Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2019

17.06.2019 | Melanoma

Utility of Level III Axillary Node Dissection in Melanoma Patients with Palpable Axillary Lymph Node Disease

verfasst von: David A. Mahvi, MD, Mark Fairweather, MD, Charles H. Yoon, MD, Nancy L. Cho, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 9/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial II results suggest that future radical axillary lymphadenectomy (ALND) will be performed for bulkier metastatic disease. The utility of level III lymph node (LN) dissection in melanoma patients with palpable metastatic axillary disease was assessed.

Methods

We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent ALND (levels I–III) for metastatic melanoma from 2005 to 2017. We assessed the frequency of level III positive nodes in patients undergoing radical axillary lymphadenectomy (ALND) for metastatic melanoma as well as the prognostic role and factors predictive of level III LN positivity.

Results

A total of 190 patients underwent ALND during the study period. Of these, 85 patients had palpable axillary disease, of which 71 had separate level III pathologic assessment. Level III LNs were positive in 16.9% of patients with palpable disease versus 0% with positive sentinel LN. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) for patients with palpable disease was 82.9%, 58.9%, and 39.0%, respectively. Median disease-free survival was 26.8 months, and the axillary recurrence rate was 8.2%. High level I/II LN ratio, BRAF mutation, and total LN examined were significant predictors of level III positivity (all p ≤ 0.05). Patients with positive level III LN had significantly worse OS (median 18.6 months vs. not reached, p = 0.001). No preoperative factors were predictive of level III LN positivity.

