Background
Methods
Study subjects and methods
Statistical considerations and study approval
Results
Study subjects
Variables | WL (N = 160) | UL(N = 55) | P- value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age (year) | 63.5(±9.1) | 60.7 (±6.7) | 0.014 | |
Sex | Male | 144 | 55 | 0.014 |
Female | 16 | 0 | ||
Preoperative T stage | 1 | 95 | 23 | 0.001 |
2 | 50 | 11 | ||
3 | 15 | 21 | ||
Postoperative T stage | 1a | 48 | 3 | < 0.001 |
1b | 68 | 13 | ||
2 | 19 | 21 | ||
3 | 25 | 18 | ||
Location of cancer | Upper thoracic | 22 | 3 | 0.254 |
Middle thoracic | 78 | 31 | ||
Lower thoracic | 60 | 21 | ||
Method of surgery | Ivor Lewis | 148 | 45 | 0.080 |
McKeown | 114 | 10 | ||
Differentiation | Well | 24 | 3 | 0.351 |
Moderate | 109 | 52 | ||
Poor | 27 | 0 | ||
Neoadjuvant therapy | No | 136 | 26 | < 0.001 |
Yes | 24 | 29 |
Prognosis between WL and UL
Covariates | Total Population | Propensity-matched Population | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WL (n = 160) | UL (n = 55) | p-value | standardized difference | WL (n = 55) | UL (n = 55) | p-value | standardized difference | |
Age | 63.5 ± 9.1 | 60.7 ± 6.7 | 0.014 | −0.430 | 61.0 ± 9.4 | 60.7 ± 6.7 | 0.842 | −0.046 |
Sex (Male) | 144 (90%) | 55 (100%) | 0.014 | N/A | 55(100%) | 55(100%) | N/A | N/A |
NT | 24(15%) | 29(52.7%) | < 0.001 | 0.749 | 21(38.2%) | 29(52.7%) | 0.180 | 0.289 |
Ivro Lewis | 146 | 45 | 0.080 | 0.242 | 42 | 45 | 0.640 | −0.140 |
pT Stage | 2.1 ± 1.0 | 3.0 ± 0.9 | < 0.001 | 0.953 | 2.6 ± 1.1 | 3.0 ± 0.9 | 0.132 | 0.448 |
Influence of neoadjuvant therapy in UL
Covariates | Total Population | Propensity-matched Population | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
non- NT (n = 26) | NT (n = 29) | p-value | standardized difference | non- NT (n = 26) | NT (n = 26) | p-value | standardized difference | |
Age | 62.0 ± 8.0 | 59.5 ± 5.2 | 0.172 | −0.479 | 62.0 ± 8.0 | 59.1 ± 5.3 | 0.130 | −0.558 |
Ivor Lewis | 23 | 22 | 0.303 | 0.289 | 23 | 22 | 0.500 | 0.088 |
pT Stage | 2.4 ± 0.9 | 3.5 ± 0.5 | < 0.001 | 2.084 | 2.4 ± 0.9 | 3.5 ± 0.5 | < 0.001 | 2.193 |