Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 10/2006

01.10.2006

Videolaparoscopic appendectomy: the current outlook

verfasst von: G. C. Roviaro, C. Vergani, F. Varoli, M. Francese, R. Caminiti, M. Maciocco

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 10/2006

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Mini-invasive techniques have revolutionized surgery, but the superiority of laparoscopic access for appendectomy is widely debated. The authors analyze their monocentric experience with 1,347 laparoscopic appendectomies.

Methods

Between October 1991 and December 2002, all the patients with an indication for appendectomy underwent surgery (301 emergency and 1,046 interval appendectomies) using the laparoscopic approach.

Results

For 1,248 patients, appendectomy was performed laparoscopically, whereas for 99 patients (7.3%), it was converted to an open procedure because of technical reasons (90 patients, 6.7%) or intraoperative complications (9 patients, 0.6%). For 59 patients (4.4%), the appendectomy was associated with another procedure. Histology showed “acute” alterations in 261 of the 301 emergency surgeries and in 148 of the 1,046 elective operations. Postoperative complications arose in 37 patients (2.7%), with 5 patients (0.3%) requiring invasive treatment. The mean postoperative stay was 30 h.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic appendectomy offers unquestionable advantages, but it is not yet considered the “gold standard” for appendiceal pathology. Many centers reserve it for selected patients (e.g., obese patients and women suspected of having other pathologies). No randomized trials or metaanalyses have definitively proved its superiority.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson DG, Edelman DS (1997) Laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy: a single-institution study. JSLS 1(4):323–324PubMed Anderson DG, Edelman DS (1997) Laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy: a single-institution study. JSLS 1(4):323–324PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Attwood SEA, Hill ADK, Murphy PG (1992) A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Surgery 112: 497–501PubMed Attwood SEA, Hill ADK, Murphy PG (1992) A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Surgery 112: 497–501PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Chevalier J, Durand A (1980) Reflexions sur une série homogène de 3,200 appendicectomies. Lyon Chir 76: 251–253 Chevalier J, Durand A (1980) Reflexions sur une série homogène de 3,200 appendicectomies. Lyon Chir 76: 251–253
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Chung RS, Rowland DY, Le P, Diaz J (1999) A metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Am J Surg 117: 250–256CrossRef Chung RS, Rowland DY, Le P, Diaz J (1999) A metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Am J Surg 117: 250–256CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Cox MR, McCall JL, Toouli J (1996) Prospective randomized comparison of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy in men. World J Surg 20: 263–266PubMedCrossRef Cox MR, McCall JL, Toouli J (1996) Prospective randomized comparison of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy in men. World J Surg 20: 263–266PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Croce E, Olmi S, Azzola M, Russo R (1999) Laparoscopic appendectomy and minilaparoscopic approach: a retrospective review after eight years’ experience. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 3: 285–292 Croce E, Olmi S, Azzola M, Russo R (1999) Laparoscopic appendectomy and minilaparoscopic approach: a retrospective review after eight years’ experience. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 3: 285–292
7.
Zurück zum Zitat European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (1995) The EAES Consensus Development Conferences on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and hernia repair. Surg Endosc 9: 550–563 European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (1995) The EAES Consensus Development Conferences on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and hernia repair. Surg Endosc 9: 550–563
