nach oben

Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology

Erschienen in:

07.09.2019 | Original Article – Cancer Research

Validity of using immunohistochemistry to predict treatment outcome in patients with non-small cell lung cancer not otherwise specified

verfasst von: Takahiro Ota, Keisuke Kirita, Reiko Matsuzawa, Hibiki Udagawa, Shingo Matsumoto, Kiyotaka Yoh, Seiji Niho, Genichiro Ishii, Koichi Goto

Erschienen in: Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology | Ausgabe 10/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Histology samples are important for the appropriate administration of tumor type-specific cytotoxic and molecular-targeted therapies for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). When biopsy samples lack a definite morphology, a diagnosis can be selected from three subtypes based on immunohistochemistry (IHC) results, as follows: favor adenocarcinoma (ADC), favor squamous cell carcinoma (SQC), or not otherwise specified (NOS)-null. In terms of patient outcome, however, the validity of IHC-based classifications remains unknown.

Methods

A large series of 152 patients with advanced NSCLC whose diagnoses had been made based on morphological findings and who had been homogeneously treated were enrolled. We used IHC staining (TTF-1, SP-A, p40, and CK5/6) to examine tumor samples and refined the diagnoses. We then analyzed the pathological subgroups according to the IHC staining results.

Results

IHC profiling resulted in 50% of the cases being classified as favor ADC, 31% being classified as favor SQC, and 19% being classified as NOS-null groups. Compared with the favor ADC and favor SQC groups, the NOS-null group had a significantly poorer outcome. Pemetrexed-containing platinum regimens produced a response rate similar to that of other platinum doublet regimens in the favor ADC group (44% vs. 46%), whereas it produced a poorer response in the favor SQC group (0% vs. 52%) and the NOS-null group (0% vs. 24%). The favor ADC group tended to have a higher percentage of EGFR positivity and ALK positivity than the favor SQC group (25% vs. 11% and 7% vs. 0%, respectively).

Conclusions

These findings support the use of immunohistological subtyping of NSCLC biopsy specimens to select patient-appropriate treatments.

Bando H (2017) The current status and problems confronted in delivering precision medicine in Japan and Europe. Curr Probl Cancer 41:166–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2017.02.003CrossRefPubMed

Barlesi F et al (2014) Maintenance bevacizumab–pemetrexed after first-line cisplatin–pemetrexed–bevacizumab for advanced nonsquamous nonsmall-cell lung cancer: updated survival analysis of the AVAPERL (MO22089) randomized phase III trial. Ann Oncol 25:1044–1052. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdu098CrossRefPubMed

Comprehensive genomic characterization of squamous cell lung cancers (2012) Nature 489:519-525 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11404

Einhorn LH (2008) First-line chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: is there a superior regimen based on histology? J Clin Oncol 26:3485–3486. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2008.17.2056CrossRefPubMed

Facchinetti F, Aldigeri R, Aloe R, Bortesi B, Ardizzoni A, Tiseo M (2015) CEA serum level as early predictive marker of outcome during EGFR-TKI therapy in advanced NSCLC patients. Tumour Biol 36:5943–5951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-015-3269-6CrossRefPubMed

Fishback NF, Travis WD, Moran CA, Guinee DG Jr., McCarthy WF, Koss MN (1994) Pleomorphic (spindle/giant cell) carcinoma of the lung. A clinicopathologic correlation of 78 cases. Cancer 73:2936–2945CrossRefPubMed

Govindan R et al (2017) Phase III trial of ipilimumab combined with paclitaxel and carboplatin in advanced squamous non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 35:3449–3457. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2016.71.7629CrossRefPubMed

Hirsch FR, Spreafico A, Novello S, Wood MD, Simms L, Papotti M (2008) The prognostic and predictive role of histology in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a literature review. J Thorac Oncol 3:1468–1481. https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e318189f551CrossRefPubMed

Inamura K et al (2008) EML4-ALK fusion is linked to histological characteristics in a subset of lung cancers. J Thorac Oncol 3:13–17. https://doi.org/10.1097/jto.0b013e31815e8b60CrossRefPubMed

Inamura K et al (2009) EML4-ALK lung cancers are characterized by rare other mutations, a TTF-1 cell lineage, an acinar histology, and young onset. Mod Pathol 22:508–515. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2009.2CrossRefPubMed

Lin Y et al (2016) Characteristics and prognostic analysis of 69 patients with pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma. Am J Clin Oncol 39:215–222. https://doi.org/10.1097/coc.0000000000000101CrossRefPubMed

Marchetti A et al (2005) EGFR mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer: analysis of a large series of cases and development of a rapid and sensitive method for diagnostic screening with potential implications on pharmacologic treatment. J CLin Oncol 23:857–865. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.08.043CrossRefPubMed

Midha A, Dearden S, McCormack R (2015) EGFR mutation incidence in non-small-cell lung cancer of adenocarcinoma histology: a systematic review and global map by ethnicity (mutMapII). Am J Cancer Res 5:2892–2911PubMedPubMedCentral

Miyamae Y et al (2011) Significance of epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations in squamous cell lung carcinoma. Oncol Rep 25:921–928. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2011.1182CrossRefPubMed

Paez JG et al (2004) EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science (New York, NY) 304:1497–1500. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1099314CrossRef

Pao W et al (2004) EGF receptor gene mutations are common in lung cancers from “never smokers” and are associated with sensitivity of tumors to gefitinib and erlotinib. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:13306–13311. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0405220101CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Patel JD et al (2013) PointBreak: a randomized phase III study of pemetrexed plus carboplatin and bevacizumab followed by maintenance pemetrexed and bevacizumab versus paclitaxel plus carboplatin and bevacizumab followed by maintenance bevacizumab in patients with stage IIIB or IV nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 31:4349–4357. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2012.47.9626CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Paz-Ares LG et al (2013) PARAMOUNT: final overall survival results of the phase III study of maintenance pemetrexed versus placebo immediately after induction treatment with pemetrexed plus cisplatin for advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 31:2895–2902. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2012.47.1102CrossRefPubMed

