Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 7/2020

06.04.2020 | Original Research

Use of Primary Care and Specialty Providers: Findings from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey

verfasst von: Melissa A. Romaire, PhD, MPH

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 7/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

A comprehensive picture of how the US population engages in specialty care use is lacking, even though redesign models focused on specialty care are becoming more popular.

Objective

To describe the type of provider, primary care or specialist, most often seen by individuals, to test associations between type of provider most often seen and insurance coverage, and to test associations between the number of generalist and specialist visits and insurance coverage.

Design

Cross-sectional analysis of 2013–2016 Medicaid Expenditure Panel Survey. Logistic and negative binomial models were used in multivariate regression modeling.

Participants

Depending on the analysis, the study samples include between 71,402 and 79,518 US residents.

Main Measures

Individuals’ provider type most often seen, primary care visits, and specialist visits were reported.

Key Results

More than half of the sample (55%) predominantly visited primary care providers (or generalists), and 36% predominantly visited specialists. Among individuals primarily visiting generalists, 80% visited only one type of primary care provider, and 24% also visited one or more specialists. Among individuals primarily visiting specialists, 48% visited only one type of specialist, and 47% did not visit any generalists in the year. Among Medicare enrollees, 50% predominantly visited specialists, and 40% predominantly visited generalists. Medicare enrollment was associated with greater odds of predominantly visiting specialists (p < 0.05), and Medicare-Medicaid enrollment and having no insurance were associated with lower odds of predominantly visiting specialists (p < 0.05). Medicare enrollment was associated with 13% more generalist visits and 35% more specialist visits, and Medicare-Medicaid enrollment was associated with 38% more generalist visits and 15% more specialist visits (all p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Given the overall frequency of specialty care use and the reliance on multiple specialists in any given year, particularly among Medicare enrollees, public payers are uniquely positioned to promote specialty care redesign and champion improved coordination between specialists.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Starfeld B. Primary Care: Balancing Health Needs, Services, and Technology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998. Starfeld B. Primary Care: Balancing Health Needs, Services, and Technology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Zuckerman S, Skopec L, Epstein M. Medicaid Physician Fees after the ACA Primary Care Fee Bump. Washington, DC: Urban Institute; 2017. Zuckerman S, Skopec L, Epstein M. Medicaid Physician Fees after the ACA Primary Care Fee Bump. Washington, DC: Urban Institute; 2017.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA). NCQA Patient-Centered Specialty Practice (PCSP) Standards and Guidelines. 1 ed. Washington, DC: National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA); 2019. National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA). NCQA Patient-Centered Specialty Practice (PCSP) Standards and Guidelines. 1 ed. Washington, DC: National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA); 2019.
Metadaten
Titel
Use of Primary Care and Specialty Providers: Findings from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey
verfasst von
Melissa A. Romaire, PhD, MPH
Publikationsdatum
06.04.2020
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe 7/2020
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-05773-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2020

Journal of General Internal Medicine 7/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.