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Symmonds RE (1994) A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg 219: 725–731PubMed Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Symmonds RE (1994) A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg 219: 725–731PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Garbutt JM, Soper NJ, Shannon WD, Botero A, Littenberg B (1999) Metaanalysis of controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 9: 17–26PubMedCrossRef Garbutt JM, Soper NJ, Shannon WD, Botero A, Littenberg B (1999) Metaanalysis of controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 9: 17–26PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Golub R, Siddiqui F, Pohl D (1998) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a metaanalysis. J Am Coll Surg 186: 545–553PubMedCrossRef Golub R, Siddiqui F, Pohl D (1998) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a metaanalysis. J Am Coll Surg 186: 545–553PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Gotz F, Pier A, Bacher C (1990) Modified laparoscopic appendectomy in surgery: a report of 338 operations. Surg Endosc 4: 6–9PubMedCrossRef Gotz F, Pier A, Bacher C (1990) Modified laparoscopic appendectomy in surgery: a report of 338 operations. Surg Endosc 4: 6–9PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Guller U, Hervey S, Purves H, Muhlbaier LH, Peterson ED, Eubanks S, Pietrobon R (2004) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database. Ann Surg 239: 43–52PubMedCrossRef Guller U, Hervey S, Purves H, Muhlbaier LH, Peterson ED, Eubanks S, Pietrobon R (2004) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database. Ann Surg 239: 43–52PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hansen JB, Smithers BM, Schache D (1996) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial. World J Surg 20: 17–21PubMedCrossRef Hansen JB, Smithers BM, Schache D (1996) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial. World J Surg 20: 17–21PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hart R, Rajgopal C, Plews A Sweenwy J, Davies W, Gray D, Taylor B (1996) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial of 81 patients. Can J Surg 39: 457–462PubMed Hart R, Rajgopal C, Plews A Sweenwy J, Davies W, Gray D, Taylor B (1996) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial of 81 patients. Can J Surg 39: 457–462PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Heikkinen TJ, Haukipuro K, Hulkko A (1998) Cost-effective appendectomy: open or laparoscopic? A prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 12: 1204–1208PubMedCrossRef Heikkinen TJ, Haukipuro K, Hulkko A (1998) Cost-effective appendectomy: open or laparoscopic? A prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 12: 1204–1208PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Hellberg A, Rudberg C, Kullman E, Enochsson L, Fenyo G, Graffnet H, Hallerback B, Johansson B, Anderberg B, Wenner J, Ringqvist I, Sorensen S (1999) Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Br J Surg 86: 48–53PubMedCrossRef Hellberg A, Rudberg C, Kullman E, Enochsson L, Fenyo G, Graffnet H, Hallerback B, Johansson B, Anderberg B, Wenner J, Ringqvist I, Sorensen S (1999) Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Br J Surg 86: 48–53PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Henle KP, Beller S, Rechener J, Zerz A, Szinic G, Klinger A (1996) Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy: a prospective randomized study. Chirurg 67: 526–530PubMed Henle KP, Beller S, Rechener J, Zerz A, Szinic G, Klinger A (1996) Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy: a prospective randomized study. Chirurg 67: 526–530PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ignacio RC, Burke R, Spencer D, Bissel C, Dorsainvil C, Lucha PA (2004) Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy: what is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial. Surg Endosc 18:334–337PubMedCrossRef Ignacio RC, Burke R, Spencer D, Bissel C, Dorsainvil C, Lucha PA (2004) Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy: what is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial. Surg Endosc 18:334–337PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson AB, Peetz ME (1998) Laparoscopic appendectomy is an acceptable alternative for the treatment of perforated appendicitis. Surg Endosc 12: 940–943PubMedCrossRef Johnson AB, Peetz ME (1998) Laparoscopic appendectomy is an acceptable alternative for the treatment of perforated appendicitis. Surg Endosc 12: 940–943PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kazemier G, De Zeew GR, Lange JF, Hop WCJ, Bonjer HJ (1997) Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 11: 336–340PubMedCrossRef Kazemier G, De Zeew GR, Lange JF, Hop WCJ, Bonjer HJ (1997) Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 11: 336–340PubMedCrossRef
