nach oben

Updates in Surgery

Erschienen in:

01.02.2020 | Review Article

Updates in office hysteroscopy: a practical decalogue to perform a correct procedure

verfasst von: Salvatore Giovanni Vitale, Simone Bruni, Benito Chiofalo, Gaetano Riemma, Ricardo Bassil Lasmar

Erschienen in: Updates in Surgery | Ausgabe 4/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Nowadays, hysteroscopy is the gold standard for the diagnosis and treatment of intrauterine pathologies as it represents a safe and minimally invasive procedure that allows the visualization of the entire uterine cavity. Numerous technological innovations have occurred over the past few years, contributing to the development and widespread use of this technique. In particular, the new small-diameter hysteroscopes are equipped with an operating channel in which different mechanical instruments can be inserted, and they allow not only to examine the cervical canal and uterine cavity but also to perform biopsies or treat benign diseases in a relatively short time without anesthesia and in an outpatient setting. In this scenario, the operator must be able to perform hysteroscopy in the correct way to make this procedure increasingly safe and painless for the patient. This review aims to describe the ten steps to perform a correct office hysteroscopy, starting from patient counseling to the therapy after the procedure.

Campo R, Santangelo F, Gordts S, Di Cesare C, Van Kerrebroeck H, De Angelis MC, Di Spiezio Sardo A (2018) Outpatient hysteroscopy. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 10(3):115–122PubMed

Bettocchi S, Nappi L, Ceci O, Selvaggi L (2003) What does ‘diagnostic hysteroscopy’ mean today? The role of the new techniques. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 15(4):303–308. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.gco.0000084241.09900.c8CrossRefPubMed

Vitale SG, Sapia F, Rapisarda AMC, Valenti G, Santangelo F, Rossetti D, Chiofalo B, Sarpietro G, La Rosa VL, Triolo O, Noventa M, Gizzo S, Laganà AS (2017) Hysteroscopic morcellation of submucous myomas: a systematic review. Biomed Res Int 2017:6848250. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6848250CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Salazar CA, Isaacson KB (2018) Office operative hysteroscopy: an update. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 25(2):199–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2017.08.009CrossRefPubMed

Di Spiezio Sardo A, Sharma M, Taylor A, Buck L, Magos A (2004) A new device for “no touch” biopsy at “no touch” hysteroscopy: the H pipelle. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191(1):157–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2003.11.026CrossRef

Vitale SG (2019) The biopsy snake grasper sec. VITALE: a new tool for office hysteroscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2019.12.014CrossRefPubMed

Centini G, Troia L, Lazzeri L, Petraglia F, Luisi S (2016) Modern operative hysteroscopy. Minerva Ginecol 68(2):126–132PubMed

Brauer MM (2017) Plasticity in uterine innervation: state of the art. Curr Protein Pept Sci 18(2):108–119. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389203717666160322145411CrossRefPubMed

Vitale SG, Caruso S, Vitagliano A, Vilos G, Di Gregorio LM, Zizolfi B, Tesarik J, Cianci A (2019) The value of virtual reality simulators in hysteroscopy and training capacity: a systematic review. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2019.1625404CrossRefPubMed

10.

Connor M (2015) New technologies and innovations in hysteroscopy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 29(7):951–965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.03.012CrossRefPubMed

11.

Paulo AAS, Solheiro MHR, Paulo COS, Afreixo VMA (2016) What proportion of women refers moderate to severe pain during office hysteroscopy with a mini-hysteroscope? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 293(1):37–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3836-5CrossRefPubMed

12.

Senturk MB, Guraslan H, Babaoglu B, Yasar L, Polat M (2016) The effect of intrauterine lidocaine and rectal indomethacin on pain during office vaginoscopic hysteroscopy: randomized double-blind controlled study. Gynecol Obstet Invest 81(3):280–284. https://doi.org/10.1159/000441787CrossRefPubMed

13.

Fouda UM, Elsetohy KA, Elshaer HS, Hammad BEM, Shaban MM, Youssef MA, Hashem AT, Attia AH (2018) Misoprostol prior to diagnostic office hysteroscopy in the subgroup of patients with no risk factors for cervical stenosis: a randomized double blind placebo-controlled trial. Gynecol Obstet Invest 83(5):455–460. https://doi.org/10.1159/000480234CrossRefPubMed

14.

