Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 2/2018

12.09.2017

Utility of (18) F-FDG PET/CT and CECT in conjunction with serum CA 19-9 for detecting recurrent pancreatic adenocarcinoma

verfasst von: Sampanna Rayamajhi, Aparna Balachandran, Mathew Katz, Arun Reddy, Eric Rohren, Priya Bhosale

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 2/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The roles of different cross-sectional imaging in evaluating the recurrence of pancreatic adenocarcinoma are not well established. We evaluated the utility of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in the diagnosis of recurrent pancreatic adenocarcinoma in conjunction with the tumor marker CA 19-9.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who underwent CECT and FDG PET/CT along with serum CA 19-9 measurement as a follow-up or on a clinical suspicion of recurrent disease after initial surgery for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Two observers blinded to the other imaging modality results retrospectively reviewed and interpreted the images in consensus using a three-point scale (negative, equivocal, or positive). Pathologic analysis by biopsy or further clinical and radiologic follow-up determined the true status of the suspected recurrences. The imaging results were compared with CA 19-9 levels and true disease status.

Results

Thirty-nine patients were included in the study. Thirty-three patients (85%) had proven recurrent cancer and six patients (15%) had no evidence of disease. Twenty-four patients had elevated CA 19-9 and 15 patients had normal CA 19-9. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for recurrence were 90.9%, 100.0%, and 92.3% for PET/CT and 72.2%, 66.6%, and 71.7% for CECT, respectively. Sensitivity for locoregional recurrence was 94.4% for PET/CT but only 61.1% for CECT. PET/CT detected recurrence in 12 patients who had normal levels of CA 19-9. PET/CT showed lesions not visible on CECT in five (15%) patients. Although the sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT were higher than those of CECT, they were not statistically significant (p = 0.489 and p = 0.1489, respectively).

