Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2017

07.11.2016 | Gastrointestinal Oncology

Ultimate Clinical Outcomes of Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasm of Uncertain Malignant Potential

verfasst von: Rumi Shin, MD, Young Jun Chai, MD, Ji Won Park, MD, Mee soo Chang, MD, PhD, Jeong Mo Bae, MD, PhD, Min Jung Kim, MD, Byung Kwan Park, MD, Kyu Joo Park, MD, PhD, Seung-Yong Jeong, MD, PhD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The clinical outcome of appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (AMN) is not well understood. This study aimed to compare the long-term outcome for the uncertain malignant potential (UMP) subtype of AMNs with those of the mucinous adenoma (MA) and mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) subtypes.

Methods

In this study, AMNs were classified into three groups (MA, UMP, and MAC), and clinical characteristics, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared among the three groups.

Results

The study included 65 AMN patients (26 MA, 20 UMP, and 19 MAC patients). The median follow-up period was 87 months (range 0.3–311.0) months. The symptoms at diagnosis and the presence of pseudomyxoma peritonei were more common in the MAC group than in the MA group (P = 0.012) or the UMP group (P < 0.001). The 5-year OS rates were 95.5% for the MA group, 93.8% for the UMP group, and 78.3% for the MAC group (P < 0.001), and the 5-year PFS rates were 95.2% for the MA group, 95% for the UMP group, and 36.8% for the MAC group (P < 0.001). Thus, OS and PFS did not differ significantly in the MA and UMP groups (P = 0.884 and 0.345, respectively). In contrast, the OS and PFS of the MAC group were worse than in the MA group (P = 0.017 and <0.001, respectively) or the UMP group (P < 0.001 and 0.001, respectively).

