Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Konkret geht es um den Diabetes-Patienten mit kardiovaskulären Erkrankungen oder Risiken, die Herzinsuffizienz sowie die kardiovaskuläre Primär- und Sekundärprävention. Sind Sie hier schon auf dem neuesten Stand? Unsere Experten beleuchten, wo und warum das bisherige Procedere geändert werden soll und was in der Praxis sinnvoll ist. Holen Sie sich Ihr Update und 2 CME-Punkte beim MMW-Webinar am 24. April von 17.30 bis 19 Uhr. 
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Die Urologie
Erschienen in: Der Urologe 5/2014

01.05.2014 | Leitthema

Uretero(reno)skopie

Komplikationsmanagement

verfasst von: Prof. Dr. T. Knoll, G. Wendt-Nordahl

Erschienen in: Die Urologie | Ausgabe 5/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Zusammenfassung

Die rigide und flexible Uretero(reno)skopie (URS) sind effektive und sichere Verfahren in der interventionellen Steintherapie. Komplikationen sind selten und können in vielen Fällen bereits im Vorfeld vermieden werden. Bei Harnleitersteinen hat die URS vielerorts die extrakorporale Stoßwellenlithotripsie (ESWL) als Verfahren der ersten Wahl abgelöst. Hierbei ist es jedoch wichtig, den betreffenden Patienten die Vor- und Nachteile bzw. Risiken der Verfahren ausführlich zu beschreiben.
Literatur
1.
Geavlete P, Georgescu D, Nita G et al (2006) Complications of 2735 retrograde semirigid ureteroscopy procedures: a single-center experience. J Endourol 20(3):179–185PubMedCrossRef
2.
Michel MS, Trojan L, Rassweiler JJ (2007) Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 51(4):899–906PubMedCrossRef
3.
Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG et al (2007) 2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. J Urol 178(6):2418–2434PubMedCrossRef
4.
Tiselius HG, Ackermann D, Alken P et al (2001) Guidelines on urolithiasis. Eur Urol 40(4):362PubMedCrossRef
5.
Türk C, Knoll T, Petrik A et al (2011) Guidelines on Urolithiasis. European Association of Urology, Arnheim, Niederlande, pp 1–104. http://​www.​uroweb.​org/​guidelines
6.
Turna B, Stein RJ, Smaldone MC et al (2008) Safety and efficacy of flexible ureterorenoscopy and holmium: YAG lithotripsy for intrarenal stones in anticoagulated cases. J Urol 179(4):1415–1419PubMedCrossRef
7.
Semins MJ, Matlaga BR (2010) Management of stone disease in pregnancy. Curr Opin Urol 20(2):174–177PubMedCrossRef
8.
Gnessin E, Chertin L, Chertin B (2012) Current management of paediatric urolithiasis. 7:659–665. http://​ovidsp.​ovid.​com
9.
Jeong US, Lee S, Kang J et al (2013) Factors affecting the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for unilateral urinary stones in children: a 17-year single-institute experience. Korean J Urol 7:460–466. http://​ovidsp.​ovid.​com
10.
Somani BK, Ishii H, Ali A et al (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of flexible ureteroscopy and lasertripsy (FURSL) for large stones. J Urol 187(4):741CrossRef
11.
Aboumarzouk OM, Monga M, Kata SG et al (2012) Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for stones > 2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol 26(10):1257–1263PubMedCrossRef
12.
Scoffone CM, Cracco CM, Poggio M, Scarpa RM (2010) Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery for high burden renal stones. Arch Ital Urol Androl 82(1):41–42PubMed
13.
Ghani KR, Patel U, Anson K (2009) Computed tomography for percutaneous renal access. J Endurol 23(10):1633–1639CrossRef
14.
Lamb AD, Wines MD, Mousa S et al (2008) Plain radiography still is required in the planning of treatment for urolithiasis. J Endourol 22(10):2201–2205PubMedCrossRef
15.
Ben Nakhi A, Gupta R, Al-Hunayan A et al (2010) Comparative analysis and interobserver variation of unenhanced computed tomography and intravenous urography in the diagnosis of acute flank pain. Med Princ Pract 19(2):118–121CrossRef
16.
Jellison FC, Smith JC, Heldt JP et al (2009) Effect of low dose radiation computerized tomography protocols on distal ureteral calculus detection. J Urol 182(6):2762–2767PubMedCrossRef
17.
Shine S (2008) Urinary calculus: IVU vs. CT renal stone? A critically appraised topic. Abdom Imaging 33(1):41–43PubMedCrossRef
18.
Tuerk CK, Knoll T, Petrik A et al (2012) Guidelines office, guidelines on urolithiasis. Presented at the 27th EAU Congress, Paris
19.
Zanetti G, Paparella S, Trinchieri A et al (2008) Infections and urolithiasis: current clinical evidence in prophylaxis and antibiotic therapy. Arch Ital Urol Androl 80(1):5–12PubMed
