Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology 7/2019

08.01.2019 | Original Paper

Value of dedicated small-field-of-view sacroiliac versus large-field-of-view pelvic magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating pediatric sacroiliitis

verfasst von: Sagar Wagle, Jeff T. Gu, Jesse L. Courtier, Andrew S. Phelps, Clara Lin, John D. MacKenzie

Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology | Ausgabe 7/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Optimized MRI parameters can be leveraged to improve signal intensity, accelerate imaging acquisition and increase resolution. Higher-resolution imaging with a small field of view (FOV) has been proposed as standard practice for investigating sacroiliac (SI) joints, but the improvement in disease detection and characterization over pelvic imaging with large FOV has not been established.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to compare dedicated MR images of the SI joints with survey imaging (large-FOV pelvic MRI) for detecting sacroiliitis.

Materials and methods

Fifty-eight pediatric patients suspected of having sacroiliitis underwent dedicated sacroiliac joint and survey pelvic imaging at the same imaging session. We independently evaluated the small- and large-FOV image data sets for presence or absence of sacroiliitis, e.g., bone marrow edema, erosions and synovitis. We used nonparametric statistical tests to compare lesion scores for severity of inflammation. We created test characteristics for the survey pelvic images (low-resolution images of the sacroiliac joints) using dedicated sacroiliac images (small-FOV, high-resolution images) as the gold standard.

Results

Dedicated sacroiliac small-FOV MRI detected more sacroiliitis compared to survey pelvic imaging with large FOV (χ2=6.125, P=0.013). Readers detected significantly more features of inflammation on small- compared to large-FOV images, e.g., erosions (P=0.039), synovitis (P=0.009), sclerosis (P=0.017) and osteitis (P=0.001). Test characteristics for pelvic large-FOV imaging were sensitivity=0.76, specificity=1.00, positive predictive value = 1.00 and negative predictive value = 0.75.

Conclusion

This study provides test characteristics for survey pelvic MRI with lower-resolution large-field-of-view images as a screening tool for detecting sacroiliitis. Pelvic screening studies with large FOV have lower sensitivity, and dedicated sacroiliac MRI with small FOV is superior in detecting sacroiliitis when compared to pelvic screening MRI.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Sieper J, Rudwaleit M, Baraliakos X et al (2009) The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international society (ASAS) handbook: a guide to assess spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 68(Suppl 2):ii1–i44CrossRefPubMed Sieper J, Rudwaleit M, Baraliakos X et al (2009) The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international society (ASAS) handbook: a guide to assess spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 68(Suppl 2):ii1–i44CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Puhakka KB, Jurik AG, Schiottz-Christensen B et al (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging of sacroiliitis in early seronegative spondylarthropathy. Abnormalities correlated to clinical and laboratory findings. Rheumeatology 43:234–237CrossRef Puhakka KB, Jurik AG, Schiottz-Christensen B et al (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging of sacroiliitis in early seronegative spondylarthropathy. Abnormalities correlated to clinical and laboratory findings. Rheumeatology 43:234–237CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Maksymowych WP (2012) Controversies in conventional radiography in spondyloarthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 26:839–852 Maksymowych WP (2012) Controversies in conventional radiography in spondyloarthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 26:839–852
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bredella MA, Steinbach LS, Morgan S et al (2006) MRI of the sacroiliac joints in patients with moderate to severe ankylosing spondylitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:1420–1426CrossRefPubMed Bredella MA, Steinbach LS, Morgan S et al (2006) MRI of the sacroiliac joints in patients with moderate to severe ankylosing spondylitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:1420–1426CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Munir S, Patil K, Miller E et al (2014) Juvenile idiopathic arthritis of the axial joints: a systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy and predictive value of conventional MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202:199–210CrossRefPubMed Munir S, Patil K, Miller E et al (2014) Juvenile idiopathic arthritis of the axial joints: a systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy and predictive value of conventional MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202:199–210CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Forst SL, Wheeler MT, Fortin JD, Vilensky JA (2006) The sacroiliac joint: anatomy, physiology and clinical significance. Pain Physician 9:61–67PubMed Forst SL, Wheeler MT, Fortin JD, Vilensky JA (2006) The sacroiliac joint: anatomy, physiology and clinical significance. Pain Physician 9:61–67PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hermann K-GA, Bollow M (2014) Magnetic resonance imaging of sacroiliitis in patients with spondyloarthritis: correlation with anatomy and histology. Rofo 186:230–237CrossRefPubMed Hermann K-GA, Bollow M (2014) Magnetic resonance imaging of sacroiliitis in patients with spondyloarthritis: correlation with anatomy and histology. Rofo 186:230–237CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Antonio GE, Griffith JF, Yeung DKW (2004) Small-field-of-view MRI of the knee and ankle. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:24–28CrossRefPubMed Antonio GE, Griffith JF, Yeung DKW (2004) Small-field-of-view MRI of the knee and ankle. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:24–28CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Griffith JF, Wang Y-XJ, Lodge SJ et al (2010) Small field-of-view surface coil MR imaging of talar osteochondral lesions. Foot Ankle Int 31:517–522CrossRefPubMed Griffith JF, Wang Y-XJ, Lodge SJ et al (2010) Small field-of-view surface coil MR imaging of talar osteochondral lesions. Foot Ankle Int 31:517–522CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Toomayan GA, Russell Holman W, Major NM et al (2006) Sensitivity of MR arthrography in the evaluation of acetabular labral tears. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:449–453CrossRefPubMed Toomayan GA, Russell Holman W, Major NM et al (2006) Sensitivity of MR arthrography in the evaluation of acetabular labral tears. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:449–453CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat de Hooge M, van den Berg R, Navarro-Compán V et al (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging of the sacroiliac joints in the early detection of spondyloarthritis: no added value of gadolinium compared with short tau inversion recovery sequence. Rheumatology 52:1220–1224CrossRefPubMed de Hooge M, van den Berg R, Navarro-Compán V et al (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging of the sacroiliac joints in the early detection of spondyloarthritis: no added value of gadolinium compared with short tau inversion recovery sequence. Rheumatology 52:1220–1224CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Puhakka KB, Melsen F, Jurik AG et al (2004) MR imaging of the normal sacroiliac joint with correlation to histology. Skelet Radiol 33:15–28CrossRef Puhakka KB, Melsen F, Jurik AG et al (2004) MR imaging of the normal sacroiliac joint with correlation to histology. Skelet Radiol 33:15–28CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Rudwaleit M, Jurik AG, Hermann KG et al (2009) Defining active sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for classification of axial spondyloarthritis: a consensual approach by the ASAS/OMERACT MRI group. Ann Rheum Dis 68:1520–1527 Rudwaleit M, Jurik AG, Hermann KG et al (2009) Defining active sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for classification of axial spondyloarthritis: a consensual approach by the ASAS/OMERACT MRI group. Ann Rheum Dis 68:1520–1527
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin Bland J, Altman D (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 327:307–310CrossRef Martin Bland J, Altman D (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 327:307–310CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Value of dedicated small-field-of-view sacroiliac versus large-field-of-view pelvic magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating pediatric sacroiliitis
verfasst von
Sagar Wagle
Jeff T. Gu
Jesse L. Courtier
Andrew S. Phelps
Clara Lin
John D. MacKenzie
Publikationsdatum
08.01.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Pediatric Radiology / Ausgabe 7/2019
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-018-4323-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2019

Pediatric Radiology 7/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Hermes

Hermes

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.