Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2020

01.07.2020 | Clinical trial

Use of MarginProbe as an adjunct to standard operating procedure does not significantly reduce re-excision rates in breast conserving surgery

verfasst von: Elyse LeeVan, Be Thi Ho, Sadie Seto, Jeannie Shen

Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Ausgabe 1/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

A positive margin after breast conserving surgery has consistently been shown to be a significant predictor for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. Currently, there is no standard for intraoperative margin assessment during lumpectomy, and up to 20% of cases result in positive margins. MarginProbe is a device that provides real-time evaluation of lumpectomy margins during surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of MarginProbe as an adjunct to standard operating procedure (SOP).

Methods

Patients diagnosed with breast cancer scheduled for breast conserving surgery were consented for intraoperative use of MarginProbe. Shaved margins were excised based on margin assessment using the surgeon’s SOP which included specimen radiography and gross pathologic examination, and feedback from the device. The primary endpoint was re-excision rate. Secondary endpoints included sensitivity, specificity, false-positive and negative rates.

Results

Of the 60 breast cancers, initial histologically close/positive margins were identified in 18 patients (30%). The re-excision rate in the overall cohort was 6.6%, compared to a historical re-excision rate of 8.6% (p < 0.01). Based on 360 measurement sites, MarginProbe demonstrated a sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 60%, with a positive predictive value of 16%, and of negative predictive value of 94%, which was similar to the accuracy of SOP.

