Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Osteoporosis 1/2015

01.12.2015 | Original Article

Validation of a modified FRAX® tool for improving outpatient efficiency—part of the “Catch Before a Fall” initiative

verfasst von: Simon Parker, Maria Ciaccio, Erica Cook, Graham Davenport, Alun Cooper, Simon Grange, Peter Smitham

Erschienen in: Archives of Osteoporosis | Ausgabe 1/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Summary

We have validated our touch-screen-modified FRAX® tool against the traditional healthcare professional-led questionnaire, demonstrating strong concordance between doctor- and patient-derived results. We will use this in outpatient clinics and general practice to increase our capture rate of at-risk patients, making valuable use of otherwise wasted patient waiting times.

Introduction

Outpatient clinics offer an opportunity to collect valuable health information from a captive population. We have previously developed a modified fracture risk assessment (FRAX®) tool, enabling patients to self-assess their osteoporotic fracture risk in a touch-screen computer format and demonstrated its acceptability with patients. We aim to validate the accuracy of our tool against the traditional questionnaire.

Methods

Fifty patients over 50 years of age within the fracture clinic independently completed a paper equivalent of our touch-screen-modified FRAX® questionnaire. Responses were analysed against the traditional healthcare professional (HCP)-led questionnaire which was carried out afterwards. Correlation was assessed by sensitivity, specificity, Cohen’s kappa statistic and Fisher’s exact test for each potential FRAX® outcome of “treat”, “measure BMD” and “lifestyle advice”.

Results

Age range was 51–98 years. The FRAX® tool was completed by 88 % of patients; six patients lacked confidence in estimating either their height or weight. Following question adjustment according to patient response and feedback, our tool achieved >95 % sensitivity and specificity for the “treat” and “lifestyle advice” groups, and 79 % sensitivity and 100 % specificity in the “measure BMD” group. Cohen’s kappa value ranged from 0.823 to 0.995 across all groups, demonstrating “very good” agreement for all. Fisher’s exact test demonstrated significant concordance between doctor and patient decisions.

Discussion

Our modified tool provides a simple, accurate and reliable method for patients to self-report their own FRAX® score outside the clinical contact period, thus releasing the HCP from the time required to complete the questionnaire and potentially increasing our capture rate of at-risk patients.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang XM (1994) Patient attitude towards waiting in an outpatient clinic and its applications. Health Serv Manag Res: Off J Assoc Univ Prog Health Admin / HSMC, AUPHA 7(1):2–8 Huang XM (1994) Patient attitude towards waiting in an outpatient clinic and its applications. Health Serv Manag Res: Off J Assoc Univ Prog Health Admin / HSMC, AUPHA 7(1):2–8
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Rabar S, Lau R, O’Flynn N et al (2012) Risk assessment of fragility fractures: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 345, e3698PubMedCrossRef Rabar S, Lau R, O’Flynn N et al (2012) Risk assessment of fragility fractures: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 345, e3698PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310PubMedCrossRef Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Dunnill MGS, Pounder RE (2004) Medical outpatients: changes that can benefit patients. ClinMed 4:45–49 Dunnill MGS, Pounder RE (2004) Medical outpatients: changes that can benefit patients. ClinMed 4:45–49
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Velikova G, Wright P, Smith AB et al (2001) Self-Reported Quality of Life of Individual Cancer Patients: Concordance of Results With Disease Course and Medical Records. J Clin Oncol 19:2064–2073PubMed Velikova G, Wright P, Smith AB et al (2001) Self-Reported Quality of Life of Individual Cancer Patients: Concordance of Results With Disease Course and Medical Records. J Clin Oncol 19:2064–2073PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Velikova G, Wright EP, Smith AB et al (1999) Automated collection of quality-of-life data: a comparison of paper and computer touch-screen questionnaires. J Clin Oncol 17:998–1007PubMed Velikova G, Wright EP, Smith AB et al (1999) Automated collection of quality-of-life data: a comparison of paper and computer touch-screen questionnaires. J Clin Oncol 17:998–1007PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Buxton J, White M, Osoba D (1998) Patients’ experiences using a computerized program with a touch-sensitive video monitor for the assessment of health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res 7:513–519PubMedCrossRef Buxton J, White M, Osoba D (1998) Patients’ experiences using a computerized program with a touch-sensitive video monitor for the assessment of health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res 7:513–519PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Validation of a modified FRAX® tool for improving outpatient efficiency—part of the “Catch Before a Fall” initiative
verfasst von
Simon Parker
Maria Ciaccio
Erica Cook
Graham Davenport
Alun Cooper
Simon Grange
Peter Smitham
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2015
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
Archives of Osteoporosis / Ausgabe 1/2015
Print ISSN: 1862-3522
Elektronische ISSN: 1862-3514
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-015-0230-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2015

Archives of Osteoporosis 1/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.