Pelosi G et al (2014) Does immunohistochemistry affect response to therapy and survival of inoperable non-small cell lung carcinoma patients? A survey of 145 stage III-IV consecutive cases. Int J Surg Pathol 22:136–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066896913511527CrossRefPubMed

Rekhtman N, Ang DC, Sima CS, Travis WD, Moreira AL (2011) Immunohistochemical algorithm for differentiation of lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma based on large series of whole-tissue sections with validation in small specimens. Mod Pathol 24:1348–1359. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2011.92CrossRefPubMed

Rekhtman N et al (2013) Distinct profile of driver mutations and clinical features in immunomarker-defined subsets of pulmonary large-cell carcinoma. Mod Pathol 26:511–522. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2012.195CrossRefPubMed

Righi L et al (2014) Impact of non-small-cell lung cancer-not otherwise specified immunophenotyping on treatment outcome. J Thorac Oncol 9:1540–1546. https://doi.org/10.1097/jto.0000000000000271CrossRefPubMed

Salido M et al (2011) Increased ALK gene copy number and amplification are frequent in non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 6:21–27. https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181fb7cd6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Scagliotti GV et al (2008) Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:3543–3551. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2007.15.0375CrossRefPubMed

Shoji F et al (2007) Serum carcinoembryonic antigen level is associated with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in recurrent lung adenocarcinomas. Cancer 110:2793–2798. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23101CrossRefPubMed

Shukuya T et al (2015) Nedaplatin plus docetaxel versus cisplatin plus docetaxel for advanced or relapsed squamous cell carcinoma of the lung (WJOG5208L): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 16:1630–1638. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00305-8CrossRefPubMed

Soda M et al (2007) Identification of the transforming EML4-ALK fusion gene in non-small-cell lung cancer. Nature 448:561–566. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05945CrossRefPubMed

Stinchcombe TE, Grilley-Olson JE, Socinski MA (2010) If histology matters. J Clin Oncol 28:1810–1812. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.27.1247CrossRefPubMed

Sugio K et al (2006) Mutations within the tyrosine kinase domain of EGFR gene specifically occur in lung adenocarcinoma patients with a low exposure of tobacco smoking. Br J Cancer 94:896–903. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603040CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Takeuchi K et al (2008) Multiplex reverse transcription-PCR screening for EML4-ALK fusion transcripts. Clin Cancer Res 14:6618–6624. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-08-1018CrossRefPubMed

Travis WD et al (2013) Diagnosis of lung cancer in small biopsies and cytology: implications of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society classification. Arch Pathol Lab Med 137:668–684. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2012-0263-RACrossRefPubMed

Travis WD et al (2015) The 2015 World Health Organization Classification of Lung Tumors: impact of genetic, clinical and radiologic advances since the 2004 classification. J Thorac Oncol 10:1243–1260. https://doi.org/10.1097/jto.0000000000000630CrossRefPubMed

Tsao MS et al (2011) Prognostic and predictive value of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase domain mutation status and gene copy number for adjuvant chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 6:139–147. https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181fd83a4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Venissac N, Pop D, Lassalle S, Berthier F, Hofman P, Mouroux J (2007) Sarcomatoid lung cancer (spindle/giant cells): an aggressive disease? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 134:619–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.05.031CrossRefPubMed

Whithaus K, Fukuoka J, Prihoda TJ, Jagirdar J (2012) Evaluation of napsin A, cytokeratin 5/6, p63, and thyroid transcription factor 1 in adenocarcinoma versus squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. Arch Pathol Lab Med 136:155–162. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2011-0232-oaCrossRefPubMed

Titel: Validity of using immunohistochemistry to predict treatment outcome in patients with non-small cell lung cancer not otherwise specified
verfasst von: Takahiro Ota
Keisuke Kirita
Reiko Matsuzawa
Hibiki Udagawa
Shingo Matsumoto
Kiyotaka Yoh
Seiji Niho
Genichiro Ishii
Koichi Goto
Publikationsdatum: 07.09.2019
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology / Ausgabe 10/2019
Print ISSN: 0171-5216
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1335
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-019-03012-z

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

18.04.2024 | Wirbelsäulenmetastase | Nachrichten

Springer Medizin

Validity of using immunohistochemistry to predict treatment outcome in patients with non-small cell lung cancer not otherwise specified

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Adjuvante Brustkrebstherapie: Doppelt hält besser

Manche Gestagene können das Risiko für Meningeome erhöhen

Einladung zum PSA-Screening senkt die Krebssterblichkeit

Update Onkologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2019

Meeting report of the 7th Heidelberg Myeloma Workshop: today and tomorrow

Invasive stratified mucin-producing carcinoma (i-SMILE) of the uterine cervix: report of a case series and review of the literature indicating poor prognostic subtype of cervical adenocarcinoma

PLK4: a promising target for cancer therapy

High-intensity interval training can modulate the systemic inflammation and HSP70 in the breast cancer: a randomized control trial

Change in neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio during immunotherapy treatment is a non-linear predictor of patient outcomes in advanced cancers

Predictive factors for survival outcomes of oligometastatic prostate cancer patients treated with metastases-directed therapy: a recursive partitioning-based analysis

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Adjuvante Brustkrebstherapie: Doppelt hält besser

Manche Gestagene können das Risiko für Meningeome erhöhen

Einladung zum PSA-Screening senkt die Krebssterblichkeit

Update Onkologie