Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Konkret geht es um den Diabetes-Patienten mit kardiovaskulären Erkrankungen oder Risiken, die Herzinsuffizienz sowie die kardiovaskuläre Primär- und Sekundärprävention. Sind Sie hier schon auf dem neuesten Stand? Unsere Experten beleuchten, wo und warum das bisherige Procedere geändert werden soll und was in der Praxis sinnvoll ist. Holen Sie sich Ihr Update und 2 CME-Punkte beim MMW-Webinar am 24. April von 17.30 bis 19 Uhr. 
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Translational Behavioral Medicine
Erschienen in: Translational Behavioral Medicine 4/2016

30.11.2015 | Original Research

Uptake of evidence-based physical activity programs: comparing perceptions of adopters and nonadopters

verfasst von: Sallie Beth Johnson, MPH, Samantha M Harden, PhD, Paul A Estabrooks, PhD

Erschienen in: Translational Behavioral Medicine | Ausgabe 4/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Translating evidence-based physical activity interventions into practice have been problematic. Limited research exists on the adoption decision-making process. This study explored health educator perceptions of two evidence-based, physical activity programs—one was developed through an integrated research-practice partnership approach (FitEx) and the other was research-developed, Active Living Every Day (ALED). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 health educators who were trained on either ALED (n = 6) or FitEx (n = 6) and had either delivered (n = 6) or did not deliver (n = 6) the intervention. Program adopters identified with program characteristics, materials, processes, implementation, fit within system, and collaborations as more positive factors in decision-making when compared to those that did not deliver. FitEx health educators were more likely to deliver the program and found it to be a better fit and easier to use. An integrated research-practice partnership may improve adoption of physical activity programs in typical practice settings.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Surgeon General's report on physical activity and health. JAMA. 1996, 276:522.
2.
Heath GW, Parra DC, Sarmiento OL, Andersen LB, et al. Evidence-based intervention in physical activity: lessons from around the world. Lancet. 2012; 380: 272-281.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Beedie C, Mann S, Jimenez A. Community fitness center-based physical activity interventions: a brief review. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2014; 13: 267-274.CrossRefPubMed
4.
5.
Kahn EB, Ramsey LT, Brownson RC, et al. The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity. A systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2002; 22: 73-107.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Task Force for Community Preventive Services. Recommendations to increase physical activity in communities. Am J Prev Med. 2002; 22: 67-72.CrossRef
7.
Task Force for Community Preventive Services. Methods used for reviewing evidence and linking evidence to recommendation. In by Zaza S BP, Harris KW, eds. The Guide to Community Preventive Services: What Works to Promote Health?. Atlanta, GA: Oxford University Press; 2005: 431-448
8.
Roux L, Pratt M, Tengs TO, et al. Cost effectiveness of community-based physical activity interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2008; 35: 578-588.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Sheppard L, Senior J, Park CH, Mockenhaupt R, et al. The National Blueprint Consensus Conference summary report: strategic priorities for increasing physical activity among adults aged ≥ 50. Am J Prev Med. 2003; 25: 209-213.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Heath GW. The role of the public health sector in promoting physical activity: national, state, and local applications. J Phys Act Health. 2009; 6: S159-S167.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Brownson RC, Jones E. Bridging the gap: translating research into policy and practice. Prev Med. 2009; 49: 313-315.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Dzewaltowski DA, Estabrooks PA, Glasgow RE. The future of physical activity behavior change research: what is needed to improve translation of research into health promotion practice? Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2004; 32: 57-63.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Downey SM, Wages J, Jackson SF, Estabrooks PA. Adoption decisions and implementation of a community-based physical activity program: a mixed methods study. Health Promot Pract. 2012; 13: 175-182.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Rabin BA, Brownson RC, Haire-Joshu D, Kreuter MW, Weaver NL. A glossary for dissemination and implementation research in health. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008; 14: 117-123.