Skip to main content
main-content

01.12.2015 | Research article | Ausgabe 1/2015 Open Access

BMC Public Health 1/2015

Understanding for whom, under what conditions, and how group-based physical activity interventions are successful: a realist review

Zeitschrift:
BMC Public Health > Ausgabe 1/2015
Autoren:
Samantha M. Harden, Desmond McEwan, Benjamin D. Sylvester, Megan Kaulius, Geralyn Ruissen, Shauna M. Burke, Paul A. Estabrooks, Mark R. Beauchamp
Wichtige Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.​1186/​s12889-015-2270-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

Authors SMH, PAE, and MRB conceptualized the study, contributed to data extraction and synthesis, and significantly contributed to the manuscript preparation. SMH led the protocol and data analysis. Author SMB contributed to the development of the data collection tool, data extraction, interpretation, and edits of the manuscript. Authors DM and BDS contributed to the literature search and elimination process, data extraction, data synthesis and interpretation as well as edits to the manuscript. Authors MK and GR data extraction, data synthesis and interpretation as well as edits to the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

Not applicable.

Abstract

Background

Participation in group-based physical activity (GBPA) interventions has been found to result in higher levels of exercise adherence and program compliance. However, previous reviews of GBPA programs have provided limited insight regarding ‘for whom’, ‘under what conditions’, and ‘how’ these interventions increase physical activity behavior.

Methods

A realist review was conducted by following the seven recommended iterative and overlapping steps (J Health Serv Res Policy 10S1:21-34, 2005). The review was limited to group dynamics-based interventions for adults (>17 years of age). The search was conducted in PubMed, PsychInfo, and Web of Science search engines associated with the Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index, Arts & Humanities Citation Index, and MEDLINE.

Results

Using a realist review approach, data from 52 studies were synthesized. Of those, 92 % (n = 48) reported significant increases in participant physical activity. The synthesis resulted in three main observations and recommendations.

Discussion

GBPA interventions have worked for a variety of populations, including those who are hard to reach; however, more research is needed on moderating factors to determine for whom different GBPA programs may be effective. Second, previous interventions have varied in the duration, frequency, and number of group-based strategies used, and comparative effectiveness research may be necessary to isolate the mechanisms of effect. Third, these interventions have been conducted in a diverse range of settings, using a variety of research designs and analytical approaches. Less information is known about the costs or sustainability of these programs in their intended settings.

Conclusion

The results of this realist review have important implications for practice, refining trial designs, and replication across diverse populations and settings.
Zusatzmaterial
Additional file 1: Eligibility Criteria. Inclusion criteria for articles. A tabular representation of the criteria for inclusion in the realist review. (PDF 71 kb)
12889_2015_2270_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Additional file 2: References. Supplemental Reference List: Articles included in realist review, not referenced in text. All articles included in realist review, if not referenced within the text. (PDF 100 kb)
12889_2015_2270_MOESM2_ESM.pdf
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2015

BMC Public Health 1/2015 Zur Ausgabe