Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 5/2009

01.05.2009

Value of Laparoscopic Appendectomy in the Elderly Patient

verfasst von: Boris Kirshtein, Zvi Howard Perry, Solly Mizrahi, Leonid Lantsberg

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 5/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Acute appendicitis (AA) in elderly patients (60 years of age and older) is a challenging problem associated with significant morbidity and mortality when perforation is present. We hypothesized that laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) would enable an earlier correct diagnosis and have advantages in elderly patients.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for suspected AA. Data of elderly patients were compared to data of younger patients (18 to <60 years of age).

Results

Fifty-four LA were performed in elderly patients and 423 in younger patients. Patients over the age of 60 years had more co-morbidities and required more frequent use of anticoagulants. Preoperative imaging (ultrasound or computerized tomography) was significantly more frequent in elderly patients (36% versus 15%), and was associated with a higher rate of confirmation of acute appendicitis (78% versus 55%), which allowed a decrease in the rate of negative surgical explorations to 4.1% in elderly patients compared to 10.2% in younger patients. Complicated appendicitis and conversions were more frequent in the elderly patients. This resulted in prolonged operative time and longer hospital stay for this group. The overall complication rate was equivalent in the two groups, without differences in the occurrence either of infectious complications or of complications related to surgical site. There were no deaths following appendectomy in our series.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic appendectomy is safe in the elderly population and is not associated with any increase in morbidity. The high incidence of complicated appendicitis in elderly patients affects operative time and length of hospital stay following laparoscopic appendectomy, and it can also lead to an increased rate of conversion to an open procedure. Use of preoperative abdominal computerized tomography scan is mandatory in elderly patients to provide an early diagnosis and to decrease unnecessary surgical exploration when acute appendicitis is suspected.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Fagbohun CF, Toy EC, Baker B (1999) The evaluation of acute abdominal pain in the elderly patient. Primary Care Update Ob/Gyn 181–185 Fagbohun CF, Toy EC, Baker B (1999) The evaluation of acute abdominal pain in the elderly patient. Primary Care Update Ob/Gyn 181–185
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Sheu BF, Chiu TF, Chen JC et al (2007) Risk factors associated with perforated appendicitis in elderly patients presenting with signs and symptoms of acute appendicitis. Aust N Z J Surg 77:662–666CrossRef Sheu BF, Chiu TF, Chen JC et al (2007) Risk factors associated with perforated appendicitis in elderly patients presenting with signs and symptoms of acute appendicitis. Aust N Z J Surg 77:662–666CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Franz MG, Norman J, Fabri PJ (1995) Increased morbidity of appendicitis with advancing age. Am Surg 61:40–44PubMed Franz MG, Norman J, Fabri PJ (1995) Increased morbidity of appendicitis with advancing age. Am Surg 61:40–44PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamini D, Vargas H, Bongard F et al (1998) Perforated appendicitis: is it truly a surgical urgency? Am Surg 64:970–975PubMed Yamini D, Vargas H, Bongard F et al (1998) Perforated appendicitis: is it truly a surgical urgency? Am Surg 64:970–975PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Storm-Dickerson TL, Horattas MC (2003) What have we learned over the past 20 years about appendicitis in the elderly? Am J Surg 185:198–201PubMedCrossRef Storm-Dickerson TL, Horattas MC (2003) What have we learned over the past 20 years about appendicitis in the elderly? Am J Surg 185:198–201PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lunca S, Bouras G, Romedea NS (2004) Acute appendicitis in the elderly patient: diagnostic problems, prognostic factors and outcomes. Rom J Gastroenterol 13:299–303PubMed Lunca S, Bouras G, Romedea NS (2004) Acute appendicitis in the elderly patient: diagnostic problems, prognostic factors and outcomes. Rom J Gastroenterol 13:299–303PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee SL, Walsh AJ, Ho HS (2001) Computed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. Arch Surg 136:556–562PubMedCrossRef Lee SL, Walsh AJ, Ho HS (2001) Computed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. Arch Surg 136:556–562PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Fuchs JR, Schlamberg JS, Shortsleeve MJ et al (2002) Impact of abdominal CT imaging on the management of appendicitis: an update. J Surg Res 106:131–136PubMedCrossRef Fuchs JR, Schlamberg JS, Shortsleeve MJ et al (2002) Impact of abdominal CT imaging on the management of appendicitis: an update. J Surg Res 106:131–136PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hui TT, Major KM, Avital I et al (2002) Outcome of elderly patients with appendicitis: effect of computed tomography and laparoscopy. Arch Surg 137:995–998, discussion 999–1000PubMedCrossRef Hui TT, Major KM, Avital I et al (2002) Outcome of elderly patients with appendicitis: effect of computed tomography and laparoscopy. Arch Surg 137:995–998, discussion 999–1000PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Golub R, Siddiqui F, Pohl D (1998) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a metaanalysis. J Am Coll Surg 186:545–553PubMedCrossRef Golub R, Siddiqui F, Pohl D (1998) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a metaanalysis. J Am Coll Surg 186:545–553PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Chung RS, Rowland DY, Li P et al (1999) A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Am J Surg 177:250–256PubMedCrossRef Chung RS, Rowland DY, Li P et al (1999) A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Am J Surg 177:250–256PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Paik PS, Towson JA, Anthone GJ et al (1997) Intra-abdominal abscesses following laparoscopic and open appendectomies. J Gastrointest Surg 1:188–193PubMedCrossRef Paik PS, Towson JA, Anthone GJ et al (1997) Intra-abdominal abscesses following laparoscopic and open appendectomies. J Gastrointest Surg 1:188–193PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Krisher SL, Browne A, Dibbins A et al (2001) Intra-abdominal abscess after laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. Arch Surg 136:438–441PubMedCrossRef Krisher SL, Browne A, Dibbins A et al (2001) Intra-abdominal abscess after laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. Arch Surg 136:438–441PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Von Titte SN, McCabe CJ, Ottinger LW (1996) Delayed appendectomy for appendicitis: causes and consequences. Am J Emerg Med 14:620–622CrossRef Von Titte SN, McCabe CJ, Ottinger LW (1996) Delayed appendectomy for appendicitis: causes and consequences. Am J Emerg Med 14:620–622CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim K, Lee CC, Song KJ et al (2008) The impact of helical computed tomography on the negative appendectomy rate: a multi-center comparison. J Emerg Med 34:3–6PubMedCrossRef Kim K, Lee CC, Song KJ et al (2008) The impact of helical computed tomography on the negative appendectomy rate: a multi-center comparison. J Emerg Med 34:3–6PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Gwynn LK (2001) The diagnosis of acute appendicitis: clinical assessment versus computed tomography evaluation. J Emerg Med 21:119–123PubMedCrossRef Gwynn LK (2001) The diagnosis of acute appendicitis: clinical assessment versus computed tomography evaluation. J Emerg Med 21:119–123PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Horton MD, Counter SF, Florence MG et al (2000) A prospective trial of computed tomography and ultrasonography for diagnosing appendicitis in the atypical patient. Am J Surg 179:379–381PubMedCrossRef Horton MD, Counter SF, Florence MG et al (2000) A prospective trial of computed tomography and ultrasonography for diagnosing appendicitis in the atypical patient. Am J Surg 179:379–381PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Laurell H, Hansson LE, Gunnarsson U (2006) Acute abdominal pain among elderly patients. Gerontology 52:339–344PubMedCrossRef Laurell H, Hansson LE, Gunnarsson U (2006) Acute abdominal pain among elderly patients. Gerontology 52:339–344PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang YC, Yang HR, Chung PK et al (2006) Laparoscopic appendectomy in the elderly. Surg Endosc 20:887–889PubMedCrossRef Wang YC, Yang HR, Chung PK et al (2006) Laparoscopic appendectomy in the elderly. Surg Endosc 20:887–889PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Guller U, Jain N, Peterson ED et al (2004) Laparoscopic appendectomy in the elderly. Surgery 135:479–488PubMedCrossRef Guller U, Jain N, Peterson ED et al (2004) Laparoscopic appendectomy in the elderly. Surgery 135:479–488PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Galizia G, Prizio G, Lieto E et al (2001) Hemodynamic and pulmonary changes during open, carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum and abdominal wall-lifting cholecystectomy. A prospective, randomized study. Surg Endosc 15:477–483PubMedCrossRef Galizia G, Prizio G, Lieto E et al (2001) Hemodynamic and pulmonary changes during open, carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum and abdominal wall-lifting cholecystectomy. A prospective, randomized study. Surg Endosc 15:477–483PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Davidson BR (2008) Abdominal lift for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD006574 Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Davidson BR (2008) Abdominal lift for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD006574
Metadaten
Titel
Value of Laparoscopic Appendectomy in the Elderly Patient
verfasst von
Boris Kirshtein
Zvi Howard Perry
Solly Mizrahi
Leonid Lantsberg
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2009
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 5/2009
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9916-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2009

World Journal of Surgery 5/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Letter

Reply

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.