The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-015-0657-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests in relation to this research.
All authors contributed to the design of the study. Data collection was undertaken by INA and the analyses were performed by JEJ and INA. INA drafted the manuscript with the assistance of AMB, JEJ, SVD and MR, and all authors have approved the final manuscript.
Although women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) face a number of challenges in negotiating the journey to parenthood, no studies have explored the information needs of women with RA in relation to their childbearing years. This study aimed to determine the need for (and preferred mode/s of delivery of) information regarding pregnancy, post-natal care and early parenting among women with RA.
Interviews and focus groups were conducted with 27 women with RA who were pregnant in the last 5 years, currently pregnant or planning pregnancy. Verbatim transcripts were analysed using both inductive and deductive approaches. Two validated instruments were used to quantify information needs and preferences: the Educational Needs Assessment Tool (ENAT, range 0-156, higher scores indicate higher educational needs) and the Autonomy Preference Index (API, range 0-100, higher scores indicate stronger preferences).
Lack of information about medication safety, access to physical/emotional support services and practical strategies for coping with daily challenges related to parenting were the most prominent of the six key themes identified. Rheumatologists were the primary source for information regarding treatment decisions while arthritis consumer organisations were perceived as critical ‘resource hubs’. There was strong preference for information delivered electronically, especially among rural participants. Quantitative outcomes supported the qualitative findings; on average, participants reported high educational needs (mean ENAT score 97.2, SD 30.8) and API scores indicated that desire for information (mean 89.8, SD 5.6) was greater than the need for involvement in treatment decision-making (mean 68.4, SD 8.2).
Many women with RA struggle to find adequate information on pregnancy planning, pregnancy and early parenting in relation to their chronic condition, and there is a clear need to develop accessible information that is consumer-focused and evidence-based. Although most participants trusted their rheumatologist as their primary information source, there was consistent demand for more information, particularly regarding the safety of RA medications during pregnancy and breastfeeding, and the importance of learning from other women’s personal experiences was strongly emphasised.
Additional file 1: Schedule for interviews and focus groups. (PDF 19 kb)12891_2015_657_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Chambers CD, Tutuncu ZN, Johnson D, Jones KL. Human pregnancy safety for agents used to treat rheumatoid arthritis: Adequacy of available information and strategies for developing post-marketing data. Arthritis Res Therapy. 2006;8:215. CrossRef
de Man YA, Dolhain RJEM, van de Geijn FE, Willemsen SP, Hazes JMW. Disease activity of rheumatoid arthritis during pregnancy: Results from a nationwide prospective study. Arthritis Care Res. 2008;59:1241–8. CrossRef
Katz PP. Childbearing decisions and family size among women with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2006;55:217–23. CrossRef
Neame R, Hammond A, Deighton C. Need for information and for involvement in decision making among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A questionnaire survey. Arthritis Care Res. 2005;53:249–55. CrossRef
Patton M. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2002.
Hardware B, Anne Lacey E, Shewan J. Towards the development of a tool to assess educational needs in patients with arthritis. Clin Eff Nurs. 2004;8:111–7. CrossRef
Cooper CP, Jorgensen CM, Merritt TL. Telephone focus groups: An emerging method in public health research. J Womens Health. 2003;12:945–51. CrossRef
Australian Standard Geographical Classification - Remoteness Area (ASGC-RA). Available from: http://www.doctorconnect.gov.au/internet/otd/Publishing.nsf/Content/ra-intro; accessed 28 July 2015.
Thomas DR. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Eval. 2006;27:237–46. CrossRef
May SE. Arthritis, pregnancy and the path to parenthood. Fremantle: Vivid Publishing; 2010.
Khamashta M, Pushparajah D, Chakravarty E. Attitudes of patients and physicians in the treatment of rheumatological disease during pregnancy. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74 Suppl 2:186.
Dragoi R, Ndosi M, Sadlonova M, Hill J, Duer M, Graninger W, et al. Patient education, disease activity and physical function: Can we be more targeted? A cross sectional study among people with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and hand osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2013;15:R156. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Murray E, Burns J, See T, Lai R, Nazareth I. Interactive Health Communication Applications for people with chronic disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;4:CD004274. PubMed
Arthritis Foundation. Pregnancy, family planning & arthritis. Available from: http://www.arthritis.org/living-with-arthritis/life-stages/pregnancy-family/; accessed 28 July 2015.
Arthritis Research UK. Pregnancy and arthritis. Available from: http://www.arthritisresearchuk.org/arthritis-information/arthritis-and-daily-life/pregnancy-and-arthritis.aspx; accessed 28 July 2015.
National Rheumatoid Arthritis Society. Rheumatoid arthritis & pregnancy. Available from: http://www.nras.org.uk/rheumatoid-arthritis-pregnancy; accessed 28 July 2015.
Rugelsjoen A, Ostensen M. Being a rheumatic mother. Trondheim: Haraldus Medical Communications; 1994.
- Understanding the information needs of women with rheumatoid arthritis concerning pregnancy, post-natal care and early parenting: A mixed-methods study
Ilana N. Ackerman
Joanne E. Jordan
Sharon Van Doornum
Andrew M. Briggs
- BioMed Central
Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie
Mail Icon II