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Goode AD, Eakin EG. Dissemination of an evidence-based telephone-delivered lifestyle intervention: factors associated with successful implementation and evaluation. Transl Behav Med. 2013; 3: 351-356.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Glasgow RE, Bull SS, Gillette C, Klesges LM, et al. Behavior change intervention research in healthcare settings: a review of recent reports with emphasis on external validity. Am J Prev Med. 2002; 23: 62-69.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Haggis C, Sims-Gould J, Winters M, Gutteridge K, et al. Sustained impact of community-based physical activity interventions: key elements for success. BMC Public Health. 2013; 13: 892.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Rogers E. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press; 1962.
19.
Rogers E. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press; 2003.
20.
Moseley SF. Everett Rogers' diffusion of innovations theory: its utility and value in public health. J Health Commun. 2004; 9(Suppl 1): 149-151.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Ammerman A, Smith TW, Calancie L. Practice-based evidence in public health: improving reach, relevance, and results. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014; 35: 47-63.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Jagosh J, Macaulay AC, et al. Uncovering the benefits of participatory research: implications of a realist review for health research and practice. Milbank Q. 2012; 90: 311-346.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Glasgow RE, Green LW, Taylor MV, Stange KC. An evidence integration triangle for aligning science with policy and practice. Am J Prev Med. 2012; 42: 646-654.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Green LW. Public health asks of systems science: to advance our evidence-based practice, can you help us get more practice-based evidence? Am J Public Health. 2006; 3: 406-9.CrossRef
25.
Kessler R, Glasgow RE. A proposal to speed translation of healthcare research into practice: dramatic change is needed. Am J Prev Med. 2011; 40: 637-644.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Estabrooks PA, Glasgow RE. Translating effective clinic-based physical activity interventions into practice. Am J Prev Med. 2006; 31: S45-56.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Chambers DA, Azrin ST. Research and services partnerships: partnership: a fundamental component of dissemination and implementation research. Psychiatr Serv. 2013; 64: 509-511.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Glasgow RE, Vinson C, Chambers D, Khoury MJ, et al. National Institutes of Health approaches to dissemination and implementation science: current and future directions. Am J Public Health. 2012; 102: 1274-1281.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK. Dissemination and implementation research in health: translating science to practice. Oxford University Press; 2012.
30.
31.
Kessler RS, Purcell EP, Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, et al. What does it mean to "employ" the RE-AIM model? Eval Health Prof. 2013; 36: 44-66.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Glasgow RE. What does it mean to be pragmatic? Pragmatic methods, measures, and models to facilitate research translation. Health Educ Behav. 2013; 40: 257-265.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, et al. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012; 50: 217-226.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Wilcox S, Dowda M, Leviton LC, Bartlett-Prescott J, et al. Active for life: final results from the translation of two physical activity programs. Am J Prev Med. 2008; 35: 340-351.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Baruth M, Wilcox S. Effectiveness of two evidence-based programs in participants with arthritis: findings from the active for life initiative. Arthritis Care Res. 2011; 63: 1038-1047.CrossRef
36.
Dunn AL, Buller DB, Dearing JW, Cutter G, et al. Adopting an evidence-based lifestyle physical activity program: dissemination study design and methods. Transl Behav Med. 2012; 2: 199-208.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Estabrooks PA, Bradshaw M, Dzewaltowski DA, Smith-Ray RL. Determining the impact of Walk Kansas: applying a team-building approach to community physical activity promotion. Ann Behav Med. 2008; 36: 1-12.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Rubin HJ, Rubin IS. Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2004.
39.
Dedoose 4.5. Web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data Los Angeles, CA: SocioCultural Research Consultants, LLC; 2013.
40.
Wilcox S, Parra-Medina D, Felton GM, Poston MB, et al. Adoption and implementation of physical activity and dietary counseling by community health center providers and nurses. J Phys Act Health. 2010; 7: 602-612.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
