Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 12/2017

01.12.2017 | Original Article

Validation of a single summary score for the Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire–IUGA revised (PISQ-IR)

verfasst von: Melissa L. Constantine, Rachel N. Pauls, Rebecca R. Rogers, Todd H. Rockwood

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 12/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire–International Urogynecology Association (IUGA) Revised (PISQ-IR) measures sexual function in women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) yet is unwieldy, with six individual subscale scores for sexually active women and four for women who are not. We hypothesized that a valid and responsive summary score could be created for the PISQ-IR.

Methods

Item response data from participating women who completed a revised version of the PISQ-IR at three clinical sites were used to generate item weights using a magnitude estimation (ME) and Q-sort (Q) approaches. Item weights were applied to data from the original PISQ-IR validation to generate summary scores. Correlation and factor analysis methods were used to evaluate validity and responsiveness of summary scores.

Results

Weighted and nonweighted summary scores for the sexually active PISQ-IR demonstrated good criterion validity with condition-specific measures: Incontinence Severity Index = 0.12, 0.11, 0.11; Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 = 0.39, 0.39, 0.12; Epidemiology of Prolapse and Incontinence Questionnaire-Q35 = 0.26 0,.25, 0.40); Female Sexual Functioning Index subscale total score = 0.72, 0.75, 0.72 for nonweighted, ME, and Q summary scores, respectively. Responsiveness evaluation showed weighted and nonweighted summary scores detected moderate effect sizes (Cohen’s d > 0.5). Weighted items for those NSA demonstrated significant floor effects and did not meet criterion validity.

Conclusions

A PISQ-IR summary score for use with sexually active women, nonweighted or calculated with ME or Q item weights, is a valid and reliable measure for clinical use. The summary scores provide value for assesing clinical treatment of pelvic floor disorders.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Rogers RG, Rockwood TH, Constantine ML, Thakar R, Kammerer-Doak DN, Pauls RN, et al. A new measure of sexual function in women with pelvic floor disorders (PFD): the pelvic organ prolapse/incontinence sexual questionnaire, IUGA-revised (PISQ-IR). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2013;24(7):1091–103.CrossRef Rogers RG, Rockwood TH, Constantine ML, Thakar R, Kammerer-Doak DN, Pauls RN, et al. A new measure of sexual function in women with pelvic floor disorders (PFD): the pelvic organ prolapse/incontinence sexual questionnaire, IUGA-revised (PISQ-IR). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2013;24(7):1091–103.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Lodge M. Magnitude scaling, quantitative measurement of opinions. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications; 1981.CrossRef Lodge M. Magnitude scaling, quantitative measurement of opinions. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications; 1981.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown SR. Political subjectivity: applications of Q methodology in political science. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1980. Brown SR. Political subjectivity: applications of Q methodology in political science. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1980.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Watts S, Stenner P. Doing Q methodological research: theory, method and interpretation. London: Singapore Sage Publications; 2012. Watts S, Stenner P. Doing Q methodological research: theory, method and interpretation. London: Singapore Sage Publications; 2012.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hersen M. Comprehensive handbook of psychological assessment, behavioral assessment. Hokoben: Wiley; 2004. Hersen M. Comprehensive handbook of psychological assessment, behavioral assessment. Hokoben: Wiley; 2004.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat McKeown B, Thomas D. Q methodology. Series 66: quantitative applications in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1988. McKeown B, Thomas D. Q methodology. Series 66: quantitative applications in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1988.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Pett MA, Lackey NR, Sullivan JJ. Making sense of factor analysis: the use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2003.CrossRef Pett MA, Lackey NR, Sullivan JJ. Making sense of factor analysis: the use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2003.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral science. New York: Academic Press; 1977. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral science. New York: Academic Press; 1977.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, et al. An international urogynecologic association (IUGA)/international continence society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:5–26.CrossRefPubMed Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, et al. An international urogynecologic association (IUGA)/international continence society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:5–26.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Campbell DT, Russo MJ. Social measurement. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc; 2001.CrossRef Campbell DT, Russo MJ. Social measurement. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc; 2001.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Tversky A, Shafir E. Preference, belief, and similarity: selected writings. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2004. Tversky A, Shafir E. Preference, belief, and similarity: selected writings. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2004.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwarz N, Bienias J. What mediates the impact of response alternatives on frequency reports of mundane behaviors? Appl Cogn Psychol. 2006;4(1):61–72.CrossRef Schwarz N, Bienias J. What mediates the impact of response alternatives on frequency reports of mundane behaviors? Appl Cogn Psychol. 2006;4(1):61–72.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwarz N, Sudman S. Context effects in social and psychological research. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1992.CrossRef Schwarz N, Sudman S. Context effects in social and psychological research. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1992.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Rockwood TH, Constantine ML, Adegoke O, Rogers RG, McDermott E, Davila GW, et al. The PISQ-IR: considerations in scale scoring and development. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(7):1105–22.CrossRefPubMed Rockwood TH, Constantine ML, Adegoke O, Rogers RG, McDermott E, Davila GW, et al. The PISQ-IR: considerations in scale scoring and development. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(7):1105–22.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Validation of a single summary score for the Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire–IUGA revised (PISQ-IR)
verfasst von
Melissa L. Constantine
Rachel N. Pauls
Rebecca R. Rogers
Todd H. Rockwood
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2017
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 12/2017
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3373-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2017

International Urogynecology Journal 12/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.