Skip to main content

23.05.2024 | Original Article

Validity of the General Practice Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPPAQ) in adults 60–90 years

verfasst von: Archontissa Maria Kanavaki, Maria Michalopoulou, Afroditi Stathi, Evgenia Kouli, Vassilios Gourgoulis, Athanasios Gkrekidis, Ilias Smilios, Helen T. Douda, Georgios Ch. Sirakoulis, Nikolaos Aggelousis

Erschienen in: Journal of Public Health

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Aim

The present study aimed to assess the sensitivity, specificity and construct validity of the General Practice Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPPAQ) and two modified versions, GPPAQ-WALK and GPPAQ-WALK-Old in retired, community-dwelling older adults, 60–90 years.

Methods

Participants completed assessments from the Senior Fitness Test (lower limb strength, dynamic balance, aerobic endurance) and used a waist-worn accelerometer for a week, following which they responded to the GPPAQ. Active/non-active GPPAQ classification was compared against accelerometry regarding meeting/not meeting the guidelines of ≥ 150 min/week of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. T tests compared BMI and fitness scores between active and non-active participants.

Results

A total of 180 retired adults residing in Greece, mean age 72.82 ± 6.30, participated in the study, 114 of whom had valid accelerometer data corresponding to the GPPAQ recall week. The GPPAQ active classification showed 4.4% sensitivity and 97.4% specificity but did not differentiate active and non-active participants regarding BMI and physical fitness. The GPPAQ-WALK showed 27.8% sensitivity and 80.8% specificity, with active participants performing better in dynamic balance and lower limb strength than non-active. The GPPAQ-WALK-Old showed 69.4% sensitivity and 44.9% specificity. Active participants had lower BMI, better lower limb strength and dynamic balance than non-active.

Conclusion

With an interest in increasing awareness of the importance of PA and improving public health outcomes through PA promotion in insufficiently active older adults, we advocate that the GPPAQ-WALK can be a useful tool in healthcare and other community settings. Further modifications to fully assess adherence to PA guidelines for older adults are proposed.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig L, Lijmer JG, Moher D, Rennie D, de Vet HCW, Kressel HY, Rifai N, Golub RM, Altman DG, Hooft L, Korevaar DA, Cohen JF (2015) STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ: British Med J 351:h5527. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h5527CrossRef Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig L, Lijmer JG, Moher D, Rennie D, de Vet HCW, Kressel HY, Rifai N, Golub RM, Altman DG, Hooft L, Korevaar DA, Cohen JF (2015) STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ: British Med J 351:h5527. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​bmj.​h5527CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, Borodulin K, Buman MP, Cardon G, Carty C, Chaput J-P, Chastin S, Chou R, Dempsey PC, DiPietro L, Ekelund U, Firth J, Friedenreich CM, Garcia L, Gichu M, Jago R, Katzmarzyk PT, Lambert E, Leitzmann M, Milton K, Ortega FB, Ranasinghe C, Stamatakis E, Tiedemann A, Troiano RP, van der Ploeg HP, Wari V, Willumsen JF (2020) World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br J Sports Med 54(24):1451. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955CrossRefPubMed Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, Borodulin K, Buman MP, Cardon G, Carty C, Chaput J-P, Chastin S, Chou R, Dempsey PC, DiPietro L, Ekelund U, Firth J, Friedenreich CM, Garcia L, Gichu M, Jago R, Katzmarzyk PT, Lambert E, Leitzmann M, Milton K, Ortega FB, Ranasinghe C, Stamatakis E, Tiedemann A, Troiano RP, van der Ploeg HP, Wari V, Willumsen JF (2020) World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br J Sports Med 54(24):1451. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​bjsports-2020-102955CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Colley RC, Butler G, Garriguet D, Prince SA, Roberts KC (2018) Comparison of self-reported and accelerometer-measured physical activity in Canadian adults. Health Rep 29(12):3–15PubMed Colley RC, Butler G, Garriguet D, Prince SA, Roberts KC (2018) Comparison of self-reported and accelerometer-measured physical activity in Canadian adults. Health Rep 29(12):3–15PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat US Department of Health and Human Services (2018) Physical activity guidelines for Americans, 2nd edn. USDHHS, Washinghton, DC US Department of Health and Human Services (2018) Physical activity guidelines for Americans, 2nd edn. USDHHS, Washinghton, DC
Zurück zum Zitat Wareham NJ, Jakes RW, Rennie KL, Schuit J, Mitchell J, Hennings S, Day NE (2003) Validity and repeatability of a simple index derived from the short physical activity questionnaire used in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study. Public Health Nutr 6(4):407–413. https://doi.org/10.1079/PHN2002439CrossRefPubMed Wareham NJ, Jakes RW, Rennie KL, Schuit J, Mitchell J, Hennings S, Day NE (2003) Validity and repeatability of a simple index derived from the short physical activity questionnaire used in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study. Public Health Nutr 6(4):407–413. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1079/​PHN2002439CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Validity of the General Practice Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPPAQ) in adults 60–90 years
verfasst von
Archontissa Maria Kanavaki
Maria Michalopoulou
Afroditi Stathi
Evgenia Kouli
Vassilios Gourgoulis
Athanasios Gkrekidis
Ilias Smilios
Helen T. Douda
Georgios Ch. Sirakoulis
Nikolaos Aggelousis
Publikationsdatum
23.05.2024
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Journal of Public Health
Print ISSN: 2198-1833
Elektronische ISSN: 1613-2238
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-024-02288-x