Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2/2020

20.11.2019 | 2019 SSAT Plenary Presentation

Utilization of Minimally Invasive Surgery and Its Association with Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

verfasst von: Rhami Khorfan, Cary Jo R. Schlick, Anthony D. Yang, David D. Odell, David J. Bentrem, Ryan P. Merkow

Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is increasingly used to treat gastric cancer in the USA. A potential benefit of MIS is increased likelihood of receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Our objectives were (1) to assess trends and predictors of MIS for gastric cancer, (2) to evaluate the association between MIS and postoperative chemotherapy, and (3) to investigate the relationship between MIS and survival.

Methods

Patients with T3 or greater and/or N+ gastric adenocarcinoma were identified from the National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2015. Patients aged ≥ 85, with metastatic disease, treated with only preoperative chemotherapy, or with contraindications to chemotherapy were excluded. Hierarchical logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards were used to assess associations between MIS and postoperative chemotherapy and survival.

Results

Of 21,872 gastric resections, 6083 (27.8%) were MIS and 15,789 (72.2%) open. The majority were partial/subtotal (68.3%). Utilization of MIS increased from 18 to 37% from 2010 to 2015 (p < 0.01). Predictors of MIS were Asian race, any insurance coverage, and treatment at high-volume centers. Among 7540 patients with locally advanced disease, MIS was associated with receiving postoperative chemotherapy compared to open surgery (77.7% vs. 71.9%; OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.11–1.54). MIS was associated with improved survival before adjusting for postoperative chemotherapy (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.72–0.97) but not after (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.75–1.01).

