Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 11/2016

16.03.2016 | New Technology

Use of the Ambu® aScope 2TM in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration

verfasst von: Yousif Aawsaj, Duncan Light, Jamie Brown, Liam Horgan

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 11/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

We have recently begun to use a sterile disposable endoscope to perform laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. We evaluated our practice in a large district general hospital and reported the early feasibility of this equipment in performing bile duct exploration.

Methods

We began to use the Ambu® aScope 2TM from June 2015 in our institution. Any case eligible for a laparoscopic common bile duct exploration was included. Our study period is from June 2015 to November 2015. Data were collected and analysed retrospectively.

Results

Thirteen patients were included. Nine were female and five were male. The mean age was 59 years old (range 28 to 82 years). Seven were performed as an emergency and six were performed for elective cases. All patients had common bile duct stones with no history of previous cholecystectomy. The Ambu® aScope 2TM was used in 11 cases, and a standard choledocoscope was used in two cases due to lack of availability of the Ambu® aScope 2TM. There was one conversion due to an impacted bile duct stone and technical difficulty intra-operatively. Five cases were performed as a transcystic exploration with 1 case being converted to a choledocotomy due to inability to pass the cystic duct using the Ambu® aScope 2TM. The mean operating time was 158 min (range 85–255 min). The mean operative time using the reusable endoscope was 130 min. The mean postoperative stay was 3 days (range 0–8 days).

Conclusions

The use of the Ambu® aScope 2TM is safe and feasible in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. It confers significant financial benefits and offers an economical alternative to expensive reusable endoscopes.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Dasari BV, Tan CJ, Gurusamy KS, Martin DJ, Kirk G, McKie L, Diamond T, Taylor MA (2013) Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:003327 Dasari BV, Tan CJ, Gurusamy KS, Martin DJ, Kirk G, McKie L, Diamond T, Taylor MA (2013) Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:003327
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bansal VK, Misra MC, Rajan K, Kilambi R, Kumar S, Krishna A, Kumar A, Pandav CS, Subramaniam R, Arora MK, Garg PK (2014) Single-stage laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus two-stage endoscopic stone extraction followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with concomitant gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 28(3):875–885CrossRefPubMed Bansal VK, Misra MC, Rajan K, Kilambi R, Kumar S, Krishna A, Kumar A, Pandav CS, Subramaniam R, Arora MK, Garg PK (2014) Single-stage laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus two-stage endoscopic stone extraction followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with concomitant gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 28(3):875–885CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamande IW, Bradley S, Minford E (2014) Novel use of Ambu® aScope™ 2 for choledochoscopy. Int J Surg 12(Supplement 3):S21CrossRef Kamande IW, Bradley S, Minford E (2014) Novel use of Ambu® aScope™ 2 for choledochoscopy. Int J Surg 12(Supplement 3):S21CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan JK, Ng I, Ang JP, Koh SM, Lee K, Mezzavia P, Morris J, Loh F, Segal R (2015) Randomised controlled trial comparing the Ambu® aScope™2 with a conventional fibreoptic bronchoscope in orotracheal intubation of anaesthetised adult patients. Anaesth Intensive Care 43(4):479–484PubMed Chan JK, Ng I, Ang JP, Koh SM, Lee K, Mezzavia P, Morris J, Loh F, Segal R (2015) Randomised controlled trial comparing the Ambu® aScope™2 with a conventional fibreoptic bronchoscope in orotracheal intubation of anaesthetised adult patients. Anaesth Intensive Care 43(4):479–484PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hodzovic I, Wilkes AR (2013) Clinical evaluation of the Ambu® aScope™. Anaesthesia 68(7):784–785CrossRefPubMed Hodzovic I, Wilkes AR (2013) Clinical evaluation of the Ambu® aScope™. Anaesthesia 68(7):784–785CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kristensen MS, Fredensborg BB (2013) The disposable Ambu aScope vs. a conventional flexible videoscope for awake intubation—a randomised study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 57(7):888–895CrossRefPubMed Kristensen MS, Fredensborg BB (2013) The disposable Ambu aScope vs. a conventional flexible videoscope for awake intubation—a randomised study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 57(7):888–895CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan DS, Jain PA, Khalifa A, Hughes R, Baker AL (2014) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Br J Surg 101(11):1448–1452CrossRefPubMed Chan DS, Jain PA, Khalifa A, Hughes R, Baker AL (2014) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Br J Surg 101(11):1448–1452CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Mattila A, Luhtala J, Mrena J, Kautiainen H, Kellokumpu I (2014) An audit of short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic removal of common bile duct stones in Finland. Surg Endosc 28(12):3451–3454CrossRefPubMed Mattila A, Luhtala J, Mrena J, Kautiainen H, Kellokumpu I (2014) An audit of short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic removal of common bile duct stones in Finland. Surg Endosc 28(12):3451–3454CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat McCahon RA, Whynes DK (2015) Cost comparison of re-usable and single-use fibrescopes in a large English teaching hospital. Anaesthesia 70(6):699–706CrossRefPubMed McCahon RA, Whynes DK (2015) Cost comparison of re-usable and single-use fibrescopes in a large English teaching hospital. Anaesthesia 70(6):699–706CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Use of the Ambu® aScope 2TM in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration
verfasst von
Yousif Aawsaj
Duncan Light
Jamie Brown
Liam Horgan
Publikationsdatum
16.03.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 11/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4839-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2016

Surgical Endoscopy 11/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.