nach oben

Erschienen in:

17.09.2018 | Original Article

Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Korean version of the Core Outcome Measures Index in patients with degenerative lumbar disease

verfasst von: Ho-Joong Kim, Jin S. Yeom, Yunjin Nam, Na-Kyoung Lee, Young Woo Heo, Se Yeon Lee, Jiwon Park, Bong-Soon Chang, Choon-Ki Lee, Heoung-Jae Chun, Anne F. Mannion

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal | Ausgabe 11/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To translate and cross-culturally adapt the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) into the Korean language and to test the psychometric properties of the Korean COMI in patients with degenerative lumbar spine diseases.

Methods

A cross-cultural adaptation of the COMI into Korean was carried out using established guidelines. A total of 117 patients with lumbar spinal diseases were recruited from the spinal center of a tertiary care teaching institution and completed a baseline questionnaire including the newly translated COMI, the visual analog scale for back pain and for leg pain, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the EuroQOL-5 dimensions (EQ-5D). Within 2 weeks after the first assessment, 83 (71%) completed a second COMI questionnaire and a transition question (no change, slight change, moderate change, a lot of change) by phone to assess reproducibility.

Results

COMI summary scores displayed 1.7% floor effects and no ceiling effect. For construct validity, each COMI item and COMI summary score well correlated with its corresponding reference questionnaire. Therefore, the predefined hypotheses for the construct validities of each COMI item (ρ > 0.4 with the corresponding questionnaire) and the COMI summary score (ρ > 0.6 with both ODI and EQ-5D) were confirmed. Intraclass correlation coefficients of each COMI item and summary score ranged from 0.93 to 0.98. Therefore, the hypothesis for reliability (ICC > 0.8) was confirmed.

Conclusions

The present study highlights that the Korean version of the COMI is a reliable and valid outcome tool for use in Korean-speaking patients with degenerative lumbar spinal disease.

Graphical abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Lee SY, Kim T-H, Oh JK, Lee SJ, Park MS (2015) Lumbar stenosis: a recent update by review of literature. Asian Spine J 9(5):818–828CrossRef

Park S, Kim HJ, Ko BG, Chung JW, Kim SH, Park SH, Lee MH, Yeom JS (2016) The prevalence and impact of sarcopenia on degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Bone Joint J 98-b(8):1093–1098. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.98b8.37623 CrossRefPubMed

Waddell G (1996) Low back pain: a twentieth century health care enigma. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21(24):2820–2825CrossRef

Baliga S, Treon K, Craig NJA (2015) Low back pain: current surgical approaches. Asian Spine J 9(4):645–657CrossRef

Becker A, Held H, Redaelli M, Strauch K, Chenot JF, Leonhardt C, Keller S, Baum E, Pfingsten M, Hildebrandt J, Basler HD, Kochen MM, Donner-Banzhoff N (2010) Low back pain in primary care: costs of care and prediction of future health care utilization. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(18):1714–1720CrossRef

Ekman M, Jonhagen S, Hunsche E, Jonsson L (2005) Burden of illness of chronic low back pain in Sweden: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in primary care setting. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(15):1777–1785CrossRef

Miekisiak G, Kollataj M, Dobrogowski J, Kloc W, Libionka W, Banach M, Latka D, Sobolewski T, Sulewski A, Nowakowski A, Kiwic G, Pala A, Potaczek T (2013) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Polish version of the core outcome measures index for low back pain. Eur Spine J 22(5):995–1001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2607-2 CrossRefPubMed

Mannion AF, Elfering A, Staerkle R, Junge A, Grob D, Semmer NK, Jacobshagen N, Dvorak J, Boos N (2005) Outcome assessment in low back pain: how low can you go? Eur Spine J 14(10):1014–1026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-0911-9 CrossRefPubMed

Ferrer M, Pellise F, Escudero O, Alvarez L, Pont A, Alonso J, Deyo R (2006) Validation of a minimum outcome core set in the evaluation of patients with back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(12):1372–1379. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000218477.53318.bc CrossRef

10.

Mannion AF, Porchet F, Kleinstuck FS, Lattig F, Jeszenszky D, Bartanusz V, Dvorak J, Grob D (2009) The quality of spine surgery from the patient’s perspective. Part 1: the Core Outcome Measures Index in clinical practice. Eur Spine J 18(Suppl 3):367–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-0942-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJ, Bombardier C, Croft P, Koes B, Malmivaara A, Roland M, Von Korff M, Waddell G (1998) Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine 23(18):2003–2013CrossRef

12.

Zweig T, Mannion AF, Grob D, Melloh M, Munting E, Tuschel A, Aebi M, Roder C (2009) How to Tango: a manual for implementing Spine Tango. Eur Spine J 18(Suppl 3):312–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1074-x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Nakhostin Ansari N, Naghdi S, Eskandari Z, Salsabili N, Kordi R, Hasson S (2016) Reliability and validity of the Persian adaptation of the Core Outcome Measure Index in patients with chronic low back pain. J Orthop Sci 21(6):723–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2016.07.022 CrossRefPubMed

14.

