroded. The degradation process takes only a month, but the present cases showed active granulomas at 6 months after the last surgery, suggesting that other mechanisms may have caused granuloma.
In our institution, there were six reoperations against suspected recurrence tumors between 2011 and 2017, and two of them were granulomas presented in this report. Reoperation after lobectomy and segmentectomy is occasionally performed for local recurrence of lung cancer and metastatic lung tumors. Reoperation is usually difficult and involves substantial risk because of severe adhesion surrounding the bronchial stump and pulmonary artery caused by the manipulation during initial surgery. Blood loss in Case 2 was 4100 mL, and the patient required blood transfusion. Therefore, diagnosis of local recurrence of lung malignancy is extremely important, although local recurrence usually occurs in sites difficult to perform bronchoscopic and CT-guided biopsy. PET/CT is frequently used as a diagnostic imaging modality in patients with suspected malignancy, but false-positive findings are quite common [
2]. In the present cases, PET/CT revealed FDG uptake in the nodules, but both cases were false-positive findings.
Although serum CEA level measurement is useful for postoperative follow-up of malignant tumors, CEA also may show false-positive results, because the normal mucosal epithelium, such as the oral, colorectal, and bronchial mucosa, secretes CEA. Smoking and aging also result in serum CEA elevation. In the present study, both cases showed serum CEA elevation postoperatively, and CEA levels decreased after reoperation; however, the serum CEA elevation was a false-positive result in both cases. Immunohistochemistry of case 1 showed CEA-positive cells partially in the alveolar epithelium, and CEA-positive cells were observed in the granuloma site of case 2, suggesting that these cells may have elevated serum CEA levels, although it is unclear which cell type secretes CEA.
Conclusions
We reported two cases of false-positive results on PET/CT scans and serum CEA elevation that mimicked recurrent lung cancer in the intersegmental plane after pulmonary segmentectomy. Although this appears to be the first report of granulomas caused by PGA sheets, we should consider the possibility of granulomas by sutures, staplers, and PGA sheets during the postoperative follow-up. Furthermore, recurrence of lung cancer should be diagnosed using pathological findings to avoid unnecessary treatment such as chemotherapy, radiation, and difficult reoperation.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.