Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Radiological Physics and Technology 4/2017

18.08.2017

Validation of a calibration method using the cross-calibration factor and system planar sensitivity in quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography imaging

verfasst von: Norikazu Matsutomo, Saki Matsumoto, Tomoaki Yamamoto, Eisuke Sato

Erschienen in: Radiological Physics and Technology | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The present study aimed to validate the absolute quantitative accuracy of a calibration method for single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) using cross-calibration factor (CCF)- and system sensitivity-based calibration methods. The CCF obtained with different reconstruction parameters was evaluated using a cylindrical phantom (diameter 20 cm, height 20 cm). SPECT images were acquired with a positron emission tomography/computed tomography (CT) phantom. Subsequently, they were reconstructed by using ordered subset expectation maximization with resolution recovery, scatter, and CT-based attenuation correction. All reconstructed SPECT counts were converted to activity concentrations based on the CCF and system planar sensitivity. We placed 12 circular regions of interest, 37 mm in diameter, on the phantom background, and the converted activity concentration and relative measurement error were assessed. The CCF obtained using a cylindrical phantom was affected by the iterative update number and post-smoothing filter function. The activity concentration calibrated using the CCF showed over- and underestimation. However, the activity concentration obtained from the system planar sensitivity was similar to that gained using the phantom. The values obtained using the system planar sensitivity were within 10% of the activity concentrations obtained with the phantom. These findings demonstrated that the calibration method using system planar sensitivity provides accurate quantification within 10% of the true activity concentration. Further clinical examination is required to validate the present results.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bailey DL, Kathy PW. An evidence-based review of quantitative SPECT imaging and potential clinical applications. J Nucl Med. 2013;54(1):83–9.CrossRefPubMed Bailey DL, Kathy PW. An evidence-based review of quantitative SPECT imaging and potential clinical applications. J Nucl Med. 2013;54(1):83–9.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Beauregard JM, Hofman MS, Pereira JM, Eu P, Hicks RJ. Quantitative (177) Lu SPECT (QSPECT) imaging using a commercially available SPECT/CT system. Cancer Imaging. 2011;11(1):56–66.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Beauregard JM, Hofman MS, Pereira JM, Eu P, Hicks RJ. Quantitative (177) Lu SPECT (QSPECT) imaging using a commercially available SPECT/CT system. Cancer Imaging. 2011;11(1):56–66.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaneta T, Ogawa M, Daisaki H, Nawata S, Yoshida K, Inoue T. SUV measurement of normal vertebrae using SPECT/CT with Tc-99m methylene diphosphonate. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;6(5):262–8.PubMedPubMedCentral Kaneta T, Ogawa M, Daisaki H, Nawata S, Yoshida K, Inoue T. SUV measurement of normal vertebrae using SPECT/CT with Tc-99m methylene diphosphonate. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;6(5):262–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Assié K, Gardin I, Véra P, Buvat I. Validation of the Monte Carlo simulator GATE for indium-111 imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2005;50(13):3113–25.CrossRefPubMed Assié K, Gardin I, Véra P, Buvat I. Validation of the Monte Carlo simulator GATE for indium-111 imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2005;50(13):3113–25.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Heller GV, Bateman TM, Johnson LL, Cullom SJ, Case JA, Galt JR, et al. Clinical value of attenuation correction in stress-only Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2004;11(3):273–81.CrossRefPubMed Heller GV, Bateman TM, Johnson LL, Cullom SJ, Case JA, Galt JR, et al. Clinical value of attenuation correction in stress-only Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2004;11(3):273–81.