Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

10.01.2022 | Interventional Radiology

Variability in personal protective equipment in cross-sectional interventional abdominal radiology practices

verfasst von: Virginia Planz, Jennifer Huang, Samuel J. Galgano, Olga R. Brook, Ghaneh Fananapazir

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 3/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To determine institutional practice requirements for personal protective equipment (PPE) in cross-sectional interventional radiology (CSIR) procedures among a variety of radiology practices in the USA and Canada.

Methods

Members of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) CSIR Emerging Technology Commission (ETC) were sent an eight-question survey about what PPE they were required to use during common CSIR procedures: paracentesis, thoracentesis, thyroid fine needle aspiration (FNA), superficial lymph node biopsy, deep lymph node biopsy, solid organ biopsy, and ablation. Types of PPE evaluated were sterile gloves, surgical masks, gowns, surgical hats, eye shields, foot covers, and scrubs.

Results

26/38 surveys were completed by respondents at 20/22 (91%) institutions. The most common PPE was sterile gloves, required by 20/20 (100%) institutions for every procedure. The second most common PPE was masks, required by 14/20 (70%) institutions for superficial and deep procedures and 12/12 (100%) institutions for ablation. Scrubs, sterile gowns, eye shields, and surgical hats were required at nearly all institutions for ablation, whereas approximately half of institutions required their use for deep lymph node and solid organ biopsy. Compared with other types of PPE, required mask and eye shield use showed the greatest increase during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

Conclusion

PPE use during common cross-sectional procedures is widely variable. Given the environmental and financial impact and lack of consensus practice, further studies examining the appropriate level of PPE are needed.