21.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Laine S, Rantala A, Gullichsen R, Ovaska J (1997) Laparoscopic appendectomy: is it worthwhile? Surg Endosc 11: 95–97PubMedCrossRef Laine S, Rantala A, Gullichsen R, Ovaska J (1997) Laparoscopic appendectomy: is it worthwhile? Surg Endosc 11: 95–97PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Lehmann-Willenbrock E, Mecke H, Riedel HH (1990) Sequelae of appendicectomy with special reference to intraabdominal adhesions, chronic abdominal pain, and infertility. Gynecol Obstet Invest 29: 241–245PubMedCrossRef Lehmann-Willenbrock E, Mecke H, Riedel HH (1990) Sequelae of appendicectomy with special reference to intraabdominal adhesions, chronic abdominal pain, and infertility. Gynecol Obstet Invest 29: 241–245PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Lorenz EP, Ehren G, Schmid M, Soop J, Konradt J (1998) Laparoscopic appendectomy as standard procedure: technique and outcome in 409 patients. Zentralbl Chir 123(Suppl 4): 97–100PubMed Lorenz EP, Ehren G, Schmid M, Soop J, Konradt J (1998) Laparoscopic appendectomy as standard procedure: technique and outcome in 409 patients. Zentralbl Chir 123(Suppl 4): 97–100PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Macarulla E, Vallet J, Abad JM, Hussein H, Fernandez E, Nieto B (1997) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc 7: 335–339PubMedCrossRef Macarulla E, Vallet J, Abad JM, Hussein H, Fernandez E, Nieto B (1997) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc 7: 335–339PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin LC, Puente I, Sosa JL (1995) Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg 222: 256–262PubMed Martin LC, Puente I, Sosa JL (1995) Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg 222: 256–262PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Maxwell JG, Robinson CL, Maxwell TG, Maxwell BG, Smith CR, Brinker C (2001) Deriving the indications for laparoscopic appendectomy from comparison of the outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Am J Surg 182: 687–692PubMedCrossRef Maxwell JG, Robinson CL, Maxwell TG, Maxwell BG, Smith CR, Brinker C (2001) Deriving the indications for laparoscopic appendectomy from comparison of the outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Am J Surg 182: 687–692PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat McCahill LE, Pellegrini CA, Wiggins TBS, Helton SW (1996) A clinical outcome and cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Am J Surg 171: 533–537PubMedCrossRef McCahill LE, Pellegrini CA, Wiggins TBS, Helton SW (1996) A clinical outcome and cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Am J Surg 171: 533–537PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat McCall JL, Sharpless K, Jadallah F (1997) Systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic with open appendicectomy. Br J Surg 84: 1045–1050PubMedCrossRef McCall JL, Sharpless K, Jadallah F (1997) Systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic with open appendicectomy. Br J Surg 84: 1045–1050PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Meynaud-Kraemer L, Colin C, Vergnon P, Barth X (1999) Wound infection in open versus laparoscopic appendectomy: a meta-analysis. Int J Tech Assess Health Care 15: 380–391 Meynaud-Kraemer L, Colin C, Vergnon P, Barth X (1999) Wound infection in open versus laparoscopic appendectomy: a meta-analysis. Int J Tech Assess Health Care 15: 380–391
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Oka T, Kurkchubasche AG, Bussey JC, Wesselhoeft CW Jr, Tracy TF Jr, Luks FI (2004) Open and laparascopic appendectomy are equally safe and acceptable in children. Surg Endosc 18: 242–245PubMedCrossRef Oka T, Kurkchubasche AG, Bussey JC, Wesselhoeft CW Jr, Tracy TF Jr, Luks FI (2004) Open and laparascopic appendectomy are equally safe and acceptable in children. Surg Endosc 18: 242–245PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Ortega AE, Hunter JC, Peters JH (1995) A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Am J Surg 169: 208–213PubMedCrossRef Ortega AE, Hunter JC, Peters JH (1995) A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Am J Surg 169: 208–213PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Ozmen MM, Zulfikaroglu B, Tanik A, Kale IT (1999) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 9: 187–189PubMedCrossRef Ozmen MM, Zulfikaroglu B, Tanik A, Kale IT (1999) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 9: 187–189PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Reiertsen O, Larsen S, Trondsen E (1997) Randomized controlled trial with sequential design of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Br J Surg 84: 842–847PubMedCrossRef Reiertsen O, Larsen S, Trondsen E (1997) Randomized controlled trial with