Conclusion

FDG PET/CT has a high sensitivity for pancreatic cancer recurrence. Normal CA 19-9 does not necessarily exclude these recurrences. FDG PET/CT is useful when CECT is equivocal and can detect recurrence in patients with normal CA 19-9.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E (2010) Cancer statistics, 2010. CA 60:277–300PubMed Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E (2010) Cancer statistics, 2010. CA 60:277–300PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Barugola G, Falconi M, Bettini R, et al. (2007) The determinant factors of recurrence following resection for ductal pancreatic cancer. JOP 8:132–140PubMed Barugola G, Falconi M, Bettini R, et al. (2007) The determinant factors of recurrence following resection for ductal pancreatic cancer. JOP 8:132–140PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Sperti C, Pasquali C, Piccoli A, Pedrazzoli S (1997) Recurrence after resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. World J Surg 21:195–200CrossRefPubMed Sperti C, Pasquali C, Piccoli A, Pedrazzoli S (1997) Recurrence after resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. World J Surg 21:195–200CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim JK, Ha HK, Han DJ, Auh YH (2003) CT analysis of postoperative tumor recurrence patterns in periampullary cancer. Abdom Imaging 28:384–391CrossRefPubMed Kim JK, Ha HK, Han DJ, Auh YH (2003) CT analysis of postoperative tumor recurrence patterns in periampullary cancer. Abdom Imaging 28:384–391CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Strobel O, Hartwig W, Hackert T, et al. (2013) Re-resection for isolated local recurrence of pancreatic cancer is feasible, safe, and associated with encouraging survival. Ann Surg Oncol 20:964–972CrossRefPubMed Strobel O, Hartwig W, Hackert T, et al. (2013) Re-resection for isolated local recurrence of pancreatic cancer is feasible, safe, and associated with encouraging survival. Ann Surg Oncol 20:964–972CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Miyazaki M, Yoshitomi H, Shimizu H, et al. (2014) Repeat pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal cancer recurrence in the remnant pancreas after initial pancreatectomy: is it worthwhile? Surgery 155:58–66CrossRefPubMed Miyazaki M, Yoshitomi H, Shimizu H, et al. (2014) Repeat pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal cancer recurrence in the remnant pancreas after initial pancreatectomy: is it worthwhile? Surgery 155:58–66CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomas RM, Truty MJ, Nogueras-Gonzalez GM, et al. (2012) Selective reoperation for locally recurrent or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma following primary pancreatic resection. J Gastrointest Surg 16:1696–1704CrossRefPubMed Thomas RM, Truty MJ, Nogueras-Gonzalez GM, et al. (2012) Selective reoperation for locally recurrent or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma following primary pancreatic resection. J Gastrointest Surg 16:1696–1704CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilkowski R, Thoma M, Bruns C, Duhmke E, Heinemann V (2006) Combined chemoradiotherapy for isolated local recurrence after primary resection of pancreatic cancer. JOP 7:34–40PubMed Wilkowski R, Thoma M, Bruns C, Duhmke E, Heinemann V (2006) Combined chemoradiotherapy for isolated local recurrence after primary resection of pancreatic cancer. JOP 7:34–40PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Habermehl D, Brecht IC, Bergmann F, et al. (2013) Chemoradiation in patients with isolated recurrent pancreatic cancer—therapeutical efficacy and probability of re-resection. Radiat Oncol 8:27CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Habermehl D, Brecht IC, Bergmann F, et al. (2013) Chemoradiation in patients with isolated recurrent pancreatic cancer—therapeutical efficacy and probability of re-resection. Radiat Oncol 8:27CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Horiuchi H, Uchida S, Hisaka T, et al. (2005) A study of recurrent pancreatic cancer with metastatic liver tumors after pancreatectomy. Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer Chemother 32:1685–1687 Horiuchi H, Uchida S, Hisaka T, et al. (2005) A study of recurrent pancreatic cancer with metastatic liver tumors after pancreatectomy. Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer Chemother 32:1685–1687
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Safi F, Roscher R, Beger HG (1989) Tumor markers in pancreatic cancer. Sensitivity and specificity of CA 19-9. Hepatogastroenterology 36:419–423PubMed Safi F, Roscher R, Beger HG (1989) Tumor markers in pancreatic cancer. Sensitivity and specificity of CA 19-9. Hepatogastroenterology 36:419–423PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Park JK, Paik WH, Ryu JK, et al. (2013) Clinical significance and revisiting the meaning of CA 19-9 blood level before and after the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: analysis of 1,446 patients from the pancreatic cancer cohort in a single institution. PLoS ONE 8:e78977CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Park JK, Paik WH, Ryu JK, et al. (2013) Clinical significance and revisiting the meaning of CA 19-9 blood level before and after the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: analysis of 1,446 patients from the pancreatic cancer cohort in a single institution. PLoS ONE 8:e78977CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kitajima K, Suzuki K, Nakamoto Y, et al. (2010) Low-dose non-enhanced CT versus full-dose contrast-enhanced CT in integrated PET/CT studies for the diagnosis of uterine cancer recurrence. