Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 1/2019

02.08.2018

Ultra-low-dose limited renal CT for volumetric stone surveillance: advantages over standard unenhanced CT

verfasst von: Virginia B. Planz, Natasza M. Posielski, Meghan G. Lubner, Ke Li, Guang-Hong Chen, Stephen Y. Nakada, Perry J. Pickhardt

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 1/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To describe and validate a novel CT approach using volumetric analysis for renal stone surveillance.

Materials and methods

This prospective trial consisted of a standard low-dose non-contrast CT (SLD) of the abdomen and pelvis, immediately followed by an ultra-low-dose non-contrast CT (ULD) with reconstruction limited to the kidneys. A novel dedicated software tool was applied that automates stone volume, density, and maximum linear size. Manual linear stone size was measured by a radiology fellow and urology resident for comparison. CT dose and clinical charges were considered.

Results

Twenty-eight stones in 16 patients were analyzed. Mean effective dose of ULD CT was 0.57 mSv, an average 92% lower than the SLD CT dose. For SLD, mean size ± SD (range) (mm) was 7.9 ± 6.2 (2.6–30.5) for Reader 1, 7.3 ± 6 (2.4–30.7) for Reader 2, and 9.3 ± 6.4 (3.7–33.1) for the automated software. For ULD, mean size ± SD (range) (mm) was 7.3 ± 6 (2.5–30.5) for Reader 1, 7.2 ± 6.1 (2.1–30.7) for Reader 2, and 9.1 ± 6.4 (4.2–32.8) for the automated software. Automated stone diameters were larger than manual diameters for 27/28 stones (mean difference, 23%); difference was ≥ 2 mm in 30%. Average variability between manual measurements was 8.6% (SLD) and 7.8% (ULD), but was 0% for the automated technique. Our institutional charge for ULD renal CT is slightly less than renal US, and > 4× less than SLD CT. The Medicare global fee for the ULD renal CT is less than the SLD CT of the abdomen and pelvis.

Conclusions

This focused stone surveillance CT protocol is lower cost and lower dose compared to the standard CT approach. Automated assessment of stone burden provides improved reproducibility over manual linear measurement and offers the advantages of 3D measurements and volumetry. We now offer and perform this protocol in routine clinical practice for stone surveillance.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Fulgham PF, Assimos DG, Pearle MS, Preminger GM (2013) Clinical effectiveness protocols for imaging in the management of ureteral calculous disease: AUA technology assessment. J Urol. 189(4):1203–1213CrossRefPubMed Fulgham PF, Assimos DG, Pearle MS, Preminger GM (2013) Clinical effectiveness protocols for imaging in the management of ureteral calculous disease: AUA technology assessment. J Urol. 189(4):1203–1213CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG, et al. (2007) 2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. J Urol. 178(6):2418–2434CrossRefPubMed Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG, et al. (2007) 2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. J Urol. 178(6):2418–2434CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Selby MG, Vrtiska TJ, Krambeck AE, et al. (2015) Quantification of asymptomatic kidney stone burden by computed tomography for predicting future symptomatic stone events. Urology. 85(1):45–50CrossRefPubMed Selby MG, Vrtiska TJ, Krambeck AE, et al. (2015) Quantification of asymptomatic kidney stone burden by computed tomography for predicting future symptomatic stone events. Urology. 85(1):45–50CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Sternberg KM, Eisner B, Larson T, et al. (2016) Ultrasonography significantly overestimates stone size when compared to low-dose, noncontrast computed tomography. Urology. 95:67–71CrossRefPubMed Sternberg KM, Eisner B, Larson T, et al. (2016) Ultrasonography significantly overestimates stone size when compared to low-dose, noncontrast computed tomography. Urology. 95:67–71CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Pearle MS, Goldfarb DS, Assimos DG, et al. (2014) Medical management of kidney stones: AUA guideline. J Urol. 192(2):316–324CrossRefPubMed Pearle MS, Goldfarb DS, Assimos DG, et al. (2014) Medical management of kidney stones: AUA guideline. J Urol. 192(2):316–324CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Pooler BD, Lubner MG, Kim DH, et al. (2014) Prospective trial of the detection of urolithiasis on ultralow dose (sub mSv) noncontrast computerized tomography: direct comparison against routine low dose reference standard. J Urol. 192(5):1433–1439CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pooler BD, Lubner MG, Kim DH, et al. (2014) Prospective trial of the detection of urolithiasis on ultralow dose (sub mSv) noncontrast computerized tomography: direct comparison against routine low dose reference standard. J Urol. 192(5):1433–1439CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Patel SR, Stanton P, Zelinski N, et al. (2011) Automated renal stone volume measurement by noncontrast computerized tomography is more reproducible than manual linear size measurement. J Urol. 186(6):2275–2279CrossRefPubMed Patel SR, Stanton P, Zelinski N, et al. (2011) Automated renal stone volume measurement by noncontrast computerized tomography is more reproducible than manual linear size measurement. J Urol. 186(6):2275–2279CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Patel SR, Wells S, Ruma J, et al. (2012) Automated volumetric assessment by noncontrast computed tomography in the surveillance of nephrolithiasis. Urology. 80(1):27–31CrossRefPubMed Patel SR, Wells S, Ruma J, et al. (2012) Automated volumetric assessment by noncontrast computed tomography in the surveillance of nephrolithiasis. Urology. 80(1):27–31CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Demehri S, Kalra MK, Rybicki FJ, et al. (2011) Quantification of urinary stone volume: attenuation threshold-based CT method--a technical note. Radiology. 258(3):915–922CrossRefPubMed Demehri S, Kalra MK, Rybicki FJ, et al. (2011) Quantification of urinary stone volume: attenuation threshold-based CT method--a technical note. Radiology. 258(3):915–922CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Mettler FA Jr, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M (2008) Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology. 248(1):254–263CrossRefPubMed Mettler FA Jr, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M (2008) Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology. 248(1):254–263CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Ultra-low-dose limited renal CT for volumetric stone surveillance: advantages over standard unenhanced CT
verfasst von
Virginia B. Planz
Natasza M. Posielski
Meghan G. Lubner
Ke Li
Guang-Hong Chen
Stephen Y. Nakada
Perry J. Pickhardt
Publikationsdatum
02.08.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 1/2019
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1719-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

Abdominal Radiology 1/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Classics in Abdominal Radiology

Target sign: appendicitis

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.