nach oben

International Urogynecology Journal

Erschienen in:

01.03.2021 | Original Article

Validity and reliability of two Danish versions of the ICIQ-UI SF

verfasst von: Josephine Clausen, Helga Gimbel, Louise Thomsen Schmidt Arenholt, Ea Løwenstein

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 12/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

We aimed to assess the validity and reliability of two Danish versions of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) in a female population. We hypothesized that the questionnaires had good predictive validity, internal consistency, patient-physician agreement, construct validity, test-retest reliability, and sensitivity to change.

Methods

To test the predictive validity, we compared the ICIQ-UI SF to urodynamics (n = 153). The same answers were used for testing the internal consistency. The patient-physician agreement was assessed by comparing the self-administered questionnaire with a physician’s evaluation based on telephone interviews (n = 60). To test the construct validity, we calculated the proportion of scores ≥ 1 in questionnaires completed by women defining themselves as “not suffering from involuntary urination” (n = 69). Test-retest reliability was assessed by comparing questionnaires completed twice with an interval of 2 weeks (n = 186). Sensitivity to change was evaluated by analyzing answers before and after treatment for women treated surgically for stress urinary incontinence (n = 755) and with botulinum type A toxin for overactive bladder (n = 63).

Results

Predictive validity: 26.6–27.6% agreement. Internal consistency: Cronbach’s alpha: 0.7–0.8. Patient-physician agreement: 53.9–92.9% agreement. Some interview participants misunderstood the word “leak.” Construct validity: 19% and 23% had a total score ≥ 1. Test-retest reliability: 77.0–95.7% agreement. Sensitivity to change: Significantly lower score after treatment.

Conclusion

The ICIQ-UI SF had excellent internal consistency, patient-physician agreement, test-retest reliability, and sensitivity to change. The ICIQ-UI SF had questionable predictive validity and construct validity compared to urodynamic testing. We recommend precaution in diagnostics or research based solely on the questionnaire.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Schreiber Pedersen L, Lose G, Hoybye MT, Elsner S, Waldmann A, Rudnicki M. Prevalence of urinary incontinence among women and analysis of potential risk factors in Germany and Denmark. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96(8):939–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13149.CrossRefPubMed

Krhut J, Gartner M, Mokris J, Horcicka L, Svabik K, Zachoval R, et al. Effect of severity of urinary incontinence on quality of life in women. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(6):1925–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23568.CrossRefPubMed

Coyne KS, Kvasz M, Ireland AM, Milsom I, Kopp ZS, Chapple CR. Urinary incontinence and its relationship to mental health and health-related quality of life in men and women in Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Eur Urol. 2012;61(1):88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.07.049.CrossRefPubMed

Avery K, Donovan J, Peters TJ, Shaw C, Gotoh M, Abrams P. ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2004;23(4):322–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20041.CrossRefPubMed

International Consultation on Incontinence (2014–2021) International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF). https://iciq.net/iciq-ui-sf. Accessed 04 Dec 2020.

Jepsen R, Egholm CL, Brodersen J, Simonsen E, Grarup J, Cyron A, et al. Lolland-Falster Health Study: Study protocol for a household-based prospective cohort study. Scand J Public Health. 2020;48(4):382–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494818799613.CrossRefPubMed

Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60 (1):34–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012.

Rosier P, Schaefer W, Lose G, Goldman HB, Guralnick M, Eustice S, et al. International Continence Society good urodynamic practices and terms 2016: Urodynamics, uroflowmetry, cystometry, and pressure-flow study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36(5):1243–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23124.CrossRefPubMed

van Leijsen SA, Hoogstad-van Evert JS, Mol BW, Vierhout ME, Milani AL, Heesakkers JP, et al. The correlation between clinical and urodynamic diagnosis in classifying the type of urinary incontinence in women. A systematic review of the literature. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30(4):495–502. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.21047.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Colli E, Artibani W, Goka J, Parazzini F, Wein AJ. Are urodynamic tests useful tools for the initial conservative management of non-neurogenic urinary incontinence? A review of the literature. Eur Urol. 2003;43(1):63–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0302-2838(02)00494-3.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Hripcsak G, Heitjan DF. Measuring agreement in medical informatics reliability studies. J Biomed Inform. 2002;35(2):99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1532-0464(02)00500-2.CrossRefPubMed

12.

De Vet H, Terwee C, Mokkink L, Knol D. Measurement in medicine: a practical guide (Practical Guides to Biostatistics and Epidemiology). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; 2015. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511996214.

13.

Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, et al. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(2):167–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.10052.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Espuna-Pons M, Dilla T, Castro D, Carbonell C, Casariego J, Puig-Clota M. Analysis of the value of the ICIQ-UI SF questionnaire and stress test in the differential diagnosis of the type of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26(6):836–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20379.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Rotar M, Trsinar B, Kisner K, Barbic M, Sedlar A, Gruden J, et al. Correlations between the ICIQ-UI short form and urodynamic diagnosis. Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28(6):501–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20689.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Hajebrahimi S, Nourizadeh D, Hamedani R, Pezeshki MZ. Validity and reliability of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-urinary incontinence short form and its correlation with urodynamic findings. Urol J. 2012;9(4):685–90.PubMed

17.

Hashim H, Avery K, Mourad MS, Chamssuddin A, Ghoniem G, Abrams P. The Arabic ICIQ-UI SF: an alternative language version of the English ICIQ-UI SF. Neurourol Urodyn. 2006;25(3):277–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20212.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Huang L, Zhang SW, Wu SL, Ma L, Deng XH. The Chinese version of ICIQ: a useful tool in clinical practice and research on urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27(6):522–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20546.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Gotoh M, Homma Y, Funahashi Y, Matsukawa Y, Kato M. Psychometric validation of the Japanese version of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-short form. Int J Urol. 2009;16(3):303–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2008.02237.x.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Al-Shaikh G, Al-Badr A, Al Maarik A, Cotterill N, Al-Mandeel HM. Reliability of Arabic ICIQ-UI short form in Saudi Arabia. Urol Ann. 2013;5(1):34–8. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.106964.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Tubaro A, Zattoni F, Prezioso D, Scarpa RM, Pesce F, Rizzi CA, et al. Italian validation of the International Consultation on Incontinence questionnaires. BJU Int. 2006;97(1):101–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.05885.x.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Moller LA, Lose G, Jorgensen T. Incidence and remission rates of lower urinary tract symptoms at one year in women aged 40-60: longitudinal study. BMJ. 2000;320(7247):1429–32. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7247.1429.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Uren AD, Cotterill N, Parke SE, Abrams P. Psychometric equivalence of electronic and telephone completion of the ICIQ modules. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36(5):1342–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23103.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Feinstein AR, Cicchetti DV. High agreement but low kappa: I. the problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(6):543–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(90)90158-l.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Klovning A, Avery K, Sandvik H, Hunskaar S. Comparison of two questionnaires for assessing the severity of urinary incontinence: the ICIQ-UI SF versus the incontinence severity index. Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28(5):411–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20674.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Lim R, Liong ML, Lau YK, Yuen KH. Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the ICIQ-UI SF and ICIQ-LUTSqol in the Malaysian population. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36(2):438–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22950.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Chang SR, Chen KH, Chang TC, Lin HH. A Taiwanese version of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire—urinary incontinence short form for pregnant women: instrument validation. J Clin Nurs. 2011;20(5–6):714–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03364.x.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Nitti VW, Dmochowski R, Herschorn S, Sand P, Thompson C, Nardo C, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of patients with overactive bladder and urinary incontinence: results of a phase 3, randomized, placebo controlled trial. J Urol. 2017;197(2S):S216–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.10.109.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Drake MJ, Nitti VW, Ginsberg DA, Brucker BM, Hepp Z, McCool R, et al. Comparative assessment of the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA and oral therapies (anticholinergics and mirabegron) for overactive bladder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BJU Int. 2017;120(5):611–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13945.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Validity and reliability of two Danish versions of the ICIQ-UI SF
verfasst von: Josephine Clausen
Helga Gimbel
Louise Thomsen Schmidt Arenholt
Ea Løwenstein
Publikationsdatum: 01.03.2021
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 12/2021
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-04712-2

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

23.04.2024 | Medikamente in Schwangerschaft und Stillzeit | Nachrichten

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Validity and reliability of two Danish versions of the ICIQ-UI SF

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Weniger postpartale Depressionen nach Esketamin-Einmalgabe

Bei RSV-Impfung vor 60. Lebensjahr über Off-Label-Gebrauch aufklären!

Harnwegsinfektprophylaxe: Es geht auch ohne Antibiotika

Update Gynäkologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2021

Outcomes collected in female pelvic floor surgical procedure registries and databases: a scoping review

Minimal important difference and patient acceptable symptom state for PFDI-20 and POPDI-6 in POP surgery

Translation and linguistic validation of the Female Genitourinary Pain Index in Spanish

Laparoscopic removal of intravesically inserted transobturator tape

Intraoperative ultrasound assessment of ureteral patency during pelvic surgery

Translation and validation of the Polish version of the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire short form 7

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Weniger postpartale Depressionen nach Esketamin-Einmalgabe

Bei RSV-Impfung vor 60. Lebensjahr über Off-Label-Gebrauch aufklären!

Harnwegsinfektprophylaxe: Es geht auch ohne Antibiotika

Update Gynäkologie