Conclusions

MarginProbe performs equally as well as specimen radiography and gross pathologic examination. In this setting where the baseline re-excision rate was low, the use of MarginProbe as an adjunct to SOP resulted in a small 2% absolute reduction in re-excision rate.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat NIH (1992) Early stage breast cancer: consensus statement. NIH consensus development conference, June 18–21, 1990. Cancer Treat Res 60:383–393 NIH (1992) Early stage breast cancer: consensus statement. NIH consensus development conference, June 18–21, 1990. Cancer Treat Res 60:383–393
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Lautner M, Lin H, Shen Y, Parker C, Kuerer H, Shaitelman S, Babiera G, Bedrosian I (2015) Disparities in the use of breast-conserving therapy among patients with early-stage breast cancer. JAMA Surg 150:778–786CrossRef Lautner M, Lin H, Shen Y, Parker C, Kuerer H, Shaitelman S, Babiera G, Bedrosian I (2015) Disparities in the use of breast-conserving therapy among patients with early-stage breast cancer. JAMA Surg 150:778–786CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen K, Li S, Li Q, Zhu L, Liu Y, Song E, Su F (2016) Breast-conserving surgery rates in breast cancer patients with different molecular subtypes: an observational study based on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Medicine (Baltimore) 95:e2593CrossRef Chen K, Li S, Li Q, Zhu L, Liu Y, Song E, Su F (2016) Breast-conserving surgery rates in breast cancer patients with different molecular subtypes: an observational study based on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Medicine (Baltimore) 95:e2593CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, Jeong JH, Wolmark N (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1233–1241CrossRef Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, Jeong JH, Wolmark N (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1233–1241CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Braunstein LZ, Taghian AG, Miemierko A, Salama L, Capuco A, Bellon JR, Wong JS, Punglia RS, MacDonald SM, Harris JR (2017) Breast-cancer subtype, age, and lymph node status as predictors of local recurrence following breast-conserving therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 161:173–179CrossRef Braunstein LZ, Taghian AG, Miemierko A, Salama L, Capuco A, Bellon JR, Wong JS, Punglia RS, MacDonald SM, Harris JR (2017) Breast-cancer subtype, age, and lymph node status as predictors of local recurrence following breast-conserving therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 161:173–179CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Arvold ND, Taghian AG, Niemierko A, Abi Raad RF, Sreedhara M, Mguyen PL, Bellon JR, Wong JS, Smith BL, Harris JR (2011) Age, breast cancer subtype approximation, and local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy. J Clin Oncol 29:3885–3891CrossRef Arvold ND, Taghian AG, Niemierko A, Abi Raad RF, Sreedhara M, Mguyen PL, Bellon JR, Wong JS, Smith BL, Harris JR (2011) Age, breast cancer subtype approximation, and local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy. J Clin Oncol 29:3885–3891CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Vos EL, Gaal J, Verhoef C, Brouwer K, van Deurzen CHM, Koppert LB (2017) Focally positive margins in breast conserving surgery: predictors, residual disease, and local recurrence. Eur J Surg Oncol 43:1846–1854CrossRef Vos EL, Gaal J, Verhoef C, Brouwer K, van Deurzen CHM, Koppert LB (2017) Focally positive margins in breast conserving surgery: predictors, residual disease, and local recurrence. Eur J Surg Oncol 43:1846–1854CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Marinovich ML, Azizi L, Macaskill P, Irwig L, Morrow M, Solin LF, Houssami N (2016) The association of surgical margins and local recurrence in women with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving therapy: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 23:3811–3821CrossRef Marinovich ML, Azizi L, Macaskill P, Irwig L, Morrow M, Solin LF, Houssami N (2016) The association of surgical margins and local recurrence in women with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving therapy: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 23:3811–3821CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Mechera R, Viehl CT, Oertli D (2009) Factors predicting in-breast tumor recurrence after breast-conserving surgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat 116:171–177CrossRef Mechera R, Viehl CT, Oertli D (2009) Factors predicting in-breast tumor recurrence after breast-conserving surgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat 116:171–177CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Houssami N, Macaskill P, Marinovich ML, Morrow M (2014) The association of surgical margins and local recurrence in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 21:717–730CrossRef Houssami N, Macaskill P, Marinovich ML, Morrow M (2014) The association of surgical margins and local recurrence in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 21:717–730CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Lupe K, Truong PT, Alexander C, Lesperance M, Speers C, Tyldesley S (2011) Subsets of women with close or positive margins after breast-conserving surgery with high local recurrence risk despite breast plus boost radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 81:3561–3568 Lupe K, Truong PT, Alexander C, Lesperance M, Speers C, Tyldesley S (2011) Subsets of women with close or positive margins after breast-conserving surgery with high local recurrence risk despite breast plus boost radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 81:3561–3568
