Anzeige
Erschienen in:
20.07.2018 | Original Research
Use of Chronic Care Management Codes for Medicare Beneficiaries: a Missed Opportunity?
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 11/2018
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhaltenAbstract
Background
Physicians spend significant time outside of regular office visits caring for complex patients, and this work is often uncompensated. In 2015, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) introduced a billing code for care coordination between office visits for beneficiaries with multiple chronic conditions.
Objective
Characterize use of the Chronic Care Management (CCM) code in New England in 2015.
Design
Retrospective observational analysis.
Participants
All Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries in New England continuously enrolled in Parts A and B in 2015.
Intervention
None.
Main measures
The primary outcome was the number of beneficiaries with a CCM claim per 1000 eligible beneficiaries. Secondary outcomes included the total number of CCM claims, total reimbursement, mean number of claims per beneficiary, and beneficiary characteristics independently associated with receiving CCM services.
Key results
Of the more than two million Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries in New England, almost 1.7 million were potentially eligible for CCM services. Among eligible beneficiaries, 10,951 (0.65%) had a CCM claim in 2015. Massachusetts had the highest penetration of CCM use (9.40 claims per 1000 eligible beneficiaries); Vermont had the lowest (0.54 claims per 1000 eligible beneficiaries). Mean reimbursement per physician was $1745.98. Age, race/ethnicity, dual-eligible status, income, number of chronic conditions, and state of residence were associated with receiving CCM services in an adjusted model.
Conclusions
The CCM code is likely underutilized in New England; the program may therefore not be achieving its intended goal of encouraging consistent, team-based chronic care management for Medicare’s most complex beneficiaries. Or practices may be foregoing reimbursement for care coordination that they are already providing. Recently implemented revisions may improve uptake of CCM services; it will be important to compare our results with future utilization.