Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 6/2018

03.11.2017

Uncomplicated common bile duct stone removal guided by cholangioscopy versus conventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

verfasst von: Wiriyaporn Ridtitid, Thanawat Luangsukrerk, Phonthep Angsuwatcharakon, Panida Piyachaturawat, Prapimphan Aumpansub, Cameron Hurst, Roongruedee Chaiteerakij, Pradermchai Kongkam, Rungsun Rerknimitr

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 6/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Although previous studies have reported the possibility of therapeutic ERCP without fluoroscopy, more robust documentation of fluoroscopy-free common bile duct stone (CBDS) clearance is needed. Technically, “digital cholangioscopy” (DCS) may be used to confirm CBDS clearance. We aimed to compare the feasibility, safety, and radiation exposure between patients with CBDS undergoing stone removal by DCS and conventional ERCP (cERCP).

Methods

Fifty (50) consecutive patients with a CBDS size < 15 mm underwent DCS (SpyGlass DS Direct Visualization System, Boston Scientific, Marlboro, MA, USA) between December 2015 and October 2016. Of 202 consecutive patients undergoing cERCP during the same time frame, 50 matched pairs were created using propensity score matching analysis. In the DCS group, patients underwent biliary cannulation and CBDS removal without fluoroscopy followed by DCS to confirm complete CBDS clearance. A final occlusion cholangiogram was performed as the current standard of care to confirm CBDS clearance.

Results

Cannulation success rates were similar between the DCS and cERCP groups (98 vs. 98%). By intention-to-treat analysis, CBDS clearance in the DCS and cERCP groups was not different (90 vs. 98%; p = 0.20, respectively). DCS had successful CBDS removal in 45 cases, whereas 5 (10%) failed for clearance by DCS due to technical limitations. Adverse events were not different between both groups.