20.
Dogan HS, Sahin A, Cetinkaya Y et al (2002) Antibiotic prophylaxis in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: prospective study in 81 patients. J Endurol 16(9):649–653CrossRef
21.
Wagenlehner FM, Schmiemann G, Hoyme U et al (2011) National S3 guideline on uncomplicated urinary tract infection: recommendations for treatment and management of uncomplicated community-acquired bacterial urinary tract infections in adult patients. Urologe A 50(2):153–169PubMedCrossRef
22.
Raum MR, Klotz T, Heidenreich A et al (1996) Compartment syndrome: a complication of lithotomy position. Urologe A 35(1):46–50PubMed
23.
Cybulski PA, Joo H, Honey RJ (2004) Ureteroscopy: anesthetic considerations. Urol Clin North Am 31(1):43PubMedCrossRef
24.
Yalcinkaya F, Topaloglu H, Ozmen E, Unal S (1996) Is general anaesthesia necessary for URS in women? Int Urol Nephrol 28(2):153–156PubMedCrossRef
25.
Knoll T (2009) S2 guidelines on diagnostic, therapy and metaphylaxis of urolithiasis: Part 1: diagnostic and therapy. Urologe A 48(8):917–924PubMedCrossRef
26.
Ji C, Gan W, Guo H et al (2012) A prospective trial on ureteral stenting combined with secondary ureteroscopy after an initial failed procedure. Acta Cir Bras 5:593–598. http://​ovidsp.​ovid.​com
27.
Shields JM, Bird VG, Reid G et al (2009) Impact of preoperative ureteral stenting on outcome of ureteroscopic treatment for urinary lithiasis. J Urol 182(6):2768–2774PubMedCrossRef
28.
Dickstein RJ, Kreshover JE, Babayan RK et al (2010) Is a safety wire necessary during routine flexible ureteroscopy? J Endourol 24(10):1589–1592PubMedCrossRef
29.
Eandi JA, Hu B, Low RK (2008) Evaluation of the impact and need for use of a safety guidewire during ureteroscopy. J Endourol 22(8):1653–1658PubMedCrossRef
30.
Traxer O, Thomas A (2013) Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery. Minerva Med 2:580–584. http://​ovidsp.​ovid.​com
31.
Papatsoris A, Chrisofos M, Skolarikos A et al (2013) Update on intracorporeal laser lithotripsy. Minerva Med 104(1):55–60. http://​ovidsp.​ovid.​com
32.
Elashry OM, Tawfik AM (2012) Preventing stone retropulsion during intracorporeal lithotripsy. Nat Rev Urol 9(12):691–698. http://​ovidsp.​ovid.​com
33.
Ahmed M, Pedro RN, Kieley S et al (2009) Systematic evaluation of ureteral occlusion devices: insertion, deployment, stone migration, and extraction. Urology 73(5):976–980PubMedCrossRef
34.
35.
Mishra S, Sabnis RB, Kurien A et al (2010) Questioning the wisdom of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): a prospective randomized controlled study of early tube removal vs tubeless PCNL. BJU Int 106(7):1045–1048PubMedCrossRef
36.
Knoll T, Wezel F, Michel MS et al (2010) Do patients benefit from miniaturized tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy? A comparative prospective study. J Endourol 24(7):1075–1079PubMedCrossRef
37.
Istanbulluoglu MO, Cicek T, Ozturk B et al (2009) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: nephrostomy or tubeless or totally tubeless? Urology 104(6):840–846
38.
Gupta NP, Kesarwani P, Goel R et al (2008) Comparison of standard with tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 22(7):1441–1446PubMedCrossRef
39.
Xu Y, Wei Q, Liu LR (2009) A prospective randomized trial comparing non-stented versus routine stented ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy. Saudi Med J 30(10):1276–1280PubMed
40.
Mustafa M, Ali EDB (2009) Stenting in extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy; may enhance the passage of the fragments! JPMA. J Pak Med Assoc 59(3):141–143PubMed
41.
Musa AA (2008) Use of double-J stents prior to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is not beneficial: results of a prospective randomized study. Int Urol Nephrol 40(1):19–22PubMedCrossRef
42.
Haleblian G, Kijvikain K, de la Rosette J et al (2008) Ureteral stenting and urinary stone management: a systematic review. J Urol 179(2):424–430PubMedCrossRef
43.
Shao Y, Zhuo J, Sun XW et al (2008) Nonstented versus routine stented ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy: a prospective randomized trial. Urol Res 36(5):259–263PubMedCrossRef
44.
Ibrahim HM, Al-Kandari AM, Shaaban HS et al (2008) Role of ureteral stenting after uncomplicated ureteroscopy for distal ureteral stones: a randomized, controlled trial. J Urol 180(3):961–965PubMedCrossRef
45.
Dellis A, Joshi HB, Timoney AG, Kelley FX Jr (2010) Relief of stent related symptoms: review of engineering and pharmacological solutions. J Urol 184(4):1267–1272PubMedCrossRef