Keyhan S, Munro MG (2014) Office diagnostic and operative hysteroscopy using local anesthesia only: an analysis of patient reported pain and other procedural outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21(5):791–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2014.03.006CrossRefPubMed

15.

Abbas AM, Elzargha AM, Ahmed AGM, Mohamed II, Altraigey A, Abdelbadee AY (2019) Oral diclofenac potassium versus hyoscine-N-butyl bromide in reducing pain perception during office hysteroscopy: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 26(4):709–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2018.08.001CrossRefPubMed

16.

Hassan A, Wahba A, Haggag H (2016) Tramadol versus Celecoxib for reducing pain associated with outpatient hysteroscopy: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Hum Reprod 31(1):60–66. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev291CrossRefPubMed

17.

Amer-Cuenca JJ, Marín-Buck A, Vitale SG, La Rosa VL, Caruso S, Cianci A, Lisón JF (2019) Non-pharmacological pain control in outpatient hysteroscopies. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2019.1576054CrossRefPubMed

18.

Evangelista A, Oliveira MA, Crispi CP, Lamblet MF, Raymundo TS, Santos LC (2011) Diagnostic hysteroscopy using liquid distention medium: comparison of pain with warmed saline solution vs room-temperature saline solution. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 18(1):104–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2010.09.009CrossRefPubMed

19.

Angioli R, De Cicco Nardone C, Plotti F, Cafa EV, Dugo N, Damiani P, Ricciardi R, Linciano F, Terranova C (2014) Use of music to reduce anxiety during office hysteroscopy: prospective randomized trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21(3):454–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2013.07.020CrossRefPubMed

20.

De Angelis C, Perrone G, Santoro G, Nofroni I, Zichella L (2003) Suppression of pelvic pain during hysteroscopy with a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation device. Fertil Steril 79(6):1422–1427. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(03)00363-7CrossRefPubMed

21.

Lisón JF, Amer-Cuenca JJ, Piquer-Martí S, Benavent-Caballer V, Biviá-Roig G, Marín-Buck A (2017) Transcutaneous nerve stimulation for pain relief during office hysteroscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 129(2):363–370. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001842CrossRefPubMed

22.

Mairos J, Di Martino P (2016) Office hysteroscopy. An operative gold standard technique and an important contribution to patient safety. Gynecol Surg 13:111–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-015-0926-0CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Propst AM, Liberman RF, Harlow BL, Ginsburg ES (2000) Complications of hysteroscopic surgery: predicting patients at risk. Obstet Gynecol 96(4):517–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(00)00958-3CrossRefPubMed

24.

Keogh SC, Fry K, Mbugua E, Ayallo M, Quinn H, Otieno G, Ngo TD (2014) Vocal local versus pharmacological treatments for pain management in tubal ligation procedures in rural Kenya: a non-inferiority trial. BMC Womens Health 14:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-14-21CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Ogden J, Heinrich M, Potter C, Kent A, Jones S (2009) The impact of viewing a hysteroscopy on a screen on the patient’s experience: a randomised trial. BJOG 116(2):286–292; discussion 292–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02035.x

26.

Laganà AS, Vitale SG, Muscia V, Rossetti P, Buscema M, Triolo O, Rapisarda AM, Giunta L, Palmara V, Granese R, Frangež HB, Romano A (2017) Endometrial preparation with Dienogest before hysteroscopic surgery: a systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 295(3):661–667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-016-4244-1CrossRefPubMed

27.

ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins–Gynecology (2009) ACOG practice bulletin no. 104: antibiotic prophylaxis for gynecologic procedures. Obstet Gynecol 113(5):1180–1189. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0b013e3181a6d011CrossRef

28.

Nada AM, Elzayat AR, Awad MH, Metwally AA, Taher AM, Ogila AI, Askalany AN, Mohsen RA, Mostafa M, Abdelaal H (2016) Cervical priming by vaginal or oral misoprostol before operative hysteroscopy: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23(7):1107–1112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2016.08.002CrossRefPubMed

29.

