Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Dysphagia 4/2018

08.01.2018 | Original Article

Validation and Psychometric Properties of the German Version of the SWAL-QOL

verfasst von: Eva-Maria Kraus, Natalie Rommel, Lisa H. Stoll, Andreas Oettinger, Adam P. Vogel, Matthis Synofzik

Erschienen in: Dysphagia | Ausgabe 4/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The SWAL-QOL questionnaire is a common tool for evaluating patients’ dysphagia-specific quality of life. A validated German version is not available. This study aimed to establish a German version of the SWAL-QOL (G-SWAL-QOL) using a standardized translation procedure and to systematically evaluate its psychometric properties. The original SWAL-QOL was translated into German following international translation guidelines. A pilot study (45 subjects) confirmed comprehensibility of the G-SWAL-QOL. A consecutive series of 158 subjects (103 patients with dysphagia; 55 healthy controls) was then recruited to assess validity and reliability of the G-SWAL-QOL. Construct validity was analyzed through a correlation analysis with both (i) the Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (ADI-D) and (ii) the Short Form 36 (SF-36). Internal consistency and test–retest reliability were evaluated to determine reliability. All questions of the G-SWAL-QOL were comprehensible, except one which was subsequently revised. Construct validity of the G-SWAL-QOL was demonstrated by moderate to high correlations with the ADI-D (Spearman’s rho 0.36 – 0.88). The G-SWAL-QOL was able to differentiate between patients with dysphagia and healthy controls (p < 0.001) and was sensitive to disease severity measured by different food textures. Reliability of the G-SWAL-QOL was good to excellent for both internal consistency (Cronbach’s α > 0.7 for all domains, except eating desire [α = 0.69]) and test–retest reliability (Spearman’s rho ≥ 0.68 for all domains; ICC > 0.8 for all domains). The G-SWAL-QOL is a valid and reliable measuring tool for dysphagia-specific quality of life in German-speaking persons.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Malagelada J-R, Bazzoli F, Boeckxstaens G, De Looze D, Fried M, Kahrilas P, Lindberg G, Malfertheiner P, Salis G, Sharma P. World gastroenterology organisation global guidelines: dysphagia—global guidelines and cascades update september 2014. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015;49(5):370–8.CrossRefPubMed Malagelada J-R, Bazzoli F, Boeckxstaens G, De Looze D, Fried M, Kahrilas P, Lindberg G, Malfertheiner P, Salis G, Sharma P. World gastroenterology organisation global guidelines: dysphagia—global guidelines and cascades update september 2014. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015;49(5):370–8.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ekberg O, Hamdy S, Woisard V, Wuttge-Hannig A, Ortega P. Social and psychological burden of dysphagia: its impact on diagnosis and treatment. Dysphagia. 2002;17(2):139–46.CrossRefPubMed Ekberg O, Hamdy S, Woisard V, Wuttge-Hannig A, Ortega P. Social and psychological burden of dysphagia: its impact on diagnosis and treatment. Dysphagia. 2002;17(2):139–46.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat McHorney CA, Bricker DE, Kramer AE, Rosenbek JC, Robbins J, Chignell KA, Logemann JA, Clarke C. The SWAL-QOL outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: I. Conceptual foundation and item development. Dysphagia. 2000;15(3):115–21.CrossRefPubMed McHorney CA, Bricker DE, Kramer AE, Rosenbek JC, Robbins J, Chignell KA, Logemann JA, Clarke C. The SWAL-QOL outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: I. Conceptual foundation and item development. Dysphagia. 2000;15(3):115–21.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Keage M, Delatycki M, Corben L, Vogel A. A systematic review of self-reported swallowing assessments in progressive neurological disorders. Dysphagia. 2015;30(1):27–46.CrossRefPubMed Keage M, Delatycki M, Corben L, Vogel A. A systematic review of self-reported swallowing assessments in progressive neurological disorders. Dysphagia. 2015;30(1):27–46.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat McHorney CA, Robbins J, Lomax K, Rosenbek JC, Chignell K, Kramer AE, Bricker DE. The SWAL–QOL and SWAL–CARE outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: III. Documentation of reliability and validity. Dysphagia. 2002;17(2):97–114.CrossRefPubMed McHorney CA, Robbins J, Lomax K, Rosenbek JC, Chignell K, Kramer AE, Bricker DE. The SWAL–QOL and SWAL–CARE outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: III. Documentation of reliability and validity. Dysphagia. 2002;17(2):97–114.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Khaldoun E, Woisard V, Verin E. Validation in French of the SWAL-QOL scale in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia. Gastroentérol Clin et Biol. 2009;33(3):167–71.CrossRef Khaldoun E, Woisard V, Verin E. Validation in French of the SWAL-QOL scale in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia. Gastroentérol Clin et Biol. 2009;33(3):167–71.