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Early breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG), Darby S, McGale P, Correa C, Taylor C, Arriagada R, Clarke M, Cutter D, Davies C, Ewertz M, Godwin J, Gray R, Pierce L, Whelan T, Wang Y, Peto R (2011) Lancet 378:1707–1716CrossRef Early breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG), Darby S, McGale P, Correa C, Taylor C, Arriagada R, Clarke M, Cutter D, Davies C, Ewertz M, Godwin J, Gray R, Pierce L, Whelan T, Wang Y, Peto R (2011) Lancet 378:1707–1716CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Gray RJ, Pockaj BA, Garvey E, Blair S (2018) Intraoperative margin management in breast-conserving surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Surg Oncol 24:18–27CrossRef Gray RJ, Pockaj BA, Garvey E, Blair S (2018) Intraoperative margin management in breast-conserving surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Surg Oncol 24:18–27CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Allweis TM, Kaufman Z, Lelcuk S, Pappo I, Karni T, Schneebaum S, Spector R, Schindel A, Hershko D, Zilberman M, Sayfan J, Berlin Y, Hadary A, Olsha O, Paran H, Gutman M, Carmon M (2008) A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study of a real-time, intraoperative probe for positive margin detection in breast-conserving surgery. Am J Surg 196:483–489CrossRef Allweis TM, Kaufman Z, Lelcuk S, Pappo I, Karni T, Schneebaum S, Spector R, Schindel A, Hershko D, Zilberman M, Sayfan J, Berlin Y, Hadary A, Olsha O, Paran H, Gutman M, Carmon M (2008) A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study of a real-time, intraoperative probe for positive margin detection in breast-conserving surgery. Am J Surg 196:483–489CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Thill M, Dittmer C, Baumann K, Friedrichs K, Blohmer JU (2014) MarginProbe-final results of the German post-market study in breast conserving surgery of ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast 23:94–96CrossRef Thill M, Dittmer C, Baumann K, Friedrichs K, Blohmer JU (2014) MarginProbe-final results of the German post-market study in breast conserving surgery of ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast 23:94–96CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Coble J, Reid V (2017) Achieving clear margins. Directed shaving using MarginProbe, as compared to a full cavity shave approach. Am Surg J 213:627–630CrossRef Coble J, Reid V (2017) Achieving clear margins. Directed shaving using MarginProbe, as compared to a full cavity shave approach. Am Surg J 213:627–630CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kupstas A, Ibrar W, Hayward RD, Ockner D, Wesen C, Falk J (2018) A novel modality for intraoperative margin assessment and its impact on re-excision rates in breast conserving surgery. Am J Surg 215:400–403CrossRef Kupstas A, Ibrar W, Hayward RD, Ockner D, Wesen C, Falk J (2018) A novel modality for intraoperative margin assessment and its impact on re-excision rates in breast conserving surgery. Am J Surg 215:400–403CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat McCahill LE, Single RM, Aiello Bowels EJ, Feigelson HS, James TA, Barney T, Engel JM, Initilo AA (2012) Variability in reexcision following breast conservation surgery. JAMA 307:467–475CrossRef McCahill LE, Single RM, Aiello Bowels EJ, Feigelson HS, James TA, Barney T, Engel JM, Initilo AA (2012) Variability in reexcision following breast conservation surgery. JAMA 307:467–475CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Morrow M, Abrahamse P, Hofer TP, Ward KC, Hamilton AS, Kurian AW, Katz SJ, Jagsi R (2017) Trends in reoperation after initial lumpectomy for breast cancer: addressing overtreatment in surgical management. JAMA Oncol 3:1352–1357CrossRef Morrow M, Abrahamse P, Hofer TP, Ward KC, Hamilton AS, Kurian AW, Katz SJ, Jagsi R (2017) Trends in reoperation after initial lumpectomy for breast cancer: addressing overtreatment in surgical management. JAMA Oncol 3:1352–1357CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Chagpar AB, Killelea BK, Tsangaris TN, Butler M, Stavris K, Li F, Yao X, Bossuyt V, Harigopal M, Lannin DR, Pusztai L, Horowitz NR (2015) A randomized, controlled trial of cavity shave margins in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 373:503–510CrossRef Chagpar AB, Killelea BK, Tsangaris TN, Butler M, Stavris K, Li F, Yao X, Bossuyt V, Harigopal M, Lannin DR, Pusztai L, Horowitz NR (2015) A randomized, controlled trial of cavity shave margins in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 373:503–510CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Blohmer JU, Tanko J, Kueper J, Grob J, Volker R, Machleidt A (2016) MarginProbe reduces the rate of re-excision following breast conserving surgery for breast cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet 294:361–367CrossRef Blohmer JU, Tanko J, Kueper J, Grob J, Volker R, Machleidt A (2016) MarginProbe reduces the rate of re-excision following breast conserving surgery for breast cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet 294:361–367CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Schnabel F, Boolbol SK, Gittleman M, Karni T, Tafra L, Feldman S, Police A, Friedman NB, Karlan S, Holmes D, Willey SC, Carmon M, Fernandez K, Akbari S, Harness J, Guerra L, Frazier T, Lane K, Simmons