Cooper NA, Smith P, Khan KS, Clark TJ (2011) Does cervical preparation before outpatient hysteroscopy reduce women’s pain experience? A systematic review. BJOG 118(11):1292–1301. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03046.xCrossRefPubMed

30.

Nappi C, Di Spiezio Sardo A (2014) State-of-the-art hysteroscopic approaches to pathologies of the genital tract. Endo-Press, Tuttlingen

31.

Di Spiezio Sardo A, Bettocchi S, Spinelli M, Guida M, Nappi L, Angioni S, Sosa Fernandez LM, Nappi C (2010) Review of new office-based hysteroscopic procedures 2003–2009. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17(4):436–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2010.03.014CrossRef

32.

De Wilde RL (2014) Office hysteroscopy: trophyscope CAMPO compact hysteroscope ((R)): manufacturer: KARL STORZ, Tuttlingen, Germany. J Obstet Gynaecol India 64(4):301–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-014-0593-5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Di Spiezio Sardo A, Zizolfi B, Lodhi W, Bifulco G, Fernandez L, Spinelli M, Nappi C (2012) See and treat ‘outpatient hysteroscopy with novel fibreoptic’ alphascope. J Obstet Gynaecol 32(3):298–300. https://doi.org/10.3109/01443615.2011.645922CrossRef

34.

Craciunas L, Sajid MS, Howell R (2013) Carbon dioxide versus normal saline as distension medium for diagnostic hysteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Fertil Steril 100(6):1709–1714 e1701–1704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.2003CrossRef

35.

Umranikar S, Clark TJ, Saridogan E, Miligkos D, Arambage K, Torbe E, Campo R, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Tanos V, Grimbizis G, British Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy/European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy Guideline Development Group for Management of Fluid Distension Media in Operative H (2016) BSGE/ESGE guideline on management of fluid distension media in operative hysteroscopy. Gynecol Surg 13(4):289–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-016-0983-zCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

36.

Cooper NA, Smith P, Khan KS, Clark TJ (2011) A systematic review of the effect of the distension medium on pain during outpatient hysteroscopy. Fertil Steril 95(1):264–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.080CrossRefPubMed

37.

Karaman E, Kolusari A, Cetin O, Cim N, Alkis I, Karaman Y, Guler S (2017) What should the optimal intrauterine pressure be during outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopy? A randomized comparative study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 43(5):902–908. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.13293CrossRefPubMed

38.

Shirk GJ, Gimpelson RJ (1994) Control of intrauterine fluid pressure during operative hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1(3):229–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1074-3804(05)81015-1CrossRefPubMed

39.

Bettocchi S, Selvaggi L (1997) A vaginoscopic approach to reduce the pain of office hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 4(2):255–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1074-3804(97)80019-9CrossRefPubMed

40.

Guida M, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Acunzo G, Sparice S, Bramante S, Piccoli R, Bifulco G, Cirillo D, Pellicano M, Nappi C (2006) Vaginoscopic versus traditional office hysteroscopy: a randomized controlled study. Hum Reprod 21(12):3253–3257. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/del298CrossRefPubMed

41.

Kokanali MK, Cavkaytar S, Guzel AI, Topcu HO, Eroglu E, Aksakal O, Doganay M (2014) Impact of preprocedural anxiety levels on pain perception in patients undergoing office hysteroscopy. J Chin Med Assoc 77(9):477–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcma.2014.07.004CrossRefPubMed

42.

Bettocchi S, Bramante S, Bifulco G, Spinelli M, Ceci O, Fascilla FD, Di Spiezio Sardo A (2016) Challenging the cervix: strategies to overcome the anatomic impediments to hysteroscopy: analysis of 31,052 office hysteroscopies. Fertil Steril 105(5):e16–e17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.01.030CrossRefPubMed

43.

Bifulco G, Piccoli R, Lavitola G, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Spinelli M, Cavallaro A, Nappi C (2010) Endocervicoscopy: a new technique for the diagnostic work-up of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia allowing a tailored excisional therapy in young fertile women. Fertil Steril 94(7):2726–2731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.03.079CrossRefPubMed

44.

Cooper NA, Smith P, Khan KS, Clark TJ (2010) Vaginoscopic approach to outpatient hysteroscopy: a systematic review of the effect on pain. BJOG 117(5):532–539. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02503.xCrossRefPubMed

45.

Bettocchi S, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Guida M, Bifulco G, Borriello M, Nappi C (2007) Could office endometrial biopsy be accurate as EBHR for assessing the preoperative tumor grade? Eur J Surg Oncol 33(8):1047–1048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2007.01.019CrossRefPubMed

46.

Martinelli F, Ditto A, Bogani G, Signorelli M, Chiappa V, Lorusso D, Haeusler E, Raspagliesi F (2017) Accuracy of pre-operative hysteroscopic guided biopsy for predicting final pathology in uterine malignancies. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 143(7):1275–1279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-017-2371-0CrossRefPubMed

47.

Bettocchi S, Di Venere R, Pansini N, Pansini MV, Pellegrino A, Santamato S, Ceci O (2002) Endometrial biopsies using small-diameter hysteroscopes and 5F instruments: how can we obtain enough material for a correct histologic diagnosis? J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 9(3):290–292CrossRef

48.

De Franciscis P, Riemma G, Schiattarella A, Cobellis L, Guadagno M, Vitale SG, Mosca L, Cianci A, Colacurci N (2019) Concordance between the hysteroscopic diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia and histopathological examination. Diagnostics (Basel) 9(4):142. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics9040142CrossRef

49.

Dakhly DM, Abdel Moety GA, Saber W, Gad Allah SH, Hashem AT, Abdel Salam LO (2016) Accuracy of hysteroscopic endomyometrial biopsy in diagnosis of adenomyosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23(3):364–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2015.11.004CrossRefPubMed

50.

Vilos GA, Abu-Rafea B (2005) New developments in ambulatory hysteroscopic surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 19(5):727–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2005.06.012CrossRefPubMed

51.

Stamatellos I, Stamatopoulos P, Bontis J (2007) The role of hysteroscopy in the current management of the cervical polyps. Arch Gynecol Obstet 276(4):299–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-007-0417-2CrossRefPubMed

52.

Litta P, Cosmi E, Saccardi C, Esposito C, Rui R, Ambrosini G (2008) Outpatient operative polypectomy using a 5 mm-hysteroscope without anaesthesia and/or analgesia: advantages and limits. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 139(2):210–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.11.008CrossRefPubMed

53.

Deans R, Abbott J (2010) Review of intrauterine adhesions. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17(5):555–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2010.04.016CrossRefPubMed

54.

Di Spiezio Sardo A, Zizolfi B, Bettocchi S, Exacoustos C, Nocera C, Nazzaro G, da Cunha Vieira M, Nappi C (2016) Accuracy of hysteroscopic metroplasty with the combination of presurgical 3-dimensional ultrasonography and a novel graduated intrauterine palpator: a randomized controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23(4):557–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2016.01.020CrossRef

55.

Bettocchi S, Ceci O, Di Venere R, Pansini MV, Pellegrino A, Marello F, Nappi L (2002) Advanced operative office hysteroscopy without anaesthesia: analysis of 501 cases treated with a 5 Fr bipolar electrode. Hum Reprod 17(9):2435–2438. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.9.2435CrossRefPubMed

56.

Vilos GA (1999) Intrauterine surgery using a new coaxial bipolar electrode in normal saline solution (Versapoint): a pilot study. Fertil Steril 72(4):740–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00329-5CrossRefPubMed

57.

Papalampros P, Gambadauro P, Papadopoulos N, Polyzos D, Chapman L, Magos A (2009) The mini-resectoscope: a new instrument for office hysteroscopic surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 88(2):227–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016340802516585CrossRefPubMed

58.

Casadio P, Gubbini G, Morra C, Franchini M, Paradisi R, Seracchioli R (2019) Channel-like 360 degrees isthmocele treatment with a 16F mini-resectoscope: a step-by-step technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 26(7):1229–1230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2019.04.024CrossRefPubMed

59.