Conclusions

In the management of uncomplicated CBDS, our data confirmed the feasibility of DCS for CBDS clearance as it showed efficacy and safety comparable to those of cERCP. Although certain conditions may limit its effectiveness, DCS offers the ability to perform CBDS clearance without the need for fluoroscopy unit and can avoid radiation exposure while ERCP under fluoroscopy remains the current standard of care in patients with CBDS.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Campbell N, Sparrow K, Fortier M, Ponich T (2002) Practical radiation safety and protection for the endoscopist during ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 55:552–557CrossRefPubMed Campbell N, Sparrow K, Fortier M, Ponich T (2002) Practical radiation safety and protection for the endoscopist during ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 55:552–557CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Committee AT, Pedrosa MC, Farraye FA, Shergill AK, Banerjee S, Desilets D, Diehl DL, Kaul V, Kwon RS, Mamula P, Rodriguez SA, Varadarajulu S, Song LM, Tierney WM (2010) Minimizing occupational hazards in endoscopy: personal protective equipment, radiation safety, and ergonomics. Gastrointest Endosc 72:227–235CrossRef Committee AT, Pedrosa MC, Farraye FA, Shergill AK, Banerjee S, Desilets D, Diehl DL, Kaul V, Kwon RS, Mamula P, Rodriguez SA, Varadarajulu S, Song LM, Tierney WM (2010) Minimizing occupational hazards in endoscopy: personal protective equipment, radiation safety, and ergonomics. Gastrointest Endosc 72:227–235CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Stavropoulos S, Larghi A, Verna E, Stevens P (2005) Therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography without fluoroscopy in four critically ill patients using wire-guided intraductal ultrasound. Endoscopy 37:389–392CrossRefPubMed Stavropoulos S, Larghi A, Verna E, Stevens P (2005) Therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography without fluoroscopy in four critically ill patients using wire-guided intraductal ultrasound. Endoscopy 37:389–392CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu W, Faigel DO, Sun G, Yang Y (2014) Non-radiation endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the management of choledocholithiasis during pregnancy. Dig Endosc 26:691–700CrossRefPubMed Wu W, Faigel DO, Sun G, Yang Y (2014) Non-radiation endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the management of choledocholithiasis during pregnancy. Dig Endosc 26:691–700CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Shelton J, Linder JD, Rivera-Alsina ME, Tarnasky PR (2008) Commitment, confirmation, and clearance: new techniques for nonradiation ERCP during pregnancy (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 67:364–368CrossRefPubMed Shelton J, Linder JD, Rivera-Alsina ME, Tarnasky PR (2008) Commitment, confirmation, and clearance: new techniques for nonradiation ERCP during pregnancy (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 67:364–368CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Sharma SS, Maharshi S (2008) Two stage endoscopic approach for management of choledocholithiasis during pregnancy. J Gastrointest Liver Dis 17:183–185 Sharma SS, Maharshi S (2008) Two stage endoscopic approach for management of choledocholithiasis during pregnancy. J Gastrointest Liver Dis 17:183–185
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ersoz G, Turan I, Tekin F, Ozutemiz O, Tekesin O (2016) Nonradiation ERCP with endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy plus papillary balloon dilation for the treatment of choledocholithiasis during pregnancy. Surg Endosc 30:222–228CrossRefPubMed Ersoz G, Turan I, Tekin F, Ozutemiz O, Tekesin O (2016) Nonradiation ERCP with endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy plus papillary balloon dilation for the treatment of choledocholithiasis during pregnancy. Surg Endosc 30:222–228CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Trindade AJ, Brun A, Vamadevan AS, Sideridis K, Sejpal DV, Mayo PH, Khanijo S, Koenig SJ (2015) Use of bedside transabdominal US in facilitating emergent intensive care unit ERCP without fluoroscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 81:1268–1269CrossRefPubMed Trindade AJ, Brun A, Vamadevan AS, Sideridis K, Sejpal DV, Mayo PH, Khanijo S, Koenig SJ (2015) Use of bedside transabdominal US in facilitating emergent intensive care unit ERCP without fluoroscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 81:1268–1269CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Artifon EL, Kumar A, Eloubeidi MA, Chu A, Halwan B, Sakai P, Bhutani MS (2009) Prospective randomized trial of EUS versus ERCP-guided common bile duct stone removal: an interim report (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 69:238–243CrossRefPubMed Artifon EL, Kumar A, Eloubeidi MA, Chu A, Halwan B, Sakai P, Bhutani MS (2009) Prospective randomized trial of EUS versus ERCP-guided common bile duct stone removal: an interim report (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 69:238–243CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Park SY, Park CH, Lim SU, Cho EA, Lee DH, Jun CH, Kim HS, Choi SK, Rew JS (2015) Intraductal US-directed management of bile duct stones without radiocontrast cholangiography. Gastrointest Endosc 82:939–943CrossRefPubMed Park SY, Park CH, Lim SU, Cho EA, Lee DH, Jun CH, Kim HS, Choi SK, Rew JS (2015) Intraductal US-directed management of bile duct stones without radiocontrast cholangiography. Gastrointest Endosc 82:939–943CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Shah JN, Bhat YM, Hamerski CM, Kane SD, Binmoeller KF (2016) Feasibility of nonradiation EUS-based ERCP in patients with uncomplicated choledocholithiasis (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 84:764–769CrossRefPubMed Shah JN, Bhat YM, Hamerski CM, Kane SD, Binmoeller KF (2016) Feasibility of nonradiation EUS-based ERCP in patients with uncomplicated choledocholithiasis (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 84:764–769CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Palazzo L, Girollet PP, Salmeron M, Silvain C, Roseau G, Canard JM, Chaussade S, Couturier D, Paolaggi JA (1995) Value of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones: comparison with surgical exploration and ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 42:225–231CrossRefPubMed Palazzo L, Girollet PP, Salmeron M, Silvain C, Roseau G, Canard JM, Chaussade S, Couturier D, Paolaggi JA (1995) Value of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones: comparison with surgical exploration and ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 42:225–231CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ishida Y, Itoi T, Okabe Y (2016) Types of peroral cholangioscopy: how to choose the most suitable type of cholangioscopy. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 14:210–219CrossRefPubMed Ishida Y, Itoi T, Okabe Y (2016) Types of peroral cholangioscopy: how to choose the most suitable type of cholangioscopy. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 14:210–219CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Committee ASoP, Maple JT, Ikenberry SO, Anderson MA, Appalaneni V, Decker GA, Early D, Evans JA, Fanelli RD, Fisher D, Fisher L, Fukami N, Hwang JH, Jain R, Jue T, Khan K, Krinsky ML, Malpas P, Ben-Menachem T, Sharaf RN, Dominitz JA (2011) The role of endoscopy in the management of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 74:731–744CrossRef Committee ASoP, Maple JT, Ikenberry SO, Anderson MA, Appalaneni V, Decker GA, Early D, Evans JA, Fanelli RD, Fisher D, Fisher L, Fukami N, Hwang JH, Jain R, Jue T, Khan K, Krinsky ML, Malpas P, Ben-Menachem T, Sharaf RN, Dominitz JA (2011) The role of endoscopy in the management of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 74:731–744CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, Geenen JE, Russell RC, Meyers WC, Liguory C, Nickl N (1991) Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 37:383–393CrossRefPubMed Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, Geenen JE, Russell RC, Meyers WC, Liguory C, Nickl N (1991) Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 37:383–393CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Chathadi KV, Chen YK (2009) New kid on the block: development of a partially disposable system for cholangioscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 19:545–555CrossRefPubMed Chathadi KV, Chen YK (2009) New kid on the block: development of a partially disposable system for cholangioscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 19:545–555CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Moon JH, Choi HJ (2013) The role of direct peroral cholangioscopy using an ultraslim endoscope for biliary lesions: indications, limitations, and complications. Clin Endosc 46:537–539CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moon JH, Choi HJ (2013) The role of direct peroral cholangioscopy using an ultraslim endoscope for biliary lesions: indications, limitations, and complications. Clin Endosc 46:537–539CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Sethi A, Chen YK, Austin GL, Brown WR, Brauer BC, Fukami NN, Khan AH, Shah RJ (2011) ERCP with cholangiopancreatoscopy may be associated with higher rates of complications than ERCP alone: a single-center experience. Gastrointest Endosc 73:251–256CrossRefPubMed Sethi A, Chen YK, Austin GL, Brown WR, Brauer BC, Fukami NN, Khan AH, Shah RJ (2011) ERCP with cholangiopancreatoscopy may be associated with higher rates of complications than ERCP alone: a single-center experience. Gastrointest Endosc 73:251–256CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Weigt J, Kandulski A, Malfertheiner P (2015) Technical improvement using ultra-slim gastroscopes for direct peroral cholangioscopy: analysis of the initial learning phase. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 22:74–78CrossRefPubMed Weigt J, Kandulski A, Malfertheiner P (2015) Technical improvement using ultra-slim gastroscopes for direct peroral cholangioscopy: analysis of the initial learning phase. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 22:74–78CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Raijman I (2016) Performing endoscopic retrograde cholangiography without radiation exposure: are we ready for it? Gastrointest Endosc 84:770–772CrossRefPubMed Raijman I (2016) Performing endoscopic retrograde cholangiography without radiation exposure: are we ready for it? Gastrointest Endosc 84:770–772CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Hendee WR (1992) Estimation of radiation risks. BEIR V and its significance for medicine. JAMA 268:620–624CrossRefPubMed Hendee WR (1992) Estimation of radiation risks. BEIR V and its significance for medicine. JAMA 268:620–624CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Uncomplicated common bile duct stone removal guided by cholangioscopy versus conventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
verfasst von
Wiriyaporn Ridtitid
Thanawat Luangsukrerk
Phonthep Angsuwatcharakon
Panida Piyachaturawat
Prapimphan Aumpansub
Cameron Hurst
Roongruedee Chaiteerakij
Pradermchai Kongkam
Rungsun Rerknimitr
Publikationsdatum
03.11.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 6/2018
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5966-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2018

Surgical Endoscopy 6/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.