46.
Nabi G, Cook J, N’Dow J et al (2007) Outcomes of stenting after uncomplicated ureteroscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 334(7593):572PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
47.
Joshi HB, Stainthorpe A, MacDonagh RP et al (2003) Indwelling ureteral stents: evaluation of symptoms, quality of life and utility. J Urol 169(3):1065–1069PubMedCrossRef
48.
Al-Kandari AM, Al-Shaiji TF, Shaaban H et al (2007) Effects of proximal and distal ends of double-J ureteral stent position on postprocedural symptoms and quality of life: a randomized clinical trial. J Endourol 21(7):698–702PubMedCrossRef
49.
Lee SJ, Yoo C, Oh CY et al (2010) Stent position is more important than alpha-blockers or anticholinergics for stent-related lower urinary tract symptoms after ureteroscopic ureterolithotomy: a prospective randomized study. Korean J Urol 51(9):636–641PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
50.
Jeon SS, Choi YS, Hong JH (2007) Determination of ideal stent length for endourologic surgery. J Endurol 21(8):906–910CrossRef
51.
Damiano R, Autorino R, De Sio M et al (2005) Does the size of ureteral stent impact urinary symptoms and quality of life? A prospective randomized study. Eur Urol 48(4):673–678PubMedCrossRef
52.
Rane A, Saleemi A, Cahill D et al (2001) Have stent-related symptoms anything to do with placement technique? J Endourol 15(7):741–745PubMedCrossRef
53.
Navanimitkul N, Lojanapiwat B (2010) Efficacy of tamsulosin 0.4 mg/day in relieving double-J stent-related symptoms: a randomized controlled study. J Int Med Res 38(4):1436–1441PubMedCrossRef
54.
Wang CJ, Huang SW, Chang CH (2009) Effects of specific alpha-1A/1D blocker on lower urinary tract symptoms due to double-J stent: a prospectively randomized study. Urol Res 37(3):147–152PubMedCrossRef
55.
Wang CJ, Huang SW, Chang CH (2009) Effects of tamsulosin on lower urinary tract symptoms due to double-J stent: a prospective study. Urol Int 83(1):66–69PubMedCrossRef
56.
Damiano R (2008) Effect of tamsulosin in preventing ureteral stent-related morbidity: a prospective study. J Endurol 22(4):651–656CrossRef
57.
Jeong H, Kwak C, Lee SE (2004) Ureteric stenting after ureteroscopy for ureteric stones: a prospective randomized study assessing symptoms and complications. BJU Int 93(7):1032–1034 (discussion 1034–1035)PubMedCrossRef
58.
Auge BK, Sarvis JA, L’Esperance JO, Preminger G (2007) Practice patterns of ureteral stenting after routine ureteroscopic stone surgery: a survey of practicing urologists. J Endourol 21(11):1287–1291PubMedCrossRef
59.
Shigemura K, Yasufuku T, Yamanaka K et al (2012) How long should double J stent be kept in after ureteroscopic lithotripsy? Urol Res 40(4):373–376PubMedCrossRef
60.
Perez Castro E, Osther PJ, Jinga V et al (2014) Differences in ureteroscopic stone treatment and outcomes for distal, mid-, proximal, or multiple ureteral locations: the clinical research office of the endourological society ureteroscopy global study. Eur Urol (Epub ahead of print)
61.
Pearle MS, Lingeman JE, Leveillee R et al (2008) Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less. J Urol 179(5 Suppl):69–73CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Uretero(reno)skopie
Komplikationsmanagement
verfasst von
Prof. Dr. T. Knoll
G. Wendt-Nordahl
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Die Urologie / Ausgabe 5/2014
Print ISSN: 2731-7064
Elektronische ISSN: 2731-7072
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-014-3479-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2014

Der Urologe 5/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Leitthema

Der Mensch in Hochzuverlässigkeitsorganisationen

Leitthema

Nephrektomie

Originalien

PSA-basierte Früherkennung des Prostatakarzinoms durch den Hausarzt

Leitthema

Zirkumzision und Orchidopexie

Berufspolitik BDU

Berufspolitik BDU

Leitthema

Hydrozele, Spermatozele und Vasektomie

Neu im Fachgebiet Urologie

18.04.2024 | Infertilität | Nachrichten

Viele Ärzte haben Probleme mit der Zeugungsfähigkeit

17.04.2024 | Postoperative nausea and vomiting | Nachrichten

Hochrisiko-Eingriffe für postoperative Übelkeit

10.04.2024 | PSA-Screening | Nachrichten

Einladung zum PSA-Screening senkt die Krebssterblichkeit

08.04.2024 | Andrologie | Nachrichten

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet
weitere anzeigen

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen