Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 10/2019

21.08.2019 | Pelvis

US and MR imaging findings to detect placental adhesion spectrum (PAS) in patients with placenta previa: a comparative systematic study

verfasst von: V. Romeo, L. Sarno, A. Volpe, M. I. Ginocchio, R. Esposito, P. P. Mainenti, M. Petretta, R. Liuzzi, M. D’Armiento, P. Martinelli, A. Brunetti, S. Maurea

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 10/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the performance US and MR in identifying placental adhesion spectrum (PAS) in placenta previa (PP) and to establish a potential method of image interpretation.

Methods

US and MR examinations of 51 patients with PP were selected. The presence of imaging signs commonly used to detect PAS was assessed. Penalized logistic regression was performed considering histology as standard of reference; only signs statistically significant (p < 0.05) were considered for ROC and multivariate analysis. The probability of PAS according to the presence of US and/or MR signs was then assessed.

Results

At univariate analysis, loss of retroplacental clear space, myometrial thinning (MT) and placenta lacunar spaces on US, intraplacental dark bands (IDBs), focal interruption of myometrial border (FIMB) and abnormal vascularity (AV) on MR were statistically significant (p < 0.01). Three diagnostic methods for PAS were then developed for both US and MR when at least one (Method 1), two (Method 2) or three (Method 3) imaging signs occurred, respectively. Method 2 for MR showed a significantly (p < 0.05) higher accuracy (91%) compared to the other methods. When MR IDBs and AV as well as IDBs and FIMB were present in combination with US MT the probability of PAS increased from 75 to 90% and from 80 to 91%, respectively.