Graphical abstract

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan D, Downing D, Keough CE, Saad WA, Annamalai G, d’Othee BJ, Ganguli S, Itkin M, Kalva SP, Khan AA, Krishnamurthy V, Nikolic B, Owens CA, Postoak D, Roberts AC, Rose SC, Sacks D, Siddiqi NH, Swan TL, Thornton RH, Towbin R, Wallace MJ, Walker TG, Wojak JC, Wardrope RR, Cardella JF (2012) Joint Practice Guideline for Sterile Technique during Vascular and Interventional Radiology Procedures: From the Society of Interventional Radiology, Association of periOperative Registered Nurses, and Association for Radiologic and Imaging Nursing, for the Society of Interventional Radiology (Wael Saad, MD, Chair), Standards of Practice Committee, and Endorsed by the Cardiovascular Interventional Radiological Society of Europe and the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology 23:1603–1612 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2012.07.017CrossRefPubMed Chan D, Downing D, Keough CE, Saad WA, Annamalai G, d’Othee BJ, Ganguli S, Itkin M, Kalva SP, Khan AA, Krishnamurthy V, Nikolic B, Owens CA, Postoak D, Roberts AC, Rose SC, Sacks D, Siddiqi NH, Swan TL, Thornton RH, Towbin R, Wallace MJ, Walker TG, Wojak JC, Wardrope RR, Cardella JF (2012) Joint Practice Guideline for Sterile Technique during Vascular and Interventional Radiology Procedures: From the Society of Interventional Radiology, Association of periOperative Registered Nurses, and Association for Radiologic and Imaging Nursing, for the Society of Interventional Radiology (Wael Saad, MD, Chair), Standards of Practice Committee, and Endorsed by the Cardiovascular Interventional Radiological Society of Europe and the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology 23:1603–1612 . https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jvir.​2012.​07.​017CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Lorentzen T, Nolsøe C, Ewertsen C, Nielsen M, Leen E, Havre R, Gritzmann N, Brkljacic B, Nürnberg D, Kabaalioglu A, Strobel D, Jenssen C, Piscaglia F, Gilja O, Sidhu P, Dietrich C (2015) EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part I. Ultraschall in Med 36:E3–E16 . https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1553593CrossRef Lorentzen T, Nolsøe C, Ewertsen C, Nielsen M, Leen E, Havre R, Gritzmann N, Brkljacic B, Nürnberg D, Kabaalioglu A, Strobel D, Jenssen C, Piscaglia F, Gilja O, Sidhu P, Dietrich C (2015) EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part I. Ultraschall in Med 36:E3–E16 . https://​doi.​org/​10.​1055/​s-0035-1553593CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Knott EA, Ziemlewicz TJ, Lubner SJ, Swietlik JF, Weber SM, Zlevor AM, Longhurst C, Hinshaw JL, Lubner MG, Mulkerin DL, Abbott DE, Deming D, LoConte NK, Uboha N, Couillard AB, Wells SA, Laeseke PF, Alexander ML, Lee Jr FT (2021) Microwave ablation for colorectal cancer metastasis to the liver: a single-center retrospective analysis. J Gastrointest Oncol 12:1454–1469. https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo-21-159 Knott EA, Ziemlewicz TJ, Lubner SJ, Swietlik JF, Weber SM, Zlevor AM, Longhurst C, Hinshaw JL, Lubner MG, Mulkerin DL, Abbott DE, Deming D, LoConte NK, Uboha N, Couillard AB, Wells SA, Laeseke PF, Alexander ML, Lee Jr FT (2021) Microwave ablation for colorectal cancer metastasis to the liver: a single-center retrospective analysis. J Gastrointest Oncol 12:1454–1469. https://​doi.​org/​10.​21037/​jgo-21-159
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Klapperich ME, Abel EJ, Ziemlewicz TJ, Best S, Lubner MG, Nakada SY, Hinshaw JL, Brace CL, Lee FT, Wells SA (2017) Effect of Tumor Complexity and Technique on Efficacy and Complications after Percutaneous Microwave Ablation of Stage T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Single-Center, Retrospective Study. Radiology 284:272–280 . https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2016160592CrossRefPubMed Klapperich ME, Abel EJ, Ziemlewicz TJ, Best S, Lubner MG, Nakada SY, Hinshaw JL, Brace CL, Lee FT, Wells SA (2017) Effect of Tumor Complexity and Technique on Efficacy and Complications after Percutaneous Microwave Ablation of Stage T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Single-Center, Retrospective Study. Radiology 284:272–280 . https://​doi.​org/​10.​1148/​radiol.​2016160592CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Committee of Practical Guide for Kidney Biopsy 2019, Kawaguchi T, Nagasawsa T, Tsuruya K, Miura K, Katsuno T, Morikawa T, Ishikawa E, Ogura M, Matsumura H, Kurayama R, Matsumoto S, Marui Y, Hara S, Maruyama S, Narita I, Okada H, Ubara Y (2020) A nationwide survey on clinical practice patterns and bleeding complications of percutaneous native kidney biopsy in Japan. Clin Exp Nephrol 24:389–401 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-020-01869-wCrossRefPubMedCentral Committee of Practical Guide for Kidney Biopsy 2019, Kawaguchi T, Nagasawsa T, Tsuruya K, Miura K, Katsuno T, Morikawa T, Ishikawa E, Ogura M, Matsumura H, Kurayama R, Matsumoto S, Marui Y, Hara S, Maruyama S, Narita I, Okada H, Ubara Y (2020) A nationwide survey on clinical practice patterns and bleeding complications of percutaneous native kidney biopsy in Japan. Clin Exp Nephrol 24:389–401 . https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10157-020-01869-wCrossRefPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat LeBlanc MR, Lalonde DH, Thoma A, Bell M, Wells N, Allen M, Chang P, McKee D, Lalonde J (2011) Is main operating room sterility really necessary in carpal tunnel surgery? A multicenter prospective study of minor procedure room field sterility surgery. Hand (New York, N.Y.), 6(1), 60–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-010-9301-9CrossRef LeBlanc MR, Lalonde DH, Thoma A, Bell M, Wells N, Allen M, Chang P, McKee D, Lalonde J (2011) Is main operating room sterility really necessary in carpal tunnel surgery? A multicenter prospective study of minor procedure room field sterility surgery. Hand (New York, N.Y.), 6(1), 60–63. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11552-010-9301-9CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Kemp DM, Weingarten S, Chervoneva I, Marley W (2019) Can Nonsterile Gloves for Dermatologic Procedures Be Cost-Effective without Compromising Infection Rates? Skinmed 17:155–159PubMed Kemp DM, Weingarten S, Chervoneva I, Marley W (2019) Can Nonsterile Gloves for Dermatologic Procedures Be Cost-Effective without Compromising Infection Rates? Skinmed 17:155–159PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehta D, Chambers N, Adams B, Gloster H (2014) Comparison of the Prevalence of Surgical Site Infection with Use of Sterile Versus Nonsterile Gloves for Resection and Reconstruction During Mohs Surgery. Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.], 40(3), 234–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsu.12438CrossRef Mehta D, Chambers N, Adams B, Gloster H (2014) Comparison of the Prevalence of Surgical Site Infection with Use of Sterile Versus Nonsterile Gloves for Resection and Reconstruction During Mohs Surgery. Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.], 40(3), 234–239. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​dsu.​12438CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Wormer BA, Augenstein VA, Carpenter CL, Burton PV, Yokeley WT, Prabhu AS, Harris B, Norton S, Klima DA, Lincourt AE, Heniford BT (2013) The green operating room: simple changes to reduce cost and our carbon footprint. Am Surg 79:666–671CrossRef Wormer BA, Augenstein VA, Carpenter CL, Burton PV, Yokeley WT, Prabhu AS, Harris B, Norton S, Klima DA, Lincourt AE, Heniford BT (2013) The green operating room: simple changes to reduce cost and our carbon footprint. Am Surg 79:666–671CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Variability in personal protective equipment in cross-sectional interventional abdominal radiology practices
verfasst von
Virginia Planz
Jennifer Huang
Samuel J. Galgano
Olga R. Brook
Ghaneh Fananapazir
Publikationsdatum
10.01.2022
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 3/2022
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-03406-z

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

KI-gestütztes Mammografiescreening überzeugt im Praxistest

Mit dem Einsatz künstlicher Intelligenz lässt sich die Detektionsrate im Mammografiescreening offenbar deutlich steigern. Mehr unnötige Zusatzuntersuchungen sind laut der Studie aus Deutschland nicht zu befürchten.

Stumme Schlaganfälle − ein häufiger Nebenbefund im Kopf-CT?

In 4% der in der Notfallambulanz initiierten zerebralen Bildgebung sind „alte“ Schlaganfälle zu erkennen. Gar nicht so selten handelt es sich laut einer aktuellen Studie dabei um unbemerkte Insulte. Bietet sich hier womöglich die Chance auf ein effektives opportunistisches Screening?

Die elektronische Patientenakte kommt: Das sollten Sie jetzt wissen

Am 15. Januar geht die „ePA für alle“ zunächst in den Modellregionen an den Start. Doch schon bald soll sie in allen Praxen zum Einsatz kommen. Was ist jetzt zu tun? Was müssen Sie wissen? Wir geben in einem FAQ Antworten auf 21 Fragen.

Stören weiße Wände und viel Licht die Bildqualitätskontrolle?

Wenn es darum geht, die technische Qualität eines Mammogramms zu beurteilen, könnten graue Wandfarbe und reduzierte Beleuchtung im Bildgebungsraum von Vorteil sein. Darauf deuten zumindest Ergebnisse einer kleinen Studie hin. 

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.