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Vanderwegen J, Van Nuffelen G, De Bodt M. The validation and psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Swallowing Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (DSWAL-QOL). Dysphagia. 2013;28(1):11–23.CrossRefPubMed Vanderwegen J, Van Nuffelen G, De Bodt M. The validation and psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Swallowing Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (DSWAL-QOL). Dysphagia. 2013;28(1):11–23.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Bogaardt H, Speyer R, Baijens L, Fokkens W. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Dutch version of SWAL-QoL. Dysphagia. 2009;24(1):66–70.CrossRefPubMed Bogaardt H, Speyer R, Baijens L, Fokkens W. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Dutch version of SWAL-QoL. Dysphagia. 2009;24(1):66–70.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Lam PM, Lai CKY. The validation of the Chinese version of the Swallow Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (SWAL-QOL) using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Dysphagia. 2011;26(2):117–24.CrossRefPubMed Lam PM, Lai CKY. The validation of the Chinese version of the Swallow Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (SWAL-QOL) using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Dysphagia. 2011;26(2):117–24.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Finizia C, Rudberg I, Bergqvist H, Rydén A. A cross-sectional validation study of the Swedish version of SWAL-QOL. Dysphagia. 2012;27(3):325–35.CrossRefPubMed Finizia C, Rudberg I, Bergqvist H, Rydén A. A cross-sectional validation study of the Swedish version of SWAL-QOL. Dysphagia. 2012;27(3):325–35.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ginocchio D, Alfonsi E, Mozzanica F, Accornero AR, Bergonzoni A, Chiarello G, De Luca N, Farneti D, Marilia S, Calcagno P. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Italian version of SWAL-QOL. Dysphagia. 2016;31(5):1–9.CrossRef Ginocchio D, Alfonsi E, Mozzanica F, Accornero AR, Bergonzoni A, Chiarello G, De Luca N, Farneti D, Marilia S, Calcagno P. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Italian version of SWAL-QOL. Dysphagia. 2016;31(5):1–9.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Stanschuss S. Rehabilitation von Dysphagien. Idstein: Schulz-Kirchner Verlag GmbH; 2006. Stanschuss S. Rehabilitation von Dysphagien. Idstein: Schulz-Kirchner Verlag GmbH; 2006.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186–91.CrossRefPubMed Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186–91.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat DeVellis RF. Scale development: theory and applications. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage publications; 2012. DeVellis RF. Scale development: theory and applications. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage publications; 2012.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17(2):268–74.CrossRefPubMed Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17(2):268–74.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695–9.CrossRefPubMed Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695–9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Bauer F, Seiss M, Grässel E, Stelzle F, Klotz M, Rosanowski F. Swallowing-related quality of life in oral cavity cancer. The German version of the Anderson Dysphagia Inventory. Hno. 2010;58(7):692–7.CrossRefPubMed Bauer F, Seiss M, Grässel E, Stelzle F, Klotz M, Rosanowski F. Swallowing-related quality of life in oral cavity cancer. The German version of the Anderson Dysphagia Inventory. Hno. 2010;58(7):692–7.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Bullinger M, Kirchberger I, Ware J. Der deutsche SF-36 Health Survey Übersetzung und psychometrische Testung eines krankheitsübergreifenden Instruments zur Erfassung der gesundheitsbezogenen Lebensqualität. Zeitschrift für Gesundheitswissenschaften. J Public Health. 1995;3(1):21–36.CrossRef Bullinger M, Kirchberger I, Ware J. Der deutsche SF-36 Health Survey Übersetzung und psychometrische Testung eines krankheitsübergreifenden Instruments zur Erfassung der gesundheitsbezogenen Lebensqualität. Zeitschrift für Gesundheitswissenschaften. J Public Health. 1995;3(1):21–36.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat McHorney CA, Bricker DE, Robbins J, Kramer AE, Rosenbek JC, Chignell KA. The SWAL-QOL outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: II. Item reduction and preliminary scaling. Dysphagia. 2000;15(3):122–33.CrossRefPubMed McHorney CA, Bricker DE, Robbins J, Kramer AE, Rosenbek JC, Chignell KA. The SWAL-QOL outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: II. Item reduction and preliminary scaling. Dysphagia. 2000;15(3):122–33.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen AY, Frankowski R, Bishop-Leone J, Hebert T, Leyk S, Lewin J, Goepfert H. The development and validation of a dysphagia-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with head and neck cancer: the MD Anderson dysphagia inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127(7):870–6.PubMed Chen AY, Frankowski R, Bishop-Leone J, Hebert T, Leyk S, Lewin J, Goepfert H. The development and validation of a dysphagia-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with head and neck cancer: the MD Anderson dysphagia inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127(7):870–6.PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Bullinger M, Kirchberger I (1998) Der SF-36 Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand.(SF-36)-Handbuch für die deutschsprachige Fragebogenversion. Hogrefe, Göttingen. Bullinger M, Kirchberger I (1998) Der SF-36 Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand.(SF-36)-Handbuch für die deutschsprachige Fragebogenversion. Hogrefe, Göttingen.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Ellert U, Kurth B-M. Methodische Betrachtungen zu den Summenscores des SF-36 anhand der erwachsenen bundesdeutschen Bevölkerung. Bundesgesundheitsblatt-Gesundheitsforschung-Gesundheitsschutz. 2004;47(11):1027–32.CrossRefPubMed Ellert U, Kurth B-M. Methodische Betrachtungen zu den Summenscores des SF-36 anhand der erwachsenen bundesdeutschen Bevölkerung. Bundesgesundheitsblatt-Gesundheitsforschung-Gesundheitsschutz. 2004;47(11):1027–32.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavior science. 2nd ed. Hillsdale: Lawrance Eribaum Association; 1988. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavior science. 2nd ed. Hillsdale: Lawrance Eribaum Association; 1988.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat McDowell I. Measuring health: a guide to rating scales and questionnaires. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.CrossRef McDowell I. Measuring health: a guide to rating scales and questionnaires. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Dziuban CD, Shirkey EC. When is a correlation matrix appropriate for factor analysis? Some decision rules. Psychol Bull. 1974;81(6):358.CrossRef Dziuban CD, Shirkey EC. When is a correlation matrix appropriate for factor analysis? Some decision rules. Psychol Bull. 1974;81(6):358.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Tabachnick B, Fidell L. Using multivariate statistics. 5th ed. Boston: Pearson; 2007. p. 646. Tabachnick B, Fidell L. Using multivariate statistics. 5th ed. Boston: Pearson; 2007. p. 646.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS. 4th ed. Los Angeles: Sage publications; 2014. Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS. 4th ed. Los Angeles: Sage publications; 2014.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Nunally J, Bernstein I. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994. Nunally J, Bernstein I. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Portney L, Watkins M (1993) Foundations of clinical research. Applications and practice norwalk, Connecticut: Appleton & Lange. J Rehabil. 74(3). Portney L, Watkins M (1993) Foundations of clinical research. Applications and practice norwalk, Connecticut: Appleton & Lange. J Rehabil. 74(3).
31.
Zurück zum Zitat McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res. 1995;4(4):293–307.CrossRefPubMed McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res. 1995;4(4):293–307.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilson IB, Cleary PD. Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life: a conceptual model of patient outcomes. JAMA. 1995;273(1):59–65.CrossRefPubMed Wilson IB, Cleary PD. Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life: a conceptual model of patient outcomes. JAMA. 1995;273(1):59–65.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Rinkel RN, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Langendijk JA, van Reij EJ, Aaronson NK, Leemans CR. The psychometric and clinical validity of the SWAL-QOL questionnaire in evaluating swallowing problems experienced by patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Oral Oncol. 2009;45(8):e67–71.CrossRefPubMed Rinkel RN, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Langendijk JA, van Reij EJ, Aaronson NK, Leemans CR. The psychometric and clinical validity of the SWAL-QOL questionnaire in evaluating swallowing problems experienced by patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Oral Oncol. 2009;45(8):e67–71.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Starrost U. Bogenhausener Dysphagiescore (BODS). Schluckstörungen: Diagnostik und Rehabilitation, 3rd ed. München: Urban and Fischer; 2006. Starrost U. Bogenhausener Dysphagiescore (BODS). Schluckstörungen: Diagnostik und Rehabilitation, 3rd ed. München: Urban and Fischer; 2006.
Metadaten
Titel
Validation and Psychometric Properties of the German Version of the SWAL-QOL
verfasst von
Eva-Maria Kraus
Natalie Rommel
Lisa H. Stoll
Andreas Oettinger
Adam P. Vogel
Matthis Synofzik
Publikationsdatum
08.01.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Dysphagia / Ausgabe 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0179-051X
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0460
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-017-9872-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2018

Dysphagia 4/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update HNO

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.