Conclusion

MR demonstrated a higher diagnostic accuracy than US to detect PAS. However, since the combination of MR and US signs could improve the probability to detect PAS, a complementary diagnostic role of these techniques could be considered.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Publications Committee, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Belfort MA. Placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:430–9. Doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.09.013.CrossRef Publications Committee, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Belfort MA. Placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:430–9. Doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.09.013.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Esakoff TF, Sparks TN, Kaimal AJ, Kim LH, Feldstein VA, Goldstein RB, et al. Diagnosis and morbidity of placenta accreta. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37: 324–327.CrossRefPubMed Esakoff TF, Sparks TN, Kaimal AJ, Kim LH, Feldstein VA, Goldstein RB, et al. Diagnosis and morbidity of placenta accreta. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37: 324–327.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Pagani G, Cali G, Acharya G, Trisch IT, Palacios-Jaraquemada J, Familiari A, Buca D, Manzoli L, Flacco ME, Fanfani F, Liberati M, Scambia G, D’antonio F. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in detecting the severity of abnormally invasive placentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2018;97:25–37. Doi: 10.1111/aogs.13238.CrossRefPubMed Pagani G, Cali G, Acharya G, Trisch IT, Palacios-Jaraquemada J, Familiari A, Buca D, Manzoli L, Flacco ME, Fanfani F, Liberati M, Scambia G, D’antonio F. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in detecting the severity of abnormally invasive placentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2018;97:25–37. Doi: 10.1111/aogs.13238.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Antonio F, Iacovella C, Palacios-Jaraquemada J, Bruno CH, Manzoli L, Bhide A. Prenatal identification of invasive placentation using magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 44: 8–16.CrossRefPubMed D’Antonio F, Iacovella C, Palacios-Jaraquemada J, Bruno CH, Manzoli L, Bhide A. Prenatal identification of invasive placentation using magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 44: 8–16.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Algebally AM, Yousef RR, Badr SS, AlObeidly A, Szmigielski W, AlIbrahim AA. The value of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in diagnostics and prediction of morbidity in cases of placenta previa with abnormal placentation Pol J Radiol 2014; 79:406–16. Algebally AM, Yousef RR, Badr SS, AlObeidly A, Szmigielski W, AlIbrahim AA. The value of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in diagnostics and prediction of morbidity in cases of placenta previa with abnormal placentation Pol J Radiol 2014; 79:406–16.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Elhawary TM, D. N. Diagnostic value of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in pregnant women at risk for placenta accreta. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2013; 26:1443–9.CrossRefPubMed Elhawary TM, D. N. Diagnostic value of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in pregnant women at risk for placenta accreta. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2013; 26:1443–9.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kumar I, V. A. Invasive placental disorders: a prospective US and MRI comparative analysis. Acta Radiol 2017; 58:12–128. Kumar I, V. A. Invasive placental disorders: a prospective US and MRI comparative analysis. Acta Radiol 2017; 58:12–128.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Meng X, X. L. Comparing the diagnostic value of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for placenta accreta: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Med Biol 2013; 39:1958–65. Meng X, X. L. Comparing the diagnostic value of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for placenta accreta: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Med Biol 2013; 39:1958–65.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Rezk MA, S. M. Grey-scale and colour Doppler ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging for the prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016; 29:218–23 Rezk MA, S. M. Grey-scale and colour Doppler ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging for the prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016; 29:218–23
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Masselli G, Brunelli R, Casciani E, et al. (2008) Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of placental adhesive disorders: correlation with color Doppler ultrasound. Eur Radiol 18:1292–1299CrossRefPubMed Masselli G, Brunelli R, Casciani E, et al. (2008) Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of placental adhesive disorders: correlation with color Doppler ultrasound. Eur Radiol 18:1292–1299CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Dwyer BK, Belogolovkin V, Tran L, Rao A, Carroll I, Barth R, Chitkara U. Prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta: sonography or magnetic resonance imaging? J Ultrasound Med 2008;27:1275–1281.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dwyer BK, Belogolovkin V, Tran L, Rao A, Carroll I, Barth R, Chitkara U. Prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta: sonography or magnetic resonance imaging? J Ultrasound Med 2008;27:1275–1281.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Warshak CR, Eskander R, Hull AD Accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:573–581.CrossRefPubMed Warshak CR, Eskander R, Hull AD Accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:573–581.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Riteau AS, Tassin M, Chambon G, Le Vaillant C, deLaveaucoupet J, Quere MP, Madeleine J, Prevot S, Philippe HJ, Benachi A. Accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of placenta accreta. PLoS 2014; 9:e94866.CrossRef Riteau AS, Tassin M, Chambon G, Le Vaillant C, deLaveaucoupet J, Quere MP, Madeleine J, Prevot S, Philippe HJ, Benachi A. Accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of placenta accreta. PLoS 2014; 9:e94866.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Einerson BD, R. C. Magnetic resonance imaging is often misleading when used as an adjunct to ultrasound in the management of placenta accreta spectrum disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 218:618.e1–618.e7. Einerson BD, R. C. Magnetic resonance imaging is often misleading when used as an adjunct to ultrasound in the management of placenta accreta spectrum disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 218:618.e1–618.e7.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Rahaim NS, Whitby EH. The MRI features of placental adhesion disorder and their diagnostic significance: systematic review. Clin Radiol 2015;70:917–25.CrossRefPubMed Rahaim NS, Whitby EH. The MRI features of placental adhesion disorder and their diagnostic significance: systematic review. Clin Radiol 2015;70:917–25.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Chou MM, H. E. Prenatal diagnosis of placenta previa/accreta with color Doppler ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1992; 2:293–6. Chou MM, H. E. Prenatal diagnosis of placenta previa/accreta with color Doppler ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1992; 2:293–6.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Collins SL, A. A.-R. Proposal for standardized ultrasound descriptors of abnormally invasive placenta (AIP). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;47:271–5. Collins SL, A. A.-R. Proposal for standardized ultrasound descriptors of abnormally invasive placenta (AIP). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;47:271–5.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Finberg HJ, W. J. Placenta accreta: prospective sonographic diagnosis in patients with placenta previa and prior cesarean section. J Ultrasound Med 1992;11:333–43. Finberg HJ, W. J. Placenta accreta: prospective sonographic diagnosis in patients with placenta previa and prior cesarean section. J Ultrasound Med 1992;11:333–43.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Jauniaux E, C. S. Placenta accreta spectrum: pathophysiology and evidence-based anatomy for prenatal ultrasound imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018: 218:75–87. Jauniaux E, C. S. Placenta accreta spectrum: pathophysiology and evidence-based anatomy for prenatal ultrasound imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018: 218:75–87.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Maurea S, Romeo V, Mainenti PP, Ginocchio MI, Frauenfelder G, Verde F, Liuzzi R, D’Armiento M, Sarno L, Morlando M, Petretta M, Martinelli P, Brunetti A. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing placental adhesion disorder in patients with placenta previa: Correlation with histological findings. Eur J Radiol 2018;106:77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.07.014.CrossRefPubMed Maurea S, Romeo V, Mainenti PP, Ginocchio MI, Frauenfelder G, Verde F, Liuzzi R, D’Armiento M, Sarno L, Morlando M, Petretta M, Martinelli P, Brunetti A. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing placental adhesion disorder in patients with placenta previa: Correlation with histological findings. Eur J Radiol 2018;106:77–84. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​ejrad.​2018.​07.​014.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Firth, D. 1993. Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika 80:27-38; Heinze, G. and Schemper, M. A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression. Statistics in Medicine 2002;21:2409–19. Firth, D. 1993. Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika 80:27-38; Heinze, G. and Schemper, M. A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression. Statistics in Medicine 2002;21:2409–19.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44:837–45CrossRefPubMed DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44:837–45CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Rac, M. W. Ultrasound predictors of placental invasion: the Placenta Accreta Index. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212:343.e1-7. Rac, M. W. Ultrasound predictors of placental invasion: the Placenta Accreta Index. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212:343.e1-7.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen X, Shan R, Zhao L, et al. Invasive placenta previa: placental bulge with distorted uterine outline and uterine serosal hypervascularity at 1.5 T MRI - useful features for differentiating placenta percreta from placenta accreta. Eur Radiol 2018; 28:708–717. Chen X, Shan R, Zhao L, et al. Invasive placenta previa: placental bulge with distorted uterine outline and uterine serosal hypervascularity at 1.5 T MRI - useful features for differentiating placenta percreta from placenta accreta. Eur Radiol 2018; 28:708–717.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Lax A, Prince MR, Mennitt KW, Schwebach JR, Budorick NE. The value of specific MRI features in the evaluation of unsuspected placental invasion. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2007;25: 87–93CrossRefPubMed Lax A, Prince MR, Mennitt KW, Schwebach JR, Budorick NE. The value of specific MRI features in the evaluation of unsuspected placental invasion. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2007;25: 87–93CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen X, Shan R, Zhao L, et al. Invasive placenta previa: placental bulge with distorted uterine outline and uterine serosal hypervascularity at 1.5 T MRI - useful features for differentiating placenta percreta from placenta accreta. Eur Radiol 2018;28:708–717. Chen X, Shan R, Zhao L, et al. Invasive placenta previa: placental bulge with distorted uterine outline and uterine serosal hypervascularity at 1.5 T MRI - useful features for differentiating placenta percreta from placenta accreta. Eur Radiol 2018;28:708–717.
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Knight JC Chen X, Shan R, Zhao L, et al. Invasive placenta previa: placental bulge with distorted uterine outline and uterine serosal hypervascularity at 1.5 T MRI - useful features for differentiating placenta percreta from placenta accreta. Eur Radiol 2018; 28:708–717 Knight JC Chen X, Shan R, Zhao L, et al. Invasive placenta previa: placental bulge with distorted uterine outline and uterine serosal hypervascularity at 1.5 T MRI - useful features for differentiating placenta percreta from placenta accreta. Eur Radiol 2018; 28:708–717
Metadaten
Titel
US and MR imaging findings to detect placental adhesion spectrum (PAS) in patients with placenta previa: a comparative systematic study
verfasst von
V. Romeo
L. Sarno
A. Volpe
M. I. Ginocchio
R. Esposito
P. P. Mainenti
M. Petretta
R. Liuzzi
M. D’Armiento
P. Martinelli
A. Brunetti
S. Maurea
Publikationsdatum
21.08.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 10/2019
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02185-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2019

Abdominal Radiology 10/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.