sequential design of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Br J Surg 84: 842–847PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Roviaro GC, Varoli F, Saguatti L, Vergani C, Maciocco M, Scarduelli A (2002) Major vascular injuries in laparoscopic surgery: still of interest? Surg Endosc 16: 1192–1196PubMedCrossRef Roviaro GC, Varoli F, Saguatti L, Vergani C, Maciocco M, Scarduelli A (2002) Major vascular injuries in laparoscopic surgery: still of interest? Surg Endosc 16: 1192–1196PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Sauerland S, Lefering R, Halthausen U, Neugebaner EA (1998) Laparoscopic vs conventional appendectomy: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Langenbecks Arch Surg 383: 289–295PubMedCrossRef Sauerland S, Lefering R, Halthausen U, Neugebaner EA (1998) Laparoscopic vs conventional appendectomy: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Langenbecks Arch Surg 383: 289–295PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Schafer M, Lauper M, Krahenbulh L (2000) A nation’s experience of bleeding complications during laparoscopy. Am J Surg 180: 73–77PubMedCrossRef Schafer M, Lauper M, Krahenbulh L (2000) A nation’s experience of bleeding complications during laparoscopy. Am J Surg 180: 73–77PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Schirmer BD, Schmierg RE, Dix J, Edge SB, Hanks JB (1993) Laparoscopic versus traditional appendectomy for suspected appendicitis. Am J Surg 165: 670–675PubMedCrossRef Schirmer BD, Schmierg RE, Dix J, Edge SB, Hanks JB (1993) Laparoscopic versus traditional appendectomy for suspected appendicitis. Am J Surg 165: 670–675PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Slim R, Pezet D, Chipponi J (1998) Laparascopic or open appendectomy? Critical review of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 41: 398–403PubMedCrossRef Slim R, Pezet D, Chipponi J (1998) Laparascopic or open appendectomy? Critical review of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 41: 398–403PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Tate JJT, Dawnson JW, Chung SCS, Li AKC (1993) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial. Lancet 342: 633–637PubMedCrossRef Tate JJT, Dawnson JW, Chung SCS, Li AKC (1993) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial. Lancet 342: 633–637PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Temple LK, Litwin DE, McLeod RS (1999) A metaanalysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis. Can J Surg 42: 377–383PubMed Temple LK, Litwin DE, McLeod RS (1999) A metaanalysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis. Can J Surg 42: 377–383PubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Ure BM, Bax NM, Van der Zee DC (2000) Laparoscopy in infants and children: a prospective study on feasibility and the impact on routine surgery. J Pediatr Surg 35: 1170–1173PubMedCrossRef Ure BM, Bax NM, Van der Zee DC (2000) Laparoscopy in infants and children: a prospective study on feasibility and the impact on routine surgery. J Pediatr Surg 35: 1170–1173PubMedCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Valla JS, Limonne B, Valla V (1991) Laparoscopic appendectomy in children: report of 465 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3: 166–172 Valla JS, Limonne B, Valla V (1991) Laparoscopic appendectomy in children: report of 465 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3: 166–172
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Valla JS, Ordorica Flores RM, Steyaert H, Merrot T, Barteles AM, Brean J, Ginier C, Cheli M (1999) Umbilical one-puncture laparascopic-assisted appendectomy. Surg Endosc 13: 83–85PubMedCrossRef Valla JS, Ordorica Flores RM, Steyaert H, Merrot T, Barteles AM, Brean J, Ginier C, Cheli M (1999) Umbilical one-puncture laparascopic-assisted appendectomy. Surg Endosc 13: 83–85PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Valla JS, Steyaert H (1999) Laparoscopic appendicectomy in children in endoscopic surgery. Spinger Verlag, Berlin, New York pp 234–253 Valla JS, Steyaert H (1999) Laparoscopic appendicectomy in children in endoscopic surgery. Spinger Verlag, Berlin, New York pp 234–253
Metadaten
Titel
Videolaparoscopic appendectomy: the current outlook
verfasst von
G. C. Roviaro
C. Vergani
F. Varoli
M. Francese
R. Caminiti
M. Maciocco
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2006
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 10/2006
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0021-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2006

Surgical Endoscopy 10/2006 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.