Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Urolithiasis 4/2012

01.08.2012 | Original Paper

Value of focal applied energy quotient in treatment of ureteral lithiasis with shock waves

verfasst von: Miguel Angel Arrabal-Polo, Miguel Arrabal-Martin, Francisco Palao-Yago, Jose Luis Mijan-Ortiz, Armando Zuluaga-Gomez

Erschienen in: Urolithiasis | Ausgabe 4/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The treatment of ureteral lithiasis by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is progressively being abandoned owing to advances in endoscopic lithotripsy. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the causes as to why ESWL is less effective—with a measurable parameter: focal applied energy quotient (FAEQ) that allows us to apply an improvement project in ESWL results for ureteral lithiasis. A prospective observational cohort study with 3-year follow-up and enrollment period was done with three groups of cases. In Group A, 83 cases of ureteral lithiasis were treated by endoscopic lithotripsy using Holmiun:YAG laser. In Group B, 81 cases of ureteral lithiasis were treated by ESWL using Doli-S device (EMSE 220F-XXP). In Group C, 65 cases of ureteral lithiasis were treated by ESWL using Doli-S device (EMSE 220F-XXP) (FAEQ >10). Statistical study and calculation of RR, NNT, Chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test, and Student’s t test were done. Efficiency quotient (EQ) and focal applied energy quotient [FAEQ = (radioscopy seconds/number of shock waves) × ESWL session J] were analyzed. From the results, the success rate of the treatment using Holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy and ESWL is found to be 94 and 48%, respectively, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). Success rate of endoscopic laser lithotripsy for lumbar ureteral stones was 82% versus 57% of ESWL (p = 0.611). In Group B, FAEQ was 8.12. In Group C, success rate was 93.84% with FAEQ of 10.64%. When we compare results from endoscopic lithotripsy with Holmium:YAG laser in Group B with results from ESWL with FAEQ >10, we do not observe absolute benefit choosing one or the other. In conclusion, the application of ESWL with FAEQ >10, that is, improving radiologic focalization of the calculus and increasing the number of Joules/SW, makes possible a treatment as safe and equally efficient as Holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy in ureteral lithiasis less than 13 mm.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Mobley TB, Myers DA, Jenkins JM, Grine WB, Jordan WR (1994) Effects of stents on lithotripsy of ureteral calculi: treatment results with 18,825 calculi using the Lithostar lithotriptor. J Urol 152:53–56PubMed Mobley TB, Myers DA, Jenkins JM, Grine WB, Jordan WR (1994) Effects of stents on lithotripsy of ureteral calculi: treatment results with 18,825 calculi using the Lithostar lithotriptor. J Urol 152:53–56PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Enguita CG, Perez JC, Fernandez FJC, Cardoso JG, Navarrete RV (2000) Efficient, immediate or emergency ESWL: an attractive strategic alternative to be considered in the treatment of renal colic! Actas Urol Esp 24:721–727 Enguita CG, Perez JC, Fernandez FJC, Cardoso JG, Navarrete RV (2000) Efficient, immediate or emergency ESWL: an attractive strategic alternative to be considered in the treatment of renal colic! Actas Urol Esp 24:721–727
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Eden CG, Mark IR, Gupta RR, Eastman J, Shrotri NC, Tiptaft RC (1998) Intracorporeal or extracorporeal lithotripsy for distal ureteral calculi? Effect of stone size and multiplicity on success rates. J Endourol 12:307–312PubMedCrossRef Eden CG, Mark IR, Gupta RR, Eastman J, Shrotri NC, Tiptaft RC (1998) Intracorporeal or extracorporeal lithotripsy for distal ureteral calculi? Effect of stone size and multiplicity on success rates. J Endourol 12:307–312PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Biyani CS, Cornford PA, Powell CS (1998) Ureteroscopic holmium lasertripsy for ureteric stones, initial experience. Scand J Urol Nephrol 32:92–93PubMedCrossRef Biyani CS, Cornford PA, Powell CS (1998) Ureteroscopic holmium lasertripsy for ureteric stones, initial experience. Scand J Urol Nephrol 