Klemencsics I, Lazary A, Valasek T, Szoverfi Z, Bozsodi A, Eltes P, Fekete TF, Varga PP (2016) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Hungarian version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for the back (COMI Back). Eur Spine J 25(1):257–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3750-8 CrossRefPubMed

15.

Qiao J, Zhu F, Zhu Z, Xu L, Wang B, Yu Y, Qian BP, Ding Y, Qiu Y (2013) Validation of the simplified Chinese version of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI). Eur Spine J 22(12):2821–2826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2761-1 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Damasceno LH, Rocha PA, Barbosa ES, Barros CA, Canto FT, Defino HL, Mannion AF (2012) Cross-cultural adaptation and assessment of the reliability and validity of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) for the Brazilian–Portuguese language. Eur Spine J 21(7):1273–1282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-2100-3 CrossRefPubMed

17.

Storheim K, Brox JI, Lochting I, Werner EL, Grotle M (2012) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Norwegian version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for low back pain. Eur Spine J 21(12):2539–2549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2393-x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Genevay S, Cedraschi C, Marty M, Rozenberg S, De Goumoens P, Faundez A, Balague F, Porchet F, Mannion AF (2012) Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted French version of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) in patients with low back pain. Eur Spine J 21(1):130–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1992-2 CrossRefPubMed

19.

Mannion AF, Boneschi M, Teli M, Luca A, Zaina F, Negrini S, Schulz PJ (2012) Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted Italian version of the Core Outcome Measures Index. Eur Spine J 21(Suppl 6):S737–S749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1741-6 CrossRefPubMed

20.

Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Philadelphia, Pa 1976) 25(24):3186–3191CrossRef

21.

Kim DY, Lee SH, Lee HY, Lee HJ, Chang SB, Chung SK, Kim HJ (2005) Validation of the Korean version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(5):E123–E127CrossRef

22.

Kim MH, Cho YS, Uhm WS, Kim S, Bae SC (2005) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Korean version of the EQ-5D in patients with rheumatic diseases. Qual Life Res 14(5):1401–1406CrossRef

23.

Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB (2000) The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Philadelphia, Pa 1976) 25(22):2940–2952CrossRef

24.

Soer R, Reneman MF, Speijer BL, Coppes MH, Vroomen PC (2012) Clinimetric properties of the EuroQol-5D in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine J 12(11):1035–1039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.030 CrossRefPubMed

25.

McHorney CA, Tarlov AR (1995) Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 4(4):293–307CrossRef

26.

Steiner D, Norman G (1995) Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford Medical Publications, Oxford

27.

Altman D (1991) Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman & Hall, London

28.

Nevill AM, Lane AM, Kilgour LJ, Bowes N, Whyte GP (2001) Stability of psychometric questionnaires. J Sports Sci 19(4):273–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/026404101750158358 CrossRefPubMed

29.

Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86(2):420–428CrossRef

30.

Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60(1):34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012 CrossRefPubMed

31.

Matsudaira K, Oka H, Oshima Y, Chikuda H, Taniguchi Y, Matsubayashi Y, Kawaguchi M, Sato E, Murano H, Laurent T, Tanaka S, Mannion AF (2018) Development of the Japanese Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI): cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation. BMC Musculoskelet disord 19(1):71. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-1986-x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Korean version of the Core Outcome Measures Index in patients with degenerative lumbar disease
verfasst von: Ho-Joong Kim
Jin S. Yeom
Yunjin Nam
Na-Kyoung Lee
Young Woo Heo
Se Yeon Lee
Jiwon Park
Bong-Soon Chang
Choon-Ki Lee
Heoung-Jae Chun
Anne F. Mannion
Publikationsdatum: 17.09.2018
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: European Spine Journal / Ausgabe 11/2018
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5759-x

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

18.04.2024 | Wirbelsäulenmetastase | Nachrichten

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Korean version of the Core Outcome Measures Index in patients with degenerative lumbar disease

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Graphical abstract

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

Zwei neue Alternativen zu TNF-Inhibitoren bei axSpA

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Graphical abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2018

A critical appraisal of the quality of low back pain practice guidelines using the AGREE II tool and comparison with previous evaluations: a EuroAIM initiative

13. Deutscher Wirbelsäulenkongress

Validation of the Croatian version of the Oswestry Disability Index

A novel technique of cervical pedicle screw placement with a pilot screw under the guidance of intraoperative 3D imaging from C-arm cone-beam CT without navigation for safe and accurate insertion

Cervical pedicle screw instrumentation is more reliable with O-arm-based 3D navigation: analysis of cervical pedicle screw placement accuracy with O-arm-based 3D navigation

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

Zwei neue Alternativen zu TNF-Inhibitoren bei axSpA

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie