Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 7/2017

20.12.2016 | Original Article

Vaginal vault suspension during hysterectomy for benign indications: a prospective register study of agreement on terminology and surgical procedure

verfasst von: Lisbeth Bonde, Mette Calundann Noer, Lars Alling Møller, Bent Ottesen, Helga Gimbel

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 7/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Several suspension methods are used to try to prevent pelvic organ prolapse (POP) after hysterectomy. We aimed to evaluate agreement on terminology and surgical procedure of these methods.

Methods

We randomly chose 532 medical records of women with a history of hysterectomy from the Danish Hysterectomy and Hysteroscopy Database (DHHD). Additionally, we video-recorded 36 randomly chosen hysterectomies. The hysterectomies were registered in the DHHD. The material was categorized according to predefined suspension methods. Agreement compared suspension codes in DHHD (gynecologists’ registrations) with medical records (gynecologists’ descriptions) and with videos (reviewers’ categorizations) respectively. Whether the vaginal vault was suspended (pooled suspension) or not (no suspension method + not described) was analyzed, in addition to each suspension method.

Results

Regarding medical records, agreement on terminology was good among patients undergoing pooled suspension in cases of hysterectomy via the abdominal and vaginal route (agreement 78.7, 92.3%). Regarding videos, agreement on surgical procedure was good among pooled suspension patients in cases of hysterectomy via the abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal routes (agreement 88.9, 97.8, 100%). Agreement on individual suspension methods differed regarding both medical records (agreement 0–90.1%) and videos (agreement 0–100%).

Conclusions

Agreement on terminology and surgical procedure regarding suspension method was good in respect of pooled suspension. However, disagreement was observed when individual suspension methods and operative details were scrutinized. Better consensus of terminology and surgical procedure is warranted to enable further research aimed at preventing POP among women undergoing hysterectomy.
Literatur
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Lykke R, Blaakær J, Ottesen B, Gimbel H. Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery among Danish women hysterectomized for benign conditions: age at hysterectomy, age at subsequent POP operation, and risk of POP after hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26:527–32. doi:10.1007/s00192-014-2490-y.CrossRefPubMed Lykke R, Blaakær J, Ottesen B, Gimbel H. Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery among Danish women hysterectomized for benign conditions: age at hysterectomy, age at subsequent POP operation, and risk of POP after hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26:527–32. doi:10.​1007/​s00192-014-2490-y.CrossRefPubMed
6.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Lidegaard Ø, Hammerum MS. The National Patient Registry as a tool for continuous production and quality control. Ugeskr Laeger. 2002;164:4420–3.PubMed Lidegaard Ø, Hammerum MS. The National Patient Registry as a tool for continuous production and quality control. Ugeskr Laeger. 2002;164:4420–3.PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Smilen SW. How to manage the cuff at vaginal hysterectomy. OBG Manag 2007;19:45–53. Smilen SW. How to manage the cuff at vaginal hysterectomy. OBG Manag 2007;19:45–53.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Shull BL, Bachofen C, Coates KW, Kuehl TJ. A transvaginal approach to repair of apical and other associated sites of pelvic organ prolapse with uterosacral ligaments. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:1365–74. doi:10.1067/mob.2000.110910.CrossRefPubMed Shull BL, Bachofen C, Coates KW, Kuehl TJ. A transvaginal approach to repair of apical and other associated sites of pelvic organ prolapse with uterosacral ligaments. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:1365–74. doi:10.​1067/​mob.​2000.​110910.CrossRefPubMed
12.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Armstrong T, Yu D, Frischknecht A, et al. Standardization of surgical procedures for identifying best practices and training. Work. 2012;41:4673–9.PubMed Armstrong T, Yu D, Frischknecht A, et al. Standardization of surgical procedures for identifying best practices and training. Work. 2012;41:4673–9.PubMed
14.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Cruikshank SH, Kovac SR. Randomized comparison of three surgical methods used at the time of vaginal hysterectomy to prevent posterior enterocele. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:859–65.CrossRefPubMed Cruikshank SH, Kovac SR. Randomized comparison of three surgical methods used at the time of vaginal hysterectomy to prevent posterior enterocele. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:859–65.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Vaginal vault suspension during hysterectomy for benign indications: a prospective register study of agreement on terminology and surgical procedure
verfasst von
Lisbeth Bonde
Mette Calundann Noer
Lars Alling Møller
Bent Ottesen
Helga Gimbel
Publikationsdatum
20.12.2016
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 7/2017
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3229-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2017

International Urogynecology Journal 7/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.