32:92–93PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bierkens AF, Hendrikx AJ, De La Rosette JJ, Stultiens GN, Beerlage HP, Arends AJ, Debruyne FM (1998) Treatment of mid and lower ureteric calculi: extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy versus laser ureteroscopy: a comparison of costs, morbidity and effectiveness. Br J Urol 81:31–35PubMedCrossRef Bierkens AF, Hendrikx AJ, De La Rosette JJ, Stultiens GN, Beerlage HP, Arends AJ, Debruyne FM (1998) Treatment of mid and lower ureteric calculi: extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy versus laser ureteroscopy: a comparison of costs, morbidity and effectiveness. Br J Urol 81:31–35PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Grasso M, Lang G, Taylor FC (1995) Flexible ureteroscopically assisted percutaneous renal access. Tech Urol 1:39–43PubMed Grasso M, Lang G, Taylor FC (1995) Flexible ureteroscopically assisted percutaneous renal access. Tech Urol 1:39–43PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Park H, Park M, Park T (1998) Two-year experience with ureteral stones: extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopic manipulation. J Endourol 12:501–504PubMedCrossRef Park H, Park M, Park T (1998) Two-year experience with ureteral stones: extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopic manipulation. J Endourol 12:501–504PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kupeli B, Biri H, Isen K et al (1998) Treatment of ureteral stones: comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and endourologic alternatives. Eur Urol 34:474–479PubMedCrossRef Kupeli B, Biri H, Isen K et al (1998) Treatment of ureteral stones: comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and endourologic alternatives. Eur Urol 34:474–479PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Arrabal-Polo MA, Arrabal-Martín M, Miján-Ortiz JL, Valle-Díaz F, López-León V, Merino-Salas S, Zuluaga-Gómez A (2009) Treatment of ureteric lithiasis with retrograde ureteroscopy and holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy vs extracorporeal lithotripsy. BJU Int. 104:1144–1147PubMedCrossRef Arrabal-Polo MA, Arrabal-Martín M, Miján-Ortiz JL, Valle-Díaz F, López-León V, Merino-Salas S, Zuluaga-Gómez A (2009) Treatment of ureteric lithiasis with retrograde ureteroscopy and holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy vs extracorporeal lithotripsy. BJU Int. 104:1144–1147PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu CH, Shee JJ, Lin WY et al (2004) Comparison between estracorporeal shoxk wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureterorenoscope with Holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones. J Urol 172:1899–1902PubMedCrossRef Wu CH, Shee JJ, Lin WY et al (2004) Comparison between estracorporeal shoxk wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureterorenoscope with Holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones. J Urol 172:1899–1902PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang CY, Chen SS, Chen LK (2009) Cost-effectiveness of treating ureteral stones in a Taipei City Hospital: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus lithoclast. Urol Int 83:410–415PubMedCrossRef Huang CY, Chen SS, Chen LK (2009) Cost-effectiveness of treating ureteral stones in a Taipei City Hospital: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus lithoclast. Urol Int 83:410–415PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Arrabal Martín M, Ocete Martín C, Jiménez Pacheco A, Miján Ortiz JL, Pareja Vilches M, Zuluaga Gómez A (2006) Methodology and limits of outpatient ureteroscopy. Arch Esp Urol 59:261–272PubMed Arrabal Martín M, Ocete Martín C, Jiménez Pacheco A, Miján Ortiz JL, Pareja Vilches M, Zuluaga Gómez A (2006) Methodology and limits of outpatient ureteroscopy. Arch Esp Urol 59:261–272PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Lam JS, Greene TD, Gupta M (2002) Treatment of proximal ureteral calculi: holmium:YAG laser ureterolithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 167:1972–1976PubMedCrossRef Lam JS, Greene TD, Gupta M (2002) Treatment of proximal ureteral calculi: holmium:YAG laser ureterolithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 167:1972–1976PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Arrabal-Martín