nach oben

Erschienen in:

25.04.2016 | Invited Review

Urolithiasis following urinary diversion

Erschienen in: Urolithiasis | Ausgabe 5/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Urolithiasis is a well-known occurrence after cystectomy and urinary diversion. With high incidence and recurrence rates of urolithiasis, complex anatomy and associated morbidities, these patients remain a management challenge for urologists. The purpose of this review is to examine the literature and consider the risk factors for stone formation in this group of patients and reflect on the reported outcomes with the range of available treatment options.

Terai A, Arai Y, Kawakita M, Okada Y, Yoshida O (1995) Effect of urinary intestinal diversion on urinary risk factors for urolithiasis. J Urol 153(1):37–41CrossRefPubMed

Ploeg M, Aben KK, Kiemeney LA (2009) The present and future burden of urinary bladder cancer in the world. World J Urol 27(3):289–293. doi:10.1007/s00345-009-0383-3 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Beiko DT, Razvi H (2002) Stones in urinary diversions: update on medical and surgical issues. Curr Opin Urol 12(4):297–303CrossRefPubMed

Hertzig LL, Iwaszko MR, Rangel LJ, Patterson DE, Gettman MT, Krambeck AE (2013) Urolithiasis after ileal conduit urinary diversion: a comparison of minimally invasive therapies. J Urol 189(6):2152–2157. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2012.12.003 CrossRefPubMed

Terai A, Ueda T, Kakehi Y, Terachi T, Arai Y, Okada Y, Yoshida O (1996) Urinary calculi as a late complication of the Indiana continent urinary diversion: comparison with the Kock pouch procedure. J Urol 155(1):66–68CrossRefPubMed

Cohen TD, Streem SB, Lammert G (1996) Long-term incidence and risks for recurrent stones following contemporary management of upper tract calculi in patients with a urinary diversion. J Urol 155(1):62–65CrossRefPubMed

Helmy TE, Elawdy MM, AbdelHalim A, Orban H, Nabeeh H, Dawaba M, Hafez AT (2015) Treatment of pouch stones after augmentation ileocystoplasty in children: is it always bothersome? Urology 85(1):195–198. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2014.09.021 CrossRefPubMed

N’Dow J, Robson CN, Matthews JN, Neal DE, Pearson JP (2001) Reducing mucus production after urinary reconstruction: a prospective randomized trial. J Urol 165(5):1433–1440CrossRefPubMed

Arif H, Madbouly K, Mahran MR, Ashamallah A, Ghoneim MA (1999) A prospective randomized study comparing absorbable and nonabsorbable staples in constructing antireflux valves of urethral hemi-Kock pouches. BJU Int 84(4):440–443CrossRefPubMed

10.

Turk TM, Koleski FC, Albala DM (1999) Incidence of urolithiasis in cystectomy patients after intestinal conduit or continent urinary diversion. World J Urol 17(5):305–307CrossRefPubMed

11.

Okhunov Z, Duty B, Smith AD, Okeke Z (2011) Management of urolithiasis in patients after urinary diversions. BJU Int 108(3):330–336. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10194.x CrossRefPubMed

12.

Webster C, Bukkapatnam R, Seigne JD, Pow-Sang J, Hoffman M, Helal M, Ordorica R, Lockhart JL (2003) Continent colonic urinary reservoir (Florida pouch): long-term surgical complications (greater than 11 years). J Urol 169(1):174–176. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000038954.98838.34 CrossRefPubMed

13.

Althausen AF, Hagen-Cook K, Hendren WH 3rd (1978) Non-refluxing colon conduit: experience with 70 cases. J Urol 120(1):35–39PubMed

14.

Schmidt JD, Hawtrey CE, Flocks RH, Culp DA (1973) Complications, results and problems of ileal conduit diversions. J Urol 109(2):210–216PubMed

15.

Gilbert SM, Lai J, Saigal CS, Gore JL (2013) Downstream complications following urinary diversion. J Urol 190(3):916–922. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2013.03.026 CrossRefPubMed

16.

Hall MK, Hackler RH, Zampieri TA, Zampieri JB (1989) Renal calculi in spinal cord-injured patient: association with reflux, bladder stones, and foley catheter drainage. Urology 34(3):126–128CrossRefPubMed

17.

Hensle TW, Bingham J, Lam J, Shabsigh A (2004) Preventing reservoir calculi after augmentation cystoplasty and continent urinary diversion: the influence of an irrigation protocol. BJU Int 93(4):585–587CrossRefPubMed

18.

Tollefson MK, Elliott DS, Zincke H, Frank I (2010) Long-term outcome of ureterosigmoidostomy: an analysis of patients with >10 years of follow-up. BJU Int 105(6):860–863. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08811.x CrossRefPubMed

19.

Abreu LA, Lara C, Dionisio MA, Pelosi AD, Figueiredo FA (2013) Endoscopic management of ureteral calculus in a patient with ureterosigmoidostomy diversion. Int Braz J Urol 39(4):593–596CrossRefPubMed

20.

Delvecchio FC, Kuo RL, Iselin CE, Webster GD, Preminger GM (2000) Combined antegrade and retrograde endoscopic approach for the management of urinary diversion-associated pathology. J Endourol 14(3):251–256CrossRefPubMed

21.

Fitzgerald KB, Aslan P, Preminger GM (1998) Endourological management of a large distal ureteral calculus in a patient with ureterosigmoidostomy diversion. J Urol 159(6):2081–2082CrossRefPubMed

22.

Breda A, Mossanen M, Leppert J, Harper J, Schulam PG, Churchill B (2010) Percutaneous cystolithotomy for calculi in reconstructed bladders: initial UCLA experience. J Urol 183(5):1989–1993. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2010.01.033 CrossRefPubMed

23.

Natalin RA, Xavier K, Kacker R, Gupta M (2009) Outpatient double percutaneous endolaparoscopic extraction of large continent urinary reservoir stones–a new minimally invasive approach. J Endourol 23(2):185–189. doi:10.1089/end.2008.0392 CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Urolithiasis following urinary diversion
Publikationsdatum: 25.04.2016
Erschienen in: Urolithiasis / Ausgabe 5/2016
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Elektronische ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-016-0880-y

Neu im Fachgebiet Urologie

24.04.2024 | DGIM 2024 | Nachrichten

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Urolithiasis following urinary diversion

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Urologie

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

Stufenschema weist Prostatakarzinom zuverlässig nach

Harnwegsinfektprophylaxe: Es geht auch ohne Antibiotika

Varikozelen bei Jugendlichen: Das Für und Wider der Operation

Update Urologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2016

Evidence for a distinct gut microbiome in kidney stone formers compared to non-stone formers

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in infants less than 12-month old

Comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of intermediate proximal ureteral and renal stones in the elderly

Middle calyx access is better for single renal pelvic stone in ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Mini-nephroscope combined with pressure suction: an effective tool in MPCNL for intrarenal stones in patients with urinary tract infections

Percutaneous nephrostomy versus ureteroscopic management of sepsis associated with ureteral stone impaction: a randomized controlled trial

Neu im Fachgebiet Urologie

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

Stufenschema weist Prostatakarzinom zuverlässig nach

Harnwegsinfektprophylaxe: Es geht auch ohne Antibiotika

Varikozelen bei Jugendlichen: Das Für und Wider der Operation

Update Urologie