Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 9/2017

23.12.2016

Uptake of enhanced recovery practices by SAGES members: a survey

verfasst von: Deborah S. Keller, Conor P. Delaney, Anthony J. Senagore, Liane S. Feldman, on Behalf of the SAGES SMART Task Force

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 9/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The SAGES Surgical Multimodal Accelerated Recovery Trajectory (SMART) Enhanced Recovery Task Force aims to increase awareness and provide tools for members to successfully implement enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs) to improve clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. An initial step was to survey SAGES member on their knowledge, use, and impediments to enhanced recovery.

Methods

An online survey designed by SMART committee members to define SAGES member’s awareness and use of enhanced recovery principles and practice was emailed to all SAGES members. Reminders were sent 2 and 3 weeks later, encouraging completion of the survey. The web-based survey included 48 questions and took an estimated 20 min to complete.

Results

A total of 229 members completed the survey. Respondents were primarily general/MIS surgeons (82.6%) working in an urban location (85.5%), with a bell-shaped age distribution (median 35–44). Almost half regularly used some elements of ERPs (48.7%), but 30% were unfamiliar with the concept. Wide variety in the specific ERP elements used and discharge criteria were reported. The majority had to create and implement their own plan (70.4%). Roadblocks to implementation were inconsistencies with partners/covering physicians (56.3%), nursing education (46.6%), and resources (34.7%). When implemented, members saw improvements in length of stay (88%), patient satisfaction (54.7%), postoperative pain (53.3%), time to return of bowel function (52.7%), and readmissions (16.7%). A need for education and standardization was especially seen in preoperative care, with 74.4% fasting patients from midnight the night before surgery. Wide variations were also reported in pain management practices. An overwhelming majority (89%) reported that having a protocol endorsed by a national organization, such as SAGES, would help with implementation.

Conclusions

From this survey of SAGES members, there is a need for education, tools, and standardized protocols to increase awareness, support implementation, and encourage wider utilization of ERP. The overwhelming majority stated having a protocol endorsed by a national organization, such as SAGES, would facilitate implementation.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kehlet H, Mogensen T (1999) Hospital stay of 2 days after open sigmoidectomy with a multimodal rehabilitation programme. Br J Surg 86:227–230CrossRefPubMed Kehlet H, Mogensen T (1999) Hospital stay of 2 days after open sigmoidectomy with a multimodal rehabilitation programme. Br J Surg 86:227–230CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2002) Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 183:630–641CrossRefPubMed Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2002) Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 183:630–641CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2008) Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg 248:189–198CrossRefPubMed Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2008) Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg 248:189–198CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Eskicioglu C, Forbes SS, Aarts MA, Okrainec A, McLeod RS (2009) Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs for patients having colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Gastrointest Surg 13:2321–2329CrossRefPubMed Eskicioglu C, Forbes SS, Aarts MA, Okrainec A, McLeod RS (2009) Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs for patients having colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Gastrointest Surg 13:2321–2329CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M et al (2005) Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr 24:466–477CrossRefPubMed Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M et al (2005) Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr 24:466–477CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Feroci F, Kroning KC, Lenzi E, Moraldi L, Cantafio S, Scatizzi M (2011) Laparoscopy within a fast-track program enhances the short-term results after elective surgery for resectable colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 25:2919–2925CrossRefPubMed Feroci F, Kroning KC, Lenzi E, Moraldi L, Cantafio S, Scatizzi M (2011) Laparoscopy within a fast-track program enhances the short-term results after elective surgery for resectable colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 25:2919–2925CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Fierens J, Wolthuis AM, Penninckx F, D’Hoore A (2012) Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol: prospective study of outcome in colorectal surgery. Acta Chir Belg 112:355–358CrossRefPubMed Fierens J, Wolthuis AM, Penninckx F, D’Hoore A (2012) Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol: prospective study of outcome in colorectal surgery. Acta Chir Belg 112:355–358CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Haverkamp MP, de Roos MA, Ong KH (2012) The ERAS protocol reduces the length of stay after laparoscopic colectomies. Surg Endosc 26:361–367CrossRefPubMed Haverkamp MP, de Roos MA, Ong KH (2012) The ERAS protocol reduces the length of stay after laparoscopic colectomies. Surg Endosc 26:361–367CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat King PM, Blazeby JM, Ewings P et al (2006) Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme. Br J Surg 93:300–308CrossRefPubMed King PM, Blazeby JM, Ewings P et al (2006) Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme. Br J Surg 93:300–308CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Pawa N, Cathcart PL, Arulampalam TH, Tutton MG, Motson RW (2012) Enhanced recovery program following colorectal resection in the elderly patient. World J Surg 36:415–423CrossRefPubMed Pawa N, Cathcart PL, Arulampalam TH, Tutton MG, Motson RW (2012) Enhanced recovery program following colorectal resection in the elderly patient. World J Surg 36:415–423CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Poon JT, Fan JK, Lo OS, Law WL (2011) Enhanced recovery program in laparoscopic colectomy for cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 26:71–77CrossRefPubMed Poon JT, Fan JK, Lo OS, Law WL (2011) Enhanced recovery program in laparoscopic colectomy for cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 26:71–77CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Teeuwen PH, Bleichrodt RP, Strik C et al (2010) Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) versus conventional postoperative care in colorectal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 14:88–95CrossRefPubMed Teeuwen PH, Bleichrodt RP, Strik C et al (2010) Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) versus conventional postoperative care in colorectal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 14:88–95CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Teeuwen PH, Bleichrodt RP, de Jong PJ, van Goor H, Bremers AJ (2011) Enhanced recovery after surgery versus conventional perioperative care in rectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 54:833–839CrossRefPubMed Teeuwen PH, Bleichrodt RP, de Jong PJ, van Goor H, Bremers AJ (2011) Enhanced recovery after surgery versus conventional perioperative care in rectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 54:833–839CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Walter CJ, Collin J, Dumville JC, Drew PJ, Monson JR (2009) Enhanced recovery in colorectal resections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 11:344–353CrossRefPubMed Walter CJ, Collin J, Dumville JC, Drew PJ, Monson JR (2009) Enhanced recovery in colorectal resections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 11:344–353CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Wind J, Polle SW, Fung Kon Jin PH et al (2006) Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery. Br J Surg 93:800–809CrossRefPubMed Wind J, Polle SW, Fung Kon Jin PH et al (2006) Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery. Br J Surg 93:800–809CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Delaney CP, Fazio VW, Senagore AJ, Robinson B, Halverson AL, Remzi FH (2001) ‘Fast track’ postoperative management protocol for patients with high co-morbidity undergoing complex abdominal and pelvic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 88:1533–1538CrossRefPubMed Delaney CP, Fazio VW, Senagore AJ, Robinson B, Halverson AL, Remzi FH (2001) ‘Fast track’ postoperative management protocol for patients with high co-morbidity undergoing complex abdominal and pelvic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 88:1533–1538CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Delaney CP, Zutshi M, Senagore AJ, Remzi FH, Hammel J, Fazio VW (2003) Prospective, randomized, controlled trial between a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet and traditional postoperative care after laparotomy and intestinal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 46:851–859CrossRefPubMed Delaney CP, Zutshi M, Senagore AJ, Remzi FH, Hammel J, Fazio VW (2003) Prospective, randomized, controlled trial between a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet and traditional postoperative care after laparotomy and intestinal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 46:851–859CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Joh YG, Lindsetmo RO, Stulberg J, Obias V, Champagne B, Delaney CP (2008) Standardized postoperative pathway: accelerating recovery after ileostomy closure. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1786–1789CrossRefPubMed Joh YG, Lindsetmo RO, Stulberg J, Obias V, Champagne B, Delaney CP (2008) Standardized postoperative pathway: accelerating recovery after ileostomy closure. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1786–1789CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Adamina M, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Kehlet H (2015) A systematic review of economic evaluations of enhanced recovery pathways for colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 261:e138CrossRefPubMed Adamina M, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Kehlet H (2015) A systematic review of economic evaluations of enhanced recovery pathways for colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 261:e138CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Feldman LS, Delaney CP (2014) Laparoscopy plus enhanced recovery: optimizing the benefits of MIS through SAGES ‘SMART’ program. Surg Endosc 28:1403–1406CrossRefPubMed Feldman LS, Delaney CP (2014) Laparoscopy plus enhanced recovery: optimizing the benefits of MIS through SAGES ‘SMART’ program. Surg Endosc 28:1403–1406CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W et al (2012) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society recommendations. Clin Nutr 31:783–800CrossRefPubMed Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W et al (2012) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society recommendations. Clin Nutr 31:783–800CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W et al (2013) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS((R))) Society recommendations. World J Surg 37:259–284CrossRefPubMed Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W et al (2013) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS((R))) Society recommendations. World J Surg 37:259–284CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Nygren J, Thacker J, Carli F et al (2013) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS((R))) Society recommendations. World J Surg 37:285–305CrossRefPubMed Nygren J, Thacker J, Carli F et al (2013) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS((R))) Society recommendations. World J Surg 37:285–305CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhuang CL, Ye XZ, Zhang XD, Chen BC, Yu Z (2013) Enhanced recovery after surgery programs versus traditional care for colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 56:667–678CrossRefPubMed Zhuang CL, Ye XZ, Zhang XD, Chen BC, Yu Z (2013) Enhanced recovery after surgery programs versus traditional care for colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 56:667–678CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW et al (2011) Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg 254:868–875CrossRefPubMed Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW et al (2011) Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg 254:868–875CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Thiele RH, Rea KM, Turrentine FE et al (2015) Standardization of care: impact of an enhanced recovery protocol on length of stay, complications, and direct costs after colorectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg 220:430–443CrossRefPubMed Thiele RH, Rea KM, Turrentine FE et al (2015) Standardization of care: impact of an enhanced recovery protocol on length of stay, complications, and direct costs after colorectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg 220:430–443CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu CL, Benson AR, Hobson DB et al (2015) Initiating an enhanced recovery pathway program: an Anesthesiology Department’s Perspective. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 41:447–456CrossRefPubMed Wu CL, Benson AR, Hobson DB et al (2015) Initiating an enhanced recovery pathway program: an Anesthesiology Department’s Perspective. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 41:447–456CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Hui V, Hyman N, Viscomi C, Osler T (2013) Implementing a fast-track protocol for patients undergoing bowel resection: not so fast. Am J Surg 206:152–158CrossRefPubMed Hui V, Hyman N, Viscomi C, Osler T (2013) Implementing a fast-track protocol for patients undergoing bowel resection: not so fast. Am J Surg 206:152–158CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Spanjersberg WR, van Sambeeck JD, Bremers A, Rosman C, van Laarhoven CJ (2015) Systematic review and meta-analysis for laparoscopic versus open colon surgery with or without an ERAS programme. Surg Endosc 29:3443–3453CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Spanjersberg WR, van Sambeeck JD, Bremers A, Rosman C, van Laarhoven CJ (2015) Systematic review and meta-analysis for laparoscopic versus open colon surgery with or without an ERAS programme. Surg Endosc 29:3443–3453CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Rooth C, Sidhu A (2012) Implementing enhanced recovery in gynaecology oncology. Br J Nurs 21:S4, S7-10, S12 passim Rooth C, Sidhu A (2012) Implementing enhanced recovery in gynaecology oncology. Br J Nurs 21:S4, S7-10, S12 passim
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Steenhagen E (2016) Enhanced recovery after surgery: it’s time to change practice! Nutr Clin Pract 31:18–29CrossRefPubMed Steenhagen E (2016) Enhanced recovery after surgery: it’s time to change practice! Nutr Clin Pract 31:18–29CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Baack Kukreja JE, Messing EM, Shah JB (2016) Are we doing “better”? The discrepancy between perception and practice of enhanced recovery after cystectomy principles among urologic oncologists. Urol Oncol 34:120.e17–120.e21CrossRef Baack Kukreja JE, Messing EM, Shah JB (2016) Are we doing “better”? The discrepancy between perception and practice of enhanced recovery after cystectomy principles among urologic oncologists. Urol Oncol 34:120.e17–120.e21CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Gustafsson UO, Hausel J, Thorell A, Ljungqvist O, Soop M, Nygren J (2011) Adherence to the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery. Arch Surg 146:571–577CrossRefPubMed Gustafsson UO, Hausel J, Thorell A, Ljungqvist O, Soop M, Nygren J (2011) Adherence to the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery. Arch Surg 146:571–577CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Uptake of enhanced recovery practices by SAGES members: a survey
verfasst von
Deborah S. Keller
Conor P. Delaney
Anthony J. Senagore
Liane S. Feldman
on Behalf of the SAGES SMART Task Force
Publikationsdatum
23.12.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 9/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5378-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2017

Surgical Endoscopy 9/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.