Conclusions

Level III axillary disease is not uncommon in melanoma patients with clinically palpable nodal disease and provides useful prognostic information for OS. We recommend that full level I–III ALND be considered in this patient cohort.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Balch CM, Soong SJ, Jeffrey E, et al. Prognostic factors analysis of 17,600 melanoma patients: validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Melanoma Staging System. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(16):3622–34.CrossRef Balch CM, Soong SJ, Jeffrey E, et al. Prognostic factors analysis of 17,600 melanoma patients: validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Melanoma Staging System. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(16):3622–34.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Faries MB, Thompson JF, Cochran AJ, et al. Completion dissection or observation for sentinel-node metastasis in melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(23):2211–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Faries MB, Thompson JF, Cochran AJ, et al. Completion dissection or observation for sentinel-node metastasis in melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(23):2211–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Wong SL, Faries MB, Kennedy EB, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy and management of regional lymph nodes in melanoma: American Society of Clinical Oncology and Society of Surgical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:399–413.CrossRef Wong SL, Faries MB, Kennedy EB, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy and management of regional lymph nodes in melanoma: American Society of Clinical Oncology and Society of Surgical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:399–413.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Morton DL, Thompson JF, Cochran AJ, et al. Final trial report of sentinel-nodal biopsy versus nodal observation in melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:599–609.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Morton DL, Thompson JF, Cochran AJ, et al. Final trial report of sentinel-nodal biopsy versus nodal observation in melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:599–609.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Nessim C, Law C, McConnell Y, et al. How often do level III nodes bear melanoma metastases and does it affect patient outcomes? Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:2056–64.CrossRefPubMed Nessim C, Law C, McConnell Y, et al. How often do level III nodes bear melanoma metastases and does it affect patient outcomes? Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:2056–64.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat White RR, Stanley WE, Johnson JL, Tyler DS, Seigler HF. Long-term survival in 2,505 patients with melanoma with regional lymph node metastasis. Ann Surg. 2002;235(60):879–87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral White RR, Stanley WE, Johnson JL, Tyler DS, Seigler HF. Long-term survival in 2,505 patients with melanoma with regional lymph node metastasis. Ann Surg. 2002;235(60):879–87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsutsumida A, Takahashi A, Namikawa K, et al. Frequency of level II and III axillary nodes metastases in patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes in melanoma: a multi-institutional study in Japan. Int J Clin Oncol. 2016;21(4):796–800.CrossRefPubMed Tsutsumida A, Takahashi A, Namikawa K, et al. Frequency of level II and III axillary nodes metastases in patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes in melanoma: a multi-institutional study in Japan. Int J Clin Oncol. 2016;21(4):796–800.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Namm JP, Chang AE, Cimmino VM, et al. Is a level III dissection necessary for a positive sentinel lymph node in melanoma? J Surg Oncol. 2012;105:225–8.CrossRefPubMed Namm JP, Chang AE, Cimmino VM, et al. Is a level III dissection necessary for a positive sentinel lymph node in melanoma? J Surg Oncol. 2012;105:225–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Tominaga T, Takashima S, Danno M. Randomized clinical trial comparing level II and level III node dissection in addition to mastectomy for breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2004;91:38–43.CrossRefPubMed Tominaga T, Takashima S, Danno M. Randomized clinical trial comparing level II and level III node dissection in addition to mastectomy for breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2004;91:38–43.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Pezner RD, Patterson MR, Hill LR, et al. Arm lymphedema in patients treated conservatively for breast cancer: relationship to patient age and axillary node dissection technique. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1986;12(12):2079–83.CrossRefPubMed Pezner RD, Patterson MR, Hill LR, et al. Arm lymphedema in patients treated conservatively for breast cancer: relationship to patient age and axillary node dissection technique. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1986;12(12):2079–83.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Larson D, Weinstein M, Goldberg I, et al. Edema of the arm as a function of the extent of axillary surgery in patients with stage I–II carcinoma of the breast treated with primary radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1986;12(9):1575–82.CrossRefPubMed Larson D, Weinstein M, Goldberg I, et al. Edema of the arm as a function of the extent of axillary surgery in patients with stage I–II carcinoma of the breast treated with primary radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1986;12(9):1575–82.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Gentile D, Covarelli P, Picciotto F, et al. Axillary lymph node metastases of melanoma: management of third-level nodes. In Vivo. 2016;30:141–6.PubMed Gentile D, Covarelli P, Picciotto F, et al. Axillary lymph node metastases of melanoma: management of third-level nodes. In Vivo. 2016;30:141–6.PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Dummer R, Hauschild A, Lindenblatt N, et al. Cutaneous melanoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(Suppl5):v126–32.CrossRefPubMed Dummer R, Hauschild A, Lindenblatt N, et al. Cutaneous melanoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(Suppl5):v126–32.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Wevers KP, Bastiaannet E, Poos HPAM, et al. Therapeutic lymph node dissection in melanoma: different prognosis for different macrometastasis sites? Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(12):3913–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wevers KP, Bastiaannet E, Poos HPAM, et al. Therapeutic lymph node dissection in melanoma: different prognosis for different macrometastasis sites? Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(12):3913–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Balch CM, Gershenwald JE, Soong SJ, et al. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors among 2,313 patients with stage III melanoma: comparison of nodal micrometastases versus macrometastases. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(14):2452–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Balch CM, Gershenwald JE, Soong SJ, et al. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors among 2,313 patients with stage III melanoma: comparison of nodal micrometastases versus macrometastases. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(14):2452–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Spillane AJ, Cheung BL, Stretch JR, et al. Proposed quality standards for regional lymph node dissections in patients with melanoma. Ann Surg. 2009;249(3):473–80.CrossRefPubMed Spillane AJ, Cheung BL, Stretch JR, et al. Proposed quality standards for regional lymph node dissections in patients with melanoma. Ann Surg. 2009;249(3):473–80.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Galliot-Repkat C, Cailliod R, Trost O, et al. The prognostic impact of the extent of lymph node dissection in patients with stage III melanoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2006;32(7):790–4.CrossRefPubMed Galliot-Repkat C, Cailliod R, Trost O, et al. The prognostic impact of the extent of lymph node dissection in patients with stage III melanoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2006;32(7):790–4.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Minami CA, Wayne JD, Yang AD, et al. National evaluation of hospital performance on Commission on Cancer Melanoma Quality Measures. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:3548–57.CrossRef Minami CA, Wayne JD, Yang AD, et al. National evaluation of hospital performance on Commission on Cancer Melanoma Quality Measures. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:3548–57.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Rossi CR, Mozzillo N, Maurichi A, et al. The number of excised lymph nodes is associated with survival of melanoma patients with lymph node metastasis. Ann Oncol. 2014;25:240.CrossRefPubMed Rossi CR, Mozzillo N, Maurichi A, et al. The number of excised lymph nodes is associated with survival of melanoma patients with lymph node metastasis. Ann Oncol. 2014;25:240.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Spillane AJ, Winstanley J, Thompson JF. Lymph node ratio in melanoma: a marker of variation in surgical quality? Cancer. 2009;115(11):2384–7.CrossRefPubMed Spillane AJ, Winstanley J, Thompson JF. Lymph node ratio in melanoma: a marker of variation in surgical quality? Cancer. 2009;115(11):2384–7.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Coit D, Rogatko A, Brennan M. Prognostic factors in patients with melanaoma metastatic to axillary or inguinal lymph nodes: a multivariate analysis. Ann Surg. 1991;214:627–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Coit D, Rogatko A, Brennan M. Prognostic factors in patients with melanaoma metastatic to axillary or inguinal lymph nodes: a multivariate analysis. Ann Surg. 1991;214:627–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Spillane AJ, Cheung BLH, Winstanley J, Thompson JF. Lymph node ratio provides prognostic information in addition to American Joint Committee on Cancer N stage in patients with melanoma, even if quality of surgery is standardized. Ann Surg. 2011;253(1):109–15.CrossRefPubMed Spillane AJ, Cheung BLH, Winstanley J, Thompson JF. Lymph node ratio provides prognostic information in addition to American Joint Committee on Cancer N stage in patients with melanoma, even if quality of surgery is standardized. Ann Surg. 2011;253(1):109–15.CrossRefPubMed
24.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Rossi CR, Mocellin S, Pasquali S, et al. N-ratio: a novel independent prognostic factor for patients with stage-III cutaneous melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(1):310–5.CrossRefPubMed Rossi CR, Mocellin S, Pasquali S, et al. N-ratio: a novel independent prognostic factor for patients with stage-III cutaneous melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(1):310–5.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Healy MA, Reynolds E, Banerjee M, Wong SL. Lymph node ratio is less prognostic in melanoma when minimum node retrieval thresholds are not met. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:340–6.CrossRefPubMed Healy MA, Reynolds E, Banerjee M, Wong SL. Lymph node ratio is less prognostic in melanoma when minimum node retrieval thresholds are not met. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:340–6.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng L, Lopez-Beltran A, Massari F, et al. Molecular testing for BRAF mutations to inform melanoma treatment decisions: a move toward precision medicine. Mod Pathol. 2018;31:24–38.CrossRefPubMed Cheng L, Lopez-Beltran A, Massari F, et al. Molecular testing for BRAF mutations to inform melanoma treatment decisions: a move toward precision medicine. Mod Pathol. 2018;31:24–38.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Long GV, Menzies AM, Nagrial AM, et al. Prognostic and clinicopathologic associations of oncogenic BRAF in metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29:1239–46.CrossRefPubMed Long GV, Menzies AM, Nagrial AM, et al. Prognostic and clinicopathologic associations of oncogenic BRAF in metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29:1239–46.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Long GV, Stroyakovskiy D, Gogas H, et al. (2015) Dabrafenib and trametinib versus dabrafenib and placebo for Val600 BRAF-mutant melanoma: a multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 386:444–51.CrossRefPubMed Long GV, Stroyakovskiy D, Gogas H, et al. (2015) Dabrafenib and trametinib versus dabrafenib and placebo for Val600 BRAF-mutant melanoma: a multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 386:444–51.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Heinzerling L, Baiter M, Kuhnapfel S, et al. Mutation landscape in melanoma patients clinical implications of heterogeneity of BRAF mutations. Br J Cancer. 2013;109:2833–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Heinzerling L, Baiter M, Kuhnapfel S, et al. Mutation landscape in melanoma patients clinical implications of heterogeneity of BRAF mutations. Br J Cancer. 2013;109:2833–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Wrightson WR, Wong SL, Edwards MJ, et al. Complications associated with sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma. Ann Surg. 2003; 10:676–80.CrossRef Wrightson WR, Wong SL, Edwards MJ, et al. Complications associated with sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma. Ann Surg. 2003; 10:676–80.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Pasquali S, Spillane AJ. Contemporary controversies and perspectives in the staging and treatment of patients with lymph node metastasis from melanoma, especially with regards positive sentinel lymph node biopsy. Cancer Treat Rev. 2014;40(8):893–9.CrossRefPubMed Pasquali S, Spillane AJ. Contemporary controversies and perspectives in the staging and treatment of patients with lymph node metastasis from melanoma, especially with regards positive sentinel lymph node biopsy. Cancer Treat Rev. 2014;40(8):893–9.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Utility of Level III Axillary Node Dissection in Melanoma Patients with Palpable Axillary Lymph Node Disease
verfasst von
David A. Mahvi, MD
Mark Fairweather, MD
Charles H. Yoon, MD
Nancy L. Cho, MD
Publikationsdatum
17.06.2019
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 9/2019
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07509-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2019

Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Health Services Research and Global Oncology

Trends in Volume–Outcome Relationship in Gastrectomies in Texas

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.