Discussion

Utilization of MIS for locally advanced gastric cancer approximately doubled during the study period. Compared to open surgery patients, MIS patients were more likely to receive postoperative chemotherapy. The increased utilization of postoperative chemotherapy may explain the associated survival advantage observed with MIS.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2019;69(1):7-34. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2019;69(1):7-34.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Strong VE, Song KY, Park CH, et al. Comparison of gastric cancer survival following R0 resection in the United States and Korea using an internationally validated nomogram. Annals of Surgery. 2010;251(4):640-646.CrossRef Strong VE, Song KY, Park CH, et al. Comparison of gastric cancer survival following R0 resection in the United States and Korea using an internationally validated nomogram. Annals of Surgery. 2010;251(4):640-646.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi AH, Kim J, Chao J. Perioperative chemotherapy for resectable gastric cancer: MAGIC and beyond. World journal of gastroenterology. 2015;21(24):7343-7348.CrossRef Choi AH, Kim J, Chao J. Perioperative chemotherapy for resectable gastric cancer: MAGIC and beyond. World journal of gastroenterology. 2015;21(24):7343-7348.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. The New England journal of medicine. 2006;355(1):11-20.CrossRef Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. The New England journal of medicine. 2006;355(1):11-20.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Macdonald JS, Smalley SR, Benedetti J, et al. Chemoradiotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. The New England journal of medicine. 2001;345(10):725-730.CrossRef Macdonald JS, Smalley SR, Benedetti J, et al. Chemoradiotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. The New England journal of medicine. 2001;345(10):725-730.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Smalley SR, Benedetti JK, Haller DG, et al. Updated analysis of SWOG-directed intergroup study 0116: a phase III trial of adjuvant radiochemotherapy versus observation after curative gastric cancer resection. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2012;30(19):2327-2333.CrossRef Smalley SR, Benedetti JK, Haller DG, et al. Updated analysis of SWOG-directed intergroup study 0116: a phase III trial of adjuvant radiochemotherapy versus observation after curative gastric cancer resection. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2012;30(19):2327-2333.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Raigani S, Hardacre JM, Kim J, Ammori JB. Trends in the surgical treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma. Annals of surgical oncology. 2014;21(2):569-574.CrossRef Raigani S, Hardacre JM, Kim J, Ammori JB. Trends in the surgical treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma. Annals of surgical oncology. 2014;21(2):569-574.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Sherman KL, Merkow RP, Bilimoria KY, et al. Treatment trends and predictors of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for gastric adenocarcinoma in the United States. Annals of surgical oncology. 2013;20(2):362-370.CrossRef Sherman KL, Merkow RP, Bilimoria KY, et al. Treatment trends and predictors of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for gastric adenocarcinoma in the United States. Annals of surgical oncology. 2013;20(2):362-370.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Snyder RA, Penson DF, Ni S, Koyama T, Merchant NB. Trends in the use of evidence-based therapy for resectable gastric cancer. Journal of surgical oncology 2014;110(3):285-290.CrossRef Snyder RA, Penson DF, Ni S, Koyama T, Merchant NB. Trends in the use of evidence-based therapy for resectable gastric cancer. Journal of surgical oncology 2014;110(3):285-290.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Cassidy MR, Gholami S, Strong VE. Minimally Invasive Surgery: The Emerging Role in Gastric Cancer. Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America. 2017;26(2):193-212.CrossRef Cassidy MR, Gholami S, Strong VE. Minimally Invasive Surgery: The Emerging Role in Gastric Cancer. Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America. 2017;26(2):193-212.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Costantino CL, Mullen JT. Minimally Invasive Gastric Cancer Surgery. Surgical oncology clinics of North America. 2019;28(2):201-213.CrossRef Costantino CL, Mullen JT. Minimally Invasive Gastric Cancer Surgery. Surgical oncology clinics of North America. 2019;28(2):201-213.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Russo A, Strong VE. Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer in USA: current status and future perspectives. Translational gastroenterology and hepatology. 2017;2:38.CrossRef Russo A, Strong VE. Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer in USA: current status and future perspectives. Translational gastroenterology and hepatology. 2017;2:38.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Vinuela EF, Gonen M, Brennan MF, Coit DG, Strong VE. Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and high-quality nonrandomized studies. Annals of surgery. 2012;255(3):446-456.CrossRef Vinuela EF, Gonen M, Brennan MF, Coit DG, Strong VE. Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and high-quality nonrandomized studies. Annals of surgery. 2012;255(3):446-456.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Information Committee of Korean Gastric Cancer Association. Korean Gastric Cancer Association Nationwide Survey on Gastric Cancer in 2014. Journal of Gastric Cancer. 2016;16(3):131-140.CrossRef Information Committee of Korean Gastric Cancer Association. Korean Gastric Cancer Association Nationwide Survey on Gastric Cancer in 2014. Journal of Gastric Cancer. 2016;16(3):131-140.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Merkow RP, Bentrem DJ, Mulcahy MF, et al. Effect of postoperative complications on adjuvant chemotherapy use for stage III colon cancer. Annals of surgery. 2013;258(6):847-853.CrossRef Merkow RP, Bentrem DJ, Mulcahy MF, et al. Effect of postoperative complications on adjuvant chemotherapy use for stage III colon cancer. Annals of surgery. 2013;258(6):847-853.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Merkow RP, Bilimoria KY, Tomlinson JS, et al. Postoperative complications reduce adjuvant chemotherapy use in resectable pancreatic cancer. Annals of Surgery. 