We followed with interest the discussion [
1,
2] fueled by the study of Stapel et al. [
3] who reported fairly accurate assessment of energy expenditure (EE) in critically ill patients based on ventilator-derived carbon dioxide production (VCO
2). The proposed technique is elegant and valid but has inherent limitations. It is applicable in patients who are in one way or another ventilator-dependent but not in spontaneously breathing yet oxygen-dependent subjects. We concur that VO
2 is the most relevant variable for EE measurement. However, the most accurate and precise estimation of EE in a critically ill population can only be obtained by sampling of inspired and expired oxygen/carbon dioxide concentrations and measuring expired gas flow. This is the core task of indirect calorimetry [
4].
Initiative has been undertaken to develop a ‘full option’, easy-to-use, accurate, and affordable indirect calorimeter. The project is supported by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the European Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition [
5] and has actually reached Technology Readiness Level. It is probably only a matter of time before such a device will render all current mathematical uproar obsolete.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.