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Willowson K, Bailey D, Schembri G, Baldock C. CT-based quantitative SPECT for the radionuclide 201Tl: experimental validation and a standardized uptake value for brain tumour patients. Cancer Imaging. 2012;12:31–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Willowson K, Bailey D, Schembri G, Baldock C. CT-based quantitative SPECT for the radionuclide 201Tl: experimental validation and a standardized uptake value for brain tumour patients. Cancer Imaging. 2012;12:31–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ohno Y, Koyama H, Nogami M, Takenaka D, Matsumoto S, Yoshimura M, et al. Postoperative lung function in lung cancer patients: comparative analysis of predictive capability of MRI, CT, and SPECT. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189(2):400–8.CrossRef Ohno Y, Koyama H, Nogami M, Takenaka D, Matsumoto S, Yoshimura M, et al. Postoperative lung function in lung cancer patients: comparative analysis of predictive capability of MRI, CT, and SPECT. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189(2):400–8.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Israel O, Front D, Hardoff R, Ish-Shalom S, Jerushalmi J, Kolodny GM. In vivo SPECT quantitation of bone metabolism in hyperparathyroidism and thyrotoxicosis. J Nucl Med. 1991;32(6):1157–61.PubMed Israel O, Front D, Hardoff R, Ish-Shalom S, Jerushalmi J, Kolodny GM. In vivo SPECT quantitation of bone metabolism in hyperparathyroidism and thyrotoxicosis. J Nucl Med. 1991;32(6):1157–61.PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bailey DL, Willowson KP. Quantitative SPECT/CT: SPECT joins PET as a quantitative imaging modality. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41(1):17–25.CrossRef Bailey DL, Willowson KP. Quantitative SPECT/CT: SPECT joins PET as a quantitative imaging modality. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41(1):17–25.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Zeintl J, Vija AH, Yahil A, Hornegger J, Kuwert T. Quantitative accuracy of clinical 99mTc SPECT/CT using ordered-subset expectation maximization with 3-dimensional resolution recovery, attenuation, and scatter correction. J Nucl Med. 2010;51(6):921–8.CrossRefPubMed Zeintl J, Vija AH, Yahil A, Hornegger J, Kuwert T. Quantitative accuracy of clinical 99mTc SPECT/CT using ordered-subset expectation maximization with 3-dimensional resolution recovery, attenuation, and scatter correction. J Nucl Med. 2010;51(6):921–8.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Iida H, Nakagawara J, Hayashida K, Fukushima K, Watabe H, Koshino K, et al. Multicenter evaluation of a standardized protocol for rest and acetazolamide cerebral blood flow assessment using a quantitative SPECT reconstruction program and split-dose 123I-iodoamphetamine. J Nucl Med. 2010;51(10):1624–31.CrossRefPubMed Iida H, Nakagawara J, Hayashida K, Fukushima K, Watabe H, Koshino K, et al. Multicenter evaluation of a standardized protocol for rest and acetazolamide cerebral blood flow assessment using a quantitative SPECT reconstruction program and split-dose 123I-iodoamphetamine. J Nucl Med. 2010;51(10):1624–31.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Geworski L, Knoop BO, de Wit M, Ivancević V, Bares R, Munz DL. Multicenter comparison of calibration and cross calibration of PET scanners. J Nucl Med. 2002;43(5):635–9.PubMed Geworski L, Knoop BO, de Wit M, Ivancević V, Bares R, Munz DL. Multicenter comparison of calibration and cross calibration of PET scanners. J Nucl Med. 2002;43(5):635–9.PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Willowson K, Bailey DL, Baldock C. Quantitative SPECT reconstruction using CT-derived corrections. Phys Med Biol. 2008;53(12):3099–112.CrossRefPubMed Willowson K, Bailey DL, Baldock C. Quantitative SPECT reconstruction using CT-derived corrections. Phys Med Biol. 2008;53(12):3099–112.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Koral KF, Swailem FM, Buchbinder S, Clinthorne NH, Rogers WL, Tsui BM. SPECT dual-energy-window Compton correction: scatter multiplier required for quantification. J Nucl Med. 1990;31(1):90–8.PubMed Koral KF, Swailem FM, Buchbinder S, Clinthorne NH, Rogers WL, Tsui BM. SPECT dual-energy-window Compton correction: scatter multiplier required for quantification. J Nucl Med. 1990;31(1):90–8.PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Even-Sapir E, Flusser G, Lerman H, Lievshitz G, Metser U. SPECT/multislice low-dose CT: a clinically relevant constituent in the imaging algorithm of nononcologic patients referred for bone scintigraphy. J Nucl Med. 2007;48(2):319–24.PubMed Even-Sapir E, Flusser G, Lerman H, Lievshitz G, Metser U. SPECT/multislice low-dose CT: a clinically relevant constituent in the imaging algorithm of nononcologic patients referred for bone scintigraphy. J Nucl Med. 2007;48(2):319–24.PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat NM—Q Metrix White Paper DOC1951185 Rev 2 (JB46606XX). NM—Q Metrix White Paper DOC1951185 Rev 2 (JB46606XX).