Conclusions

The long-term outcome for UMP tumors is similar to that for MA tumors and significantly better than for MAC tumors.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Marudanayagam R, Williams GT, Rees BI. Review of the pathological results of 2660 appendicectomy specimens. J Gastroenterol. 2006;41:745–9.CrossRefPubMed Marudanayagam R, Williams GT, Rees BI. Review of the pathological results of 2660 appendicectomy specimens. J Gastroenterol. 2006;41:745–9.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Rangarajan M, Palanivelu C, Kavalakat AJ, Parthasarathi R. Laparoscopic appendectomy for mucocele of the appendix: report of 8 cases. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2006;25:256–7.PubMed Rangarajan M, Palanivelu C, Kavalakat AJ, Parthasarathi R. Laparoscopic appendectomy for mucocele of the appendix: report of 8 cases. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2006;25:256–7.PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Smeenk RM, van Velthuysen ML, Verwaal VJ, Zoetmulder FA. Appendiceal neoplasms and pseudomyxoma peritonei: a population-based study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34:196–201.CrossRefPubMed Smeenk RM, van Velthuysen ML, Verwaal VJ, Zoetmulder FA. Appendiceal neoplasms and pseudomyxoma peritonei: a population-based study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34:196–201.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat van den Heuvel MG, Lemmens VE, Verhoeven RH, de Hingh IH. The incidence of mucinous appendiceal malignancies: a population-based study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013;28:1307–10.CrossRefPubMed van den Heuvel MG, Lemmens VE, Verhoeven RH, de Hingh IH. The incidence of mucinous appendiceal malignancies: a population-based study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013;28:1307–10.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Carr NJ, Sobin LH. Epithelial noncarcinoid tumors and tumor-like lesions of the appendix. Cancer 1995;76:2383–4.CrossRefPubMed Carr NJ, Sobin LH. Epithelial noncarcinoid tumors and tumor-like lesions of the appendix. Cancer 1995;76:2383–4.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Misdraji J, Yantiss RK, Graeme-Cook FM, Balis UJ, Young RH. Appendiceal mucinous tumors: a clinicopathological analysis of 92 cases. Lab Investig. 2002;82:139a–139a. Misdraji J, Yantiss RK, Graeme-Cook FM, Balis UJ, Young RH. Appendiceal mucinous tumors: a clinicopathological analysis of 92 cases. Lab Investig. 2002;82:139a–139a.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Pai RK, Beck AH, Norton JA, Longacre TA. Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: clinicopathologic study of 116 cases with analysis of factors predicting recurrence. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33:1425–39.CrossRefPubMed Pai RK, Beck AH, Norton JA, Longacre TA. Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: clinicopathologic study of 116 cases with analysis of factors predicting recurrence. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33:1425–39.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Misdraji J, Yantiss RK, Graeme-Cook FM, Balis UJ, Young RH. Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: a clinicopathologic analysis of 107 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27:1089–103.CrossRefPubMed Misdraji J, Yantiss RK, Graeme-Cook FM, Balis UJ, Young RH. Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: a clinicopathologic analysis of 107 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27:1089–103.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bosman FT, World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer. WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. 4th ed. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2010. Bosman FT, World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer. WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. 4th ed. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2010.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Yantiss RK. Advances in surgical pathology: colorectal carcinoma and tumors of the vermiform appendix. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2014. Yantiss RK. Advances in surgical pathology: colorectal carcinoma and tumors of the vermiform appendix. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2014.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Carr NJ, Cecil TD, Mohamed F, et al. A consensus for classification and pathologic reporting of pseudomyxoma peritonei and associated appendiceal neoplasia: the results of the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) modified Delphi process. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40:14–26.CrossRefPubMed Carr NJ, Cecil TD, Mohamed F, et al. A consensus for classification and pathologic reporting of pseudomyxoma peritonei and associated appendiceal neoplasia: the results of the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) modified Delphi process. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40:14–26.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Honore C, Caruso F, Dartigues P, Benhaim L, Chirica M, Goere D, et al. Strategies for preventing pseudomyxoma peritonei after resection of a mucinous neoplasm of the appendix. Anticancer Res. 2015;35:4943–7.PubMed Honore C, Caruso F, Dartigues P, Benhaim L, Chirica M, Goere D, et al. Strategies for preventing pseudomyxoma peritonei after resection of a mucinous neoplasm of the appendix. Anticancer Res. 2015;35:4943–7.PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Yantiss RK, Shia J, Klimstra DS, Hahn HP, Odze RD, Misdraji J. Prognostic significance of localized extra-appendiceal mucin deposition in appendiceal mucinous neoplasms. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33:248–55.CrossRefPubMed Yantiss RK, Shia J, Klimstra DS, Hahn HP, Odze RD, Misdraji J. Prognostic significance of localized extra-appendiceal mucin deposition in appendiceal mucinous neoplasms. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33:248–55.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Gonzalez-Moreno S, Sugarbaker PH. Right hemicolectomy does not confer a survival advantage in patients with mucinous carcinoma of the appendix and peritoneal seeding. Br J Surg. 2004;91:304–11.CrossRefPubMed Gonzalez-Moreno S, Sugarbaker PH. Right hemicolectomy does not confer a survival advantage in patients with mucinous carcinoma of the appendix and peritoneal seeding. Br J Surg. 2004;91:304–11.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Foster JM, Gupta PK, Carreau JH, et al. Right hemicolectomy is not routinely indicated in pseudomyxoma peritonei. Am Surg. 2012;78:171–7.PubMed Foster JM, Gupta PK, Carreau JH, et al. Right hemicolectomy is not routinely indicated in pseudomyxoma peritonei. Am Surg. 2012;78:171–7.PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Turaga KK, Pappas S, Gamblin TC. Right hemicolectomy for mucinous adenocarcinoma of the appendix: just right or too much? Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:1063–7.CrossRefPubMed Turaga KK, Pappas S, Gamblin TC. Right hemicolectomy for mucinous adenocarcinoma of the appendix: just right or too much? Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:1063–7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Ultimate Clinical Outcomes of Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasm of Uncertain Malignant Potential
verfasst von
Rumi Shin, MD
Young Jun Chai, MD
Ji Won Park, MD
Mee soo Chang, MD, PhD
Jeong Mo Bae, MD, PhD
Min Jung Kim, MD
Byung Kwan Park, MD
Kyu Joo Park, MD, PhD
Seung-Yong Jeong, MD, PhD
Publikationsdatum
07.11.2016
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5657-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.