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37:1490–1498CrossRefPubMed Kitajima K, Suzuki K, Nakamoto Y, et al. (2010) Low-dose non-enhanced CT versus full-dose contrast-enhanced CT in integrated PET/CT studies for the diagnosis of uterine cancer recurrence. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37:1490–1498CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Frohlich A, Diederichs CG, Staib L, et al. (1999) Detection of liver metastases from pancreatic cancer using FDG PET. J Nucl Med 40:250–255PubMed Frohlich A, Diederichs CG, Staib L, et al. (1999) Detection of liver metastases from pancreatic cancer using FDG PET. J Nucl Med 40:250–255PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Montgomery RC, Hoffman JP, Riley LB, et al. (1997) Prediction of recurrence and survival by post-resection CA 19-9 values in patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Ann Surg Oncol 4:551–556CrossRefPubMed Montgomery RC, Hoffman JP, Riley LB, et al. (1997) Prediction of recurrence and survival by post-resection CA 19-9 values in patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Ann Surg Oncol 4:551–556CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Maestranzi S, Przemioslo R, Mitchell H, Sherwood RA (1998) The effect of benign and malignant liver disease on the tumour markers CA19-9 and CEA. Ann Clin Biochem 35(Pt 1):99–103CrossRefPubMed Maestranzi S, Przemioslo R, Mitchell H, Sherwood RA (1998) The effect of benign and malignant liver disease on the tumour markers CA19-9 and CEA. Ann Clin Biochem 35(Pt 1):99–103CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Parra JL, Kaplan S, Barkin JS (2005) Elevated CA 19-9 caused by Hashimoto’s thyroiditis: review of the benign causes of increased CA 19-9 level. Dig Dis Sci 50:694–695CrossRefPubMed Parra JL, Kaplan S, Barkin JS (2005) Elevated CA 19-9 caused by Hashimoto’s thyroiditis: review of the benign causes of increased CA 19-9 level. Dig Dis Sci 50:694–695CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Osswald BR, Klee FE, Wysocki S (1993) The reliability of highly elevated CA 19-9 levels. Dis Mark 11:275–278CrossRef Osswald BR, Klee FE, Wysocki S (1993) The reliability of highly elevated CA 19-9 levels. Dis Mark 11:275–278CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kannagi R (2007) Carbohydrate antigen sialyl Lewis a—its pathophysiological significance and induction mechanism in cancer progression. Chang Gung Med J 30:189–209PubMed Kannagi R (2007) Carbohydrate antigen sialyl Lewis a—its pathophysiological significance and induction mechanism in cancer progression. Chang Gung Med J 30:189–209PubMed
21.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Malesci A, Tommasini MA, Bonato C, et al. (1987) Determination of CA 19-9 antigen in serum and pancreatic juice for differential diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma from chronic pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 92:60–67CrossRefPubMed Malesci A, Tommasini MA, Bonato C, et al. (1987) Determination of CA 19-9 antigen in serum and pancreatic juice for differential diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma from chronic pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 92:60–67CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Locker GY, Hamilton S, Harris J, et al. (2006) ASCO 2006 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in gastrointestinal cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:5313–5327CrossRefPubMed Locker GY, Hamilton S, Harris J, et al. (2006) ASCO 2006 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in gastrointestinal cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:5313–5327CrossRefPubMed
24.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Tong Y, Song Z, Zhu W (2013) Study of an elevated carbohydrate antigen 19-9 concentration in a large health check-up cohort in China. Clin Chem Lab Med 51:1459–1466CrossRefPubMed Tong Y, Song Z, Zhu W (2013) Study of an elevated carbohydrate antigen 19-9 concentration in a large health check-up cohort in China. Clin Chem Lab Med 51:1459–1466CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Waanders E, van Keimpema L, Brouwer JT, et al. (2009) Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 is extremely elevated in polycystic liver disease. Liver Int 29:1389–1395CrossRefPubMed Waanders E, van Keimpema L, Brouwer JT, et al. (2009) Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 is extremely elevated in polycystic liver disease. Liver Int 29:1389–1395CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Ozkan E, Soydal C, Araz M, Kir KM, Ibis E (2012) The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting colorectal cancer recurrence in patients with elevated CEA levels. Nucl Med Commun 33:395–402CrossRefPubMed Ozkan E, Soydal C, Araz M, Kir KM, Ibis E (2012) The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting colorectal cancer recurrence in patients with elevated CEA levels. Nucl Med Commun 33:395–402CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Gade M, Kubik M, Fisker RV, Thorlacius-Ussing O, Petersen LJ (2015) Diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT as first choice in the detection of recurrent colorectal cancer due to rising CEA. Cancer Imaging 15:11CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gade M, Kubik M, Fisker RV, Thorlacius-Ussing O, Petersen LJ (2015) Diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT as first choice in the detection of recurrent colorectal cancer due to rising CEA. Cancer Imaging 15:11CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhosale P, Peungjesada S, Wei W, et al. (2010) Clinical utility of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the evaluation of suspected recurrent ovarian cancer in the setting of normal CA-125 levels. Int J Gynecol Cancer 20:936–944CrossRefPubMed Bhosale P, Peungjesada S, Wei W, et al. (2010) Clinical utility of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the evaluation of suspected recurrent ovarian cancer in the setting of normal CA-125 levels. Int J Gynecol Cancer 20:936–944CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Casneuf V, Delrue L, Kelles A, et al. (2007) Is combined 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography superior to positron emission tomography or computed tomography alone for diagnosis, staging and restaging of pancreatic lesions? Acta Gastroenterol Belg 70:331–338PubMed Casneuf V, Delrue L, Kelles A, et al. (2007) Is combined 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography superior to positron emission tomography or computed tomography alone for diagnosis, staging and restaging of pancreatic lesions? Acta Gastroenterol Belg 70:331–338PubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Sperti C, Pasquali C, Bissoli S, et al. (2010) Tumor relapse after pancreatic cancer resection is detected earlier by 18-FDG PET than by CT. J Gastrointest Surg 14:131–140CrossRefPubMed Sperti C, Pasquali C, Bissoli S, et al. (2010) Tumor relapse after pancreatic cancer resection is detected earlier by 18-FDG PET than by CT. J Gastrointest Surg 14:131–140CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Heye T, Zausig N, Klauss M, et al. (2011) CT diagnosis of recurrence after pancreatic cancer: is there a pattern? World J Gastroenterol 17:1126–1134CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Heye T, Zausig N, Klauss M, et al. (2011) CT diagnosis of recurrence after pancreatic cancer: is there a pattern? World J Gastroenterol 17:1126–1134CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Hishinuma S, Ogata Y, Tomikawa M, et al. (2006) Patterns of recurrence after curative resection of pancreatic cancer, based on autopsy findings. J Gastrointest Surg 10:511–518CrossRefPubMed Hishinuma S, Ogata Y, Tomikawa M, et al. (2006) Patterns of recurrence after curative resection of pancreatic cancer, based on autopsy findings. J Gastrointest Surg 10:511–518CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruf J, Hanninen EL, Oettle H, et al. (2005) Detection of recurrent pancreatic cancer: comparison of FDG-PET with CT/MRI. Pancreatology 5:266–272CrossRefPubMed Ruf J, Hanninen EL, Oettle H, et al. (2005) Detection of recurrent pancreatic cancer: comparison of FDG-PET with CT/MRI. Pancreatology 5:266–272CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Kitajima K, Murakami K, Yamasaki E, et al. (2010) Performance of integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of recurrent pancreatic cancer: comparison with integrated FDG-PET/non-contrast-enhanced CT and enhanced CT. Mol Imaging Biol 12:452–459CrossRefPubMed Kitajima K, Murakami K, Yamasaki E, et al. (2010) Performance of integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of recurrent pancreatic cancer: comparison with integrated FDG-PET/non-contrast-enhanced CT and enhanced CT. Mol Imaging Biol 12:452–459CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Menke-Pluymers MB, Klinkenbijl JH, Tjioe M, Jeekel J (1992) Treatment of locoregional recurrence after intentional curative resection of pancreatic cancer. Hepato Gastroenterol 39:429–432 Menke-Pluymers MB, Klinkenbijl JH, Tjioe M, Jeekel J (1992) Treatment of locoregional recurrence after intentional curative resection of pancreatic cancer. Hepato Gastroenterol 39:429–432
Metadaten
Titel
Utility of (18) F-FDG PET/CT and CECT in conjunction with serum CA 19-9 for detecting recurrent pancreatic adenocarcinoma
verfasst von
Sampanna Rayamajhi
Aparna Balachandran
Mathew Katz
Arun Reddy
Eric Rohren
Priya Bhosale
Publikationsdatum
12.09.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 2/2018
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1316-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2018

Abdominal Radiology 2/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.