Harden S, Johnson S, Almeida F, Estabrooks P. Improving physical activity program adoption using integrated research-practice partnerships: an effectiveness-implementation hybrid trial. Trans Behav Med. Under Review.
42.
Brownson RC, Ballew P, Dieffenderfer B, Haire-Joshu D, et al. Evidence-based interventions to promote physical activity: what contributes to dissemination by state health departments. Am J Prev Med. 2007; 33: S66-73.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Ory MG, Towne Jr SD, Stevens AB, Park CH, et al. Implementing and disseminating exercise programs for older adult populations. Exercise for Aging Adults. 2015: 139-150.
44.
Naylor P-J, Nettlefold L, Race D, Hoy C, et al. Implementation of school based physical activity interventions: A systematic review. Prev Med. 2015; 72: 95-115.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Durlak JA, DuPre EP. Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. Am J Community Psychol. 2008; 41: 327-350.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Wandersman A, Chien VH, Katz J. Toward an evidence-based system for innovation support for implementing innovations with quality: tools, training, technical assistance, and quality assurance/quality improvement. Am J Community Psychol. 2012; 50: 445-459.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Wandersman A. Four keys to success (theory, implementation, evaluation, and resource/system support): high hopes and challenges in participation. Am J Community Psychol. 2009; 43: 3-21.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Harden S, Gaglio B, Shoup J, Kinney K, et al. Fidelity to and comparative results across behavioral interventions evaluated through the RE-AIM framework: A systematic review. Systematic Reviews. 2015.
49.
Green LW, Glasgow RE, Atkins D, Stange K. Making evidence from research more relevant, useful, and actionable in policy, program planning, and practice slips "twixt cup and lip". Am J Prev Med. 2009; 37: S187-191.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Tennant B, Stellefson M, Dodd V, Chaney B, et al. eHealth literacy and Web 2.0 health information seeking behaviors among baby boomers and older adults. J Med Internet Res. 2015; 17: e70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
51.
Estabrooks PA, Smith-Ray RL, Dzewaltowski DA, Dowdy D, et al. Sustainability of evidence-based community-based physical activity programs for older adults: lessons from Active for Life. Transl Behav Med. 2011; 1: 208-215.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
52.
Griffin SF, Wilcox S, Ory MG, Lattimore D, et al. Results from the Active for Life process evaluation: program delivery fidelity and adaptations. Health Educ Res. 2010; 25: 325-342.CrossRefPubMed
53.
Ory MG, Mier N, Sharkey JR, Anderson LA. Translating science into public health practice: lessons from physical activity interventions. Alzheimers Dement. 2007; 3: S52-57.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Peek CJ, Glasgow RE, Stange KC, Klesges LM, et al. The 5 R’s: an emerging bold standard for conducting relevant research in a changing world. Ann Family Med. 2014; 12: 447-455.CrossRef
55.
Evenson KR, Brownson RC, Satinsky SB, Eyler AA, et al. The U.S. National Physical Activity Plan: dissemination and use by public health practitioners. Am J Prev Med. 2013; 44: 431-438.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Uptake of evidence-based physical activity programs: comparing perceptions of adopters and nonadopters
verfasst von
Sallie Beth Johnson, MPH
Samantha M Harden, PhD
Paul A Estabrooks, PhD
Publikationsdatum
30.11.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Translational Behavioral Medicine / Ausgabe 4/2016
Print ISSN: 1869-6716
Elektronische ISSN: 1613-9860
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-015-0371-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2016

Translational Behavioral Medicine 4/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Case Study

Simplified Novel Application (SNApp) framework: a guide to developing and implementing second-generation mobile applications for behavioral health research

Practice and Public Health Policies

Impact of research investment on scientific productivity of junior researchers

Original Article

Support for indoor tanning policies among young adult women who indoor tan

Erratum

Erratum to: Implementation of an evidence-based intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening in community organizations: a cluster randomized trial

Original Research

Recall of indoor tanning salon warnings and safety guidelines among a national sample of tanners

Original Research

Implications of social media use on health information technology engagement: Data from HINTS 4 cycle 3