RM, Estabrook A, Allweis T (2014) A randomized prospective study of lumpectomy margin assessment with use of MarginProbe in patients with nonpalpable breast malignancies. Ann Surg Oncol 21:1589–1595CrossRef Schnabel F, Boolbol SK, Gittleman M, Karni T, Tafra L, Feldman S, Police A, Friedman NB, Karlan S, Holmes D, Willey SC, Carmon M, Fernandez K, Akbari S, Harness J, Guerra L, Frazier T, Lane K, Simmons RM, Estabrook A, Allweis T (2014) A randomized prospective study of lumpectomy margin assessment with use of MarginProbe in patients with nonpalpable breast malignancies. Ann Surg Oncol 21:1589–1595CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Deurzen CH (2016) Predictors of surgical margins following breast-conserving surgery: a large population-based cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol 23(Suppl 5):627–633CrossRef Van Deurzen CH (2016) Predictors of surgical margins following breast-conserving surgery: a large population-based cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol 23(Suppl 5):627–633CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Pappo I, Spector R, Schindel A, Morgenstern S, Sandbank J, Leider LT, Schneebaum S, Lelcuk S, Karni T (2010) Diagnostic performance of a novel device for real-time margin assessment in lumpectomy specimens. J Surg Res 160:277–281CrossRef Pappo I, Spector R, Schindel A, Morgenstern S, Sandbank J, Leider LT, Schneebaum S, Lelcuk S, Karni T (2010) Diagnostic performance of a novel device for real-time margin assessment in lumpectomy specimens. J Surg Res 160:277–281CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Lai HW, Huang TH, Wu YT, Chen CJ, Chen ST, Lin YJ, Chen DR, Lee CW, Wu HK, Lin HY, Kuo SJ (2018) Clinicopathologic factors related to surgical margin involvement, reoperation, and residual cancer in primary operable breast cancer: an analysis of 2050 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 44:1725–1735CrossRef Lai HW, Huang TH, Wu YT, Chen CJ, Chen ST, Lin YJ, Chen DR, Lee CW, Wu HK, Lin HY, Kuo SJ (2018) Clinicopathologic factors related to surgical margin involvement, reoperation, and residual cancer in primary operable breast cancer: an analysis of 2050 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 44:1725–1735CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE, Harris JR, Khan SA, Horton J, Klimberg S, Chavez-MacGregor M, Freedman G, Houssami N, Johnson PL, Morrow M; Society of Surgical Oncology; American Society of Radiation Oncology (2014) Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiaton Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 32:1507–1515CrossRef Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE, Harris JR, Khan SA, Horton J, Klimberg S, Chavez-MacGregor M, Freedman G, Houssami N, Johnson PL, Morrow M; Society of Surgical Oncology; American Society of Radiation Oncology (2014) Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiaton Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 32:1507–1515CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Morrow M, Van Zee KJ, Solin LJ, Houssami N, Chavez-MacGregor M, Harris JR, Horton J, Hwang S, Johnson PL, Marinovich ML, Schnitt SJ, Wapnir I, Moran MS (2016) Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology-American Society of Clinical Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ. J Clin Oncol 23:4040–4046CrossRef Morrow M, Van Zee KJ, Solin LJ, Houssami N, Chavez-MacGregor M, Harris JR, Horton J, Hwang S, Johnson PL, Marinovich ML, Schnitt SJ, Wapnir I, Moran MS (2016) Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology-American Society of Clinical Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ. J Clin Oncol 23:4040–4046CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Schulman AM, Mirrielees JA, Leverson G, Landercasper J, Greenberg C, Wilke LG (2017) Reexcision surgery for breast cancer: an analysis of the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) Mastery Breast Surgery Database following the SSO-ASTRO “No Ink on Tumor” guidelines. Ann Surg Oncol 24:52–58CrossRef Schulman AM, Mirrielees JA, Leverson G, Landercasper J, Greenberg C, Wilke LG (2017) Reexcision surgery for breast cancer: an analysis of the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) Mastery Breast Surgery Database following the SSO-ASTRO “No Ink on Tumor” guidelines. Ann Surg Oncol 24:52–58CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat DeSnyder SM, Hunt KK, Dong W, Smith BD, Moran MS, Chavez-MacGregor M, Shen Y, Kuerer HM, Lucci A (2018) American Society of Breast Surgeons’ Practice Patterns after publication of the SSO-ASTRO-ASCO DCIS consensus guidelines on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation. Ann Surg Oncol 25:2965–2974CrossRef DeSnyder SM, Hunt KK, Dong W, Smith BD, Moran MS, Chavez-MacGregor M, Shen Y, Kuerer HM, Lucci A (2018) American Society of Breast Surgeons’ Practice Patterns after publication of the SSO-ASTRO-ASCO DCIS consensus guidelines on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation. Ann Surg Oncol 25:2965–2974CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Use of MarginProbe as an adjunct to standard operating procedure does not significantly reduce re-excision rates in breast conserving surgery
verfasst von
Elyse LeeVan
Be Thi Ho
Sadie Seto
Jeannie Shen
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Ausgabe 1/2020
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-05773-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2020

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.