M, Pareja-Vilches M, Gutiérrez-Tejero F, Miján-Ortiz JL, Palao-Yago F, Zuluaga-Gómez A (2003) Therapeutic options in lithiasis of the lumbar ureter. Eur Urol 43:556–563PubMedCrossRef Arrabal-Martín M, Pareja-Vilches M, Gutiérrez-Tejero F, Miján-Ortiz JL, Palao-Yago F, Zuluaga-Gómez A (2003) Therapeutic options in lithiasis of the lumbar ureter. Eur Urol 43:556–563PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Parker BD, Frederick RW, Reilly TP, Lowry PS, Bird ET (2004) Efficiency and cost of treating proximal ureteral stones: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser. Urology 64:1102–1106PubMedCrossRef Parker BD, Frederick RW, Reilly TP, Lowry PS, Bird ET (2004) Efficiency and cost of treating proximal ureteral stones: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser. Urology 64:1102–1106PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bapat SS, Pai KV, Purnapatre SS, Yadav PB, Padye AS (2007) Comparison of holmium laser and pneumatic lithotripsy in managing upper-ureteral stones. J Endourol 21:1425–1427PubMedCrossRef Bapat SS, Pai KV, Purnapatre SS, Yadav PB, Padye AS (2007) Comparison of holmium laser and pneumatic lithotripsy in managing upper-ureteral stones. J Endourol 21:1425–1427PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Sighinolfi MC, Micali S, De Stefani S, Pini GA, Rivalta M, Cianci F, Bianchi G (2011) How effective is extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of ureteral stones with Dornier Lithotripter S EMSE 220F-XXP? A prospective and preliminary assessment. Surg Endosc. 25(3):943–946 (Epub ahead of print)PubMedCrossRef Sighinolfi MC, Micali S, De Stefani S, Pini GA, Rivalta M, Cianci F, Bianchi G (2011) How effective is extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of ureteral stones with Dornier Lithotripter S EMSE 220F-XXP? A prospective and preliminary assessment. Surg Endosc. 25(3):943–946 (Epub ahead of print)PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Tiselius HG (2005) Removal of ureteral stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic procedures: what can we learn from the literature in terms of results and treatment efforts? Urol Res 33:185–190PubMedCrossRef Tiselius HG (2005) Removal of ureteral stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic procedures: what can we learn from the literature in terms of results and treatment efforts? Urol Res 33:185–190PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Shao Y, Zhuo J, Sun XW, Wen W, Liu HT, Xia SJ (2008) Nonstented versus routine stented ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy: a prospective randomized trial. Urol Res 36:259–263PubMedCrossRef Shao Y, Zhuo J, Sun XW, Wen W, Liu HT, Xia SJ (2008) Nonstented versus routine stented ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy: a prospective randomized trial. Urol Res 36:259–263PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Hosking DH, Smith WE, McColm SE (2003) A comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy under intravenous sedation for the management of distal ureteric calculi. Can J Urol 10:1780–1784PubMed Hosking DH, Smith WE, McColm SE (2003) A comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy under intravenous sedation for the management of distal ureteric calculi. Can J Urol 10:1780–1784PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Value of focal applied energy quotient in treatment of ureteral lithiasis with shock waves
verfasst von
Miguel Angel Arrabal-Polo
Miguel Arrabal-Martin
Francisco Palao-Yago
Jose Luis Mijan-Ortiz
Armando Zuluaga-Gomez
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Urolithiasis / Ausgabe 4/2012
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Elektronische ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-011-0430-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2012

Urolithiasis 4/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Urologie

19.04.2024 | EAU 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 | EAU 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Prostatakarzinom: EU initiiert neues Screeningkonzept

19.04.2024 | EAU 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Blasenkarzinom – Biomarker statt Zytologie?

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.