nach oben

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India

Erschienen in:

13.03.2018 | Original Article

VBAC: Changes over Last 10 Years

Erschienen in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India | Ausgabe 2/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC) has been historically studied to be a standard and a safe procedure with good successful results.

Aims

This study was conducted to determine changes in pattern of VBAC by the same author over a period of 10 years.

Results

Data for 1 year between 2005–2006 and 2014–2015 were compared, and successful VBAC was found to be 74.46% in 2005–2006 period compared to only 34.42% in 2014–2015. Neonatal mortality and maternal morbidity were, however, much higher 10 years ago.

Conclusions

It was concluded that better diagnostic techniques, awareness of patients and medico legal fear have led to safer health of mother and child and lesser incidence of VBAC over the last 10 years.

Mylonas I, Friese K. Indications for and risks of elective cesarean section. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015;112(29–30):489–95.PubMedPubMedCentral

Daniel CN, Singh S. Caesarean delivery: an experience from a tertiary institution in north western Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2016;19(1):18–24.CrossRefPubMed

Samdal LJ, Steinsvik KR, Pun P, et al. Indications for Cesarean Sections in Rural Nepal. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016;66(Suppl 1):284–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller AB, et al. The increasing trend in Caesarean Section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990–2014. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(2):e0148343.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Prakash KC, Neupane S. Cesarean deliveries among Nepalese mothers: changes over time 2001-2011 and determinants. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;289(2):421–7.CrossRefPubMed

Simões R, Bernardo WM, Salomão AJ, et al. Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (Febrasgo). Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB).Birth route in case of cesarean section in a previous pregnancy. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2015 61(3):196–202.

Balachandran L, Vaswani PR, Mogotlane R. Pregnancy outcome in women with previous one cesarean section. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(2):99–102.PubMedPubMedCentral

Cunningham FG, Bangdiwala SI, Brown SS et al. NIH consensus development conference draft statement on vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2010 27(3):1–42.

Tsai HT, Wu CH. Vaginal birth after cesarean section-The world trend and local experience in Taiwan. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;56(1):41–5.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Knight HE, Gurol-Urganci I, van der Meulen JH, et al. Vaginal birth after caesarean section: a cohort study investigating factors associated with its uptake and success. BJOG. 2014;121(2):183–92.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Bangal VB, Giri PA, Shinde KK, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean section. N Am J Med Sci. 2013;5(2):140–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Lundgren I, Healy P, Carroll M, et al. Clinicians’ views of factors of importance for improving the rate of VBAC (vaginal birth after caesarean section): a study from countries with low VBAC rates. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16(1):350.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Li WH, Yang MJ, Wang PH, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean section: 10 years of experience in a tertiary medical center in Taiwan. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;55(3):394–8.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Kayani SI, Alfirevic Z. Uterine rupture after induction of labour in women with previous caesarean section. BJOG. 2005;112(4):451–5.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Christmann-Schmid C, Raio L, Scheibner K, et al. Back to “once a caesarean: always a caesarean”? A trend analysis in Switzerland. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;294(5):905–10.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Kyvernitakis I, Reichelt J, Kyvernitakis A, et al. Trends of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Germany from 1990 to 2012: a population-based study. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2014;218(5):203–9.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: VBAC: Changes over Last 10 Years
Publikationsdatum: 13.03.2018
Erschienen in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India / Ausgabe 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0971-9202
Elektronische ISSN: 0975-6434
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-018-1101-0

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

16.04.2024 | Maligne primäre ZNS-Tumoren | Nachrichten

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

VBAC: Changes over Last 10 Years

Abstract

Introduction

Aims

Results

Conclusions

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

Manche Gestagene können das Risiko für Meningeome erhöhen

Stillende Frauen haben geringeres kardiovaskuläres Risiko

Chronische Schmerzen nach Op. oft mit neuropathischer Komponente

Das Ende der vollständigen axillären Lymphknotendissektion

Update Gynäkologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Introduction

Aims

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

Evaluation of Placental VEGFA mRNA Expression in Preeclampsia: A Case Control Study

Impact of Unintended Pregnancy on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes

Ultrasound Assessment of Foetal Head–Perineum Distance Prior to Induction of Labour as a Predictor of Successful Vaginal Delivery

Early Onset Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy: Is Progesterone Supplementation to be Blamed For?

Reducing Blood Loss During Abdominal Hysterectomy with Intravenous Versus Topical Tranexamic Acid: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Life-threatening Complications in Pregnancy in a Teaching Hospital in Kolkata, India

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

Manche Gestagene können das Risiko für Meningeome erhöhen

Stillende Frauen haben geringeres kardiovaskuläres Risiko

Chronische Schmerzen nach Op. oft mit neuropathischer Komponente

Das Ende der vollständigen axillären Lymphknotendissektion

Update Gynäkologie