2014;260(2):372-377.CrossRef Merkow RP, Bilimoria KY, Tomlinson JS, et al. Postoperative complications reduce adjuvant chemotherapy use in resectable pancreatic cancer. Annals of Surgery. 2014;260(2):372-377.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kelly KJ, Selby L, Chou JF, et al. Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma in the West: A Case-Control Study. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2015;22(11):3590-3596.CrossRef Kelly KJ, Selby L, Chou JF, et al. Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma in the West: A Case-Control Study. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2015;22(11):3590-3596.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, et al. Effect of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy vs Open Distal Gastrectomy on Long-term Survival Among Patients With Stage I Gastric Cancer: The KLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA oncology. 2019. Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, et al. Effect of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy vs Open Distal Gastrectomy on Long-term Survival Among Patients With Stage I Gastric Cancer: The KLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA oncology. 2019.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee HJ, Hyung WJ, Yang HK, et al. Short-term Outcomes of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy With D2 Lymphadenectomy to Open Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer (KLASS-02-RCT). Annals of surgery. 2019.CrossRef Lee HJ, Hyung WJ, Yang HK, et al. Short-term Outcomes of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy With D2 Lymphadenectomy to Open Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer (KLASS-02-RCT). Annals of surgery. 2019.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu Y, Huang C, Sun Y, et al. Morbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopic Versus Open D2 Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2016;34(12):1350-1357.CrossRef Hu Y, Huang C, Sun Y, et al. Morbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopic Versus Open D2 Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2016;34(12):1350-1357.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Yu J, Huang C, Sun Y, et al. Effect of Laparoscopic vs Open Distal Gastrectomy on 3-Year Disease-Free Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: The CLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial. Jama. 2019;321(20):1983-1992.CrossRef Yu J, Huang C, Sun Y, et al. Effect of Laparoscopic vs Open Distal Gastrectomy on 3-Year Disease-Free Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: The CLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial. Jama. 2019;321(20):1983-1992.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Jin LX, Sanford DE, Squires MH, 3rd, et al. Interaction of Postoperative Morbidity and Receipt of Adjuvant Therapy on Long-Term Survival After Resection for Gastric Adenocarcinoma: Results From the U.S. Gastric Cancer Collaborative. Annals of surgical oncology. 2016;23(8):2398-2408.CrossRef Jin LX, Sanford DE, Squires MH, 3rd, et al. Interaction of Postoperative Morbidity and Receipt of Adjuvant Therapy on Long-Term Survival After Resection for Gastric Adenocarcinoma: Results From the U.S. Gastric Cancer Collaborative. Annals of surgical oncology. 2016;23(8):2398-2408.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Nelson H, et al. Use and outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for cancer in the United States. Archives of surgery 2008;143(9):832-839; discussion 839-840.CrossRef Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Nelson H, et al. Use and outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for cancer in the United States. Archives of surgery 2008;143(9):832-839; discussion 839-840.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Skancke M, Schoolfield C, Umapathi B, Amdur R, Brody F, Obias V. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Adenocarcinoma Shows Promising Outcomes Compared to Laparotomy, a National Cancer Database Observational Analysis. Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A 2019;29(2):218-224.CrossRef Skancke M, Schoolfield C, Umapathi B, Amdur R, Brody F, Obias V. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Adenocarcinoma Shows Promising Outcomes Compared to Laparotomy, a National Cancer Database Observational Analysis. Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A 2019;29(2):218-224.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Eto K, Hiki N, Kumagai K, et al. Prophylactic effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients with postoperative complications. Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association 2018;21(4):703-709.CrossRef Eto K, Hiki N, Kumagai K, et al. Prophylactic effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients with postoperative complications. Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association 2018;21(4):703-709.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Vicente D, Ikoma N, Chiang YJ, et al. Preoperative Therapy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma is Protective for Poor Oncologic Outcomes in Patients with Complications After Gastrectomy. Annals of surgical oncology. 2018;25(9):2720-2730.CrossRef Vicente D, Ikoma N, Chiang YJ, et al. Preoperative Therapy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma is Protective for Poor Oncologic Outcomes in Patients with Complications After Gastrectomy. Annals of surgical oncology. 2018;25(9):2720-2730.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Utilization of Minimally Invasive Surgery and Its Association with Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer
verfasst von
Rhami Khorfan
Cary Jo R. Schlick
Anthony D. Yang
David D. Odell
David J. Bentrem
Ryan P. Merkow
Publikationsdatum
20.11.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2020
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Elektronische ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04410-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2020

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Evidence-Based Current Surgical Practice

Evolving Strategies to Manage Clostridium difficile Colitis

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.