Emanuel MH, Wamsteker K (2005) The intra uterine morcellator: a new hysteroscopic operating technique to remove intrauterine polyps and myomas. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12(1):62–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2004.12.011CrossRefPubMed

60.

Ceci O, Franchini M, Cannone R, Giarre G, Bettocchi S, Fascilla FD, Cicinelli E (2019) Office treatment of large endometrial polyps using truclear 5C: feasibility and acceptability. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 45(3):626–633. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.13874CrossRefPubMed

61.

Bigatti G (2010) IBS^® Integrated Bigatti Shaver, an alternative approach to operative hysteroscopy. Gynecol Surg 8(2):187–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-010-0634-8CrossRef

62.

Bigatti G, Franchetti S, Rosales M, Baglioni A, Bianchi S (2014) Hysteroscopic myomectomy with the IBS^® integrated Bigatti Shaver versus conventional bipolar resectoscope: a retrospective comparative study. Gynecol Surg 11(1):9–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-013-0827-zCrossRef

63.

Rovira Pampalona J, Degollada Bastos M, Mancebo Moreno G, Ratia Garcia E, Buron Pust A, Mateu Prunonosa JC, Guerra Garcia A, Carreras Collado R, Bresco Torras P (2015) Outpatient hysteroscopic polypectomy: bipolar energy system (Versapoint(R)) versus mechanical energy system (TRUCLEAR System(R))—preliminary results. Gynecol Obstet Invest 80(1):3–9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000377700CrossRefPubMed

64.

Dealberti D, Riboni F, Cosma S, Pisani C, Montella F, Saitta S, Calagna G, Di Spiezio Sardo A (2016) Feasibility and acceptability of office-based polypectomy with a 16F mini-resectoscope: a multicenter clinical study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23(3):418–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2015.12.016CrossRefPubMed

65.

Di Spiezio Sardo A, Mazzon I, Bramante S, Bettocchi S, Bifulco G, Guida M, Nappi C (2008) Hysteroscopic myomectomy: a comprehensive review of surgical techniques. Hum Reprod Update 14(2):101–119. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmm041CrossRef

66.

Khan Z, Goldberg JM (2018) Hysteroscopic management of Asherman’s syndrome. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 25(2):218–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2017.09.020CrossRefPubMed

67.

Allen RH, Micks E, Edelman A (2013) Pain relief for obstetric and gynecologic ambulatory procedures. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 40(4):625–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2013.08.005CrossRef

68.

Gallos ID, Krishan P, Shehmar M, Ganesan R, Gupta JK (2013) LNG-IUS versus oral progestogen treatment for endometrial hyperplasia: a long-term comparative cohort study. Hum Reprod 28(11):2966–2971. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det320CrossRefPubMed

69.

Agostini A, Cravello L, Shojai R, Ronda I, Roger V, Blanc B (2002) Postoperative infection and surgical hysteroscopy. Fertil Steril 77(4):766–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(01)03252-6CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Updates in office hysteroscopy: a practical decalogue to perform a correct procedure
verfasst von: Salvatore Giovanni Vitale
Simone Bruni
Benito Chiofalo
Gaetano Riemma
Ricardo Bassil Lasmar
Publikationsdatum: 01.02.2020
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Updates in Surgery / Ausgabe 4/2020
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Elektronische ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00713-w

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

23.04.2024 | Ablationstherapie | Nachrichten

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 | Appendizitis | Nachrichten

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 | Operationsvorbereitung | Nachrichten

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

19.04.2024 | EAU 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

weitere anzeigen

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2020

Subcuticular sutures in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a comparative study to evaluate wound infection rates and cosmetic results

Side-to-side duodenojejunostomy after resection of third and fourth duodenal portions with pancreatic preservation

The use of Ursolit for gallstone prophylaxis following bariatric surgery: a randomized-controlled trial

Prevention of the “slippage” effect in right hemicolectomy

Patient-Derived Orthotopic Xenograft models in gastric cancer: a systematic review

Hemocoagulative post-operative changes after laparoscopic surgery compared to open surgery: the role of lupus anticoagulant

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

Update Chirurgie

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“