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim J, Lee HH, Kang Y, Kim TK, Lee SW, So Y, Lee WW. Maximum standardised uptake value of quantitative bone SPECT/CT in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. Clin Radiol. 2017;72(7):580–9.CrossRefPubMed Kim J, Lee HH, Kang Y, Kim TK, Lee SW, So Y, Lee WW. Maximum standardised uptake value of quantitative bone SPECT/CT in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. Clin Radiol. 2017;72(7):580–9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat McDougald WA, Miyaoka RS, Alessio AM, Harrison RL, Lewellen TK. A study of SPECT/CT camera stability for quantitative imaging. EJNMMI Phys. 2016;3(1):14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McDougald WA, Miyaoka RS, Alessio AM, Harrison RL, Lewellen TK. A study of SPECT/CT camera stability for quantitative imaging. EJNMMI Phys. 2016;3(1):14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Lockhart CM, MacDonald LR, Alessio AM, McDougald WA, Doot RK, Kinahan PE. Quantifying and reducing the effect of calibration error on variability of PET/CT standardized uptake value measurements. J Nucl Med. 2011;52(2):218–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lockhart CM, MacDonald LR, Alessio AM, McDougald WA, Doot RK, Kinahan PE. Quantifying and reducing the effect of calibration error on variability of PET/CT standardized uptake value measurements. J Nucl Med. 2011;52(2):218–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Zimmerman B, Kinahan P, Galbraith W, Allberg K, Mawlawi O. Multicenter comparison of dose calibrator accuracy for PET imaging using a standardized source. J Nucl Med. 2009;50(Supplement 2):472. Zimmerman B, Kinahan P, Galbraith W, Allberg K, Mawlawi O. Multicenter comparison of dose calibrator accuracy for PET imaging using a standardized source. J Nucl Med. 2009;50(Supplement 2):472.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Boellaard R, Krak NC, Hoekstra OS, Lammertsma AA. Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation study. J Nucl Med. 2004;45(9):1519–27.PubMed Boellaard R, Krak NC, Hoekstra OS, Lammertsma AA. Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation study. J Nucl Med. 2004;45(9):1519–27.PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Boellaard R. Standards for PET image acquisition and quantitative data analysis. J Nucl Med. 2009;50(Suppl 1):11S–20S.CrossRefPubMed Boellaard R. Standards for PET image acquisition and quantitative data analysis. J Nucl Med. 2009;50(Suppl 1):11S–20S.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Onishi H, Motomura N, Fujino K, Natsume T, Haramoto Y. Quantitative performance of advanced resolution recovery strategies on SPECT images: evaluation with use of digital phantom models. Radiol Phys Technol. 2013;6(1):42–53.CrossRefPubMed Onishi H, Motomura N, Fujino K, Natsume T, Haramoto Y. Quantitative performance of advanced resolution recovery strategies on SPECT images: evaluation with use of digital phantom models. Radiol Phys Technol. 2013;6(1):42–53.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Validation of a calibration method using the cross-calibration factor and system planar sensitivity in quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography imaging
verfasst von
Norikazu Matsutomo
Saki Matsumoto
Tomoaki Yamamoto
Eisuke Sato
Publikationsdatum
18.08.2017
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Erschienen in
Radiological Physics and Technology / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 1865-0333
Elektronische ISSN: 1865-0341
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-017-0416-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

Radiological Physics and Technology 4/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgment

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.